Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 210600Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 210000Z NOV 25 – 210600Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. The RF remains synchronized across the kinetic (Pokrovsk breach/KABs) and cognitive domains. The immediate shift in the Information Environment focuses on leveraging internal vulnerabilities.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

STATUS: CRITICAL/ACTIVE EXPLOITATION. The RF mechanized thrust (40th/155th OMBR) west of Mirnohrad (Pokrovsk axis) is sustained, supported by continued application of KABs (Guided Aerial Bombs). The breadth of the penetration is assessed as 3-5 km depth, threatening the operational control of the M-30/T-05-15 GLOC corridor (Kostiantynivka). KEY TERRAIN IMPACT: Continued KAB usage degrades urban defensive positions, forcing UAF reserves to move rapidly and dispersed, increasing logistical friction and denying stable assembly areas.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

STATUS: UNCHANGED. Conditions remain optimal for high-tempo mechanized maneuver and RF ISR/PGR (Precision Guided Rocket) operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF DISPOSITIONS: RF forces are leveraging integrated aviation/ground tactics. Sustained UAV activity in secondary axes (Kharkiv/Lozova track) fixes UAF AD assets, while primary AD assets are concentrated near the Pokrovsk breach to enable KAB deployment. The build-up at the 260th Central Rocket Artillery Base indicates imminent strategic strike capability. UAF CONTROL MEASURES: UAF AD remains under pressure following the saturation attack (136 UAVs). The critical measure remains the protected deployment of reserves to prevent RF consolidation of the Mirnohrad breach.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities (HIGH CONFIDENCE):

1. Integrated Air-Ground Synchronization: Proven capability to synchronize massed mechanized maneuver with heavy KAB application for rapid suppression.
2. Strategic Strike Readiness: High activity at the 260th GRAU base confirms the intent and capability for a high-volume, multi-vector strategic missile strike within the next 24-48 hours.
3. Exploitative Cognitive Warfare: New IO tactics demonstrate the capability to rapidly pivot from external pressure narratives (US deadline) to exploiting internal vulnerabilities (corruption, official deception/deepfakes).

Intentions (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF intent remains the destruction of the Pokrovsk salient defenses, coupled with a strategic pressure campaign to maximize kinetic damage (missile strike) while paralyzing UAF decision-making via IO. The new IO focus on "deepfake officials" aims to erode public trust in official directives and announcements precisely when kinetic action is peaking.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The confirmed tactical use of KABs in direct support of the Pokrovsk assault reinforces the high-value kinetic prioritization of this sector. The most significant adaptation is in the Information Environment, where RF IO is using internal security reports (MVD/TASS on deepfake scams) to sow distrust in government messaging, effectively jamming the cognitive domain against genuine official warnings.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF operational logistics supporting the Pokrovsk thrust are currently sustained, enabling continued KAB use and mechanized advance. However, the confirmed, systematic deep-rear rail sabotage (Perm/Sverdlovsk) continues to exert strategic friction on RF fuel and heavy materiel transport. RF must divert security assets to counter this persistent threat.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains HIGHLY EFFECTIVE. The coordinated timing of tactical assaults, strategic missile preparations, and pivot in IO content confirms robust, centralized multi-domain control aimed at achieving synchronized physical and psychological shock effects.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are under acute stress due to the multi-domain assault. Readiness remains high but is operationally constrained by the KAB threat, which limits traditional reserve staging and maneuver. The priority is preventing the RF breach from achieving operational depth that threatens the Kostiantynivka hub.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Setbacks: Continued, supported penetration (KABs/Mechanized) west of Mirnohrad. Successes: Replicable deep-strike success against RF logistics (Sverdlovsk rail) sustains strategic pressure on RF rear areas, forcing resource diversion. Tactical stability in the Northern Sector (Volchansk PoW capture).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

IMMEDIATE REQUIREMENT: EW/SHORAD Screen: Dedicated electronic warfare and short-range air defense coverage to protect tactical reserves against KAB targeting during deployment. CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: Interceptor Management: Need to balance current expenditure against UAVs with the high demand for interceptors required to defend against the imminent strategic missile strike (260th GRAU buildup).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

NEW VECTOR (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF IO is exploiting official Russian domestic reports to degrade trust in Ukrainian government communication.

1. Deepfake Trust Erosion: The TASS report regarding deepfakes of officials being used for financial scams is a new vector. RF IO can immediately utilize this to claim UAF official warnings regarding kinetic threats, missile strikes, or mobilization are, in fact, "deepfake hoaxes" designed to steal money or promote corruption. This targets the credibility of legitimate official communication (e.g., AD warnings) at the moment of highest danger.
2. External Control Narrative: Sustained amplification of the US deadline (27 NOV) and attacks on President Zelenskyy's diplomatic posture ("barking") continues to frame Kyiv as politically subservient.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The synchronization of an active kinetic breach with targeted IO leveraging distrust (deepfakes, political corruption) is designed to induce confusion, fear, and political apathy. The objective is to make the public question the source of all information, including official AD warnings, potentially reducing compliance with safety protocols during the imminent strategic missile strike.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

International diplomatic pressure remains high (US deadline). This pressure is a double-edged sword: providing motivation for strategic planning but simultaneously offering RF a potent IO tool to frame the conflict as externally controlled.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Consolidation and Pre-Strike Operations)

1. Breach Consolidation: RF 40th/155th OMBR will attempt to consolidate a 5-8 km perimeter west of Mirnohrad, denying UAF counter-penetration by focusing KAB strikes on exposed UAF reserves.
2. GLOC Interdiction: Spetsnaz elements will likely initiate active disruption of the Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15) within the next 4 hours to coincide with UAF reserve deployment chaos.
3. Full IO/Cognitive Assault: RF IO will leverage the "deepfake" narrative to counter genuine UAF emergency communication (e.g., missile warnings, evacuation routes), maximizing confusion prior to the expected strategic strike.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Systemic Breakdown)

1. Strategic C2 Decapitation: The RF strategic missile strike (sourced from 260th GRAU) successfully targets a critical, non-redundant UAF Command and Control (C2) node or a major energy substation vital to the military communications network. This kinetic success, synchronized with the RF IO campaign leveraging "deepfake" narratives to confuse the public, results in localized C2 failure and widespread public non-compliance with subsequent AD directives, leading to higher civilian casualties and temporary operational paralysis.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J7: IMMEDIATE ADAPTIVE RESERVE DEPLOYMENT (MISSION PRIORITY ONE).

   • Action: Commit tactical reserves immediately. Utilize dedicated mobile EW/SHORAD teams (e.g., MANPADS, mobile jammers) to accompany and shield maneuver elements during deployment, prioritizing movement during periods of assessed low RF ISR coverage. Deny RF the ability to target predictable staging areas.
   • Rationale: Reducing exposure to KABs is critical for reserve force survivability and mission effectiveness. The KAB threat mandates high-speed, decentralized movement.

2. J4: LOGISTICS HARDENING AND ROUTE DISPERSAL.

   • Action: Immediately implement the tertiary route logistics plan for all high-value resupply (ammunition, fuel) along the Kostiantynivka axis. All convoys must be accompanied by EW-capable security elements and operate under a maximum speed protocol.
   • Rationale: Preempt the highly likely Spetsnaz interdiction attempt and mitigate the high KAB risk along the primary GLOC.

3. STRATCOM/J2: COUNTER-DEEPFAKE/TRUST DIRECTIVE (URGENT).

   • Action: Issue a public service announcement (PSA) via all official and verified social media channels (Telegram, official websites, televised broadcast) warning citizens of the specific, known RF IO tactic of using "deepfake official" narratives (TASS report) to sow confusion. Establish an official, unique identifier/code word for all genuine, high-threat emergency alerts (e.g., strategic missile warnings) to distinguish them from fabricated messages.
   • Rationale: Directly combat the RF cognitive attack designed to erode trust and compliance during the kinetic phase. Establishing a verified emergency identifier is necessary to ensure AD warnings are followed.

4. Air Force/J4: INTERCEPTOR CONSERVATION (CRITICAL).

   • Action: Review AD status following the 136 UAV saturation. Institute strict control: Patriot/NASAMS systems must be conserved for confirmed, high-value cruise/ballistic missile threats. Direct low-cost interceptors (MANPADS/Gepard/mobile fire teams) to handle all remaining UAV and low-flying threats.
   • Rationale: Maximum readiness for the imminent strategic strike wave (260th GRAU) is paramount. Expenditure on fixing attacks must be minimized.

//END SITREP//