Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 241830Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 241755Z NOV 25 – 241830Z NOV 25 OPERATIONAL AXES: POKROVSK (GLOC CRITICAL) / ODESA (AD DEPLETION PHASE 3) OVERALL THREATCON: CAT-4 (OPERATIONAL RISK: SEVERE AND IMMINENT)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-SUM)

The enemy (RF) is in the terminal phase of pre-strategic strike preparation, characterized by sustained AD saturation kinetics in the South and intensifying diplomatic fragmentation efforts. CRITICAL UPDATE: The diplomatic environment has shifted advantageously for UAF: reports confirm the US negotiating position now excludes military restrictions on UAF and rejects amnesty for war criminals, potentially neutralizing the RF strategic goal of political paralysis. However, the kinetic threat from the NLT 240000Z ballistic strike remains CRITICAL, compounded by the operational vacuum at the Pokrovsk M-30/T-05-15 corridor due to the presumed interdiction of Plan 7-B MOD.

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain (FACT)

• Odesa/Southern Axis: Confirmed sustained UAV strikes have impacted residential areas (241753Z, 241800Z), confirming RF intent to maximize psychological and infrastructure damage, supplementing the confirmed earlier strike on the Thermal Power Plant (TETs).
• Pokrovsk Axis (GLOC M-30/T-05-15): Status remains unchanged: Plan 7-B MOD is assumed interdicted, creating an immediate and exploitable operational void around the Rodynske reinforcement objective.
• Zaporizhzhia: Confirmed RF Vostok Group tank engagement near Gulyaipole (241803Z) confirms persistent local fixation efforts to pin UAF reserves, supporting the strategic strike and Pokrovsk objectives.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations (FACT)

Weather remains permissive for fixed-wing, rotary-wing, and ISR operations across all major axes.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures (JUDGMENT)

UAF AD assets are currently managing sustained drone pressure, but interceptor expenditure is high. RF C2 maintains tight synchronization between kinetic deep strikes (Odesa), diplomatic IO maneuvers, and frontline fixation. UAF political leadership is capitalizing on positive diplomatic developments (Spain, Geneva delegation) to maintain unity of effort.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (JUDGMENT)

CAPABILITY: RF continues to demonstrate robust deep strike capacity targeting both critical energy infrastructure and residential areas (Odesa). RF Force Generation efforts are adapting to personnel constraints through targeted domestic IO (veteran integration/KhMAO payments). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) INTENTION (IMMEDIATE, 0-4 hours):

1. Maximize Ballistic Strike Lethality: RF will accelerate AD saturation until the ballistic launch window (2200Z), prioritizing the destruction of regional C2/J-FIRE nodes in the Dnipropetrovsk/Zaporizhzhia sector.
2. Exploit Pokrovsk Paralysis: RF SpN/OMBR elements will likely initiate direct action or aggressive reconnaissance on the M-30/T-05-15 GLOC to confirm the attrition of 7-B MOD and prepare for deeper penetration.
3. Domestic Consolidation: RF IO will intensify domestic messaging (e.g., Kadyrov promotion, Uryupin veteran appointment) to demonstrate state strength and the integration of combat personnel into the ruling elite, countering any perceived international setback.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations (JUDGMENT)

The shift in drone targeting to explicitly include residential areas after the TETs strike (Odesa) serves as a refined psychological operation (PSYOPS) aimed at breaking civilian morale and forcing UAF AD to engage at lower altitudes over densely populated zones, complicating engagement protocols. RF C2 is effectively using domestic programs ("Time of Heroes") to generate a new cohort of politically loyal, experienced administrative personnel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status (JUDGMENT)

Frontline supply and deep strike logistics remain robust. Personnel sustainment shows reliance on external motivators (financial incentives, political integration of veterans) to mask underlying recruitment quality issues.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness (FACT/JUDGMENT)

RF strategic C2 remains highly effective and fully integrated across military, political, and informational domains. Claims of shooting down UAF drones over Bryansk (241800Z) serve a minor internal IO function. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness (JUDGMENT)

POSTURE: Defensive, focused on AD conservation and contingency preparation for Rodynske. READINESS: Tactical readiness is high, but strategic readiness is challenged by critical internal human resource allocation problems (new recruits bypass depleted veteran brigades, 241803Z), which risks exacerbating combat fatigue in critical frontline units (e.g., Pokrovsk).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks (FACT)

SUCCESSES: MAJOR DIPLOMATIC WIN. The UAF Geneva delegation successfully retained operational freedom by rejecting limits on the Armed Forces and preventing amnesty for Russian war criminals (241806Z, 241810Z). This significantly reduces the risk of strategic political paralysis during the imminent kinetic threat window. SETBACKS: Confirmed kinetic strikes on residential areas in Odesa. Critical operational gap remains at Pokrovsk due to assumed loss of Plan 7-B MOD. Internal IO vulnerability due to mobilization of former official implicated in corruption (Serhiy Haidai, 241801Z).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints (JUDGMENT)

REQUIREMENT: Personnel Reinforcement Prioritization. Critical need to address reported HR allocation issues to ensure frontline brigades receive necessary replenishment (Sternenko Report). Immediate need for PR teams to locate high-value EW/C2 personnel from 7-B MOD. CONSTRAINT: High-value interceptor depletion continues. Human capital allocation remains sub-optimal due to non-meritocratic systems.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (JUDGMENT)

RF IO is actively working to consolidate internal support (Kadyrov, Uryupin appointments) while simultaneously maintaining pressure on the global diplomatic front via sustained kinetic action (Odesa). The core RF narrative—that Kyiv is rigid—is severely undermined by the successful UAF negotiation in Geneva. RF continues to use proxies (Trump/Xi dialogue) to attempt to inject instability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors (JUDGMENT)

Public sentiment in the South is under pressure due to infrastructure damage and residential strikes. However, the successful UAF diplomatic stand (No limits/No amnesty) provides a key strategic morale counterpoint, reinforcing the justification for continued defense.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments (FACT)

The UAF diplomatic effort appears highly effective. The report that the "Trump deadline" is now "not relevant" (241817Z) because of the UAF’s constructive negotiation stance indicates a temporary stabilization of the strategic support environment, allowing for clearer military decision-making regarding the ballistic strike response. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4 Hours (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Terminal AD Saturation: UAV pressure will continue or intensify until 2200Z across the South and Central sectors to fix and deplete remaining UAF strategic interceptor reserves.
2. Ballistic Launch Preparation: Final targeting and launch sequence initiation for the NLT 240000Z strategic strike, focused on primary and secondary C2 nodes (Dnipropetrovsk/Zaporizhzhia) to achieve strategic decapitation.
3. Tactical Exploitation (Pokrovsk): RF 40th/155th OMBR will initiate immediate, low-level probing and spoiling attacks along the M-30/T-05-15 GLOC to confirm the inability of UAF to reinforce Rodynske.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 12 Hours (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

RF successful destruction of the primary UAF J-FIRE coordination center, coupled with the exploitation of the Pokrovsk GLOC vacuum by RF ground elements, leading to a coordinated RF advance that encircles or seizes Rodynske. The key risk is simultaneous kinetic paralysis and tactical exploitation.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points (CRITICAL STATUS)

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. OPERATIONAL (J3/J5): POKROVSK CONTINGENCY AND FORCE POSTURE.

   • Action: Immediately dedicate all available long-range artillery and HIMARS assets in the Pokrovsk sector to counter-mobility missions along the M-30/T-05-15 corridor, preparing to interdict RF SpN/OMBR probing elements.
   • Action: Initiate high-priority personnel recovery (PR) missions for 7-B MOD assets immediately, using light, rapidly deployable teams, focused on EW system recovery.
   • Rationale: Preventing RF confirmation of 7-B MOD's total loss, even if only through aggressive counter-fire, can delay or disrupt RF tactical exploitation.

2. FORCE GENERATION / HR (J1): ADDRESS PERSONNEL ALLOCATION CRISIS.

   • Action: General Staff must issue immediate guidance to ensure personnel replenishment priority is given to combat-depleted brigades (as highlighted by Sternenko's reporting), overriding non-meritocratic assignment systems until the operational crisis passes.
   • Action: Develop a controlled IO message addressing the Haidai mobilization event to mitigate the internal risk of corruption perception undermining military morale.
   • Rationale: Internal HR mismanagement poses a critical risk to combat effectiveness, particularly in high-attrition sectors like Pokrovsk.

3. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS (STRATCOM / MFA): LEVERAGE DIPLOMATIC VICTORY.

   • Action: STRATCOM must immediately shift the narrative to leverage the diplomatic success in Geneva. NLT 241900Z, release statements confirming that the UAF secured terms preventing military limitations and war criminal amnesty, juxtaposing this resolution with the RF’s desperate, criminal escalation (Odesa residential strikes).
   • Action: Use this messaging to forcefully declare that the imminent ballistic strike is an act of diplomatic failure and military impotence, not a justified response, thereby neutralizing the strategic threat of international paralysis.
   • Rationale: The diplomatic success must be translated into operational morale and strategic political immunity before the ballistic strike occurs.