Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (OP-INT-SITREP)

TIME: 260435Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: POKROVSK AXIS: RESERVIST COMMITMENT WINDOW EXPIRED. NEW DEEP STRIKE VECTOR SHIFTS TO KREMENCHUK LOGISTICS HUB. HYBRID STRIKE INTENSIFICATION.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-TEMP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

RF forces continue the high-intensity exploitation phase on the Pokrovsk Axis. The critical window for the commitment of UAF secondary reserves (NLT 260430Z) has expired without confirmation of movement or engagement.

• Pokrovsk Axis: Forces deployed along the T-05-15 GLOC near Rodynske are under increasing pressure. Tactical C2 must now assume an immediate controlled withdrawal is required to avoid envelopment.
• Deep UAS Vector Shift (CRITICAL CHANGE): A strategic RF UAS asset previously tracked over Sumy Oblast has been diverted or replaced by a new track approaching Kremenchuk from the West (CONFIRMED 260407Z). This shifts the primary deep kinetic threat focus from northern logistics fixation (Sumy) to a critical central energy/rail junction (Kremenchuk), forcing AD reassessment.
• RF Claims Validation: TASS confirms the Head of Chuvashia (Cheboksary) reported an evacuation due to UAV attack (260353Z). This officially validates the RF narrative being utilized to justify future escalation and deep retaliatory strikes.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors

Low visibility continues to favor RF mechanized movement and deep standoff targeting operations. No change to previous report.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

The failure to confirm the commitment of secondary reserves (Plan D/E) by the NLT deadline has resulted in a critical operational vulnerability. UAF operational forces are currently fixed and lack necessary immediate reinforcement capacity on the critical Pokrovsk axis. AD prioritization is now stressed by simultaneous threats to Sumy, Kremenchuk, and the ongoing KAB pressure on Kharkiv.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intent remains the collapse of UAF defenses on the Pokrovsk Axis combined with strategic paralysis.

• Tactical Adaptation: The deep UAS vector shift to Kremenchuk (a key strategic railway and energy hub) demonstrates RF flexibility and highly adaptive ISR/strike synchronization. RF intends to generate logistical chaos centrally, preventing UAF forces from rapidly moving reserves or critical supplies to the Donbas sector. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• IO Synchronization: RF domestic propaganda (morale-boosting videos, VDV summaries, 110th Brigade fundraising) is running concurrently with the foreign IO (Cheboksary justification), demonstrating a coordinated effort to sustain operational tempo while managing domestic perception of casualties and conflict severity.
• Chuvashia Retaliation: The official confirmation of the Cheboksary UAV evacuation will be immediately weaponized by RF media to legitimize the MLCOA deep kinetic strike against Ukrainian rear areas.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The confirmed shift in the deep-strike focus from the Sumy logistics corridor to the Kremenchuk central hub is the primary tactical adaptation, maximizing pressure on the UAF AD Command.

2.3. Command and Control Effectiveness

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF C2 effectiveness is demonstrated by the timely, adaptive reallocation of strategic ISR/strike assets (UAS vector changes) to exploit UAF weaknesses and force AD dilution during the ground assault phase.

2.4. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics are judged sufficient to sustain the current high-tempo offensive and the associated kinetic strikes (UMPK, UAS-guided assets). The focus on UAF logistics (Sumy/Kremenchuk) implies RF confidence in their own sustainment capacity.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: Critical/Degraded. The non-commitment of secondary reserves by the 260430Z NLT deadline signals operational C2 paralysis, placing frontline forces at severe risk of tactical encirclement or decisive breakthrough on the Pokrovsk Axis. READINESS: AD readiness is being maximized, but asset allocation is now critically stressed between three primary high-value target areas (Pokrovsk Support, Sumy Logistics, Kremenchuk Energy/Rail).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

OPERATIONAL SETBACK: The failure to commit secondary reserves constitutes a strategic setback, likely ceding the operational initiative on the Pokrovsk Axis entirely to RF forces.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

PRIORITY REQUIREMENT: Immediate authorization and physical movement of designated fallback/blocking forces. CONSTRAINT: C2 execution authority remains severely constrained by persistent RF hybrid/IO attacks targeting the NCA's perceived legitimacy and operational resolve.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) The RF IO is effectively synchronized with the ground offensive:

1. Justification Narrative: The confirmed UAV attack in Chuvashia (Cheboksary) provides the necessary domestic and international justification for the RF to proceed with the forecasted deep, retaliatory strikes (MDCOA).
2. Domestic Distraction: The TASS report on increased welfare spending is designed to divert internal attention away from the high operational costs (casualties/attrition) associated with the Pokrovsk exploitation phase.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public morale is judged to be highly sensitive to the perceived loss of operational depth at Pokrovsk and the concurrent high-level political uncertainty (NCA narrative), exacerbated by the continuous kinetic fixation strikes.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) The reported shift in the tone and tempo of peace negotiations in Geneva following 'Rubio's' arrival (260407Z) suggests high-level diplomatic pressure is being applied. RF is likely leveraging its kinetic gains to maximize negotiating leverage, which reinforces the urgency of stabilizing the battlefield immediately.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Course of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF mechanized forces will secure the T-05-15 GLOC near Rodynske (NLT 260900Z), achieving the primary ground objective. Simultaneous kinetic operations will target central logistics: The UAS asset approaching Kremenchuk will provide terminal guidance for a focused strike package (likely UMPK or Shahed swarm) against the Kremenchuk Oil Refinery or major railway junction (NLT 260700Z), seeking to degrade the UAF's primary central logistics spine.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA)

(MEDIUM-HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF achieves operational breakthrough at Pokrovsk, leading to tactical encirclement of forward UAF units. Leveraging the justification of the Cheboksary attack, RF launches a massive, synchronized precision strike (Iskander/Kalibr/Kinzhals) targeting the following:

1. Remaining operational C2 nodes (Poltava/Vinnytsia).
2. Newly-identified logistics hubs in Kremenchuk/Sumy.
3. Primary AD storage sites detected through exploitation of the previous AD allocation shifts. Aim: Achieve strategic paralysis and decapitation, neutralizing UAF ability to coordinate effective counter-attacks or negotiate from a position of strength.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

R-1: FORCE MANAGEMENT & DEFENSE EXECUTION (J3/Eastern Command)

1. ESTABLISH BLOCKING POSITION: Given the failure to commit reserves by 260430Z, J3 must immediately authorize the mobilization of the nearest available, ready formation (designate 'Force Delta') to establish a blocking position 5-10km rear of the T-05-15 GLOC (NLT 260530Z) to cover the tactical withdrawal of frontline units.
2. CONTROLLED WITHDRAWAL EXECUTION: Implement withdrawal protocols for all units engaged near Rodynske immediately. Utilize terrain and pre-positioned obstacles to slow RF exploitation.

R-2: AIR DEFENSE AND TARGET PROTECTION (AD Command)

1. KREMENCHUK PRIORITY: Immediately re-task mobile Medium/Short-Range Air Defense (MRAD/SHORAD) assets to provide high-density protection for the Kremenchuk strategic railway junction and energy infrastructure. The confirmed UAS track demands immediate defensive saturation of this central hub.
2. AD RELOCATION EMCON: Ensure all AD systems involved in reallocation enforce strict EMCON (Emission Control) to prevent RF ISR assets (including the UAS track) from confirming their new operational positions.

R-3: STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL (NCA/J2 IO)

1. COUNTER-PARALYSIS DIPLOMACY: The NCA must issue a statement (NLT 260600Z) that leverages the ongoing diplomatic activity (Geneva/Rubio). Frame the Pokrovsk attack and IO campaign as a deliberate attempt by the RF to disrupt diplomatic progress. Use the diplomatic track as a point of strength to counter the RF defeatism narrative.
2. CHEBOKSARY COUNTER-IO: Prepare preemptive messaging that frames the Cheboksary UAV incident (if UAF-related) as a necessary, proportionate response to repeated, widespread RF strikes against Ukrainian civilian infrastructure (energy/C2).

---

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS