Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 221730Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 221653Z NOV 25 – 221730Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. Focus shifting from confirmed tactical losses (Pokrovsk BDA) to the urgent, multi-sourced strategic threat posed by US/RF-attributed negotiation proposals aimed at coercing Ukrainian territorial and military concessions.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Pokrovsk/Myrnohrad Axis (CRITICAL): RF sources (Два майора) continue to post footage from Myrnohrad, reinforcing the operational priority of this axis following the confirmed FAB-3000 strike. The ongoing mechanized assault remains the central kinetic effort.
• Kharkiv/Kupyansk Axis: Confirmed RF UAV activity over Kharkiv Oblast, directed toward Zlatopil and Slobozhanske. This sustains pressure in the Northeast, likely in an attempt to fix UAF 53rd Separate Mechanized Brigade (Signum unit confirmed active in the area), preventing redeployment to the critical Pokrovsk sector. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - FACT)
• Vovchansk (Volchansk): RF source (Rybar) claims advancement in Vovchansk (Slobozhansky Direction Map), suggesting localized, high-intensity fighting continues to consume UAF reserve capacity in this area. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - JUDGMENT/RF CLAIM)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Kinetic Impact: UAF Air Force reports confirm ongoing UAV activity over Poltavshchyna toward Dnipropetrovshchyna, indicating weather does not prohibit long-range drone strikes.
• Seasonal Factors: RF milblogger (Fighterbomber) posts imagery captioned "Winter is coming," showing ground activity near an RF forward airfield in snowy conditions. This confirms the operating environment is rapidly transitioning to severe winter conditions, impacting ground mobility and requiring enhanced logistics support for both sides. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - FACT)
• Infrastructure (Kyiv): Scheduled power outages announced for Kyiv Oblast (20 NOV), linked to RF missile/drone strikes. This continues to degrade civil defense capacity and forces UAF resources (generators, security) to remain in rear areas.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Force Posture (R&D): Putin's highly publicized focus on "Generative AI," "Technological Sovereignty," and planned large-scale Small Nuclear Power Plant (S-NPP) construction (38 blocks) in the Urals/Siberia over the next two decades demonstrates a shift in long-term strategic resource allocation prioritizing technological and energy independence, potentially insulating the military-industrial complex from long-term sanctions. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - JUDGMENT)
• RF Force Posture (New Systems): Testing of the 'SLON' (Elephant) heavy-lift quadcopter (up to 90kg payload capacity, 15-17km range at 50kg load) confirms RF development of robust military logistics/strike platforms capable of transporting heavy munitions or casualty evacuation. This directly challenges UAF's current tactical drone advantage in payload and range. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - FACT)

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Heavy-Lift Drone Integration: The 'SLON' test data confirms RF is acquiring a new, massive-payload UAS capability that transcends current FPV/light ISR roles, posing a future threat to UAF light armored vehicles and forward supply points via heavy munition drops.
2. Strategic Hybrid Warfare (CRITICAL): RF is successfully utilizing geopolitical leaks and Western journalistic reports (FT/Reuters) to amplify "capitulation plans," achieving maximum demoralizing effect on the UAF information environment simultaneous with kinetic pressure on the front line (Pokrovsk).

Intentions:

1. Sustain Kinetic Pressure (Pokrovsk): Continue the mechanized assault to establish control over critical road junctions near Myrnohrad/Hryshyne.
2. Force Diplomatic Concessions (STRATEGIC): Exploit perceived "willingness" by US/Western elements to push a peace proposal that demands significant Ukrainian concessions (territory, army reduction, arms limits), aiming to degrade UAF morale and international backing.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• UAS Payload Increase (RF): The operational testing of the 90kg-lift 'SLON' drone is a significant shift in RF UAS doctrine from ISR/light strike to heavy logistical support and high-impact ground attack.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF Front-Line: Despite confirmed deep-strike rail sabotage (previous report), RF continues to resource the Pokrovsk attack. The effects of the fuel disruption (Perm, etc.) have not yet been observed in reduced operational tempo at the tactical level.
• RF Long-Term Energy: The massive commitment to 38 new S-NPPs indicates a strategy to secure decentralized, independent, and resilient energy generation for military-industrial and civilian needs, reducing future geopolitical leverage against RF.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 remains capable of synchronizing long-term political narratives (Putin's AI/Energy focus) with immediate strategic kinetic efforts (FAB-3000 use) and Information Operations (amplifying "peace plan" rumors).
• Counter-IO (UAF): The SBU announcement of suspicion against the RF chief military chaplain ("agitators in cassocks") indicates UAF C2 is actively targeting Russian influence and morale operations within the religious domain.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Morale/Resilience: The UAF 53rd OMBr (Signum unit) demonstrates high operational tempo and dual-role capability (ground and air defense operations) in the Kharkiv sector, indicating good unit cohesion despite high pressure.
• Civil Defense: President Zelenskyy’s statement and images regarding the missile/drone incident in Ternopil (rear area) confirm the immediate activation of civil defense and "Invincibility Points," demonstrating organizational resilience in the face of continuous deep strikes.
• Political Stability: Cabinet appointments (acting Minister of Justice) continue, indicating functional governmental capacity despite the immediate military crisis and external geopolitical pressure.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success: Effective air defense operations reported in Poltavshchyna and Kharkiv regions (UAF Air Force).
• Setback: Continued deep strikes on rear areas (Ternopil casualties, Kyiv power outages) divert resources and strain civil morale.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• EW/C-UAS: Urgent need to assess and prepare defensive measures against the emerging threat of large-payload RF drones (like SLON). This requires immediate investment in heavy, specialized C-UAS systems and associated training.
• IO/Diplomacy: Immediate need for coordinated high-level communication to counter the "capitulation plan" narrative that is circulating rapidly through international media and RF channels.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• CORE IO THREAT (CRITICAL): Multiple high-profile sources (FT, Reuters, US/RF affiliated channels) are circulating the narrative of a US-Russia "peace plan" demanding UAF concessions: Loss of Donbas, 50% army reduction, limits on certain weapons systems.
  • ANALYSIS: This is a synchronized IO campaign designed to break Ukrainian political will and force domestic division by presenting inevitable defeat and maximumist concessions at the height of kinetic fighting. The goal is to weaken UAF resolve on the Pokrovsk line.
• RF Long-Term Projection: Putin's AI/Nuclear energy speeches serve to project an image of strategic strength and technological self-sufficiency, counteracting the narrative of a sanctions-crippled, technologically backward adversary.
• Hostile Amplification: RF milbloggers (Alex Parker, Операция Z) are aggressively amplifying the negotiation rumors, specifically calling it "capitulation."

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• The negotiation rumors, combined with high-impact strikes in safe rear areas (Ternopil), pose the greatest immediate threat to public sentiment and military morale. Rapid, definitive public rejection by the UAF/GoU leadership is mandatory.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• Zelenskyy’s meeting with Erdogan (Turkey) confirms efforts to stabilize Black Sea cooperation and diplomatic channels, acting as a geopolitical counterweight to the immediate US/RF "peace" narratives.
• Allied IO: The circulation of the “capitulation plan” by major Western media sources (FT, Reuters) suggests strong internal pressure within Allied governments to de-escalate, regardless of Ukraine’s position, which is a major diplomatic setback.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24 Hours (221730Z NOV 25 - 231730Z NOV 25)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Coordinated Pressure)

1. Tactical Exploitation (Pokrovsk): RF mechanized forces will exploit the damage inflicted by the FAB-3000 in Myrnohrad and attempt to bypass or seize Hryshyne, maintaining the momentum of the main assault.
2. Psychological Warfare Peak: RF and aligned media will intensify the "peace plan" narrative within the next 12 hours, focusing specifically on UAF military units at the front to suggest that their losses are now futile.
3. Heavy Drone Deployment: RF will likely deploy the SLON or similar heavy-lift UAS platforms to forward operating bases (FOBs) near the Pokrovsk or Kupyansk axis, preparing for operational testing in combat, likely against UAF supply dumps or field C2 nodes.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - Domestic Political Crisis)

A senior Ukrainian political or military figure, either through coercion or genuine belief, publicly suggests that the US/RF negotiation proposal must be considered due to current battlefield attrition. This would instantly fracture the national political consensus and potentially trigger widespread demoralization and unauthorized withdrawals in high-stress sectors (Pokrovsk).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. STRATCOM/PRESIDENT'S OFFICE: Execute IO Counter-Strike (IMMEDIATE).

   • Action: Issue an unequivocal, public rejection of any plan requiring territorial cession or the disarmament of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Frame the current kinetic fighting (Pokrovsk defense) as the necessary price for national survival and sovereignty. Target messaging specifically at frontline units and Western media simultaneously.
   • Rationale: The "capitulation plan" narrative is an immediate threat to morale and political cohesion, potentially undercutting the defense effort more effectively than any current RF kinetic strike.

2. J3/J6: Develop Counter-Heavy-Lift UAS Doctrine (URGENT).

   • Action: Immediately circulate intelligence on the SLON drone's 90kg payload capability to frontline units. Prioritize the deployment of multi-band electronic jamming systems capable of disrupting large-platform UAV C2/GPS, and assign dedicated light anti-aircraft teams (e.g., MANPADS, heavy machine guns) to protect key C2 and logistical points from this new heavy munition delivery threat.
   • Rationale: RF UAS capability is rapidly maturing beyond FPV; this new system requires tailored, specialized countermeasures before its combat introduction.

3. J4 (Logistics): Reinforce Pokrovsk C2 Resilience (HIGH).

   • Action: Given the critical political/IO pressure and the intense mechanized assault, double-down on protecting critical C2 and resupply nodes on the Pokrovsk/Kostiantynivka axis. Implement randomized movement patterns for high-value targets (e.g., fuel trucks, main ammo dumps) and ensure redundancy by opening additional, non-paved tertiary routes immediately.
   • Rationale: The combined kinetic and IO pressure aims to induce operational paralysis; logistics and C2 must remain fluid and resilient.

//END SITREP//