Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 211000Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 210600Z NOV 25 – 211000Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. The Pokrovsk-Mirnohrad breach remains the critical threat, now compounded by immediate logistical and cognitive warfare requirements. The RF multi-domain synchronization is at peak intensity.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

CRITICAL STATUS (FACT/JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE): The Mirnohrad Breach Zone is under active exploitation by elements of the 40th and 155th OMBR. Heavy engagement is ongoing 2-3 km west of the initial FAB-3000 impact crater. Intelligence Gap (Priority 2 CR) persists regarding exact penetration depth and whether RF has bypassed the urban ruins. The Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15) remains the single most critical terrain feature for UAF sustainment in the sector and is under imminent threat of Spetsnaz interdiction.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

UNCHANGED (FACT): Favorable dry, firm ground conditions persist, accelerating RF mechanized maneuver and delaying seasonal friction. This provides RF with a clear operational window over the next 48-72 hours.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF DISPOSITIONS (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF mechanized forces are committed to the breach. Aerial assets, having conducted the 136 UAV saturation strike, are currently reconstituting, though RF strategic logistics (260th Central Rocket Artillery Base) shows a high-priority push for follow-on missile stocks. UAF CONTROL MEASURES (JUDGMENT): UAF forces are engaged in close combat and focused on establishing blocking positions and firing corridors for counter-mobility efforts, particularly to secure the flanks of the breach and the GLOC approaches.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF is executing its maximum synchronized effort:

1. Mechanized Assault: Capacity to sustain a rapid, localized breakthrough for 24-48 hours before needing deep replenishment.
2. Strategic Strike: Preparation for an imminent strategic strike wave (24-48 hours) targeting high-value C2/infrastructure, as evidenced by the high SAR activity score (27.87) at the 260th Central Rocket Artillery Base.
3. Hybrid Warfare: Simultaneous application of tactical kinetic pressure and strategic political/IO paralysis attempts. Intentions (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE): Immediate intention is to achieve operational depth on the Pokrovsk axis, sever the Kostiantynivka GLOC, and compel UAF to commit strategic reserves prematurely. The confirmed second rail sabotage incident in Sverdlovsk will force RF to dedicate additional security assets internally, mitigating the long-term logistical sustainment of the offensive, but not the immediate tactical push.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The shift to using massive UAV saturation (136 platforms) immediately preceding the ground assault, coupled with confirmed deep logistics strikes (Lviv warehouse), confirms RF is prioritizing the rapid depletion of UAF AD stocks and targeting UAF rear area supply chains simultaneously with the main ground effort.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF Tactical Sustainment: Adequate for the immediate Pokrovsk assault. RF Strategic Sustainment (HIGH FRICTION): UAF's systematic rail sabotage (Perm and Sverdlovsk confirmed) imposes significant, long-term friction on RF internal fuel and equipment transfers. However, the surge activity at the 260th Central Rocket Artillery Base indicates RF is prioritizing the reconstitution of strategic strike capacity (Ballistic/Cruise) over general ground logistics resupply. This suggests the strategic strike is a higher priority than the sustainment of secondary ground operations.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust and effective, demonstrating successful synchronization between ground (40th/155th OMBR), air/strike (UAV saturation, GRAU buildup), and cognitive domains (peace narratives/internal corruption focus).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are in maximum, immediate defense. The successful 78% intercept rate against the UAV saturation (106 of 136 downed) confirms tactical proficiency but highlights the critical constraint of AD interceptor stock management in anticipation of the ballistic threat. The UAF deep-strike strategy is demonstrably successful in imposing friction on RF strategy via the two confirmed rail sabotages.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes: Confirmed second rail sabotage (Sverdlovsk); UAF capture of RF prisoners near Volchansk (Kharkiv).
• Setbacks: Active breach exploitation on the Pokrovsk axis; confirmed destruction of a dual-use logistics warehouse in Lviv.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: The immediate need to commit tactical reserves now to stabilize the breach while simultaneously managing the consumption rate of AD interceptors against the threat of the imminent strategic strike wave. Logistics must also urgently transition away from the high-risk Kostiantynivka GLOC.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

STATUS (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF IO is now dual-vectored:

1. External: Sustained peace plan narrative (RF/AXIOS "27 Nov Peace Plan") intended to confuse international opinion and UAF decision-makers.
2. Internal: Leveraging internal Ukrainian political instability (Rada pause/corruption allegations) to sow distrust and paralyze UAF High Command's ability to commit reserves decisively. NEW INPUT (TASS/UN): US declaration of new sanctions and continued weapons supply to Kyiv (Mike Waltz, UNSC) is a positive counter-signal, directly challenging the RF peace narrative externally.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Morale is under intense strain due to the highly visible kinetic action (FAB-3000, Lviv strike) and the simultaneous destabilizing political/peace rumors. Aggressive counter-IO is essential to stabilize the operational mood.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The new messaging from the US at the UNSC, confirming future sanctions and continued arms supplies, reinforces UAF strategic resolve and provides diplomatic cover against the RF narrative of inevitable peace talks. (Confidence: HIGH)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4-12 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Multi-Domain Exploitation and Interdiction)

1. Mechanized Consolidation (0-6 Hours): 40th/155th OMBR will attempt to consolidate a holding position 3-5 km west of Mirnohrad, securing favorable terrain for follow-on forces.
2. GLOC Interdiction (2-8 Hours): RF SpN will initiate kinetic action (IED/ambush) on the Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15) to create logistical chaos and delay UAF reserve commitment.
3. Missile Preparation (8-12 Hours): RF strategic strike assets (likely Iskander/Kh-101) will move from the 260th Central Rocket Artillery Base to forward launch positions, preparing for launch within the 24-48 hour window.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - Operational Paralysis and Collapse)

1. AD Exhaustion and Operational Strike: RF successfully interdicts the Kostiantynivka GLOC and launches the strategic missile strike within the next 24 hours. The strike targets strategically important UAF reserve staging areas (e.g., Kramatorsk or Dnipro) and major electrical nodes. UAF AD, depleted by the 136 UAV saturation, fails to mitigate the ballistic threat, leading to significant C2 loss or crippling of reinforcement capacity.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3: Counter-Penetration Execution (IMMEDIATE - TACTICAL).

   • Action: Immediately commit and execute the counter-penetration plan using the pre-designated tactical reserve against the flanks of the 40th/155th OMBR penetration corridor. Focus on fixing and isolating the leading elements before they consolidate.
   • Rationale: Prevent the current tactical breach from transitioning into an operational breakthrough.

2. J4/Air Force: Emergency AD Stock Management (IMMEDIATE - AIR/LOGISTICS).

   • Action: Implement the "Ballistic Priority" order. Restrict the use of high-value Patriot/NASAMS interceptors solely to counter-ballistic threats forecasted from the 260th GRAU buildup. Utilize mobile fire groups (MANPADS/Gepard) exclusively for residual UAVs and lower-threat cruise missiles to conserve stocks.
   • Rationale: Prepare for the MDCOA of a mass strategic missile strike designed to cripple UAF C2/reserves.

3. STRATCOM: Proactive Counter-IO Campaign (URGENT - COGNITIVE).

   • Action: Launch a highly aggressive, visible IO campaign across all domestic and international channels that simultaneously: 1) Publicizes the confirmed Sverdlovsk and Perm rail sabotage successes (framing it as "Systematic Destabilization of RF Logistics"); and 2) Directly utilizes the US UNSC statement (Mike Waltz) to refute all RF peace/paralysis narratives.
   • Rationale: Stabilize frontline morale and neutralize the RF attempt to paralyze High Command decision-making with disinformation.

4. J2: High-Value ISR Re-tasking (IMMEDIATE - ISR).

   • Action: Re-task all available long-duration high-resolution ISR/SAR assets to the 260th Central Rocket Artillery Base to resolve the PRIORITY 1 CR regarding missile type and launch preparation status.
   • Rationale: Resolving the missile type is essential for determining the target profile and optimizing nationwide AD deployment.

//END SITREP//