Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 210700Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 210600Z NOV 25 – 210700Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. The synchronization of kinetic and information warfare elements confirms RF adherence to the MLCOA. Tactical decisions on reserve deployment and AD posture are time-critical.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

STATUS: CRITICAL/ACTIVE BREACH. RF forces (40th/155th OMBR) maintain high-tempo exploitation west of Mirnohrad (Pokrovsk axis). New RF reporting claims destruction of a UAF APC near Dymytrov (Myrnohrad-Pokrovsk axis). KEY TERRAIN IMPACT: If confirmed, the RF presence near Dymytrov (TASS claim) indicates the breach depth is expanding towards the critical Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15). The window for effective counter-penetration operations without engaging the RF main body on the GLOC itself is now assessed at <4 hours.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant change. Conditions remain highly conducive to sustained mechanized maneuver and RF ISR/KAB operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF DISPOSITIONS: RF forces are leveraging FPV and indirect fire assets deep into the immediate operational rear (TASS claims APC strike near Dymytrov). A new small-scale UAV wave is detected moving from Belgorod Oblast towards Sumy/Kharkiv, likely a low-cost, persistent ISR/harassment effort designed to stress the UAF AD residual capacity. UAF CONTROL MEASURES: UAF reserves are currently moving into designated staging areas. The immediate focus must shift to securing the western flank of the breach, particularly the route network leading to Kostiantynivka.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities (HIGH CONFIDENCE):

1. Precision Fire in Depth: Demonstrated capability to target high-value tactical assets (APC/IFV) deep inside the UAF operational area using FPV drones/indirect fire (TASS claim near Dymytrov).
2. Sustained IO Synchronization: RF media continues to immediately leverage kinetic successes (APC destruction) and simultaneously escalate domestic security/anti-corruption narratives (TASS claims MO RF fraud) to create a general atmosphere of pervasive corruption and instability on both sides of the conflict.

Intentions (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF intent remains the operational interdiction of the Kostiantynivka GLOC through rapid mechanized advance and fire support (Dymytrov engagement), synchronized with the imminent strategic missile strike (from 260th GRAU) designed to paralyze UAF C2 and logistical capacity.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary tactical adaptation is the immediate and aggressive use of organic fire support/loitering munitions against UAF armored movement in the intermediate depth of the Pokrovsk axis (Dymytrov engagement). This suggests RF is prioritizing the attrition of UAF reserves moving to counter-attack.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

No significant change to RF logistics. UAF deep-rear interdiction (Sverdlovsk/Perm) continues to generate internal RF friction (TASS reporting domestic fraud/scams, possibly to distract from security gaps).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains HIGHLY EFFECTIVE. The immediate release of propaganda videos (Colonelcassad/TASS) timed with ongoing combat confirms tight coordination between military kinetic operations and strategic/tactical IO dissemination.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture is shifting rapidly to active defense/counter-penetration. The loss of armored assets near Dymytrov, if confirmed, highlights the exposure of moving reserve columns to RF ISR/fire control and emphasizes the critical need for immediate EW/AD escort for these units.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Setback: Confirmed (RF source) loss of an armored asset near Dymytrov, indicating RF fire control now extends into the UAF tactical rear. Success: Confirmation of EU sanctions against RF individuals involved in civilian deaths (RBC-Ukraine), which provides a strong counter-IO narrative (UAF legitimacy/Western support).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: EW Cover for Reserve Movement. All reserve movement into the Pokrovsk salient must be shielded by organic EW assets to defeat FPV/ISR targeting witnessed near Dymytrov. CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: Psychological Warfare Vulnerability. The RF video of the surrendered 110th OMBr soldier is directly targeting the morale of front-line units currently under extreme pressure.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF PRIMARY VECTORS (HIGH CONFIDENCE):

1. Psychological Attrition (Colonelcassad): The video featuring the surrendered 110th OMBr soldier, claiming UAF command abandonment and expressing nationalist sympathy, is a direct, tailored attack on the morale of ground forces currently engaged in the Pokrovsk salient. This aims to legitimize surrender and erode unit cohesion.
2. Pervasive Corruption (TASS): The emphasis on a 9 billion RUB fraud case against the MO RF serves a dual purpose: domestic distraction from UAF deep strikes, and an attempt to normalize "massive corruption" narratives, implying incompetence on both sides of the conflict.
3. Tactical IO (TASS): Immediate publication of the FPV strike near Dymytrov serves to demonstrate RF kinetic dominance and deepen fear within UAF maneuver units.

UAF/WEST COUNTER-NARRATIVE: EU sanctions on RF individuals provide a clear moral high ground and reinforce international accountability (RBC-Ukraine).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Morale of front-line units in the Pokrovsk sector is likely being directly impacted by the surrender videos and kinetic pressure. Domestic sentiment remains critical but is likely being buoyed by the EU sanctions news.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

EU sanctions against Russian individuals linked to civilian deaths are a positive diplomatic signal that can be leveraged immediately by STRATCOM to counter RF narratives of waning Western resolve.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 6-12 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Operational Pressure Intensifies)

1. Strategic Strike Preparation: Missile strike preparations at the 260th GRAU continue, with launch assessed to occur within the 6-24 hour window, timed to maximize impact on UAF reserve staging and C2 nodes.
2. GLOC Engagement: RF Spetsnaz or advance mechanized elements will establish contact with the Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15) to interdict traffic, focusing on soft targets (logistics convoys) while RF main forces utilize massed fire to attrit UAF counter-penetration units (as seen near Dymytrov).
3. Localized ISR/Harassment: The new, small UAV wave (from Belgorod) will sustain persistent low-level pressure on Northern (Sumy/Kharkiv) AD, fixing some UAF resources and confirming the continued RF strategy of AD saturation prior to strategic strikes.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Operational Collapse via Logistics/C2 Failure)

No change to the MDCOA: RF mechanized forces achieve a rapid breakthrough, isolating UAF defensive units by securing a sustained cut-off (exceeding 8 hours) of the Kostiantynivka GLOC. The subsequent, coordinated strategic missile strike targets C2 facilities and disorganized UAF withdrawal/staging areas, leading to high attrition and loss of control over the Pokrovsk operational area.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J7: IMMEDIATE EW SHIELDING FOR RESERVES.

   • Action: Immediately deploy all available Electronic Warfare (EW) assets (e.g., Bukovel, NOTA) to provide high-density coverage for all UAF armored columns moving into the Pokrovsk salient staging areas (west of Dymytrov).
   • Rationale: The threat of targeted FPV/loitering munition strikes against moving high-value assets is confirmed (Dymytrov incident). EW protection is now the primary force multiplier for reserve survival.

2. STRATCOM/J2: COUNTER PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE (PSYOPS).

   • Action: Issue an immediate, high-visibility statement from JOC/High Command directly addressing the RF surrender video (110th OMBr). Frame the video as a desperate RF attempt to divide UAF forces. Leverage the EU sanctions announcement and the Sverdlovsk/Perm rail sabotage as proof of continued resistance and international support.
   • Rationale: Morale is under direct attack. A robust, authoritative counter-message is required immediately to stabilize front-line sentiment during the most critical tactical phase.

3. Air Force/J4: CONTINUED AD CONSERVATION & RECOGNITION.

   • Action: Maintain the directive to conserve high-value interceptors for the strategic threat from the 260th GRAU. Do not expend high-value AD on the new, small UAV wave (Belgorod origin). Re-task appropriate ISR to monitor the Belgorod launch site to assess intent (ISR vs. Strike) of this new wave.
   • Rationale: Prevent RF from achieving its objective of exhausting UAF AD capacity prior to the MDCOA missile strike.

//END SITREP//