Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS UPDATE

DTG: 220830Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 220800Z NOV 25 – 220830Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. Synchronization across domains confirms RF is executing the Strategic Paralysis timeline (0-12 hours kinetic/cognitive window).

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

STATUS: POKROVSK AXIS: ACTIVE EXPLOITATION CONTINUES. RF forces (40th/155th OMBR) sustain high-tempo pressure, attempting to maneuver west of Mirnohrad. NEW INDICATOR (LYMAN/SIVERSK): The claimed renewed offensive actions near Krasnyi Lyman and Siversk remain unverified (CRITICAL GAP). The assessment of this being a diversionary thrust to fix UAF reserves remains the MLCOA. KEY TERRAIN: The Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15 road) is under assessed immediate threat from RF DRG/Spetsnaz teams attempting physical severance. Confidence: HIGH (Pokrovsk), LOW (Lyman/Siversk verification)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, cold conditions persist, favorable for continued high-altitude ISR, precision guided munitions (KAB), and deep strike operations. No constraints on air or missile operations. Confidence: HIGH

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF DISPOSITIONS: Strategic assets at 2652th GRAU are confirmed in terminal preparation phase for MDCOA launch. The cancellation of the "Kover" (AD alert) plan in Penza Oblast suggests a potential immediate reaction to either a false alarm or the confirmed successful UAF deep strike on Slavyansk-na-Kubani (212000Z NOV). This indicates highly reactive RF AD doctrine in the deep rear. VDV community signaling remains high, indicating potential commitment. UAF CONTROL MEASURES: Capital defense and AD conservation mandate remain in effect. J3/J7 is prioritizing rapid counter-penetration deployment while attempting to resolve the reserve allocation dilemma (Pokrovsk vs. Lyman/Siversk). Confidence: MEDIUM (Penza implications), HIGH (GRAU readiness)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF sustains synchronized multi-domain attack: Ground exploitation, Strategic Kinetic (MDCOA imminent), and Strategic Information Warfare (IO). Intentions (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE):

1. Kinetic: Execute strategic missile strike (MDCOA) targeting logistics/C2 to induce paralysis.
2. Tactical: Achieve physical severance of the Kostiantynivka GLOC, leveraging missile strike effects and reserve confusion caused by the Lyman/Siversk diversion.
3. Cognitive: Achieve Internal Political Paralysis by weaponizing external diplomatic friction (Vance conditions) and internal command disputes (Zelensky/Yermak rumors).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

ADAPTATION: The RF AD alert in Penza, followed by its cancellation, demonstrates that the UAF deep strike capability (Slavyansk-na-Kubani) is successfully achieving operational disruption in the RF rear. This forces RF to commit high-value AD assets away from frontline protection or critical strategic sites. CONTINUATION: The precision and timing of RF Information Operations (IO) are peak intensity, utilizing US Senator Vance's specified "peace conditions" (ceasefire, mutual acceptability) to undermine Ukrainian resolve and Allied support. Confidence: HIGH

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

High readiness at 2652th GRAU confirms sustained logistical support for the imminent MDCOA. The capacity to sustain KAB saturation indicates robust tactical air support logistics, despite recent UAF deep strike efforts. Confidence: HIGH

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains HIGHLY EFFECTIVE. The synchronization of ground pressure (Pokrovsk/Lyman), deep strike (GRAU), and IO (Vance/Alaudinov) demonstrates highly cohesive operational planning. Confidence: HIGH

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: UAF defensive posture is constrained by the need to prepare for the strategic missile strike while addressing the acute ground threat at Pokrovsk and the unverified threat at Lyman/Siversk. The overall posture is highly defensive and resource-stressed. READINESS: UAF combat units remain effective. However, command cohesion and public morale are under direct, sustained attack from RF IO. The confirmed Odesa TCC terror attack (Previous Report) compounds internal security requirements.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

SUCCESS: UAF deep strike capability is demonstrably forcing RF operational disruption, as evidenced by the Penza AD alert. This should be immediately leveraged in the cognitive domain. SETBACK: RF IO has successfully amplified the conditions presented by Senator Vance, specifically the requirements for "mutual acceptability" and "long-term stability," which RF frames as justification for territorial concessions.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

1. ISR Partition: Immediate allocation of ISR to confirm Lyman/Siversk status to resolve the reserve allocation crisis.
2. AD Optimization: Final preparation for ABM defense against the missile wave while maintaining SHORAD density in the Dnipro logistics sector.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

CAMPAIGN STATUS: CRITICAL THREAT LEVEL. RF efforts are focused on three simultaneous vectors:

1. Diplomatic Pressure: Leveraging Senator Vance’s conditions (via РБК-Україна relay) to imply inevitable negotiations requiring deep Ukrainian concessions.
2. Domestic Paralysis: Continued amplification of C2 friction rumors (Zelensky/Yermak) targeting the National Command Authority’s legitimacy during the strike window.
3. Military Demoralization: RF commanders (Alaudinov) claiming poor quality/training of foreign fighters to diminish morale and allied confidence. Confidence: HIGH

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Morale is stressed by the threat of strategic strikes, frontline setbacks, and the Odesa hybrid attack. The critical immediate vulnerability is the IO attack on the NCA’s resolve, demanding an immediate and decisive counter-narrative. Confidence: HIGH

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The immediate publication of Vance’s conditions, even via Ukrainian channels, highlights the extreme sensitivity of the diplomatic environment. The UAF must immediately amplify positive counter-signals (e.g., US sanctions push) to neutralize the impression of allied abandonment. Confidence: HIGH

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 6 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Lyman/Siversk Diversion: RF will sustain high-intensity artillery and preparatory fires in the Lyman/Siversk sectors to fix UAF reserves, but will not commit to a deep mechanized assault until the effects of the strategic strike are realized.
2. Strategic Missile Launch Preparation: Final launch sequence preparation at 2652th GRAU. Anticipated launch time remains 221000Z – 221400Z, with impact 30-90 minutes later depending on missile type (Hypersonic vs. Cruise).
3. GLOC Interdiction: DRG/Spetsnaz teams attempt kinetic severance of the Kostiantynivka GLOC, synchronized with the anticipated panic caused by the strategic strike.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Strategic Paralysis & Multi-Front Breach)

A successful Strategic Missile Strike Wave (targeting Kyiv/Dnipro C2/Logistics) combined with the physical severance of the Kostiantynivka GLOC and a successful RF exploitation maneuver at Pokrovsk. Failure to verify the Lyman/Siversk threat and subsequent misallocation of UAF reserves allows for a deeper Russian operational penetration.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J7: IMMEDIATE ISR SWEEP OF NORTHERN AXES.

   • Action: Immediately commit all flexible ISR resources (including national assets) to the Krasnyi Lyman and Siversk operational areas. Provide verification of mechanized threat composition NLT 221030Z.
   • Rationale: The reserve allocation decision is critical. Failure to confirm the threat risks either catastrophic penetration at Pokrovsk or catastrophic misallocation to a diversionary effort.

2. STRATCOM/NCA: URGENT COGNITIVE COUNTER-STRIKE AND DOMESTIC AMPLIFICATION.

   • Action: NCA must deliver a high-impact communication NLT 220930Z addressing internal unity, decisively rejecting any narrative of forced concessions based on Vance’s conditions, and immediately amplifying the proven UAF capacity to disrupt the RF deep rear (use the Penza AD alert as proof of operational reach).
   • Rationale: RF seeks to maximize political friction and public despair during the kinetic strike window. A unified and assertive counter-narrative is the primary defense against strategic paralysis.

3. J7/AIR FORCE: FINAL AD ALERT LEVEL IMPLEMENTATION.

   • Action: Transition all designated high-value AD systems (Patriot/SAMP-T) to their highest readiness posture (Anti-Ballistic Mode) for the defense of the Dnipro logistical backbone and Kyiv C2 centers. Issue a Force Protection (FP) warning across all high-value Category 1 targets.
   • Rationale: The MDCOA is imminent. Maximize intercept probability for high-speed ballistic and cruise munitions.

4. J3: GLOC COUNTER-INTERDICTION OPERATIONS.

   • Action: Activate Task Force Raven (or equivalent mobile reserve) to execute aggressive, preemptive counter-Spetsnaz sweeps along the Kostiantynivka GLOC corridor (5km deep on both flanks) between 220900Z and 221200Z.
   • Rationale: Prevent the ground forces from achieving their objective (severance) during the confusion of the strategic missile strike. Aggressive preemptive action against DRG/SpN teams is required now.

//END SITREP//