Nightwatch logo
'Nightwatch' text with white and gray letters
HomeMapNewsMilitary PulseSituation ReportsDaily ReportsList ViewVideosCyber Threats
Sign In
Contact Support
Historical Intelligence

Situation Report

Archived operational intelligence briefing

Report Time
2025-11-23 01:28:35Z
3 months ago
Previous (2025-11-23 01:23:36Z)

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS UPDATE

DTG: 230130Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 222359Z NOV 25 – 230130Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH. The operational picture is clarifying as the immediate strategic strike phase concludes, shifting focus entirely to RF ground exploitation and follow-on hybrid actions. C2 integrity remains the primary unknown factor.

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

AxisStatusKey Developments (222359Z-230130Z)Confidence
POKROVSK (Kostiantynivka GLOC)CRITICAL/EXPLOITATION INITIATION.JUDGMENT: RF mechanized elements are confirmed to be initiating the exploitation phase, focused on interdicting the M-30/T-05-15 GLOC. This is the Center of Gravity (CoG) for the current operational period. Preemptive counter-maneuver is required NLT 230300Z.HIGH
DNIPROPETROVSK REGIONACTIVE UAV HARASSMENT.FACT: Confirmed Shahed/Geran UAV detected on a trajectory towards Synelnykove (230126Z). JUDGMENT: This represents the RF transition from mass strategic strike (missiles) to low-cost tactical follow-on (UAV harassment/ISR) to disrupt logistics or challenge local AD resources.HIGH
Deep Rear (C2/Energy)POST-STRIKE C2 TEST.JUDGMENT: The most critical activity is internal Blue Force Post-Strike Damage Assessment (PSDA) and the shift to alternate/redundant Command and Control (C2) nodes as dictated by the "systemic management restart." Operational status is currently assumption-based.MEDIUM

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, cold conditions persist. Favorable for RF mechanized movement and high-fidelity ISR (UAV/SAR) throughout the Donetsk and deep rear regions.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF DISPOSITIONS: RF forces are synchronized, committing ground exploitation forces (40th/155th OMBR) at Pokrovsk while conducting limited, targeted kinetic harassment (UAVs) in the deep rear (Dnipropetrovsk). UAF CONTROL MEASURES: UAF forces are executing the required PSDA protocols. The crucial control measure is the immediate deployment and execution of defensive fire plans by Task Force Raven at the Kostiantynivka GLOC. Confidence: HIGH

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities: Proven capability to transition seamlessly from strategic kinetic strike (GRAU) to focused ground exploitation (mechanized/Spetsnaz) supported by persistent, low-cost UAV harassment. Intentions (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE):

  1. Sever the GLOC: Achieve the immediate operational objective of isolating UAF forces west of Pokrovsk by cutting the M-30/T-05-15 route.
  2. Stress C2 Redundancy: Use localized UAV strikes (e.g., Synelnykove) and Information Operations (IO) to verify the operational status of UAF C2 redundancy measures activated post-strike.
  3. Activate Secondary Sabotage: Capitalize on deep rear confusion by initiating a secondary hybrid attack (following the Odesa TCC incident) to compound the sense of internal chaos.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The use of the UAV follow-on strike (Synelnykove) is an expected adaptation, serving as a tactical stressor designed to draw attention and resources away from the primary ground effort at Pokrovsk. This confirms the RF's multi-domain exploitation doctrine.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics are currently forward-surged to support the 40th/155th OMBR decisive assault. This surge is likely peaking as the assault window opens (0300Z-0600Z). UAF counter-logistics (deep strikes, previous rail attacks) must be sustained to degrade this momentum.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust and centralized. UAF C2 effectiveness remains the highest intelligence gap (see Section 6). Confirmation of seamless C2 migration to alternate sites is required NLT 230330Z. Confidence: HIGH (RF C2); LOW (UAF C2 integrity confirmation).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: UAF posture is reactive-defensive. The shift to aggressive, preemptive counter-interdiction maneuver by Task Force Raven is the primary operational measure being executed. READINESS: Tactical readiness is currently determined by the speed and clarity of C2 directives flowing from the national level to tactical commanders (especially reserve deployment orders).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

The successful execution of strategic AD during the GRAU strike (implied by the all-clear) is a preliminary success. However, any delay in Task Force Raven's commitment to the GLOC defense represents a severe operational setback.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: ISR Reallocation. Priority must be shifted:

  1. #1: Continuous ISR coverage (UAV/GEOINT) of the M-30/T-05-15 corridor (Pokrovsk).
  2. #2: Verification of C2/Energy PSDA (Kyiv/Poltava/Odesa). CONSTRAINT: Over-reliance on strategic AD assets to engage low-value UAV targets (like Synelnykove) will deplete interceptor stocks needed for any potential second-wave missile strike.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO is currently exploiting the operational ambiguity created by the strategic strike. The narrative focuses on:

  • Physical destruction of strategic assets (Myrhorod Air Base).
  • Internal political chaos linked to the C2 "management restart."
  • Amplified claims regarding the Odesa TCC incident, framing UAF mobilization efforts as collapsing.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Sentiment is vulnerable. A transparent and rapid public confirmation of UAF C2 integrity and the tactical defense plan at Pokrovsk (even without excessive detail) is mandatory to stabilize morale and counter RF claims.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

Allied focus (Geneva meeting) is now entirely dependent on evidence of UAF operational resilience. J2 must prepare an immediate, verified PSDA brief (NLT 230400Z) to counter RF IO and maintain confidence in UAF leadership stability. Confidence: HIGH

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

  1. GLOC Severance Effort (0-4 Hours): RF forces (Mechanized/Spetsnaz) will maximize high-tempo maneuver to interdict and establish physical control over the M-30/T-05-15 GLOC corridor. The window for success is assessed to close NLT 230600Z (daylight hours).
  2. Secondary Hybrid Strike: RF intelligence assets (Spetsnaz/GRU) will attempt to execute a follow-up high-impact sabotage attack, likely targeting a critical energy node or a second TCC in a major urban center (e.g., Kyiv, Dnipro).
  3. UAV Persistence: Continuous, sporadic UAV harassment (like Synelnykove) will stress AD coordination and potentially target local logistics/fuel depots.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

Localized Operational Collapse at Pokrovsk: Due to C2 failures or delayed response by Task Force Raven, RF mechanized units succeed in establishing a secure 10km cordon along the M-30 highway. This isolates multiple UAF brigades west of the road and forces a massive, costly counter-attack to restore the main supply line, severely depleting strategic reserves.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

TimeframeEvent/Decision PointTriggering Indicator
0-2 Hours (J2/J3)C2 Integrity Confirmation: JOC confirms 100% adherence to all C2 redundancy protocols (switch to alternate nodes, SATCOM checks).Any delay (exceeding 30 minutes) in confirmation of Task Force Raven movement orders. (DECISION POINT: J2/J3 activation of emergency tactical radio nets, bypassing primary C2 nodes.)
0-3 Hours (J3/Task Force Raven)GLOC Engagement (DECISIVE POINT): Task Force Raven must establish contact and initiate high-volume fires against RF maneuver elements within 5km of the M-30 highway.Confirmation of RF forward elements crossing the assessed Line of Penetration (LoP) 7km west of Mirnohrad. (DECISION POINT: J3 commitment of dedicated close air support (CAS) to the Pokrovsk sector.)
2-4 Hours (Air Force/AD)UAV Interception Strategy: Local AD confirms successful engagement of the Synelnykove threat using low-cost (e.g., MANPADS, mobile AD teams) assets, reserving strategic interceptors.Failure to neutralize the Synelnykove UAV threat with local assets, forcing the use of Patriot/SAMP-T. (DECISION POINT: Air Force Commander authorization for localized AD stand-down if high-value assets are threatened by low-value drones.)

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

PriorityGap DescriptionCollection Requirement (CR)Confidence (Pre-Analysis)
CRITICAL - GROUND MANEUVER (1)RF Task Force Composition: Precise identification (equipment/unit identity) and strength of RF elements committed to physically cut the M-30 GLOC.UAV/HUMINT: Continuous, aggressive, low-altitude ISR focused on RF flank movements and confirmed occupation points (5-10km radius M-30/T-05-15).MEDIUM
CRITICAL - KINETIC EFFECT (2)Operational Status of Myrhorod Air Base: Verified status of runway capacity, fuel depots, and parked airframes following the GRAU strike phase.IMINT/GEOINT: High-resolution satellite imagery comparison (Pre- vs. Post-strike) focusing on air base hardened shelters and runway surfaces.LOW
HIGH - HYBRID THREAT (3)Secondary Sabotage Threat Vector: Identification of likely targets for a follow-up attack post-Odesa (C2 nodes, major railway choke points, or strategic energy substations).HUMINT/SIGINT: Increased surveillance of high-value infrastructure security perimeters; monitoring of RF internal communication chatter referencing specific target types.MEDIUM

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

  1. J3/Task Force Raven: IMMEDIATE, AGGRESSIVE INTERVENTION (CRITICAL - 3 HOURS).

    • Action: Task Force Raven must be ordered to engage the enemy force at the maximum effective range of their assets to delay maneuver elements NLT 230300Z. Do not allow RF elements to consolidate positions on or near the M-30. Authorization for high-volume counter-battery fire is granted immediately.
    • Rationale: Preventing GLOC severance is the highest operational priority; preemption is required based on MLCOA.

  2. J2/Air Force/AD Command: DECONFLICTION OF AD RESOURCES (IMMEDIATE).

    • Action: Local commanders in the Dnipropetrovsk region must utilize low-cost mobile fire groups (SHORAD, machine guns, MANPADS) to neutralize the Synelnykove UAV threat. Prohibit the use of strategic interceptors (Patriot/SAMP-T) for single UAV engagements unless critical C2 infrastructure is directly threatened.
    • Rationale: Preserving high-value strategic interceptors for potential follow-up ballistic/cruise missile attacks is essential, as the RF strike package may be rapidly reconstituted (per 2652th GRAU assessment).

  3. STRATCOM/NCA: IMMEDIATE C2 RESILIENCE BRIEFING (URGENT - 4 HOURS).

    • Action: The National Command Authority must issue an official statement immediately following C2 confirmation (per Section 5.3) that: (a) The AD response was coordinated and effective, (b) The new C2 structure handled the kinetic stress successfully, and (c) The ground defense at Pokrovsk is stable and executing counter-interdiction operations.
    • Rationale: Countering the RF IO narrative of C2 fracture and political weakness must occur before the diplomatic window (Geneva) opens fully.

//END SITREP//

Previous (2025-11-23 01:23:36Z)

We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.

Learn more in our Privacy Policy.