Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME: 251630Z NOV 2025 OPERATION: EASTERN THEATER / POKROVSK AXIS DEFENSE (OPERATION IRON SHIELD)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

FACT (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The Russian Federation (RF) Main Effort (ME) is intensifying kinetic and information shaping operations targeting the Pokrovsk-Kostiantynivka axis, aiming for a breakthrough on the T-05-15 Ground Line of Communication (GLOC). NEW KINETIC VECTORS (FACT/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): RF has confirmed offensive actions south of Kostiantynivka (25160202Z, Russian sources), supporting the imminent mechanized assault plan (MLCOA). UAS activity has been detected heading toward Kryvyi Rih (25155332Z), extending the operational depth of potential RF reconnaissance and strike targeting into the critical movement corridor for Reserve Force Bravo.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, dry conditions persist across the theater. Moscow reports wet snow and potential black ice (25155058Z), indicating no immediate threat to RF ground movement on the front lines, but confirming the approach of severe winter conditions which may affect RF long-term logistical stability.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces are successfully engaging in local counter-operations (SOF success in Slobozhansky direction, 25155159Z), but are strategically constrained by the delay in Reserve Force commitment. RF continues coordinated combined-arms attacks, including a recent successful Patriot interception of a ballistic missile over Kyiv (25160725Z), demonstrating continued RF commitment to high-cost strikes aimed at C2 and energy infrastructure.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

INTENTION (CRITICAL/HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF intent is to fully maximize the cognitive paralysis induced by the "peace talks" IO NLT 252000Z to prevent the commitment of any organized UAF strategic reserve force. This paralysis is the primary precondition for the successful execution of the ground assault NLT 260000Z. CAPABILITY (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF demonstrates synchronized multi-domain capability. Kinetic pressure is maintained deep (KABs, Kryvyi Rih UAS), while PSYOP components (leaflet drops, 25161101Z) confirm the intent to achieve psychological collapse in localized frontline units prior to the assault.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The IO campaign has shifted from general narratives to highly specific, supposedly 'confirmed' details, including TASS citing the Financial Times on the 800k troop limit (25155712Z) and subsequent false compromise figures (700k limit, 25160550Z). This adaptation aims to maintain maximum ambiguity and uncertainty within the UAF National Command Authority (NCA) and public opinion.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): While forward tactical logistics appear robust (high rate of PGM use), Russian internal reporting suggests resource strain on essential national infrastructure (fiber optics, 25160255Z), with component diversion to FPV drone production. This indicates a strategic resource allocation conflict that favors immediate tactical needs over long-term sustainment.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains HIGHLY EFFECTIVE. The coordination of false diplomatic reporting (Macron, Starmer quotes), TASS confirmation via Western sources, and concurrent ground reports (Konstantinovka) suggests centralized, top-down synchronization designed to achieve the tactical objective of freezing UAF reserves.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: UAF is maintaining defensive integrity, aided by successful localized operations (e.g., SOF in Slobozhansky). Morale is supported by official messaging on equipment upgrades (25154940Z) and localized counter-IO efforts, but remains fragile due to the ongoing strategic paralysis at the NCA level. READINESS ASSESSMENT: High. Units are capable of executing localized defense and counter-fire. The critical risk remains strategic maneuver readiness, specifically the timely and protected deployment of Reserve Force Bravo.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

SUCCESS: Confirmed successful engagement of an RF ballistic missile over Kyiv by the Patriot system (25160725Z). This confirms the resilience of the High-Value Asset (HVA) AD network despite previous massed strikes. CRITICAL SETBACK (CRITICAL): The NCA failed to meet the 251600Z deadline for the decisive joint counter-IO statement. This leaves the window open for the RF to deepen the cognitive paralysis, directly endangering the movement of Reserve Force Bravo.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CONSTRAINT: The expansion of RF kinetic shaping (Kryvyi Rih UAS track) places severe stress on the existing AD allocation plan. Reserve Force Bravo requires maximized EW and SHORAD coverage along its new movement vectors to mitigate the elevated risk of interdiction NLT 252000Z. REQUIREMENT: The immediate confirmation of SHORAD reallocation status to backup C2 nodes (Poltava/Vinnytsia) remains the highest AD priority to mitigate the MDCOA.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

CRITICAL THREAT (PARALYSIS IO): The RF IO campaign is now at peak intensity and complexity.

• Narrative Focus: False agreement on troop limitations (800k/700k) and quotes falsely attributed to Western leaders (Starmer, Macron) suggesting Kyiv's capitulation (25160739Z, 25160550Z).
• Counter-Indicator: Ukrainian media (RBC-Ukraine) released internal sourced messages denying the troop limit (25155244Z). This provides a tactical opportunity for the NCA to amplify a verifiable counter-narrative, but this must be done immediately.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public perception is highly volatile. The success of the Patriot interception and SOF actions provides a morale boost, but the continued prevalence of high-authority RF diplomatic narratives (citing FT, Macron, Starmer) risks operational passivity and delays in mobilization efforts.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The primary RF objective in this domain—cognitive shock and paralysis—is currently successful. The high Dempster-Shafer belief scores regarding peace plan agreements (0.082 mediation, 0.066 US Plan agreement) confirm that strategic attention is diverted from the immediate kinetic threat (Pokrovsk breakthrough).

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - 95%): Execution of Penetration and Reserve Interdiction. RF will intensify deep kinetic shaping on the projected reserve movement corridors.

• 251630Z - 252000Z: RF ISR (UAS/SIGINT) will focus heavily on Dnipropetrovsk/Zaporizhzhia axes to identify Reserve Force Bravo movement. Expect increased electronic warfare activity along likely movement routes.
• 260000Z: Main mechanized assault on the T-05-15 GLOC commences, leveraging the strategic delay and potential kinetic disruption of UAF reserves.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - 85%): Operational Defeat via C2 Decapitation Strike. If SHORAD assets are not confirmed protecting backup C2 nodes by 251700Z:

• Immediate Threat: RF executes a precision strike (Iskander/KN-23) targeting Poltava/Vinnytsia backup C2 nodes NLT 251800Z.
• Operational Outcome: The resulting loss of operational C2 stability coincides with the reserve movement phase and the pre-assault kinetic fire preparation, ensuring maximal chaos prior to the 260000Z ground assault.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points (CRITICAL UPDATE)

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

TO: NCA / J7 (STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS) – CRITICAL 30 MINUTE WINDOW

1. EXECUTE EMERGENCY COUNTER-IO (CRITICAL PRIORITY): The NCA must issue the joint rejection statement NLT 251700Z. This statement must explicitly link the "peace talks" IO to the imminent 260000Z RF ground assault, framing the deception as a deliberate tactical maneuver against the Ukrainian people. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

TO: J3 (OPERATIONS) / GROUND FORCES COMMAND

2. C2 AD PROTECTION VERIFICATION: J3/J2 must verify the physical presence and operational status of SHORAD assets protecting Poltava and Vinnytsia C2 nodes NLT 251700Z. If relocation failed, identify and commit substitute mobile air defense capability immediately. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
3. RESERVE MOVEMENT PLAN MODIFICATION: Reroute Reserve Force Bravo to utilize off-road, low-signature movement corridors immediately. Authorize the dispersal of movement columns to mitigate vulnerability to KAB and Kryvyi Rih-vector UAS interdiction. Movement must commence NLT 252000Z.

TO: J2 (INTELLIGENCE) / AIR FORCE COMMAND

4. DEEP STRIKE EXPLOITATION: Utilize the demonstrated long-range strike capability (Taganrog precedent) to prioritize follow-up strikes against RF forward airbases/dispersal fields (e.g., Yeysk, Morozovsk) that host KAB-launching aircraft. Targeting must be executed NLT 252300Z to disrupt pre-assault fire preparation. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
5. NEW ISR TASKING (Kryvyi Rih): Task ELINT/SIGINT assets to the Kryvyi Rih UAS track to determine the specific target set (AD, C2, or logistics) to inform immediate SHORAD reallocation decisions for the southern axis.

//END OF REPORT//