Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS UPDATE

DTG: 230530Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 230430Z NOV 25 – 230530Z NOV 25 PREPARED FOR: J2/J3 Operations Center

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The RF operational objective has escalated from mere interdiction to kinetic destruction of UAF rear area strongpoints along the penetration axis. The city of Mirnohrad, which provides defensive depth west of Pokrovsk and protects the critical M-30 GLOC, has sustained a massive kinetic strike (FAB-3000M54 confirmed). This confirms RF is willing to expend high-value air assets and heavy ordnance to ensure the GLOC remains functionally severed.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, stable conditions persist, highly favorable for RF fixed-wing CAS (enabling high-altitude FAB delivery) and continued heavy-lift UAV (Slon) operations supporting forward elements.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF DISPOSITIONS: RF exploitation elements (40th/155th OMBR) are supported by high-tempo air sorties, prioritizing destruction over traditional ground attrition. The successful FAB-3000 strike indicates the RF Air Force (VKS) is fully integrated into the operational-tactical plan to secure the penetration zone. UAF CONTROL MEASURES: UAF assets must assume that any established C2 or high-value infrastructure within 10km of the Pokrovsk penetration zone is now vulnerable to mass-effect ordnance. The need for immediate dispersal and hardened positions is paramount.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capability Confirmation: FAB-3000 Usage The confirmed use of the FAB-3000M54 (a 3-ton high-explosive ordnance) against Mirnohrad demonstrates RF capacity for massive kinetic destruction at the operational depth.

• Tactical Intent: Achieve rapid, localized operational collapse in the Mirnohrad area, targeting UAF formations that were likely attempting to stage a counter-penetration operation (Plan 7-A staging areas).
• Strategic Intent: The overall strategic objective remains unchanged: Paralysis by Coordinated Kinetic and Cognitive Shock. The imminent missile strike (C2/Energy) is now reinforced by overwhelming tactical destruction (M-30/Mirnohrad).
• Long-Term Intent: New IO data (Trutnev, Arctic) confirms RF is integrating military-patriotic mobilization into state policy, signaling preparation for a prolonged conflict and multi-year sustainment effort. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary tactical adaptation is the integration of heavy, unguided/semi-guided air ordnance (FAB-3000) directly into the tactical ground exploitation phase. This adaptation seeks to bypass local UAF artillery dominance and defeat hardened defenses quickly, reducing the time window for UAF reserve mobilization. The high frequency of VKS reporting (Aviahub) suggests high sortie rates are being sustained.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics are supported by effective tactical air power (FABs, high sortie rates) and the confirmed resilience provided by the Slon heavy-lift UAVs at the immediate point of contact. Strategic sustainment is robust, evidenced by the 2652nd GRAU readiness and the new IO focus on internal political/economic cleanup (arrest videos) which enhances long-term efficiency.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains highly effective, demonstrating synchronous planning across air, ground (40th/155th OMBR), logistics (Slon), and the strategic IO campaign.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: UAF defense in the Pokrovsk sector is extremely vulnerable. The Mirnohrad strike confirms the loss of operational sanctuary in the immediate rear. Immediate measures are required to protect mobile C2 and reserve staging areas from similar air strikes. READINESS: Air Defense Coverage: The need to protect C2 nodes against the imminent strategic missile salvo conflicts directly with the need to protect the Pokrovsk operational area against sustained VKS heavy ordnance strikes (FABs). This presents an acute AD resource allocation dilemma.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

The successful deep strike on Slavyansk-na-Kubani remains a positive operational effect. However, the catastrophic kinetic strike on Mirnohrad and the persistent loss of C2 integrity regarding Task Force Raven (TFR) are critical immediate setbacks.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate Tactical AD/EW Reinforcement at Pokrovsk. While strategic AD focuses on missile defense (Kyiv/Dnipro), tactical AD (short-range SAMs, man-portable air-defense systems, and aggressive EW against UAV pathfinding) must be redirected to the Mirnohrad-Pokrovsk axis to suppress FAB-delivery aircraft and Slon logistics. CONSTRAINT: The limited availability of hardened shelters and the time required to disperse existing forward operational C2 centers dramatically increase vulnerability to heavy kinetic strikes.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF Information Operations (IO) have entered the Coercive Escalation Phase, designed to justify massive kinetic strikes and undermine UAF command resilience prior to the strategic salvo.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

RF IO is highly calibrated to maximize demoralization within UAF military and political circles by demonstrating superior, coordinated kinetic force and highlighting internal political divisions.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The persistent use of IO to distract via global crises (e.g., extensive Rybar MENA/Syria/Gaza coverage) aims to draw international attention away from the imminent strategic escalation in Ukraine, minimizing the diplomatic response to the mass strike.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 6 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Strategic Kinetic Strike (NLT 230645Z): Full missile salvo launch targeting UAF C2 nodes (Kyiv/Dnipro) and energy infrastructure, aiming to induce system failure simultaneous with tactical crisis.
2. M-30 Denial Consolidation: RF 40th/155th OMBR, supported by Slon UAV logistics, will exploit the destruction wrought by the FAB-3000 strike on Mirnohrad, moving to secure the immediate west side of the M-30 GLOC, preventing any UAF counter-maneuver.
3. VKS Sustained Pressure: RF fixed-wing assets will maintain high sortie rates, prepared to deliver follow-on heavy ordnance strikes (FAB-500/1500/3000) on any identified UAF reserve movement or fire preparation positions (Plan 7-A staging).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 12 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

RF achieves effective strategic paralysis by degrading C2 integrity via the missile strike, combined with successful IO amplifying internal political friction. The resulting confusion prevents UAF from authorizing or effectively coordinating pre-planned reserve fires (Plan 7-A) and counter-penetration maneuvers. RF exploitation elements, now benefiting from the kinetic destruction in Mirnohrad, execute a localized operational encirclement of vulnerable UAF units at Pokrovsk before relief forces can arrive, forcing a localized but strategically significant surrender.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/Reserve Command: IMMEDIATE DISPERSAL AND FIRE SUPPORT (CRITICAL ACTION).

   • Action: Immediate execution of Plan 7-A reserve fires (NLT 230545Z). Simultaneously, disperse all tactical C2 and reserve staging areas near Mirnohrad. No large UAF formation or static C2 center should remain in place following the FAB-3000 strike confirmation. Redirect counter-battery assets to target RF forward air control (FAC) parties and launch sites for tactical drones.
   • Rationale: The FAB-3000 confirms that static concentration is a failure condition. Dispersal mitigates future massive ordnance casualties while Plan 7-A must proceed to destabilize the RF ground exploitation forces.

2. Air Force/AD Command: DUAL AD ALLOCATION (URGENT).

   • Action: Maintain allocation of high-tier interceptors (Patriot/SAMP-T) for C2 hub protection against the imminent strategic strike (MLCOA). Simultaneously, immediately surge short-range tactical air defense systems (MANPADS/Gepard/Avenger equivalents) into the Pokrovsk/Mirnohrad sector with the sole mission of denying RF fixed-wing CAS access to the forward area.
   • Rationale: Preventing the next FAB strike is essential to stabilizing the tactical line; preserving strategic C2 integrity prevents MDCOA. Both are required concurrently.

3. J2/EW Command: DEDICATED COUNTER-SLON EW EFFORT (CRITICAL PRIORITY).

   • Action: Dedicate EW assets (CR HIGH (3)) to suppressing the Slon heavy-lift UAV logistics network. Confirmation of FAB-3000 use means RF ground forces are now heavily reliant on Slon to maintain combat tempo after the air strikes. Neutralizing Slon will immediately degrade the 40th/155th OMBR exploitation capability.
   • Rationale: The Slon is the short-term logistical link between RF tactical success and air superiority. Severing this link is the most efficient method to halt RF momentum at the GLOC.

//END SITREP//