Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME: 251313Z NOV 2025 OPERATION: EASTERN THEATER / KOSTIANTYNIVKA DEFENSE AND MULTI-DOMAIN COUNTER-PARALYSIS

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational situation at the Kostiantynivka MLR is deteriorating rapidly. RF forces, specifically the 1194th regiment (Yug Group), claim the liberation of Ivanopolye (251304Z).

• Ivanopolye (CRITICAL JUDGMENT/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): If confirmed, the loss of Ivanopolye represents a significant setback, immediately exposing the western/southwestern flank of Kostiantynivka and providing RF direct, uncontested access to critical approaches, including the T-05-15 Ground Line of Communication (GLOC).
• Deep Area Penetration (FACT/HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF is executing highly aggressive deep strikes, including a confirmed daytime drone attack on Dnipro (251245Z, 251308Z) resulting in severe civilian casualties. This indicates a shift toward maximizing psychological impact and exploiting localized UAF air defense gaps during daylight hours.
• Air Activity: UAV detected in the Black Sea aquatory, approaching the Odesa region (251310Z). This suggests continued targeting or reconnaissance preparation for follow-on attacks in the Southern Operational Zone.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear conditions across the Eastern and Central Theaters continue to facilitate uninterrupted RF ISR operations and the effective delivery of air-to-ground precision munitions (KABs/UAVs). The daytime drone strike on Dnipro confirms RF willingness and ability to conduct sustained aerial operations across all lighting conditions.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Forces (RED): RF is leveraging territorial gains (Ivanopolye claim) to generate momentum against the MLR while simultaneously using strategic deep strikes (confirmed massive attack night 25 NOV) and kinetic psychological warfare (Dnipro daytime strike) to degrade UAF resolve and command coordination.
• UAF Forces (BLUE): UAF is engaged in continuous stabilization efforts, demonstrating localized air defense success (Signum unit neutralizing 11 'Molniya' drones, 251303Z) and attempting to rapidly scale specialized drone capabilities via active recruitment (251252Z).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

INTENTION (IMMEDIATE): RF seeks to complete the operational isolation of Kostiantynivka by fixing UAF reserves in the rear through continuous kinetic and psychological pressure (drone strikes on civilians) while simultaneously exploiting the Ivanopolye flank to secure a breakthrough. CAPABILITY: Confirmed ability to execute large-scale, coordinated air strikes (missile/drone saturation) against strategic infrastructure and population centers, demonstrated by the confirmed massed strike on 25 NOV. RF also possesses the capability to quickly adapt its targeting matrix to emerging UAF technologies (claimed drone strike on UAF ground robotic vehicles, 251259Z).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Shift to Daytime Terror Strikes (FACT/HIGH CONFIDENCE): The Dnipro drone attack in daylight marks an escalation. This tactic is designed to maximize terror and drain limited UAF SHORAD assets that are typically reserved for nighttime mass attacks.
• Focus on UAF Robotics (JUDGMENT/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): The RF claim of destroying UAF ground robotic vehicles (NRTCs) suggests RF reconnaissance is actively prioritizing the identification and destruction of emerging UAF battlefield technology, indicating a tactical adaptation to counter UAF innovation.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics are stretched but functional. Continued UAF deep strikes (Novorossiysk BDA confirmed by RF sources, 251246Z) impose non-trivial disruption, but RF retains the sustainment base needed for prolonged Kostiantynivka assault operations.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is highly effective in synchronizing diplomatic maneuvering (peace talks IO) with kinetic action (Dnipro/massed strikes) to maximize cognitive shock and operational advantage.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Readiness is critically strained by continuous deep strikes and the severe threat to the MLR. Force posture is defensive and reactive, focusing on local air defense (Signum success) and operational resilience (NCA meetings with international partners).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• SUCCESS (Trench Level): Successful interdiction of 11 ‘Molniya’ drones by the Signum unit (251303Z).
• SETBACK (Humanitarian/Morale): Severe civilian casualties and psychological trauma resulting from the Dnipro daytime attack (251308Z).
• SETBACK (Internal/IO): The confirmed $28 million procurement fraud case involving drone supplies (251300Z) critically undermines trust and provides high-value material for RF IO targeting military integrity.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CONSTRAINT: SECURITY OF THE FLANK: The potential loss of Ivanopolye necessitates the immediate diversion of reserves or repositioning of fire support to secure the western Kostiantynivka flank, placing enormous strain on already limited maneuver units. CONSTRAINT: AIR DEFENSE: The requirement to defend against both strategic nighttime mass strikes (energy grid) and localized, high-impact daytime terror strikes (Dnipro) stretches AD capacity beyond sustainable limits.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

CRITICAL IO EVENT: Peace Agreement Fiction: Highly synchronized media reports (citing US sources like ABC News/CBS) stating Ukraine has "agreed" to a peace deal with only "minor details" remaining (251248Z, 251249Z).

• Objective: This is assessed as a sophisticated RF IO campaign designed to generate a perception of imminent ceasefire, thereby freezing or delaying critical Western military support flows and potentially inducing premature strategic restraint by the Ukrainian NCA during the key kinetic phase at Kostiantynivka.
• Diplomatic Erosion: The non-attendance of US envoy Driscoll in London (251247Z) is being amplified by TASS and SVR-linked channels (251257Z) to showcase division and diplomatic paralysis within the Western coalition.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public sentiment is volatile due to the graphic nature of the Dnipro daytime civilian casualties. This kinetic terror must be immediately countered by the NCA confirming operational focus and linking the RF diplomatic maneuvers directly to the violence. Morale is further eroded by confirmed internal corruption issues (drone procurement fraud).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The convergence of the peace rumors and the US delegation withdrawal (251247Z) creates an acute risk of diplomatic deceleration. Ukrainian high-level engagement (Zelenskyy meeting with German Chancellor Merz, 251300Z) is necessary but may be insufficient to counteract the coordinated diplomatic friction being applied by Moscow.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - 85%): Direct MLR Breach via Flank Exploitation. RF forces will consolidate the Ivanopolye axis NLT 260000Z and initiate coordinated armored and infantry assaults on the vulnerable western flank of Kostiantynivka, supported by continuous KAB strikes. Simultaneously, RF IO will maintain the "peace agreement" narrative to pressure Kyiv into delaying the deployment of deep reserves. The UAV detection near Odesa suggests follow-on strikes, likely targeting logistics or port infrastructure, NLT 260800Z.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - 75%): Strategic Cohesion Collapse. RF successfully uses the internal procurement fraud and the 'peace deal' narrative to generate a critical failure of faith between the Ukrainian populace, political leadership, and military command. This cognitive collapse leads to a significant delay in the NCA authorizing necessary tactical withdrawals or the commitment of the final strategic reserve. RF forces exploit this window to achieve a decisive breakthrough and operational encirclement of Kostiantynivka before the end of the reporting cycle (NLT 270000Z).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points (ADJUSTED)

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

TO: J3 (OPERATIONS) / GROUND FORCES COMMAND

1. Direct Flank Defense (CRITICAL): Assume the Ivanopolye claim is accurate until proven otherwise. Immediately commit available tactical reserves to establish an emergency blocking position west of Kostiantynivka focusing exclusively on denying RF the use of the T-05-15 GLOC. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
2. Adaptive AD Deployment: Disperse mobile SHORAD assets away from fixed infrastructure toward actively shifting UAF forward movement corridors and reserve assembly areas. Accept higher risk for fixed C2 nodes for the next 48 hours.

TO: J7 (INFORMATION OPERATIONS) / NCA

3. Counter-Fraud Transparency (URGENT): Task the Prosecutor General's Office to release a public statement detailing the swift and aggressive nature of the response to the $28 million drone procurement fraud, ensuring the narrative focuses on operational integrity and zero tolerance for corruption during wartime.
4. Strategic Communications Alignment: Use the brutal daytime attack on Dnipro as immediate proof that the RF-backed "peace negotiations" are a cover for continued kinetic aggression. Link the Dnipro casualties directly to the RF diplomatic posturing.

TO: J2 (INTELLIGENCE) / TARGETING

5. ISR Focus on Robotics Counter-Adaptation: Prioritize SIGINT/IMINT (GAP 15) to confirm RF success in targeting UAF ground robotic vehicles. If confirmed, issue a force protection warning to all tactical units operating NRTCs and adjust deployment doctrine immediately to mitigate drone-on-robot threat.
6. Deep Strike BDA (Energy): Rapidly assess the BDA (GAP 14) from the 25 NOV massed strike to determine specific vulnerabilities exploited in the energy grid and inform J4/J6 on critical infrastructure hardening requirements.

---

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

//END OF REPORT//