Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - POST-KINETIC STRIKE ASSESSMENT

DTG: 230700Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 230530Z NOV 25 – 230700Z NOV 25 PREPARED FOR: J2/J3 Operations Center

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational environment is characterized by kinetic and cognitive shock. RF objectives are focused on rapidly exploiting the damage inflicted by the FAB-3000 strike in the Mirnohrad area to secure operational control over the M-30 Ground Line of Communication (GLOC) axis near Pokrovsk. Secondary kinetic operations continue across the deep rear.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear conditions persist, favoring sustained RF air superiority operations (both VKS fixed-wing CAS and tactical/logistical UAVs).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF DISPOSITIONS: RF forces are exhibiting high synchronization between heavy air power (FAB strikes/CAS) and ground exploitation forces (OMBR). They are prioritizing the destruction of high-value UAF reserve staging areas and C2 nodes over traditional attrition fights. UAF CONTROL MEASURES: Immediate, decentralized C2 dispersal is the highest priority. Static C2 nodes must be assumed compromised/targeted. Immediate counter-mobility measures are required against RF ground exploitation forces attempting to consolidate west of the M-30.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capability: RF has confirmed the ability to deliver massive kinetic payloads (FAB-3000) at operational depth, synchronized with likely strategic missile strikes (as previously forecast). The intent is to overwhelm UAF command response capacity. Strategic Intent (Long Term): Analysis of new geopolitical intelligence (Dempster-Shafer data on Central Asia) suggests that Russia is experiencing pressure points regarding its long-term regional influence (e.g., Kyrgyz WGS 84 adoption, Kazakh nuclear shifts). This perception of geopolitical erosion may intensify RF motivation to achieve a decisive military outcome in Ukraine, validating the current use of overwhelming, escalatory force. Hybrid Intent: RF continues its highly coordinated Information Operations (IO) campaign to maximize the political impact of kinetic strikes. This includes:

1. Amplifying alleged UAF war crimes (Kuypansk video) to undermine moral legitimacy.
2. Attacking Western support (Boris Johnson IO).
3. Targeting internal political cohesion (Trump peace plan narrative).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The use of heavy, mass-effect FABs directly linked to ground force exploitation is the key adaptation. This allows RF to punch through prepared defenses quickly, shortening the operational timeline and placing extreme stress on UAF reserve mobilization and C2 integrity.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF sustainment relies heavily on VKS air cover and Slon heavy-lift UAV systems to maintain high combat tempo in the penetration zone. Strategic readiness remains high (2652nd GRAU activity confirmed previously).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is demonstrating highly effective, synchronous planning across strategic (missile/IO), operational (FAB targeting), and tactical (OMBR exploitation, FPV usage) domains.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: UAF defensive posture at Pokrovsk is in a crisis state, requiring rapid stabilization. The loss of staging area sanctuary necessitates immediate dispersion of reserves and rapid deployment of mobile C2 units. READINESS: AD Allocation Dilemma: The confirmed drone activity near Pavlohrad (0158Z) reinforces the acute resource constraint: high-value AD assets must be maintained over strategic C2/energy centers against deep strikes, while tactical assets are desperately needed at Pokrovsk to deny RF fixed-wing CAS (the source of the FAB threat).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Setback: The confirmed massive kinetic strike on Mirnohrad is the most critical immediate setback, compromising UAF counter-penetration staging areas (Plan 7-A). Success: UAF AD demonstrated success against drone saturation (Kharkiv/Kyiv axis reported in RF IO, 1415Z), indicating local resilience, though high-value AD remains strained.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate, layered Tactical AD/EW deployment to the Pokrovsk-Mirnohrad axis to create a fixed-wing denial zone (preventing follow-on FAB strikes). This must be prioritized over general air defense coverage in the operational rear. CONSTRAINT: The intelligence gap regarding Task Force Raven (TFR) status (C/E/M) remains a critical constraint on coordinating an effective counter-penetration operation (Plan 7-A).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO output remains at surge level, employing geopolitical distraction (Africa/Caucasus/Central Asia reports) to minimize international focus on the escalation in Ukraine.

• Key IO Vectors: RF is attempting to use graphic narratives of alleged UAF atrocities (Kuypansk) to undermine Western support and increase internal pressure on UAF leadership.
• Counter-IO Success: The statement by Boris Johnson (0159Z) denouncing the proposed US "peace plan" as "complete capitulation" serves as a critical, high-profile counter-narrative, affirming key Western political rejection of Russian territorial demands. UAF STRATCOM must immediately amplify this message.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

RF aims to drive demoralization by demonstrating overwhelming kinetic capacity and amplifying internal political fracture (e.g., mocking Verkhovna Rada/Trump plan rejection).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF continues to use IO outlets to frame Western diplomatic engagement (e.g., US/Azerbaijan tech, EU/Georgia pressure) as interference, seeking to consolidate support among allied/neutral states. The Johnson statement is the most immediate positive diplomatic development for UAF stability.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 6 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Ground Exploitation and Consolidation: RF 40th/155th OMBR will exploit the physical damage and C2 disruption in the Mirnohrad area, pushing forward to secure tactical control over the M-30 GLOC junction and denying UAF access for counter-maneuver.
2. Sustained Tactical Air Suppression: VKS fixed-wing sorties will continue at high frequency, prioritizing follow-on heavy ordnance strikes (FAB-500/1500) against dispersed UAF staging areas or identified reserve movement attempting to execute Plan 7-A.
3. Hybrid Attack Follow-up: RF deep-cover assets will attempt a secondary hybrid/sabotage attack (e.g., targeting another TCC or logistical node in Odesa/Kyiv) to maintain internal pressure and compound the effects of the strategic kinetic strike.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 12 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

RF succeeds in preventing the coordinated implementation of UAF Plan 7-A fires and reserve maneuver due to combined strategic paralysis (C2 damage) and tactical shock (FAB aftermath). RF exploitation elements achieve a localized operational encirclement, potentially forcing a fighting withdrawal or surrender of critical UAF maneuver units west of Pokrovsk, severely compromising the entire defense of the Donbas operational area.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/Reserve Command: EXECUTE DISPERSED COUNTER-FIRES (CRITICAL ACTION).

   • Action: Proceed immediately with the activation of Plan 7-A reserve fires (NLT 230730Z), prioritizing artillery and MRLS against RF ground exploitation units (40th/155th OMBR). Decouple fire authorization from centralized C2 if connectivity is compromised due to strategic strikes. All C2 must operate under hardened, dispersed protocols.
   • Rationale: Preventing RF from consolidating the breach is paramount. Immediate, aggressive fire prevents the OMBR from exploiting the temporary paralysis caused by the air strike.

2. Air Force/AD Command: SURGE TACTICAL AD TO POKROVSK (URGENT).

   • Action: Immediately task and deploy all available short-range tactical air defense systems (MANPADS/Gepard/Avenger) to establish a denial zone against RF fixed-wing CAS in the Pokrovsk-Mirnohrad sector. Accept increased risk to secondary targets to mitigate the catastrophic operational risk posed by further FAB strikes.
   • Rationale: The threat has shifted from mass missile saturation (which high-tier AD is mitigating) to localized, massive air ordnance (FABs) which tactical AD must suppress.

3. STRATCOM/J2: AMPLIFY COUNTER-NARRATIVES (HIGH PRIORITY).

   • Action: Leverage the Boris Johnson statement ("complete capitulation") to strongly rebut RF narratives of imminent Western withdrawal or territorial compromise (Trump Peace Plan IO). Simultaneously, prepare to preemptively counter anticipated RF IO amplifying internal political friction following the strategic strike.
   • Rationale: Maintaining domestic and international political confidence is essential to preventing the MDCOA of strategic collapse driven by internal political fracture.

//END SITREP//