Nightwatch logo
'Nightwatch' text with white and gray letters
Historical Intelligence

Situation Report

Archived operational intelligence briefing

Report Time
2025-11-20 07:39:26Z
3 months ago
Previous (2025-11-20 07:09:25Z)

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 201000Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 200700Z NOV 25 – 201000Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH. The imminent mechanized assault on the Pokrovsk Axis is confirmed by the preceding FAB-3000 strike (Previous Daily Report). New reporting confirms sustained UAF deep-strike capability (GUR sabotage efforts), countered by successful FSB counter-intelligence operations targeting UAF agents in the RF rear. The primary strategic threat remains the impending missile strike wave, validated by high activity at the GRAU Arsenal.


1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

  • Pokrovsk Axis (Donetsk): The Mirnohrad breach zone is now confirmed cleared by a high-yield weapon (FAB-3000), suggesting the RF intent to bypass lengthy urban fighting and commit mechanized units immediately. Key terrain remains the approach to Pokrovsk and the Kostiantynivka Ground Line of Communication (GLOC).
  • Sumi/Chernihiv Axes: Air Force reports indicate persistent incoming threats, specifically Shahed (Moped) UAVs targeting Chernihiv and Guided Aerial Bombs (KABs) targeting Sumy region. This simultaneous pressure is standard procedure to fix UAF Air Defense (AD) assets regionally.
  • Deep RF Rear (DNR/Perm): RF counter-intelligence (FSB) claims confirmed arrests of GUR-directed agents involved in planning high-profile sabotage/assassinations against MoD officers in occupied territory (DNR). This indicates continued UAF offensive pressure against RF Command & Control (C2), despite successful RF interdiction.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

  • Nighttime UAV operations confirm cold weather operations requiring thermal/IR capabilities (WarGonzo, SIGNUM footage). Ground conditions remain muddy (Previous SITREP), potentially impacting the speed of the immediate RF mechanized push following the FAB-3000 strike.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

  • RF Posture: RF units, specifically the 40th/155th OMBR (Group Vostok), are positioned for immediate operational exploitation following the FAB-3000 strike. RF AD assets failed to prevent UAF FPV/deep strike operations resulting in the Perm rail sabotage, but RF internal security (FSB) is actively neutralizing UAF intelligence cells (DNR arrests). RF forces are concurrently executing a kinetic fixing operation via KABs and Shaheds on the northern/central axes (Sumi, Chernihiv, Pavlohrad).
  • UAF Posture: UAF AD is engaged, reporting 106 enemy UAVs shot down/suppressed (Gen Staff). UAF Tactical Medical (TacMed) units are confirmed active and under stress (Шеф Hayabusa). UAF FPV/Drone units (53rd OMBR SIGNUM) maintain high efficacy against RF personnel and logistics, confirming continued deep/frontline ISR and counter-force capability.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

  1. Massive Pre-Assault Clearance: RF demonstrated the willingness and capability to use FAB-3000 guided bombs for terrain clearance, drastically reducing the tactical time required for mechanized units to breach defenses. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  2. Persistent Hybrid Warfare: RF C2 continues to synchronize kinetic operations (Pokrovsk assault, KAB/Shahed strikes) with Information Warfare (IO) campaigns aimed at degrading Western support and domestic Ukrainian morale (Rubio/Trump/WSJ peace plan rumors).
  3. Strategic Missile Recalibration: The high activity at the GRAU Missile Arsenal strongly indicates an imminent reconstitution of strategic long-range strike capability, likely exceeding previous strike volumes.

Intentions:

  • Immediate Mechanized Breakthrough (Pokrovsk): Exploit the FAB-3000 cleared zone within the next few hours to achieve operational depth towards Pokrovsk.
  • Degrade UAF Strategic AD: Use persistent, low-cost UAV attacks (Chernihiv) to exhaust UAF interceptor stocks ahead of the expected strategic missile wave.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

  • Escalation in Ordnance: Shift to the confirmed use of the FAB-3000 for local tactical clearance. (FACT)
  • Increased Counter-Sabotage Focus: FSB emphasis on arresting GUR-linked assets (DNR arrest/confession footage) suggests UAF deep strikes (Perm, Ryazan) have triggered enhanced RF internal security focus. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

  • RF Logistics (Fuel): CRITICAL FRICTION. The successful sabotage of the Perm fuel railway exacerbates the friction caused by the Ryazan refinery strike. This will degrade RF maneuver capability on the Pokrovsk Axis within 48-72 hours if UAF can prevent immediate repair and alternative routing.
  • Personnel/Morale: RF military channels promoting the "Guards" status for the 255th Motorized Rifle Regiment suggests a need to use institutional incentives to manage internal morale and reward units achieving local tactical success.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

  • RF C2 remains capable of coordinating complex, multi-axis operations (Pokrovsk ground assault + Sumi/Chernihiv air pressure). The FSB success in intercepting GUR agents plotting high-ranking MoD assassinations demonstrates effective RF counter-intelligence in occupied areas, mitigating a high-value C2 threat. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

  • AD Effectiveness: UAF AD units demonstrated continued high kill/suppression rates (106 UAVs). However, persistent KAB launches (Sumi) remain challenging to counter and pose a continuous threat to fixed infrastructure.
  • Deep Strike Continuity: UAF GUR/SOF operations remain active and high-risk, successfully inflicting strategic damage (Perm rail sabotage), but also sustaining losses via FSB counter-intelligence efforts (DNR agent arrest).
  • Frontline Adaptation: FPV drone units (53rd OMBR SIGNUM) continue to deliver effective attrition against RF personnel and light vehicles.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

  • Successes: Confirmed strategic logistics sabotage (Perm rail). High UAF UAV interception rate (106).
  • Setbacks: RF tactical preparation phase completed with the use of the FAB-3000, presenting an immediate, high-volume breakthrough risk. Confirmed loss of GUR assets/network in the RF rear via FSB operations.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

  • AD Interceptors: Continued high interception rates (106 UAVs) places severe constraints on the supply of AD missiles/interceptors required to counter the impending strategic missile wave (MDCOA).
  • Personnel/Manpower: RF IO claims that UAF airbase technical personnel are being redirected to infantry roles near Vovchansk (Kharkiv) suggests perceived or real UAF manpower constraints on secondary axes. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

  • RF IO Themes (HIGH VOLUME): Heavy focus on undermining the Kyiv government by linking US "peace plan" rumors (WSJ/NBC) to alleged "glaring corruption scandals" (Alex Parker Returns). The message is: Kyiv is weak and disposable, and Western support is conditional.
  • External Support Anxiety: Reports citing Rubio on "difficult but necessary concessions" further amplify the RF narrative regarding the required scale of compromise (territory, NATO abandonment) demanded of Ukraine.
  • UAF Counter-Messaging: Official channels focus on the protection of children and remembrance of victims (Zelenska, Kharkiv ODA), aiming to maintain domestic unity and frame the conflict in moral/humanitarian terms.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

  • Public morale is being heavily manipulated by the simultaneous kinetic terror (FAB-3000 on Mirnohrad, Shahed attacks on Pavlohrad) and strategic anxiety (international peace plan rumors). STRATCOM must ensure the internal kinetic successes (Perm sabotage, 106 UAV intercepts) are maximized to offset this terror-anxiety composite.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

  • Germany (Taurus): Confirmed high-level discussions regarding the provision of long-range missiles (Taurus), suggesting a continuing, albeit complex, commitment to increasing UAF kinetic reach. (FACT)
  • US Peace Plan Rumors (CRITICAL): The recurring theme across multiple channels regarding US/Trump-backed peace plans requiring significant UAF concessions (territorial loss, NATO abandonment) is highly disruptive. The physical presence of US officials (Driskill/George - Previous Daily Report) must be leveraged immediately to counter this narrative.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Exploitation and Pinning)

  1. Immediate Mechanized Assault (Pokrovsk): The 40th/155th OMBR (Group Vostok) will execute the pre-staged mechanized thrust directly through the FAB-3000 impact zone at Mirnohrad, aiming to gain 5-8km of operational depth toward Pokrovsk.
  2. Synchronized GLOC Interdiction: RF Spetsnaz teams will likely activate IEDs or launch ambushes on the Kostiantynivka GLOC to coincide with the main mechanized assault, maximizing the disruption of UAF resupply during the most critical defensive period.
  3. Sustained Air Pressure: RF Air Force will continue KAB launches on Sumi/Kharkiv, and persistent Shahed/FPV drone harassment on central/northern sectors to prevent UAF AD redeployment toward the Pokrovsk axis.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Strategic Kinetic Paralysis)

  1. Massed Strategic Missile Strike (GRAU Launch): Following the confirmed high activity at the GRAU Arsenal, RF will launch a massed, reconstituted strategic missile wave (Iskander, Kh-101/555) targeting UAF Command Nodes, critical rail choke points outside Donbas (Poltava/Dnipropetrovsk hubs), and verified AD sites. This strike will seek to temporarily paralyze UAF C2 and logistics ahead of the predicted RF fuel shortages (48-72 hour window).
  2. Operational Envelopment (Pokrovsk): Successful RF breach and GLOC closure (Kostiantynivka) lead to rapid UAF attrition. RF mechanized forces bypass Pokrovsk city center, severing UAF forces and forcing a chaotic withdrawal or encirclement.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

TimeframeEvent/Decision PointTriggering Indicator
0-4 Hours (TACTICAL)RF Main Assault Confirmation: Visual confirmation of 40th/155th OMBR armor breaching UAF forward lines.GEOINT/ISR confirming rapid movement of armor formations past the FAB-3000 impact zone. (DECISION POINT: J3 must authorize immediate commitment of pre-staged tactical reserve units to their blocking positions and commence pre-planned artillery fires.)
0-12 Hours (HYBRID/SOF)GLOC Closure Confirmation: Confirmed kinetic engagement or IED on Kostiantynivka road (primary GLOC).HUMINT/Ground reports of blocked/ambushed convoys. (DECISION POINT: J4 must transition all essential logistics to tertiary, non-paved routes and coordinate immediate route clearance by combat engineers/security forces.)
12-24 Hours (STRATEGIC AD)Missile Launch Detection: SIGINT/ELINT confirming Russian early warning systems detecting UAF preparations or detection of strategic bomber takeoffs/Iskander battery activation.CRITICAL GEOINT/SAR confirmation of missile types/launch signatures. (DECISION POINT: UAF High Command must enter maximum AD alert status and authorize preemptive relocation of remaining high-value AD assets.)

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

PriorityGap DescriptionCollection Requirement (CR)Confidence (Pre-Analysis)
CRITICAL - STRATEGIC WEAPONRYGRAU Arsenal Cargo Profile: Determine the specific missile types being loaded/transferred at the GRAU Arsenal (59.9719, 29.3124) to forecast the strategic strike profile (Kh-101 vs. Iskander).GEOINT/SAR (GRAU): High-resolution imagery tasked to analyze crate dimensions. (Priority 1 Refinement)LOW
HIGH - TACTICAL THREAT40th OMBR Exploitation Vector: Verify if RF armor is bypassing or directly assaulting the cleared Mirnohrad area.ISR/UAV (Pokrovsk Axis): Continuous EO/IR surveillance of the breach zone and primary bypass roads leading W/NW.LOW
HIGH - COUNTER-FORCE CLAIMSATACMS BDA Verification: Confirm or deny RF claims of destroying two UAF ATACMS launchers in Kharkiv.HUMINT/TECHINT (Kharkiv): Cross-reference RF targeting data with UAF maintenance/asset tracking logs. (UNSATISFIED)MEDIUM
MEDIUM - ENEMY SOFSpetsnaz GLOC Status: Determine the precise location and composition of the Spetsnaz interdiction element targeting the Kostiantynivka GLOC.EW/SIGINT (Kostiantynivka Sector): Tasking for specific low-power radio/communications emissions indicative of SpN operations.MEDIUM

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

  1. J3/OC East: Execute Pre-Planned Blocking Operations (IMMEDIATE).

    • Action: The FAB-3000 strike is the confirmation signal. Do not delay commitment of the tactical reserve. Move designated units (e.g., mechanized or armored brigade elements) to the intermediate blocking positions west of the Mirnohrad breach immediately.
    • Rationale: Delaying the deployment to counter the MLCOA increases the risk of operational depth loss and disorganized withdrawal.
  2. J4/Logistics Command: GLOC Transition and Security (IMMEDIATE).

    • Action: Immediately transition all non-combat essential logistics off the Kostiantynivka GLOC to secondary/tertiary routes. Deploy Combat Engineers and motorized security forces with explicit counter-IED/ambush clearance missions along the main road.
    • Rationale: Preventing the simultaneous failure of frontline defense and logistics resupply is critical to maintain tactical integrity during the RF breakthrough attempt.
  3. STRATCOM/J2: Proactive Counter-IO (URGENT).

    • Action: Utilize the confirmed success of the Perm railway sabotage and the US DoD official visits (Driskill/George) in Kyiv to flood information channels. The message must be two-fold: 1) UAF deep-strike capability is intact; 2) International support is physical, real, and unconditional. Directly counter the narrative linking peace plans to corruption.
    • Rationale: The IO threat is synchronized with the kinetic threat; maintaining public resolve and international confidence is a vital force multiplier.

//END SITREP//

Previous (2025-11-20 07:09:25Z)

We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.

Learn more in our Privacy Policy.