Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 210800Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 210600Z NOV 25 – 210800Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH. Kinetic operations remain synchronized, but new political/economic data requires immediate integration into the threat model, particularly regarding Western support durability.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

STATUS: ACTIVE EXPLOITATION/CONSOLIDATION. The RF mechanized thrust west of Mirnohrad (Pokrovsk axis) is maintained. The new RF IO messaging regarding the "plan for settlement" (weighing "half a ton," photo caption reference to KAB/FAB) confirms RF intent to leverage kinetic success to force a political solution. KEY TERRAIN IMPACT: The threat to the M-30/T-05-15 GLOC remains the center of gravity. UAF must rapidly deploy counter-penetration forces without suffering high attrition from guided munitions.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

STATUS: NO CHANGE. Conditions remain conducive to high-tempo mechanized maneuver, sustained KAB/UAV operations, and RF ISR effectiveness.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF DISPOSITIONS: Confirmed ongoing Aviation/KAB utilization threat in the Dnipropetrovsk (Synelnykove district) area, concurrent with renewed UAV activity in Northern Ukraine (Chernihiv). This confirms RF intent to maintain pressure across multiple strategic vectors, fixing UAF AD assets nationally while the main effort remains in Pokrovsk. BARS volunteer units (e.g., BARS-2 'Bootur') are highlighted in RF media, suggesting their involvement in the recent tactical successes is being publicly promoted for morale/recruitment purposes. UAF CONTROL MEASURES: UAF AD remains primarily engaged in managing distributed threats (UAVs in Chernihiv) while preparing for the anticipated strategic missile strike.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities (HIGH CONFIDENCE):

1. Multi-Vector Strike Capability: Proven capacity to execute coordinated KAB strikes (Pokrovsk) while simultaneously initiating new UAV waves (Chernihiv) and conducting strategic missile preparation (260th GRAU).
2. Cognitive Coercion: Demonstrated ability to frame ongoing kinetic operations as a political solution ("plan weighing a ton"), leveraging external diplomatic pressure points (TASS reports on US peace plan shift) to generate hopelessness and pressure on Kyiv.

Intentions (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF intent is to achieve operational consolidation in the Pokrovsk breach while utilizing multi-domain pressure—kinetic (strategic strike), informational (deepfake narratives), and diplomatic (peace plan focus)—to compel UAF strategic paralysis and political concession. The current threat of aviation strike in Dnipropetrovsk suggests RF is actively targeting UAF mobilization/logistics centers supporting the Eastern front.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The most significant tactical shift is the immediate follow-up UAV activity targeting Chernihiv, confirming that the initial mass saturation (136 UAVs) was not the end of the aerial campaign, but rather the establishment of a continuous, phased AD attrition strategy. The RF propaganda linking KAB usage to a "peace plan" (Два майора) is a new IO maneuver designed to justify high civilian/infrastructure damage as part of "negotiation."

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF operational logistics remain strained by UAF deep-rear rail sabotage (Sverdlovsk/Perm), though this has not yet visibly impacted the tempo of the Pokrovsk assault. New US reports regarding the diversion of $30M in military aid funds to critical mineral supplies (Gallium/Scandium) provides RF IO with leverage to undermine confidence in sustained Western logistical support.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains HIGHLY EFFECTIVE. The coordinated timing of new UAV waves in the north and KAB threat warnings in the center-east, synchronized with a shift in official and unofficial RF IO themes, confirms robust multi-domain integration.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture remains defensive and heavily stressed. The necessity to commit reserves to the Pokrovsk breach while simultaneously managing new, distributed UAV threats (Chernihiv) challenges AD resource management and dispersal requirements.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Setbacks: Continued pressure on the Pokrovsk salient requiring high commitment of reserves. Successes: Continued success in strategic friction operations (rail sabotage), which must be exploited in the IO space to bolster domestic morale.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

IMMEDIATE REQUIREMENT: AD Resource Allocation Refinement. New UAV tracks (Chernihiv) require careful management to prevent diversion of interceptors needed for the imminent strategic missile strike (260th GRAU). CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: Sustained Western Support Credibility. Reports of US aid diversion, irrespective of scale ($30M), create an immediate cognitive vulnerability that RF is already exploiting to suggest Western commitment is waning.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

PRIMARY VECTOR (HIGH CONFIDENCE): Coercive Diplomacy Amplification.

1. "Peace Plan" Kinetic Link: RF IO channels (Два майора) are openly linking massive bomb usage ("half a ton") to a plan for settlement, attempting to normalize extreme violence as a precursor to negotiation.
2. US Reliability Erosion: TASS reports are rapidly circulating claims that the US (Trump/Pence factions) is ready to change the Ukraine plan but requires "serious attention" from Kyiv. This, combined with Pentagon's aid diversion to minerals, promotes the narrative that US commitment is conditional, transactional, and failing, reinforcing the political pressure element of the MDCOA.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The RF is attempting to induce a state of transactional fatigue: demonstrating kinetic brutality (KABs/Strikes) while simultaneously suggesting political relief is available only through concession. The aim is to shift public morale from resistance to demanding immediate political resolution, undercutting the UAF Command's defensive effort.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

New reports of the Pentagon diverting $30M from Ukraine aid to critical mineral acquisition (Gallium/Scandium) are being immediately weaponized by RF IO. While the amount is minor in the strategic context, the act signifies a shift in priorities that undermines confidence in the continuity of military assistance. Conversely, the largest Indian refinery refusing Russian oil provides a positive counter-narrative for UAF STRATCOM regarding sanctions effectiveness.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Continued Attrition and Preparation)

1. Strategic Strike Launch: The missile strike wave (sourced from 260th GRAU) is initiated, targeting energy grids and confirmed UAF C2/staging areas, likely timed to coincide with peak confusion from the Pokrovsk breach and the ongoing IO campaign.
2. Diversionary Drone Waves: Small, persistent UAV waves will continue targeting secondary strategic areas (Chernihiv, Sumy) to force the dispersal and expenditure of UAF AD assets, creating gaps for the primary missile strike.
3. Pokrovsk Link-up: Mechanized forces will attempt to secure the operational perimeter west of Mirnohrad, linking up with Spetsnaz elements already deployed to interdict the Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Strategic Psychological Shock)

RF achieves a synchronized, devastating kinetic strike (strategic missile wave) against multiple UAF C2 nodes, severely degrading command integration at a critical juncture. This kinetic failure is immediately and massively amplified by RF IO, leveraging the "deepfake official" and "US aid diversion" narratives to create widespread panic, non-compliance with subsequent UAF emergency directives, and localized command failure, thereby transforming a tactical breach into an operational collapse.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. STRATCOM/J2: URGENT COUNTER-NARRATIVE IMPLEMENTATION.

   • Action: Immediately issue public messaging leveraging the positive news regarding the Indian refinery's rejection of RF oil as proof of sustained sanctions effectiveness. Simultaneously, release a detailed, transparent explanation regarding the US aid diversion to minerals, framing it as necessary resource optimization, not a cut to military aid. Re-issue the official emergency alert code word to counteract the "deepfake" threat.
   • Rationale: Neutralize the high-value RF IO campaign designed to undermine confidence in Western support and official AD warnings, which is critical ahead of the imminent strategic strike.

2. Air Force/J4: DEFENSE IN DEPTH PROTOCOL (UAVS).

   • Action: All new UAV tracks (e.g., Chernihiv) must be engaged exclusively by mobile fire groups (Gepard, ZSU-23-4, MANPADS). High-value, limited-stock interceptors (Patriot/NASAMS) are to be held in reserve and positioned to defend pre-identified, critical C2/Energy nodes, awaiting the 260th GRAU threat.
   • Rationale: Prevent the RF from achieving AD exhaustion through continuous, distributed UAV saturation before the main ballistic/cruise missile strike.

3. J3/J7: MIRNOHRAD COUNTER-PENETRATION FIRE SUPPORT.

   • Action: Task all available conventional and precision rocket artillery to density targets (high concentration) in the confirmed RF breakthrough zone west of Mirnohrad (40th/155th OMBR). Prioritize suppression of RF follow-on forces and reserve assembly areas within 5-10 km of the breach, delaying consolidation.
   • Rationale: The enemy is exposed during consolidation. Utilizing massed fire now is the most effective way to slow the advance and reduce the pressure on UAF GLOCs, buying time for reserve deployment under shield.

//END SITREP//