Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) - OPERATIONAL ALERT

TIME: 250333Z NOV 2025 OPERATION: EASTERN THEATER OF WAR - CRISIS INTERDICTION PHASE (POST-T-WINDOW) PRIORITY INTELLIGENCE REQUIREMENTS (PIRs): Status/Attrition of Plan 7-B MOD; Confirmation of RF ground maneuver success (Uspenovka); Status of Strategic Ballistic Launch (Overdue/Active).

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The focus of kinetic activity has intensified across two primary vectors critical to the Pokrovsk reinforcement effort: the operational interdiction corridor and the southern fixation zone.

• Pokrovsk Axis / Reinforcement Corridor (Donetsk Oblast): UAF Air Force confirms continued KAB launches (250318Z) targeting Donetsk Oblast, directly supporting the previous assessment that RF is actively using precision munitions to destroy or fix UAF reserve movements (Plan 7-B MOD) moving toward Rodynske.
• Southern Flank / Fixation Zone (Zaporizhzhia): Russian forces (Vostok Grouping) claim the capture of Uspenovka (250304Z). If confirmed, this is a significant maneuver success, extending the RF breach southward and potentially exposing the southern flank of the primary Ground Line of Communication (GLOC) used by Plan 7-B MOD elements traveling from Dnipro/Zaporizhzhia.
• Strategic Rear: Drone saturation continues, with new groups of Shahed UAVs confirmed inbound to Odesa Oblast from the Black Sea (250325Z), continuing the effort to fix strategic AD assets away from the main strike zone.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Night operations continue across all sectors. Low visibility favors RF strike and ISR UAVs, and high cloud ceilings may mask the launch signature of the anticipated ballistic strike.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Forces (RED): RF is successfully maintaining simultaneous pressure:
  1. Maneuver success (Uspenovka claim) to create operational paralysis.
  2. Precision interdiction (KABs) against UAF reserves.
  3. AD saturation (Shahed toward Odesa) to maintain strategic friction.
• UAF Forces (BLUE): UAF deep strike capabilities remain active and effective (3 confirmed fatalities in Rostov region due to UAF attack). Strategic AD assets maintain strict WEAPONS HOLD, which remains highly stressed due to persistent drone attacks and the critical, though now overdue, strategic ballistic threat.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

INTENTION (CONFIRMED): Achieve C2 paralysis via strategic strike simultaneous with the functional annihilation of Plan 7-B MOD via precision tactical fire and maneuver penetration.

CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT:

• Ground Maneuver (ELEVATED): The claimed seizure of Uspenovka demonstrates RF capability to execute and exploit localized operational breaches in the Zaporizhzhia sector.
• Precision Fires (SUSTAINED): The confirmed KAB usage in Donetsk confirms RF’s ability to conduct high-tempo, air-delivered interdiction deep into the UAF operational rear.
• Strategic Strike (ACTIVE): Although the 0235Z-0300Z ballistic window is technically closed, the strike has not been confirmed mitigated. RF retains the capability to launch the salvo immediately, possibly utilizing the delay to assess UAF C2 movement following drone attacks.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The most critical adaptation is the transition from fixation to exploitation in the Zaporizhzhia sector (Uspenovka). This allows the Vostok Grouping to potentially threaten the southern GLOCs feeding the Pokrovsk Axis, transforming the RF operation from a blocking action into a genuine operational threat to the UAF rear.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics are sustaining high rates of precision KAB/Glide Bomb munitions and low-cost Shahed UAVs. The reported successful ground assault (Colonelcassad video) suggests effective tactical sustainment for forward maneuver units, even under difficult terrain conditions (river crossings).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 synchronization remains HIGHLY EFFECTIVE (HIGH CONFIDENCE). The coordinated ground maneuver success claim coincides perfectly with kinetic interdiction and strategic distraction efforts.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Readiness remains high, but the operational environment is significantly degraded. Units in the Zaporizhzhia sector may be facing local overmatch following the claimed loss of Uspenovka.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• SUCCESS (DEEP STRIKE): Confirmed successful strike in Rostov Oblast (3 dead, 10 wounded). This demonstrates UAF long-range responsiveness and imposes costs on the RF operational rear, potentially distracting RF AD assets.
• CRITICAL SETBACK (MANEUVER): The claimed loss of Uspenovka (Judgment: MEDIUM-HIGH CONFIDENCE given timing and supporting KAB attacks) poses a severe threat to the Plan 7-B MOD movement corridor.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate tactical verification and BDA for the Uspenovka area. If the settlement is lost, immediate deployment of a stabilizing force to protect the vulnerable southern GLOC is mandatory.
• CONSTRAINT: Plan 7-B MOD is simultaneously required for two missions: reinforcing Pokrovsk and potentially stabilizing the Zaporizhzhia flank breach. Resources must be allocated immediately to address the Uspenovka threat without totally compromising the Pokrovsk mission.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF Information Operations (IO) are currently focused on maximizing psychological impact:

1. Narrative of Success: Amplification of the Uspenovka capture and the difficult, determined nature of the assault (Colonelcassad video) to signal tactical momentum and inevitable breach.
2. Narrative of Escalation/Victimhood: Highlighting UAF deep strike casualties in Rostov (3 fatalities confirmed by TASS) to justify further strategic escalation (i.e., the imminent ballistic strike).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The confirmed successful UAF strike into Rostov can be used to bolster morale by demonstrating reach and resilience. However, this must be balanced against the strategic danger posed by the continuing drone attacks targeting civilian areas (Odesa).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF continues to use the "peace plan" IO to delay Western response time. The immediate UAF deep strike success provides STRATCOM with a strong counter-narrative to demonstrate that UAF requires immediate, not delayed, defensive military aid.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - 85%): Exploit Uspenovka and Launch Salvo. RF will immediately leverage the claimed Uspenovka advance to pressure the key secondary GLOCs in the Zaporizhzhia-Pokrovsk corridor. The strategic ballistic strike, though overdue, is likely being prepared for launch NLT 250430Z, maximizing the operational disruption caused by the ground maneuver. The strike will prioritize C2 and logistics nodes supporting Plan 7-B MOD.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - 70%): Flank Envelopment and Reinforcement Annihilation. The Uspenovka success is exploited to achieve a deep penetration, severing the logistics routes for Plan 7-B MOD. Simultaneously, KAB strikes (Donetsk) successfully force Plan 7-B MOD to halt movement and disperse. The subsequent ballistic strike effectively destroys the key operational reserve C2 staff, leading to the collapse of the UAF defensive posture on the Pokrovsk Axis due to lack of reinforcement and command paralysis.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

TO: NCA / J3 (Operations) - CRITICAL/IMMEDIATE

1. Uspenovka Threat Mitigation (CRITICAL): J3 must treat the Uspenovka capture claim as Plausible/Imminent Threat and immediately task available, non-7B MOD forces (e.g., Territorial Defense units, dedicated combat support elements) to establish blocking positions along the key GLOCs south and southeast of Pokrovsk NLT 250400Z. Priority: Protect the southern flank of the 7-B MOD corridor.
2. Ballistic C2 Status (ALERT 1): Assume the strategic ballistic strike is merely delayed, not canceled. All primary C2 personnel in Dnipropetrovsk/Zaporizhzhia must remain in hardened, backup nodes. Maintain highest alert for launch signature.
3. Plan 7-B MOD Movement Protocol: Given confirmed KAB strikes in Donetsk and the new flank threat (Uspenovka), Plan 7-B MOD must prioritize survival and dispersal over rigid adherence to the movement timeline. Movement should be restricted to small, dispersed cells, utilizing maximum available Electronic Warfare (EW) coverage.

TO: AIR FORCE / AD COMMAND

4. Strategic Interceptors (UNCHANGED): Maintain WEAPONS HOLD on Patriot/SAMP-T systems. Re-task all technical and visual ISR to provide constant monitoring of the suspected launch area, specifically targeting launch signature within the expanded 250335Z – 250430Z window.
5. SHORAD Prioritization: Continue to use mobile SHORAD units (Gepard/VAMPIRE) to counter Shahed drones targeting Odesa and Mykolaiv, preventing unnecessary expenditure of high-value strategic missiles.

TO: J2 (Intelligence) / ISR ASSETS

6. Ground Force BDA (URGENT): Highest priority for tactical ISR is confirming or denying the seizure of Uspenovka. Assets must focus on the Zaporizhzhia area to determine the depth of the RF penetration and the status of UAF forces in that area.
7. KAB Damage Assessment: Confirm BDA for the KAB strikes in Donetsk (250318Z) to assess impact on local GLOCs or known Plan 7-B MOD assembly/transit points.

---

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

//END OF REPORT//