Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 240430Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 240400Z NOV 25 – 240800Z NOV 25 (CRITICAL C2 WINDOW) OPERATIONAL AREA: POKROVSK AXIS (C2 ATTACK PHASE) OVERALL THREATCON: CAT-2 (C2 FRAGMENTATION RISK: EXTREME)

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-SUM)

The battlefield remains dominated by the Russian Federation (RF) Electronic Warfare (EW) and Strategic Information Operations (SIOP) attack, designed to achieve Command and Control (C2) paralysis during the execution of UAF Plan 7-B MOD dispersal. RF ground forces (40th/155th OMBR) are transitioning from reconnaissance (RECCE) preparation to tactical probing, leveraging the perceived vacuum created by spectral pressure.

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Pokrovsk Axis: Primary focus remains the spectral battle over the M-30/T-05-15 Ground Line of Communication (GLOC). Physical interdiction at Rodynske is the RF kinetic objective following successful C2 fragmentation.
• Zaporizhzhia/Novozaporizhzhia: Confirmed low-level fighting and RF minor advances, supported by TASS reports aiming to inflate tactical successes and fix UAF attention away from the Pokrovsk axis.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, stable weather persists, favoring high-altitude RF Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) assets and ensuring optimal propagation for high-power EW jamming systems (CRITICAL GAP 2). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF: EW assets are confirmed active at high power. RF Ministry of Defense (MOD) and affiliated channels are synchronizing operational reporting (93 UAV intercepts) with the ongoing pressure to maximize the cognitive effect. UAF (Plan 7-B MOD): Dispersed forces are currently in the most vulnerable phase, attempting to maintain integrity of the Initial Defense Line (IDL) while under active denial of communications.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capability: The RF has demonstrated capability to simultaneously execute high-volume EW jamming, high-level strategic disinformation (Geneva/Political Chaos), and aggressive tactical RECCE/PSYOPS synchronization. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Intention (Next 4 Hours): Leverage the massed UAV interception claim (93 BPLAs) to internally and externally negate the psychological impact of previous UAF deep strikes (Kstovo) and create the conditions for a ground advance near Rodynske.

Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations: The massive, coordinated dissemination of the claim that 93 UAF UAVs were shot down overnight (TASS, MOD, ASTRA, Pro-RF channels 0408Z-0420Z) indicates a defensive information operation designed to address the effectiveness of UAF deep strike capability (e.g., Kstovo strikes noted in previous reports). This is not just propaganda; it is an active effort to restore RF morale and counter the UAF narrative. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Logistics and Sustainment Status

No new indicators of large-scale RF logistical failures. Tactical logistics for forward RECCE elements remain robust. RF Air Defense (AD) posture is being overtly highlighted through IO (93 intercepts) to deter further UAF deep strikes. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

2.3. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 shows high effectiveness in coordinating across the kinetic, EW, and cognitive domains. The primary mission of RF C2 is to maintain this synchronization until UAF Plan 7-B MOD C2 fragments. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: Defensive consolidation remains the imperative. The C2 environment is the primary combat space. Readiness depends on decentralized leadership's ability to operate under Mission Command doctrine while maintaining strict EMCON Level 2 protocols.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

SETBACK (Cognitive Domain): The RF's mass media push regarding the successful interception of 93 UAVs (fact unverifiable, but high-volume distribution) works to psychologically neutralize the positive effects of previous UAF deep strikes on global perception and domestic morale.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate, high-level denial and counter-IO regarding the RF UAV claim (93 BPLAs) to maintain the narrative of UAF initiative in deep operations. CONSTRAINT: Real-time feedback on C2 fragmentation status (CRITICAL GAP 1) remains severely limited by the necessity of EMCON adherence.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

The RF SIOP is operating on two synchronized levels (DS Belief: 0.429 - Disinformation):

• Strategic Vector: TASS is amplifying political destabilization narratives targeting Western cohesion (Durov/Kirk/France claims, 0419Z). This is designed to sow deep mistrust among international partners and confirm the perceived chaos supporting the "Geneva Peace Framework" narrative.
• Operational/Tactical Vector: The saturation reporting of 93 successful UAV intercepts (0408Z-0420Z) is an immediate, high-priority counter-IO effort aimed at demonstrating RF resilience and deterring future UAF deep strikes.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

RF domestic morale is being boosted by official claims of successful defense against UAF strikes. UAF tactical morale, particularly on the Pokrovsk Axis, is susceptible to localized RF PSYOPS broadcasts and the amplified narratives of strategic failure.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The RF's utilization of political conspiracy theories (TASS, 0419Z) demonstrates a concerted effort to shift international media focus from the Pokrovsk offensive to internal Western political friction, degrading the diplomatic support structure.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4 Hours (240430Z - 240830Z)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. C2 Decapitation Attempt: RF EW assets will continue maximum effort jamming. Any UAF unit that breaks EMCON protocol or shows an exploitable SIGINT signature will be immediately targeted by precision fires guided by UAVs/ISR, attempting to neutralize tactical command nodes of Plan 7-B MOD.
2. Immediate RECCE Follow-Up: RF forward elements (40th/155th OMBR) will increase the aggressiveness of their RECCE probes along the M-30, utilizing the expected C2 confusion to rapidly identify gaps in the unformed IDL.
3. IO Sustainment: RF state media will continue to amplify the successful UAV intercept narrative and strategic political instability themes to sustain cognitive pressure during the kinetic push.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 12 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF EW successfully isolates Battalion-level UAF command nodes (Plan 7-B MOD). Decentralized Mission Command fails due to aggressive, tailored RF PSYOPS broadcasts leveraging the strategic uncertainty (Geneva IO). RF Spetsnaz/light motorized forces achieve penetration through the Pokrovsk IDL (likely bypassing Rodynske defenses) due to non-coordinated UAF defensive fire, leading to the immediate collapse of the sector and exposure of operational reserves.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points (CRITICAL STATUS)

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

The tactical imperative is C2 survival and denial of RF ground exploitation, coupled with immediate neutralization of RF PSYOPS effectiveness.

1. C2 AND EW DEFENSE (J6 / J3): ENSURE MISSION COMMAND ACTIVATION.

   • Action: Disseminate a flash message via all secure, limited-emission channels (LPI/LPD) confirming that the Decentralized C2 Loss Protocol is now in effect for all Plan 7-B MOD elements. Command must prioritize the destruction of detected RF Direction Finding (DF) arrays.
   • Rationale: Mitigate the MDCOA of coordinated operational failure by institutionalizing decentralized initiative.

2. COUNTER-ISR / COUNTER-RECCE (J2 / J3): MAXIMUM INTERDICTION.

   • Action: Authorize immediate expenditure of MANPADS/Short-Range Air Defense (SHORAD) against all identified RF ISR assets (Orlan/ZALA) over the Pokrovsk M-30 corridor. RF RECCE UAVs are now the highest priority kinetic target in the sector.
   • Rationale: Break the kill chain synchronization between RF EW/SIGINT and RF artillery/maneuver forces.

3. STRATEGIC IO / COUNTER-NARRATIVE (STRATCOM): NEUTRALIZE RF MORALE BOOST.

   • Action: Immediately issue a coordinated official statement refuting the "93 UAVs shot down" claim. STRATCOM must pivot the narrative, framing the claim as gross RF exaggeration required to mask confirmed UAF deep strike successes (Kstovo) and boost internal RF military morale during the Pokrovsk C2 attack.
   • Rationale: Counter the cognitive effect designed to inflate RF confidence and demoralize UAF forces regarding the effectiveness of their offensive capabilities.

4. AIR DEFENSE RE-TASKING (AIR FORCE / J-3): PROTECT C2 INFRASTRUCTURE.

   • Action: Confirmed the likely abortion/delay of the predicted massed ballistic strike (NLT 240000Z). Continue the re-tasking of high-value Patriot/SAMP-T interceptors to prioritize the defense of fixed J-FIRE nodes and deep rear C2 hubs against high-subsonic/supersonic cruise missile threats (Kh-101/Kalibr), which are the logical kinetic cover for ongoing EW operations.
   • Rationale: Shift AD posture from a past threat (ballistic) to the current immediate threat (cruise/CAS) targeting fixed C2/Fires nodes.

//END SITREP//