Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 210600Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 212330Z NOV 25 – 220600Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. The RF remains committed to the current operational tempo, characterized by synchronized kinetic pressure in Donetsk and sustained cognitive operations aimed at achieving policy paralysis. The failure to immediately commit reserves could result in a critical operational breach.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

STATUS: CRITICAL. The RF mechanized penetration west of Mirnohrad (Pokrovsk axis) is sustained by immediate close air support (KABs). The previous report's assessment of the Mirnohrad Breach Zone being the main effort is validated. RF forces (40th/155th OMBR) are actively attempting to consolidate ground gained within the past 12 hours. The Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15) is now in the immediate kinetic zone, increasing the probability of Spetsnaz interdiction.

FACT: UAF Air Force confirms continuous delivery of KABs onto UAF positions in Donetsk Oblast. This level of synchronization is rare and indicates high prioritization of this axis.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

STATUS: UNCHANGED. Dry, firm ground persists, favoring RF mechanized maneuver. Visibility remains good, supporting both RF (KAB guidance) and UAF (ISR) air operations. No limiting factors detected for the next 72 hours.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF DISPOSITIONS (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE): The 40th/155th OMBR are advancing, utilizing KAB strikes to suppress forward UAF strongpoints before direct assault. A secondary UAV saturation strike continues to develop from the Black Sea towards Odesa/Chornomorsk, likely serving as a deliberate distraction or drawing down southern AD assets.

UAF CONTROL MEASURES (JUDGMENT - MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): High Command is currently balancing the need to commit tactical reserves to the breach against the need to preserve strategic reserves for the predicted missile strike window (24-48 hours). Defensive lines west of Mirnohrad are under extreme pressure.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities (HIGH CONFIDENCE):

1. VKS Integration: Proven capability to deliver precision-guided KABs in real-time support of ground maneuver units, significantly reducing UAF force protection effectiveness.
2. Multi-Domain Synchronization: Successfully coordinating kinetic action (Donetsk penetration), AD fixing (Black Sea UAVs), and strategic IO (Peace Plan narrative).
3. Sustained Pressure: RF tactical resupply remains adequate for the current thrust, despite strategic rail sabotage.

Intentions (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF primary intent is rapid, shallow operational penetration on the Pokrovsk axis to force UAF consumption of scarce tactical reserves. The concurrent IO campaign is designed to paralyze decision-makers, delaying the necessary commitment of those reserves. The overall objective remains to precede the strategic missile strike (expected 24-48 hours) with a tactical victory.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The immediate, close-air integration of KABs with advancing mechanized units confirms the high priority RF places on this breach. This is an adaptation from previous attrition warfare patterns, signaling an attempt at rapid maneuver and exploitation.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics remain strategically hampered by the Sverdlovsk/Perm rail sabotage, which restricts strategic fuel flow. However, tactical logistics supporting the 40th/155th OMBR thrust are sustained. Critical observation point remains the 260th Central Rocket Artillery Base, where buildup continues, indicating high prioritization of missile stocks.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is assessed as HIGHLY EFFECTIVE on this axis, demonstrating tight synchronization between Ground Forces, VKS (KAB strikes), and Strategic Information Support (IO).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are experiencing high attrition rates due to sustained KAB strikes and the massed mechanized assault. Readiness remains high, but the strategic decision on reserve commitment is critical and time-sensitive. The forces are currently reacting defensively rather than proactively countering the penetration.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes: Confirmed strategic success in replication of deep-rear rail sabotage (Sverdlovsk) significantly restricts RF strategic maneuverability and forces dispersal of internal security assets. Setbacks: Sustained KAB strikes are degrading UAF positions faster than previously estimated. The lack of immediate, decisive counter-penetration action increases the risk of the RF breach stabilizing.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

IMMEDIATE REQUIREMENT: Tactical reserves and close-range, mobile air defense to counter KAB platforms/launch points. CONSTRAINT: Preservation of high-value AD interceptors (Patriot/NASAMS) against the imminent strategic ballistic threat (24-48 hours window).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

ESCALATION (FACT - HIGH CONFIDENCE): The aggressive dissemination of the "Full text of Trump's peace plan" across RF-aligned military and civilian media channels is a coordinated PSYOPS effort. Analysis (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE): This campaign is timed to maximize political paralysis and strategic uncertainty within UAF High Command, providing the RF tactical advantage by delaying UAF reserve commitment during the critical penetration window. The narrative directly challenges national resolve and attempts to create a "Why fight when peace is coming?" dynamic.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Morale is resilient but is being severely tested by the combined effect of high kinetic violence (KABs, Lviv strike) and the high-profile IO campaign suggesting international abandonment.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF IO aims to exploit any perceived cracks in Western unity, specifically leveraging the "peace plan" to suggest US political resolve is wavering, complicating UAF strategic planning.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Sustained Kinetic and Cognitive Pressure)

1. Tactical Consolidation and Expansion: The 40th/155th OMBR will attempt to solidify a penetration depth of 3-5 km west of Mirnohrad, utilizing engineer assets to establish immediate defensible positions. KAB strikes will continue to prep targets for the next stage of the assault.
2. GLOC Severing: RF Spetsnaz or dedicated reconnaissance forces will initiate contact/interdiction on the Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15) to create a logistical crisis coinciding with the greatest tactical pressure.
3. Missile Strike Prepositioning: IMINT will confirm the movement of ballistic/cruise missile stocks from the 260th Central Rocket Artillery Base to forward launch zones, confirming the 24-48 hour strike window.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - Operational Collapse)

1. Operational Depth Achievement: RF forces achieve a critical breakthrough (>5km), creating a deep flank exposure for UAF formations. The subsequent logistical chaos resulting from the GLOC interdiction and the continued KAB bombardment forces a disorderly, multi-sector UAF withdrawal toward Pokrovsk, jeopardizing control over key eastern cities.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J7: Immediate Counter-Penetration (MISSION PRIORITY ONE).

   • Action: Immediately commit the dedicated tactical reserve forces (mechanized/armor) to execute the counter-penetration plan on the flanks of the 40th/155th OMBR penetration corridor. Focus fire on isolating lead mechanized elements from follow-on logistics and fire support.
   • Rationale: Delaying reserve commitment risks stabilization of the breach, which would exponentially increase the cost of future counter-attacks. Deny RF the ability to exploit the advantage provided by the KAB synchronization.

2. STRATCOM: Decisive IO Counter-Measure (URGENT - COGNITIVE).

   • Action: High Command, ideally Presidential Office, must issue a definitive, immediate public and international rejection of the "peace plan," labeling it a hostile information warfare tactic intended to support the active military assault in Donetsk. Simultaneously, amplify reports of the Sverdlovsk/Perm sabotage to demonstrate strategic resolve.
   • Rationale: Neutralize cognitive paralysis and prevent internal/international policy friction from delaying critical operational decisions.

3. Air Force/J4: Optimized AD Allocation (CONSERVATION).

   • Action: Restrict usage of scarce, long-range AD interceptors (Patriot/NASAMS) against current KAB launch platforms and Black Sea UAVs. Reallocate short-range, mobile systems (Gepard/Osa/MANPADS groups) to the Mirnohrad axis to engage low-flying VKS assets or drones, conserving high-value stocks for the imminent strategic ballistic strike.
   • Rationale: Prepare for the higher threat (MDCOA/MLCOA strategic missile wave) by minimizing current expenditure against fixing operations.

4. J4: Proactive GLOC Protection (CRITICAL LOGISTICS).

   • Action: Fully execute the GLOC diversion plan. All non-essential logistics are immediately shifted to alternative routes. Deploy dedicated QRF (Quick Reaction Force) with mounted EW assets to patrol the M-30/T-05-15, prioritizing the detection and disruption of RF Spetsnaz teams before kinetic contact occurs.
   • Rationale: Anticipate the MLCOA of Spetsnaz interdiction which could rapidly transition the tactical pressure into an operational collapse.

//END SITREP//