Nightwatch logo
'Nightwatch' text with white and gray letters
Historical Intelligence

Situation Report

Archived operational intelligence briefing

Report Time
2025-11-25 15:13:59Z
3 months ago
Previous (2025-11-25 15:00:25Z)

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME: 251530Z NOV 2025 OPERATION: EASTERN THEATER / POKROVSK AXIS DEFENSE (OPERATION IRON SHIELD)


1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

FACT (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The Russian Federation (RF) Main Effort (ME) remains focused on operational penetration toward the T-05-15 Ground Line of Communication (GLOC), necessary for the interdiction of Kostiantynivka's western approach. RF forces are employing heavy indirect fire (KAB) and continued loitering munition attacks (ZALA/Lancet activity confirmed near Krasnoarmeysk). ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): RF claims of seizing Ivanopolye (near Kostiantynivka) indicate that tactical pressure is successfully executing Phase 1 (shallow penetration) along the main vector. NEW THREAT AXIS (FACT/HIGH CONFIDENCE): Confirmed enemy activation and localized successes near Siversk (DeepState, 251440Z) signals the use of a secondary fixation axis, likely intended to draw UAF reserves north and prevent their deployment to the critical Pokrovsk sector.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, dry conditions persist, continuing to favor maximized RF ISR and precision glide bomb (KAB) targeting. No immediate environmental constraints inhibit RF mechanized movement NLT 260000Z.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF continues a highly kinetic, synchronized offensive phase. Confirmed KAВ launches into Donetsk Oblast (251426Z) are preceding the anticipated ground assault. RF forces are demonstrating synchronization between front-line penetration claims (Ivanopolye) and rear-area logistical strikes (Chernihiv UAV vector).


2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

INTENTION (CRITICAL/HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF intent is to achieve operational paralysis in the National Command Authority (NCA) via Information Operations (IO) (800k troop limit narrative) to ensure that UAF strategic reserves are delayed past the critical commitment window (NLT 252000Z). This paralysis must precede the decisive ground assault NLT 260000Z. CAPABILITY (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF maintains overwhelming kinetic advantage in precision strike assets (KAB) and localized operational mobility, demonstrated by claimed advances near Kostiantynivka and Siversk.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF appears to be executing a deliberate, multi-axis fixation plan:

  1. Main Penetration: Pokrovsk (confirmed KAB support, confirmed claims of Ivanopolye).
  2. Northern Fixation: Kharkiv/Chernihiv (UAV detection/KAB strikes).
  3. Flank Pressure: Siversk (confirmed localized RF success). This adaptation minimizes the possibility of UAF successfully shifting operational reserves from the North/East to the Pokrovsk defense.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

JUDGMENT (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): Despite localized, catastrophic attrition indicators (RF chatter: "Half the regiment is gone," 251432Z), the RF overall operational logistics posture remains adequate to sustain the high-tempo push NLT 260000Z. The sustained rate of KAB usage confirms PGM availability is not a current constraint.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains HIGHLY EFFECTIVE in the multi-domain synchronization of IO and kinetic operations. The speed with which the 800k troop limit IO (251429Z) is being amplified across media platforms confirms centralized control and rapid dissemination protocols.


3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: Tactical defense is holding north of Pokrovsk, evidenced by successful local engagements and heavy RF losses reported (251426Z). However, the operational readiness is critically degraded by the confirmed non-viability of the primary relief force ("Plan 7-B MOD"). READINESS ASSESSMENT: High cognitive fatigue due to IO campaign. Critical risk of mission failure hinges on the immediate commitment of an alternative reserve force.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

SUCCESS: Confirmed high attrition inflicted on RF elements along the Pokrovsk "Road of Death" (251426Z) demonstrates local fire superiority when fixed positions are maintained. CRITICAL SETBACK: Failure to launch a convincing counter-IO NLT 251530Z exacerbates the crisis, pushing the operational decision window closer to the point of tactical failure.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CONSTRAINT (TIME): The commitment window for the alternative reserve force closes NLT 252000Z (T-4.5 hours) to effectively prevent a breach of the T-05-15 GLOC during the 260000Z RF assault. REQUIREMENT: Immediate priority for EW coverage and tactical SHORAD along the new reserve movement corridor, coupled with maximized ISR/counter-battery fire capability to stabilize Siversk.


4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

CRITICAL THREAT (800k LIMIT): The primary RF deception vector—the false agreement to peace terms and an 800,000 troop ceiling—is confirmed to be active and disseminated via trusted Ukrainian news sources (251429Z, citing FT). This creates maximal confusion and paralyzes mobilization efforts. SECONDARY IO: RF is leveraging diplomatic messaging (Abu Dhabi talks) and domestic issues (UK troop placement claims) to portray Ukraine as externally controlled, further undermining domestic resolve and external aid delivery timelines.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF Morale: Remains supported by high-quality recruitment campaigns (SBS Drone Forces, 251431Z) and veteran support initiatives, but this resilience is highly vulnerable to the unrefuted NCA paralysis narrative. RF Morale: Specific intercepted chatter (251432Z) indicates localized, severe morale collapse among specific RF units due to high attrition ("Half the regiment is gone"). This is an exploitable opportunity once the UAF defensive posture is stabilized.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The IO campaign is designed to force external partners to pressure Kyiv into compliance with fabricated terms, directly threatening the reliability of the J-4 materiel pipeline (Predicted 72-hour delay remains valid).


5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - 95%): Execution of Penetration and Reserve Interdiction. RF will intensify kinetic operations and maintain maximal IO pressure until 260000Z.

  • 251600Z - 252000Z: RF ISR (UAS/Lancet) will concentrate on identifying the movement of any new UAF reserve forces, utilizing the compromised status of Plan 7-B as a baseline assumption.
  • 260000Z: Main mechanized assault on the Pokrovsk-Kostiantynivka axis (T-05-15 GLOC) commences, leveraging the expected delay or poor security of UAF reserve commitment. Simultaneously, the Siversk and Northern fixation efforts will spike to prevent asset relocation.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - 85%): Operational Defeat via Decapitation Strike and Flanking Maneuver. If the NCA misses the 251600Z IO deadline, and alternative reserves are not secured and committed NLT 252000Z:

  • Immediate Threat: RF executes the predicted second precision strike targeting backup C2 nodes (Poltava/Vinnytsia) NLT 251800Z, capitalizing on the 63% missile intercept rate weakness.
  • Operational Outcome: The loss of C2 combined with the defensive gap allows RF forces to rapidly seize Rodynske and initiate envelopment operations against Kostiantynivka NLT 280000Z. This forces a complete operational withdrawal from the region.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points (CRITICAL UPDATE)

EventEstimated Timeline (Z)Decision Point / Action Required
CRITICAL IO Counter-AttackURGENT (NLT 251600Z)NCA must execute joint televised rejection of peace framework claims and troop limits.
C2 Protection / SHORAD ReallocationNLT 251700ZAD Command must shift SHORAD assets to Poltava/Vinnytsia backup C2 nodes to mitigate MDCOA.
Commitment of New ReservesNLT 252000ZJ3 must authorize the movement of an alternative reserve force (Reserve Force Bravo) to the T-05-15 corridor with dedicated EW screening.
RF Main Assault (Kinetic)NLT 260000ZAnticipate highest density of RF ground assault (40th/155th OMBR).

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

TO: NCA / J7 (STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS) – 30 MINUTE WINDOW

  1. EXECUTE IMMEDIATE COUNTER-IO (CRITICAL PRIORITY): The NCA must issue a joint Presidential/MoD statement NLT 251600Z (T-30 Minutes). The message must explicitly reject the 'agreement' and the 800k troop limit, framing the disinformation as a deliberate and failed RF attempt to achieve strategic paralysis immediately preceding their 260000Z ground assault. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  2. Exploit RF Attrition: Immediately task J7 to develop a tactical IO package leveraging the intercepted RF internal chatter regarding catastrophic losses ("Half the regiment is gone") and the UAF "Road of Death" footage. Deploy this package after the NCA counter-statement to bolster UAF morale and deny RF narrative dominance.

TO: J3 (OPERATIONS) / GROUND FORCES COMMAND

  1. PRIORITIZE NEW RESERVE DEPLOYMENT: Confirm official abandonment of "Plan 7-B MOD." Immediately deploy Reserve Force Bravo (or equivalent) to secure the T-05-15 GLOC corridor NLT 252000Z. This unit must move using decentralized, low-signature routes.
  2. EW/C-UAS Shielding: Divert two (2) highly mobile EW systems (e.g., Bukovel-AD, Nota) to accompany the Reserve Force Bravo movement corridor as primary protection against RF Lancet/KAB cuing.

TO: J2 (INTELLIGENCE) / AIR FORCE COMMAND

  1. C2 AD Reallocation (CRITICAL MDCOA MITIGATION): J2 assessment strongly supports an imminent RF follow-up strike on backup C2. AD Command must immediately reallocate mobile SHORAD assets from low-priority energy infrastructure to Poltava/Vinnytsia C2 nodes NLT 251700Z. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  2. Confirm Flanking Threat: Task immediate, high-resolution GEOINT/IMINT (UAS) to verify the unconfirmed RF claims regarding the capture of Otradnoye (Dnipropetrovsk region) to determine required response NLT 251700Z.

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

GAP IDGAP DESCRIPTIONPRIORITYCOLLECTION REQUIREMENTS
GAP 1A (CRITICAL)Verification of RF Control of Ivanopolye. Need to determine if the RF claim (251431Z) is kinetic reality or operational propaganda to define the forward edge of the battle area (FEBA) near Kostiantynivka.CRITICALForward reconnaissance patrol reports (HUMINT) and high-tempo UAS/GEOINT focused on Ivanopolye. NLT 251800Z.
GAP 1B (CRITICAL)Status of Otradnoye. Confirm/deny RF breach of the Dnipropetrovsk administrative border (Flank Threat).CRITICALDedicated UAS/SIGINT sweep of the Otradnoye sector. NLT 251700Z.
GAP 1C (HIGH)Targeting derived from the Chernihiv UAV group (251450Z). Confirm if the vector indicates targeting of Patriot/SAMP-T locations or major fuel/munitions depots.HIGHELINT/COMINT focused on data links and mission profiles of the detected UAV group. NLT 260100Z.

//END OF REPORT//

Previous (2025-11-25 15:00:25Z)

We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.

Learn more in our Privacy Policy.