Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 220645Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 220645Z NOV 25 – 222123Z NOV 25 (Immediate Update) ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. The primary kinetic and cognitive thrusts remain synchronized: immediate breakthrough threat at Pokrovsk (kinetic) and maximum information saturation (cognitive).

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Pokrovsk Axis (CRITICAL): No confirmed reports of the 40th/155th OMBR mechanized thrust initiation in the period. This suggests RF is finalizing fire preparation or awaiting specific meteorological/tactical synchronicity, potentially utilizing the night cycle for cover. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Kupyansk Axis (ELEVATED FRICTION): Reports confirm continuous, intense kinetic activity, particularly through the use of RF FPV drones and heavy fire (20:59:02, 21:20:22). This supports the assessment that RF is maintaining pressure and maximizing UAF attrition on secondary axes while primary forces regroup for Pokrovsk.
• Krasnyi Lyman Axis (FRICTION): New photo intelligence shows activity at Krasnyi Lyman - Komunalny, suggesting RF movement or persistent UAF/RF engagement in this area, consistent with holding operations. (LOW CONFIDENCE on specific action type, HIGH on persistent engagement)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Night conditions, as evidenced by the dark, high-friction fighting near Kupyansk (21:20:22), continue to favor small-unit drone strikes and infiltration, which are effective in degrading UAF C2 and logistics elements (e.g., UAV control points, transport vehicles, 20:59:02).
• The terrain remains extremely muddy in wooded areas (21:14:17), complicating heavy mechanized off-road maneuver and reinforcing the reliance on pre-cleared or paved axes (like the Kostiantynivka GLOC).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Force Posture: RF C2 is emphasizing localized tactical success via FPV/UAS assets across the line of contact (Kupyansk, 20:59:02). This resource intensive approach seeks to fix UAF units and prevent lateral reinforcement.
• UAF Force Posture: UAF appears to be maintaining defensive positions while managing complex logistical and political challenges (e.g., AD activity, managing IO leaks). (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities (Confirmed):

1. Precision Attrition via UAS: Demonstrated capability to effectively target and destroy UAF high-value low-signature assets (UAV control points, transport vehicles, T-72 tanks) using FPV drones, suggesting effective forward spotter and C2 integration. (20:59:02)
2. Hybrid Synchronization (IO/Legal): RF continues to leverage international legal/political events (e.g., Nord Stream extradition, 21:06:07) to tie Ukraine to controversial actions, fueling their core propaganda narrative that Ukraine is a Western proxy engaged in global destabilization.

Intentions (Reinforced):

1. Maintain Operational Initiative: Sustain high attrition on secondary fronts (Kupyansk) to prevent UAF from freely deploying strategic reserves toward the imminent Pokrovsk breakthrough.
2. Maximize Information Dominance: Leverage state media to push extreme political narratives (Załkharova comparing the West to Hitler, 21:12:05) to solidify domestic support and further demoralize pro-Western elements globally.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Drone System Focus: The proliferation of professionally edited, high-impact combat footage specifically highlighting successful strikes against UAF C2 (UAV control points) indicates a tactical adaptation aimed at degrading UAF ISR and close-air support capability. (20:59:02)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF logistics continue to support high-intensity, localized kinetic operations (Kupyansk). The success of the Perm sabotage (previous report) has not yet manifested in a visible reduction in front-line kinetic resupply, though it will impact deep strategic sustainment.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2: Highly effective in distributing resources (drones, EW support) to maintain intense operations on multiple axes. C2 remains centralized and highly synchronized with the strategic IO effort.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• UAF units are confirmed to be operating in difficult, muddy terrain (21:14:17), which tests endurance and logistics but also naturally channels RF heavy armor onto fewer, more predictable axes.
• The continued discussion and scrutiny of the alleged "US peace plan" leak (20:57:52) suggests UAF political/strategic C2 is actively managing the information fallout.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback: Confirmed loss of multiple assets (light vehicles, armored vehicles, possible UAV control point) to FPV drone strikes in the Kupyansk sector (20:59:02). This highlights a persistent vulnerability to low-cost, high-attrition UAS attacks.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• Anti-UAS/EW Capability (CRITICAL): The high effectiveness of RF FPV attacks necessitates immediate reinforcement of front-line units with advanced mobile EW systems, particularly in sectors facing concentrated drone saturation (Kupyansk, Pokrovsk approaches).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• Main Effort: Moral Equivalence/Genocide Framing: RF State Media (TASS/Zakharova, 21:12:05) has escalated rhetoric by claiming the West seeks to "destroy Ukrainians, like Hitler Slavs." This extreme framing is designed to:
  1. Delegitimize Western support entirely.
  2. Justify RF maximalist military and diplomatic demands.
• Secondary Effort: Disinformation Confirmation: The public discourse concerning the alleged "leaking" of the US/Russia peace plan source (20:57:52) keeps the narrative of strategic abandonment alive, fostering distrust between Kyiv and its Western partners.
• Cultural Warfare: RF diplomatic organs are actively framing Western cultural actions (e.g., canceling a Russian pianist, 21:23:09) as Russophobia and censorship, distracting from kinetic operations and leveraging soft power for narrative control.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• The combination of intense political pressure (peace plan) and sustained high-friction fighting (Kupyansk) places significant stress on the morale of UAF forward units and domestic political stability.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• The extradition decision by an Italian court concerning a Ukrainian national related to the Nord Stream incident (21:06:07) is immediately leveraged by RF media to confirm their narrative of Ukrainian culpability and state terrorism. This requires a carefully coordinated diplomatic counter-narrative from Kyiv.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12 Hours (222123Z NOV 25 - 230923Z NOV 25)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Breakthrough Initiation and IO Apex)

1. Pokrovsk Breakthrough (Immediate): The mechanized thrust (40th/155th OMBR) will be initiated under cover of darkness or during the pre-dawn hours (0300Z - 0600Z). The attack will be preceded by massed artillery fire and simultaneous employment of high-volume FPV drone swarms and loitering munitions against UAF forward observation posts and light vehicles.
2. Synchronized Interdiction: RF Spetsnaz teams will execute the planned kinetic ambush on the Kostiantynivka GLOC concurrently with the main thrust to impede UAF tactical reserve deployment.
3. IO Diversion: RF will amplify the most extreme propaganda (e.g., Załkharova statements) immediately following the breakthrough announcement to dominate the media cycle and obscure the kinetic reality.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Operational Deep Maneuver)

1. Successful Interdiction and Reserve Delay: RF Spetsnaz succeeds in sustaining an 8+ hour operational closure of the Kostiantynivka GLOC. UAF units attempting resupply/reinforcement via tertiary routes are further delayed by RF ISR/loitering munitions.
2. Exploitation of Gap: The 40th/155th OMBR bypasses the immediate ruins of Mirnohrad, utilizing the breach to execute a rapid maneuver aimed at the rear of UAF defenses protecting Pokrovsk city, forcing a chaotic, uncoordinated UAF retreat.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (Pokrovsk): Pre-Emptive Counter-Battery/EW Activation (IMMEDIATE).

   • Action: Initiate a pre-emptive, short-duration high-volume counter-battery and EW suppression effort on known RF forward positions/fire bases on the Pokrovsk axis 45 minutes prior to the predicted 0300Z - 0600Z window.
   • Rationale: Disrupt the RF final synchronization sequence, force the mechanized assault to move without ideal artillery cover, and degrade C2/FPV drone support at the point of attack.

2. J2/J7 (Air Defense): Prioritize Mobile EW/Anti-UAS (URGENT).

   • Action: Immediately detach and assign every available mobile EW system and C-UAS team to protect the Kostiantynivka GLOC and forward UAF C2 nodes, particularly against FPV saturation attacks (as seen at Kupyansk).
   • Rationale: FPV drones are currently proving highly lethal in high-friction environments. Protecting rear C2 and supply movement from this threat is paramount to sustaining the Pokrovsk defense.

3. STRATCOM/MoD: Counter-Narrative Deployment (IMMEDIATE).

   • Action: Directly address the RF's extreme rhetoric (Załkharova's Hitler comparison) with a coordinated statement focused on national sovereignty and objective facts about RF targeting of civilian infrastructure (Mirnohrad FAB-3000). Simultaneously, issue a brief, verifiable update on the Perm railway sabotage to maintain a morale anchor.
   • Rationale: Must prevent RF from shifting the moral high ground or paralyzing public discourse with maximalist rhetoric.

//END SITREP//