Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 201805Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 201745Z NOV 25 – 201805Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. The critical threat remains the imminent mechanized assault on the Pokrovsk-Mirnohrad Axis, now judged to be in the immediate execution phase. New intelligence focuses primarily on information environment reinforcement by both sides.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

FACT: The Pokrovsk-Mirnohrad Axis is the current decisive point. The FAB-3000 strike created a cleared corridor for maneuver west of Mirnohrad (Ref: Previous Reports). ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF maneuver forces are positioned to attempt to sever the Kostiantynivka GLOCs (M-30/T-05-15) by exploiting the breach zone. UAF defensive strongpoints are currently isolated or bypassed, emphasizing the need for robust rear-area defense and interdiction fire.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

UNCHANGED: Current dry conditions favor rapid, off-road mechanized movement by RF forces. The operational clock remains dictated by the anticipated shift to wet weather, likely driving the urgency of the current RF assault.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF POSTURE: Elements of the 40th and 155th OMBR are assessed as being in the immediate pre-assault or initial movement phase toward the UAF defensive perimeter west of Mirnohrad. UAF POSTURE: UAF units remain in maximum readiness. Operational command focus is strictly on the Donetsk Oblast ground threat following the lifting of central/southern air alerts. New Information Operations (IO) traffic (ASTRA, Kotsnews) indicates high interest in domestic Russian political stability and the continuation of strategic support for Ukraine.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities: Confirmed capability to utilize extreme kinetic force (FAB-3000) to clear defensive areas rapidly. High capacity for synchronized hybrid warfare, combining ground assault with IO campaigns targeting UAF domestic support and morale. Intentions:

• Primary (IMMINENT): Achieve a rapid mechanized breach to sever the Kostiantynivka GLOC and force a large-scale UAF tactical withdrawal from Pokrovsk. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Secondary (BUILDING): Prepare for a follow-on strategic missile wave, as evidenced by the high-tempo activity at the GRAU Missile Arsenal (Score 47.07).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary adaptation is the shift from sustained artillery preparation to the single, massive-yield FAB-3000 strike to create immediate maneuver terrain, indicating a commitment to speed over attrition in this specific sector.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

Strategic RF logistics are degraded by the Perm rail sabotage (Ref: Previous Reports). However, tactical forward sustainment for the 40th/155th OMBR is judged sufficient for the immediate 48-hour assault window.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust, demonstrated by the synchronization of the kinetic main effort, the likely pre-positioning of SpN for GLOC interdiction, and immediate, coordinated counter-IO efforts (e.g., Kotsnews/Voyenkor Kotenok).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are postured defensively across the Pokrovsk axis. Intelligence from UAF units (e.g., 60th OMBR/FATUM) indicates sustained operational effectiveness in localized anti-personnel and anti-equipment FPV/drone operations on other sectors (Lyman, Donetsk direction), suggesting high morale and technical proficiency within key units.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success: Strategic deep-strike action (Perm rail sabotage) continues to impose significant strategic friction on RF logistics.
• Setback: The loss of hardened defenses due to the FAB-3000 strike necessitates a high volume of indirect fire to compensate for the compromised terrain.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate requirement is the sustained commitment of long-range fires and tactical air defense/EW to disrupt the RF mechanized column upon movement. The main constraint remains the vulnerability and defense of the Kostiantynivka GLOC to SpN teams and subsequent RF fire control.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO (FACT): RF channels (Kotsnews, Voyenkor Kotenok) are engaging in internal discussions focusing on the perceived unwavering European/NATO commitment to inflict "strategic defeat" on Russia, indicating an attempt to both manage domestic expectations and reinforce the narrative of existential conflict. UAF IO (FACT/JUDGMENT): UAF unit media (60th OMBR, FATUM) consistently publishes high-quality combat footage showing successful destruction of RF personnel, equipment, and entrenched positions (trenches, dugouts, armor). This effectively counters RF claims of total operational superiority and is crucial for maintaining frontline morale. The emphasis on drone/FPV use highlights UAF technical superiority in the tactical reconnaissance/strike domain.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale is stressed by the threat of breakthrough and the terror impact of the FAB-3000, but sustained publishing of UAF tactical successes (e.g., FPV kills, Perm sabotage) provides necessary counter-balancing narratives. The public memorial ceremonies in Zaporizhzhia (FACT) underscore the ongoing cost of conflict, demanding commensurate tactical success to justify sacrifice.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The highly publicized visit of senior US DoD officials in Kyiv (Ref: Previous Daily Summary) remains the key pillar reinforcing the narrative of sustained, high-level international military commitment, directly challenging RF "peace plan" IO efforts.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Initial Breach Attempt)

1. Massed Armor Advance (0-2 Hours): RF mechanized forces (40th/155th OMBR) initiate synchronized movement out of staging areas, utilizing the FAB-3000 cleared corridor to achieve maximum speed toward UAF defensive lines.
2. Immediate Indirect Fire Suppression: RF artillery and fixed-wing/loitering munitions will concentrate suppression fires on known UAF ATGM positions, command posts, and communication nodes along the immediate line of contact (LOC).
3. SpN GLOC Trigger: SpN teams positioned along the M-30/T-05-15 route will initiate interdiction attacks (IEDs/ambushes) timed to the mechanized advance to maximize chaos and delay UAF reserve commitment.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - Operational Thrust and Deep Strike)

1. Successful Penetration and GLOC Seizure: RF mechanized forces successfully punch through the main UAF defense layer and establish a direct fire observation/control point dominating the M-30/T-05-15. This interdiction forces UAF units in Pokrovsk to execute a costly, high-speed withdrawal across compromised terrain.
2. Strategic Missile Launch: The rapid reloading/transfer activity at the GRAU Missile Arsenal culminates in a large-scale strategic strike (Iskander/Kh-101 wave) targeting UAF strategic reserves, C2 nodes, and logistics depots deep in the rear area (e.g., Dnipro/Kryvyi Rih), eliminating the capacity for an immediate, effective operational counterattack.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3: Pre-Emptive Artillery Interdiction (IMMEDIATE - TACTICAL).

   • Action: Do not wait for direct contact. Initiate the pre-planned massed artillery interdiction missions (CRITICAL) using anti-personnel/cluster munitions on known RF staging and assembly areas upon first confirmed movement of the 40th/155th OMBR columns past the confirmed last cover line.
   • Rationale: The time compression created by the FAB-3000 strike demands an immediate, overwhelming fire response to shatter the RF formation before it can achieve momentum.

2. J4/J6: GLOC Contingency Activation and Defense (CRITICAL - LOGISTICS/C2).

   • Action: Immediately transition 50% of logistical traffic to pre-staged tertiary (unpaved/alternate) routes for the Kostiantynivka axis, regardless of whether a SpN attack has occurred. Simultaneously, task the deployed Engineer Combat Support Unit (ECSU) to focus on enhanced counter-IED measures and patrol saturation along the primary M-30/T-05-15 route.
   • Rationale: Assuming GLOC compromise is required given the high confidence in synchronized SpN attacks. Pre-emptive diversification mitigates the operational paralysis threat.

3. STRATCOM/J2: Exploit RF Domestic Instability IO (URGENT - COGNITIVE).

   • Action: Amplify and disseminate intelligence regarding the strategic impact of the Perm rail sabotage. Concurrently, leverage internal RF narratives (e.g., ASTRA's focus on censorship, Kotsnews's focus on strategic defeat) to promote the internal instability narrative within RF military units via targeted psy-ops.
   • Rationale: Maintain the initiative in the cognitive domain to counter the terror effect of the FAB-3000. Reinforce the UAF narrative of resilience and deep-strike capability.

//END SITREP//