Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME: 251430Z NOV 2025 OPERATION: EASTERN THEATER / KOSTIANTYNIVKA DEFENSE AND COGNITIVE COUNTER-PARALYSIS

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The focus of RF kinetic operations remains split between exploiting territorial gains near Kostiantynivka and simultaneous fixation strikes in the operational depth.

• Kostiantynivka MLR: The critical vulnerability remains the western flank following the claimed loss of Ivanopolye (GAP 1D remains active). RF is positioning to leverage the T-05-15 Ground Line of Communication (GLOC).
• Northern Fixation (FACT/HIGH CONFIDENCE): Confirmed RF use of KABs on the Kharkiv region (251356Z). This supports the earlier assessment that RF intends to fix UAF reserves and deny the free movement of reinforcements toward the main Kostiantynivka axis.
• Southern ISR/Strike Prep (FACT/HIGH CONFIDENCE): UAV detection approaching Mykolaiv from the south (251347Z) indicates continued threat to port infrastructure or follow-on reconnaissance preceding a deep strike, likely related to the Black Sea activity noted in the previous report.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, dry conditions persist. High visibility continues to favor RF ISR and the deployment of precision-guided munitions (KABs/UAVs).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF forces are executing a complex hybrid strategy, synchronizing kinetic fixation (Kharkiv) with a high-impact diplomatic disinformation campaign designed to freeze Ukrainian operational decision-making. UAF disposition remains heavily focused on static defense and air defense response, constrained by the need to protect the threatened Kostiantynivka flank.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

INTENTION (CRITICAL): Operational & Cognitive Encirclement. RF seeks to use the high-profile diplomatic track (peace talks in Abu Dhabi, global media leaks) as a psychological weapon to compel the Ukrainian National Command Authority (NCA) into delaying or aborting necessary tactical countermeasures (e.g., committing reserves to the Kostiantynivka flank) while military pressure is maximized. CAPABILITY: Demonstrated ability to leak specific, high-value, and damaging information (e.g., the 800k troop limit) through Western media (FT, CBS) to maximize internal political friction within Ukraine and diplomatic uncertainty among allies.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF kinetic activity supports a fixation strategy on the Northern Axis (Kharkiv KABs). This tactic ensures UAF attention and resources are diverted, preventing a swift counter-response to the Kostiantynivka breakthrough threat. RF also continues to prioritize rear-area interdiction in the Kharkiv direction using UAVs and reconnaissance (251349Z).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics remain sufficient to support the dual-pronged approach (ground assault at Kostiantynivka + deep/fixation strikes). Putin’s high-profile diplomatic visit to Kyrgyzstan (251344Z) is an IO effort projecting regional political stability and supply chain security for the RF war machine.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is highly synchronized across the military (GRU/FSB) and diplomatic (MFA/TASS) domains, maximizing pressure points simultaneously. This coordination demonstrates high effectiveness in hybrid warfare execution. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Readiness is currently being degraded by the coordinated Information Operation. While ground forces remain engaged, the credibility of the military and political leadership is under direct attack by the publicized details of the peace plan (800k troop limit). Readiness hinges on immediate NCA clarity.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes: No new major tactical successes confirmed in this window. Previous reports noted localized air defense successes.
• Setbacks (CRITICAL COGNITIVE): Widespread circulation and acceptance (via FT, CBS, Axios) of the claims regarding the 800,000 troop limitation agreed to in draft negotiations. This provides the enemy a powerful wedge issue to disrupt domestic mobilization efforts and internal morale.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CONSTRAINT: COGNITIVE OVERLOAD: The NCA is required to manage simultaneous kinetic threats (Kostiantynivka flank, Kharkiv KABs) while addressing a coordinated international diplomatic crisis regarding the alleged peace terms. This overloads the C2 and decision-making cycle. REQUIREMENT: Immediate commitment of EW/SHORAD resources to the Kharkiv-Poltava GLOCs to mitigate KAB/UAV interdiction efforts against UAF logistics and C2 in the operational rear.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

The RF IO campaign has achieved operational success in the information domain.

• Point of Information Control (PIC): The 800,000 soldier limit (251346Z, 251347Z, 251357Z) is the key metric being used to frame the negotiations.
  • Impact: This clause, if unaddressed, implies future demobilization and limits long-term defensive capability, immediately eroding morale among conscripts and volunteers.
• Coalition Paralysis: UK statements confirming commitment to the US plan framework (251400Z) are being used by RF media to suggest Kyiv is boxed into an unfavorable plan that the RF (via Bloomberg sources, 251401Z) is already signaling it intends to reject. This positions the RF to later collapse the talks while blaming Ukraine's 'western handlers.'
• Confidence Erosion: TASS amplification of the US NATO envoy’s assessment of RF "stronger position" (251349Z) is designed to weaken Western political resolve.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public sentiment will trend toward confusion and distrust if the 800k troop limit is not immediately clarified or refuted by high-level Ukrainian officials. The internal corruption setback (previous report) combined with this external pressure creates a perfect storm for morale degradation.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

High-level negotiations involving the Ukrainian delegation (Budanov), US, and RF in Abu Dhabi (251347Z) confirm direct engagement is underway. The diplomatic risk is extremely high: Western partners are signaling unified support for the US framework, while the RF is posturing to be the party that rejects the revised plan, thereby achieving its goal of strategic pause without offering concessions.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - 90%): Operational Maneuver and IO Consolidation. RF will commit to a decisive breach attempt on the Kostiantynivka western flank NLT 260000Z, exploiting the tactical advantage gained via Ivanopolye. Simultaneously, RF IO will leverage the diplomatic track to force a 48-72 hour operational pause in Western military deliveries (due to the perception of imminent peace) and to compel the NCA to hold strategic reserves in place rather than commit them to the front. RF will maintain KAB/UAV fixation in the Kharkiv/Mykolaiv sectors to secure their flanks and C2 lines.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - 80%): Catastrophic Political-Military Fracture. The RF IO surrounding the 800k troop limit successfully fuels high-level political infighting or popular protests against the NCA and the Ministry of Defense. This internal fracture leads to a critical delay in authorizing the operational response (reserves deployment, targeted counter-fire) required to contain the Kostiantynivka breakthrough. RF achieves operational encirclement or seizure of Kostiantynivka within 96 hours (NLT 290000Z), leading to widespread loss of faith in the government's ability to prosecute the war.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points (REVISED)

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

TO: J3 (OPERATIONS) / AIR FORCE COMMAND

1. Prioritize Kharkiv EW/SHORAD (CRITICAL): Immediately divert mobile EW systems and SHORAD (e.g., Gepard, Avenger) to the main Ground Lines of Communication (GLOCs) and logistics nodes in the Kharkiv operational rear. Assume RF intent is to fully interdict movement. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
2. Kostiantynivka Flank Readiness: Implement full defensive fire plans to interdict any observed RF mechanized movement along the T-05-15 axis by 252000Z. Assume GAP 1D (Ivanopolye status) is negative.

TO: J7 (INFORMATION OPERATIONS) / NCA STRATCOM

3. Neutralize Troop Limit Claim (IMMEDIATE): The NCA must hold a press briefing (NLT 251600Z) to definitively clarify the nature of draft negotiations. The narrative must emphasize that any talks are subject to operational realities and that Ukraine will never agree to terms that compromise its long-term defensive requirements. Frame the leak as intentional RF psychological warfare aimed at disrupting mobilization. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
4. Leverage Diaspora Opposition: Task the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) to amplify public rejection of unfavorable peace terms by the Ukrainian diaspora (e.g., German/US protests, 251358Z), demonstrating strong domestic and international unity against premature concessions.

TO: J2 (INTELLIGENCE) / TARGETING

5. ISR on Kharkiv KAB Cuing: Prioritize SIGINT/IMINT (GAP 17) to determine the source and method used by RF to cue the latest KAB strikes on Kharkiv. This informs C3/EW protection requirements for UAF forces attempting relief/maneuver operations. (COLLECTION PRIORITY: HIGH)
6. Diplomatic-Kinetic Synchronization: Maintain 24/7 correlation between high-level diplomatic negotiation movements (Abu Dhabi, Geneva claims) and observed shifts in kinetic intensity and targeting patterns.

---

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

//END OF REPORT//