Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME: 251030Z NOV 2025 OPERATION: EASTERN THEATER / POST-BALLISTIC STRIKE ASSESSMENT AND POKROVSK AXIS DEFENSE REFERENCE: Previous ISR 251000Z NOV 25; Daily Intel Summary 241530Z NOV 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture is characterized by kinetic shock (RF deep rear strike) coupled with accelerated tactical consolidation (Donetsk/Zaporizhzhia fronts).

• Kyiv/Central Sector (FACT): The highly anticipated RF massive ballistic strike (predicted NLT 240000Z) was confirmed to have hit residential areas in the Darnytskyi and Desnianskyi districts of Kyiv. This confirms RF intent to maintain strategic psychological pressure and disrupt civilian infrastructure, despite UAF deep strike successes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Pokrovsk Axis / Central Donetsk (FACT): RF Ministry of Defense (MoD) claims to have “liberated” Ivanopillia (southwest of Kostiantynivka). This thrust directly threatens the immediate western flank of the Kostiantynivka-Pokrovsk defensive line. UAF forces successfully deny RF claims of Kostiantynivka capture. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for claim/denial; MEDIUM for actual territorial control).
• Zaporizhzhia Front (FACT): Pro-RF channels document confirmed drone strikes on UAF transport near Huliaipole and claim to be moving toward "liberating the administrative center." This indicates RF is maintaining fixation operations south of the main Donetsk efforts, likely to prevent UAF reserves from pivoting north toward Pokrovsk. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

The kinetic degradation of major urban centers (Kyiv, Zaporizhzhia) has shifted the immediate environmental burden toward urgent medical and engineering stabilization efforts, diverting critical logistics away from the forward edge of the battle area (FEBA). The urgent appeal for blood/plasma confirms the immediate humanitarian pressure.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Forces (RED): RF is executing a coordinated strategy: Strategic Retaliation (Ballistic Strike) combined with Tactical Consolidation (Donetsk). They are capitalizing on the pre-existing strategic strike timeline rather than immediately pausing due to the A-60 loss.
• UAF Forces (BLUE): UAF is balancing immediate damage assessment and casualty management following the strike with the ongoing, critical tactical defense of the Pokrovsk-Kostiantynivka corridor. UAF 63rd Mechanized Brigade confirmed localized success (POW capture near Lyman), demonstrating sustained combat effectiveness in other sectors.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

INTENTION: RF intent is multi-layered:

1. Punishment/Deterrence: To inflict proportional kinetic damage following the UAF deep strikes (A-60 loss) and maintain the threat profile across Ukraine.
2. Tactical Breakthrough: To exploit the pressure on the M-30/T-05-15 GLOC by accelerating advances near Ivanopillia and Myrnohrad, thereby isolating Pokrovsk.

CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT (Ballistic Strike): RF retains robust capabilities for saturation ballistic strikes, as evidenced by the Kyiv hit and the subsequent confirmed spillover of aerial vehicles into Moldova (Drones/debris). This demonstrates a high-volume, low-precision approach prioritizing saturation over specific C2 decapitation.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations (JUDGMENT)

RF appears to have successfully masked its pre-planned ballistic strike (MDCOA from previous reports) using the diplomatic "peace plan" IO cover. The kinetic response was rapid (within 24 hours of the A-60 loss), indicating a high degree of pre-positioning and readiness for escalation.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status (JUDGMENT)

UAF deep strikes (Taganrog, oil facilities) likely have a strategic, long-term impact on RF air maintenance cycles. However, the immediate RF kinetic response suggests their frontline logistical chain for massed ground attacks (Donetsk) remains robust and is not yet significantly constrained by the deep strikes.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness (JUDGMENT)

RF C2 demonstrated effective synchronization in executing the massive ballistic strike across deep rear areas. UAF denial of critical C2 node destruction (as noted by Ihnat) suggests either failure of RF targeting or successful hardening/dispersion by UAF J6 prior to the strike (referencing Recommendation 4, Previous Daily Summary).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Posture is defensively stressed in the east and centrally focused on damage control. The immediate medical urgency (blood shortage appeal) is a critical indicator of high casualty rates (civilian and military) following the ballistic strike and persistent FEBA engagements.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• SUCCESS (TACTICAL): UAF denial of Kostiantynivka capture and confirmed POW acquisition near Lyman. Possible successful dispersion of C2 nodes ahead of the strategic strike.
• SETBACK (STRATEGIC/TACTICAL): Confirmed residential damage in Kyiv underscores the permeability of strategic air defense during massed attacks. RF claims on Ivanopillia further degrade the strategic depth of the Pokrovsk defensive line.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

GAP 1C (CRITICAL): The lack of confirmation regarding the status of "Plan 7-B MOD" (reinforcement column) remains the single most dangerous constraint. The timeline for the Myrnohrad GLOC collapse (NLT 251200Z per previous ISR) is imminent and requires immediate decision-making regarding these missing forces.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF Primary Narrative Shift: RF is attempting to consolidate domestic support (civil defense courses in Moscow, Matviyenko demographic push) while internationally framing the Kyiv strike as a "proportional response."

• RF SVR IO (FACT): RF Foreign Intelligence is running a diplomatic IO operation, claiming the UK is attempting to "sabotage" peace talks, likely intended to sow discord among Western allies regarding the new peace framework.
• UAF Counter-Narrative Requirement (JUDGMENT): UAF StratComs must immediately amplify evidence of the civilian nature of the Kyiv targets and the cross-border incident in Moldova to counter the RF narrative of "retaliation against military targets."

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors (JUDGMENT)

Domestic morale in Ukraine remains resilient, driven by the successful denial of Kostiantynivka's capture and the Umerov diplomatic push. However, persistent infrastructure damage and high casualties risk long-term fatigue. Morale indicators in Russia show internal strain (documentation of casualties, financial crimes of high officials).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The urgency of Umerov's planned meeting with Trump (NLT end of November) confirms that the UAF NCA perceives a critical, time-sensitive diplomatic window. Macron's discussion of potential post-conflict EU security deployment (UK/FR in Kyiv, Turkey in Odesa) reinforces the West's long-term commitment despite RF efforts to disrupt diplomatic momentum.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - 90%): Full Isolation of Pokrovsk NLT 251600Z. RF ground forces will leverage the capture of Ivanopillia to rapidly flank Kostiantynivka while maintaining maximum kinetic pressure on the Myrnohrad GLOC. This simultaneous pressure will achieve the functional isolation of Pokrovsk defense forces within the next 6 hours, forcing UAF to divert resources to controlled extraction or risk encirclement. RF will primarily use massive artillery and KAB saturation to achieve this objective.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - 85%): C2 Decapitation Follow-up Strike. Following the initial strategic strike, RF Intelligence (GRU) will analyze the damage to UAF C2/logistics nodes. If primary UAF C2 was successfully dispersed (as suggested by Ihnat's comments), RF will use reconnaissance and precision strike assets (Iskander/Kinzhals) NLT 251800Z to target secondary/alternate C2 nodes in the Poltava/Vinnytsia/Dnipropetrovsk regions. This strike would be designed to paralyze the high command's ability to coordinate the necessary defensive maneuver in the Pokrovsk sector.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

TO: J3 (OPERATIONS) / GROUND FORCES COMMAND

1. Pokrovsk Contingency (CRITICAL): Assume the Pokrovsk-Myrnohrad GLOC is functionally closed by 251200Z. Shift priority from holding Myrnohrad to reinforcing and hardening the Kostiantynivka defensive perimeter to prevent RF exploitation of the Ivanopillia advance.
2. GAP 1C Closure (IMMEDIATE): Re-task all available long-range UAS (A-22, Leleka) and SSO assets to conduct immediate, high-risk searches for "Plan 7-B MOD" along secondary and tertiary movement corridors (ref. Previous ISR GAP 1C). The time window for its tactical utility is closing rapidly.
3. Huliaipole Monitoring: Increase ISR focus on the Huliaipole sector to confirm if RF drone strikes indicate a renewed major offensive push or merely a fixation effort. Plan for rapid reserve deployment if a new axis of advance opens on the Zaporizhzhia front.

TO: J2 (INTELLIGENCE) / J6 (COMMUNICATIONS)

4. C2 Hardening Assessment: J2/J6 must immediately confirm which primary/alternate C2 nodes were targeted in the Kyiv strike. If primary C2 was unaffected, credit the pre-strike dispersion protocol. Maintain full EM silence protocols across all secondary nodes until 251800Z.
5. Ivanopillia BDA (CRITICAL): Immediately obtain satellite IMINT or direct ISR (if available) to verify the RF claim of Ivanopillia "liberation." This is crucial for updating the defensive depth model for Kostiantynivka.

TO: J7 (INFORMATION OPERATIONS) / MFA

6. Moldova Incident Amplification (CRITICAL): J7 must immediately use the confirmed Russian drone debris/strikes in Moldova and the Kyiv residential damage to refute the RF MoD narrative of the strategic strike being a "proportional response" against military targets. Frame this as state terrorism and a violation of non-belligerent sovereignty.
7. Diplomatic Support Narrative: Ensure StratComs amplify the urgency and necessity of the Umerov-Trump meeting, framing it as the only viable path to stability, directly countering RF SVR claims of UK/Western "sabotage."

---

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

//END OF REPORT//