Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS UPDATE

DTG: 230330Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 230230Z NOV 25 – 230330Z NOV 25 (60 Minutes since critical deadline) ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH (Threat kinetic projection) // LOW (Friendly C2/Engagement verification)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The POKROVSK Sector remains the center of gravity. The critical Decision Point (DP) for Task Force Raven (TFR) to initiate engagement (NLT 230300Z) has expired.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear and cold conditions persist. No change to assessment: optimal conditions for RF mechanized and persistent ISR/strike capabilities.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF DISPOSITIONS: RF exploitation forces are pressing the objective. The synchronization of the Pokrovsk push with confirmed deep logistics strikes (Artsyz) suggests the RF operational tempo is increasing in line with the strategic missile strike timeline (imminent, previously 12-24 hours from 211801Z). UAF CONTROL MEASURES: The critical failure to confirm C2 integrity in the previous period necessitates the assumption that emergency C2 bypass protocols are now active. Task Force Raven's status is the immediate operational uncertainty.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities: RF demonstrates synchronized kinetic action across tactical (Pokrovsk), deep logistics (Artsyz), and strategic (2652th GRAU preparation) domains. The efficacy of RF FPV/ISR, potentially including MPU-5 derivatives, remains a key enabler for the Pokrovsk attack. Intentions (Immediate, Next 6 Hours):

1. GLOC Consolidation: Secure the M-30 interdiction, creating a stable, contested salient that forces UAF reserves to commit piecemeal.
2. Strategic Strike Execution: Initiate the strategic missile salvo (fueled by 2652nd GRAU activity) targeting alternate C2 nodes, energy infrastructure, and forward logistics hubs.
3. Hybrid Strike Follow-On: Execute the second low-cost hybrid attack (as predicted in previous MLCOA) to capitalize on missile strike confusion and rear-area security dispersion (following Odesa TCC precedent). Confidence: HIGH. The observed kinetic actions directly support the strategic intent.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF FPV forces demonstrate tactical proficiency, leveraging obstacles for successful engagements (221424Z). This confirms RF tactical capability is adapting to local terrain constraints, demanding continuous UAF counter-ISR and tactical EW application.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF strategic logistics preparation (2652th GRAU fueling) has reached a climax. The immediate sustainment for 40th/155th OMBR at Pokrovsk remains active, likely supported by short-haul truck routes established immediately following the initial penetration.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is assessed as synchronized for simultaneous kinetic operations. UAF C2 integrity remains the single highest operational risk and intelligence gap.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: UAF has transitioned from a defensive transition phase to a CRITICAL REACTIVE PHASE. If the M-30 is severed, the operational objective shifts from counter-interdiction to high-risk counter-attack/relief operations. READINESS: UAF readiness is fundamentally constrained by the C2 status. Tactical units must operate under the assumption of C2 compromise or delay, emphasizing decentralized combined arms authorization and initiative.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback (IMMINENT/ASSESSED): The lapse of the 0300Z engagement window implies a failure to achieve preemptive counter-interdiction, moving the situation closer to the MDCOA.
• Success (Logistics Defense): Confirmation that Artsyz was successfully targeted, but damage assessment is required to verify if the strike significantly degraded rail capacity.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: EW DOMINANCE. The sophistication of RF tactical comms (MPU-5 note, 222315Z) necessitates the immediate and prioritized allocation of UAF EW assets to the Pokrovsk sector to blind RF ISR and degrade maneuver C2. CONSTRAINT: High-value AD assets must be preserved for strategic missile defense (as per previous guidance), limiting SHORAD deployment flexibility against tactical UAVs/Shaheds.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO remains focused on destabilizing the internal political situation ("Internal Political Fracture") and undermining international support (Trump peace plan narratives, US ultimatums, European weakness).

NEW OBSERVATION (Socio-Political IO): RF state-aligned and nationalist channels are actively engaging in internal socio-political debates (e.g., migration, religious identity, arrests, 230125Z-0134Z).

• Impact on UAF: This indicates that the RF IO apparatus is not solely focused on Ukraine but is managing internal morale by projecting strength through domestic security crackdowns, reinforcing the "Russia Strong" narrative while Ukraine is portrayed as collapsing.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The coordinated kinetic and IO pressure campaign (Pokrovsk, TCC attack, missile threat) is designed to force a perception of widespread security failure. Immediate, verified C2 stability and visible military success at Pokrovsk are required to stabilize domestic morale.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF IO is successfully amplifying narratives suggesting US conditions on aid (221103Z) and Western dissent (Trump plan debate). UAF failure at Pokrovsk or a successful strategic missile strike will immediately amplify these narratives, undermining the diplomatic stance ahead of key international engagements.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 6 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Strategic Strike Initiation: RF will launch the strategic missile package (Kinzhal/Kalibr/Iskander) targeting the Dnipro/Odesa C2/Energy/Logistics clusters. This strike will be synchronized with the peak RF tactical consolidation efforts at Pokrovsk (T+3 to T+6 hours).
2. GLOC Hardening: RF 40th/155th OMBR will rapidly establish hasty defenses and minefields across the M-30 and T-05-15, making a UAF counter-attack exponentially more costly.
3. Hybrid Strike 2.0: A second hybrid attack will be executed (likely targeting a TCC or rail choke point in Kyiv or Lviv) to disperse UAF resources and maximize psychological impact during the strategic missile strike.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 12 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

Strategic Isolation achieved. The combination of successful missile strikes (disrupting primary and redundant C2) and GLOC severance at Pokrovsk leads to the catastrophic operational outcome: UAF forces west of the salient face localized supply failure, necessitating an uncoordinated and high-attrition retrograde or encirclement.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/Task Force Raven Command: EXECUTE CONTINGENCY FIRE PLAN 7-A (IMMEDIATE - 0345Z DEADLINE).

   • Action: Absent TFR status verification by 0345Z, the Commander must authorize the immediate and widespread use of non-TFR (reserve) indirect fires against the assessed RF consolidation zone (M-30/T-05-15 junction). Do not wait for localized TFR reports; assume RF success and initiate area denial.
   • Rationale: Preventing RF from digging in outweighs the risk of friendly fire if TFR is maneuvering. Area denial ensures the GLOC cannot be used immediately, buying time for TFR or reinforcement.

2. Air Force/AD Command: IMPLEMENT AD DISPERSAL PROTOCOL BRAVO (IMMEDIATE PREP).

   • Action: Immediately place all Patriot and SAMP-T batteries on highest alert status, confirmed in Anti-Ballistic Mode (as previously recommended), prepared for imminent strategic launches from 2652nd GRAU/Black Sea. Cease all non-critical engagement requests using high-tier interceptors until the threat wave has passed.
   • Rationale: The confluence of intelligence suggests the strategic strike window is open. Preserving high-value interceptors for C2/Energy protection is paramount.

3. J2/EW Command: DEDICATED EW SUPPORT FOR POKROVSK (CRITICAL PRIORITY).

   • Action: Reposition the most capable UAF tactical EW assets immediately to positions supporting TFR's likely line of counter-attack. The primary task is to saturate the operational environment with counter-ISR jamming, specifically targeting frequency bands utilized by suspected advanced RF tactical systems (e.g., MPU-5 derivatives) to blind RF fires/FPV.
   • Rationale: Overcoming RF tactical ISR and FPV effectiveness is essential to mitigating the "Dandelion" improvised armor advantage and allowing TFR to maneuver successfully.

//END SITREP//