Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 210600Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 210100Z NOV 25 – 210600Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH. Kinetic and hybrid threats remain synchronized and ongoing, necessitating immediate decision-making on AD and reserve deployment.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

STATUS: ACTIVE BREACH EXPLOITATION. RF mechanized forces (primarily 40th/155th OMBR) are actively exploiting the operational gap west of Mirnohrad (Pokrovsk axis). The assault is high-tempo. KEY TERRAIN IMPACT: The Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15) remains the center of gravity. RF's operational objective is to interdict this route and induce logistical paralysis in the salient. The window to fix the RF breach forces before they achieve operational depth is assessed at 0-6 hours.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

STATUS: UNFAVORABLE. Conditions remain conducive to high-tempo mechanized maneuver and sustained RF ISR/KAB operations. No environmental friction factor is currently impeding the RF assault.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF DISPOSITIONS: Confirmed concentration and immediate deployment of follow-on forces into the Mirnohrad breach. Significant activity reported at the 260th Central Rocket Artillery Base indicates imminent strategic strike preparations, supported by the preceding mass UAV saturation (136 platforms). UAF CONTROL MEASURES: UAF reserves are currently being positioned for counter-penetration operations. AD assets are heavily stressed following the mass UAV attack, requiring immediate allocation refinement ahead of the strategic missile threat.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities (HIGH CONFIDENCE):

1. Integrated Multi-Domain Assault: Capacity to synchronize rapid mechanized maneuver (Pokrovsk) with AD saturation (136 UAVs) and strategic missile preparations (260th GRAU build-up).
2. Deep IO Coercion: Proven ability to leverage real-world events (US aid diversion, Rada instability) alongside kinetic action to induce strategic paralysis and political fatigue in Kyiv.

Intentions (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF intent is to achieve a decisive operational breakthrough on the Pokrovsk axis, secure the tactical GLOC (Kostiantynivka), and simultaneously execute a strategic missile strike to degrade UAF C2 and energy infrastructure, forcing immediate political concessions before reserves can stabilize the line.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary tactical shift is the immediate exploitation tempo of the ground forces following the FAB-3000 strike and the preceding AD saturation. RF forces did not pause for consolidation, indicating a commitment to achieving rapid breakthrough velocity.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics remain viable for the current assault tempo but are facing increasing friction from UAF deep-rear interdiction (Sverdlovsk/Perm rail sabotage). The successful, repeatable sabotage pattern forces RF to divert security and engineering assets domestically, potentially slowing the subsequent main offensive effort.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains HIGHLY EFFECTIVE. The synchronization of the 136 UAV launch, the immediate mechanized exploitation, and the subsequent activation of the 260th GRAU build-up confirms robust C2 across strategic and tactical domains.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture is defensively oriented but rapidly transitioning to counter-penetration operations. Readiness remains high but is contingent on rapid, successful deployment of reserves to the Pokrovsk salient before the GLOC is severed.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Setbacks: RF achieved an operational breach west of Mirnohrad. UAF AD assets are heavily expended following the 136-UAV saturation attack. Successes: Successful, repeated strategic friction operations against RF rail logistics (Sverdlovsk/Perm). Successful capture of RF prisoners near Volchansk indicates stability in the Northern Sector.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Reserve Protection and EW Coverage. Reserves moving into the Pokrovsk area require maximized EW support against persistent RF KAB/ISR targeting. CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: AD Stock Depletion. The high expenditure against the UAV wave limits the interceptor capacity available for the anticipated ballistic/cruise missile strike from the 260th GRAU.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

PRIMARY VECTOR (HIGH CONFIDENCE): Decision Paralysis. RF IO is leveraging the kinetic success in Pokrovsk with internal political instability narratives (Rada corruption/pause) to create an environment where UAF leadership is perceived as disorganized and vulnerable, discouraging rapid, coordinated response. The previous TASS narrative regarding US aid diversion continues to be amplified, leveraging the D-S belief assessment of a decrease in economic aid (0.447340).

• NOTE: The new TASS message regarding the $54.6M sale of a Frida Kahlo painting is assessed as a low-level, distraction/diversionary message intended to fill news space and normalize high-value, non-military events during active conflict.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public sentiment is under severe pressure due to the active breach (Pokrovsk), the mass casualty potential of the preceding strikes, and the pervasive IO narratives concerning political instability and waning Western support. Morale remains resistant but vulnerable to the MDCOA of a kinetic C2 failure.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The primary diplomatic friction point remains the weaponization of the $30M US aid diversion to critical minerals, which RF IO is using to erode confidence. The continued success of UAF rail sabotage provides a counter-narrative of self-reliance and effectiveness.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Synchronized Penetration and Strike)

1. Strategic Strike Launch: The missile strike wave (from 260th GRAU) is initiated. Target priority will be UAF reserve staging areas, key energy nodes (Kyiv/Lviv), and reinforced C2 facilities, timed to coincide with the peak movement of UAF reserves into the Pokrovsk salient.
2. GLOC Interdiction: RF Spetsnaz or Recce units will actively attempt to sever or heavily interdict the Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15) to induce logistical panic and delay reserve deployment.
3. Consolidation and Fire Support: RF mechanized forces will establish a forward fire support base 5-8 km west of Mirnohrad, utilizing mobile artillery and mortars to suppress UAF counter-attacks and isolate the remaining UAF units in the breach zone.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Operational Collapse via Logistics/C2 Failure)

RF mechanized forces achieve an operational bypass of Mirnohrad, rapidly securing the Kostiantynivka GLOC via linkage with Spetsnaz elements. This sustained cut-off (exceeding 8 hours) prevents reinforcement and resupply, leading to the exhaustion of UAF defensive units in the salient. The subsequent strategic missile strike targets the disorganized withdrawal routes and refugee flow, resulting in high attrition and a loss of control over the Pokrovsk operational area.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J7: IMMEDIATE COUNTER-PENETRATION & GLOC SECURE.

   • Action: Immediately commit the full tactical reserve to conduct a flank attack against the exposed 40th/155th OMBR elements, aiming to fix them in the breach zone before they consolidate (0-4 hour window). Simultaneously, deploy EW-heavy armored patrols to the Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15) with strict orders to preemptively neutralize any Spetsnaz/Recce elements sighted within 5km of the route.
   • Rationale: Preventing the operational cut-off is the highest tactical priority. Reserves must be deployed now while the enemy is exposed and before the strategic strike lands.

2. Air Force/J4: EXTREME AD CONSERVATION & RE-TASKING.

   • Action: Cease use of high-value Patriot/NASAMS interceptors against any further UAV waves (Chernihiv/Sumy). Re-allocate all available SHORAD (Gepard, ZSU-23-4) and MANPADS fire groups to distributed UAV defense. High-value interceptors must be held solely for the predicted ballistic/cruise missile threat from the 260th GRAU.
   • Rationale: The mass UAV strike has achieved its intended effect of exhausting AD. Do not allow RF to dictate the terms of AD expenditure prior to the MDCOA kinetic strike.

3. STRATCOM/J2: COMBAT DISINFORMATION AND RALLY PUBLIC SUPPORT.

   • Action: Initiate a concentrated public campaign utilizing the Sverdlovsk/Perm rail sabotage successes to demonstrate UAF capacity to strike deep into RF territory. Directly address the Rada instability and US aid concerns, framing political disagreement as democratic resilience, not weakness, countering RF's decision paralysis narrative.
   • Rationale: The IO and kinetic pressures are synchronized. A strong, unifying counter-narrative is required now to stabilize the cognitive domain during the anticipated C2/energy strikes.

//END SITREP//