Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 212300Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 212000Z NOV 25 – 212300Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. All new data reinforces the MLCOA of a synchronized kinetic-cognitive offensive centered on the Pokrovsk axis, with the GLOC interdiction window having closed further. The deep strike campaign continues to exert maximum psychological pressure.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Ternopil Deep Strike (Confirmed Escalation): Confirmed use of Kh-101 missiles (ASTRA reporting) and Geran UAVs (Colonelcassad reporting) against civilian targets in Ternopil. This expands the RF strategic strike toolkit beyond previously reported KABs in this window, confirming capability to strike deep strategic depth on the western axis, directly supporting psychological objectives. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - FACT)
• Pokrovsk Axis / Southern Front (High Activity): RF MoD released propaganda of alleged UAF servicemen being captured near Krasnoarmeysk (Pokrovsk area) and being unaware of encirclement. This is a deliberate IO pre-condition for the main assault, aiming to degrade UAF morale and suggest impending collapse in the critical sector. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - JUDGMENT)
• Northern/Seversk Front (IO Pressure): RF sources (Alex Parker) are propagating highly optimistic claims of RF breakthrough in the Seversk direction (seizing Vyemka and Ivano-Daryevka, and entering Seversk city center). This narrative is likely intended to force UAF command to divert scarce reserves away from Pokrovsk. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - JUDGMENT)
• Crimean Strikes (UAF Response): Reports of explosions in Crimea, attributed to a missile strike, suggest UAF is maintaining pressure on RF rear areas despite the Pokrovsk crisis. Sevastopol issued and then cancelled an air raid warning. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - FACT)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• No new significant weather events. The continuation of long-range missile and UAV attacks (Ternopil, Crimea, Northern BLOC attacks) indicates sustained favorable conditions for fixed-wing and UAV operations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - FACT)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF UAV Activity (Northern Axis): Confirmed new groups of UAVs detected heading toward Chernihiv and Sumy regions (UAF Air Force). This activity ties down air defense assets needed elsewhere and sustains pressure on the northern border, fixing UAF reserves. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - FACT)
• RF Deep Strike Posture: Confirmed multiple deep kinetic strikes on Ternopil, a city far from the contact line, demonstrating continued commitment to maximum psychological pressure over immediate tactical gain. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - FACT)

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Integrated Deep Strike: RF demonstrates the ability to execute simultaneous deep kinetic strikes across the strategic depth (Ternopil, Crimea) while sustaining high-intensity ground pressure (Pokrovsk IO), maximizing C2 workload on UAF High Command.
2. Effective Psychological Manipulation: The immediate, coordinated use of Reuters and Russian channels to push the US/RF peace deal narrative, combined with battlefield IO (encirclement claims near Krasnoarmeysk), shows masterful synchronization of political and tactical disinformation.

Intentions:

1. Impose Operational Paralysis: The primary intention remains to use political and psychological shock (peace rumors, internal corruption scandals) to cause sufficient hesitation and mistrust within UAF C2 to delay the operational response to the imminent Pokrovsk ground attack.
2. Overmatch Pokrovsk Defenses: Sustain localized force superiority (40th/155th OMBR) and logistics starvation (GLOC interdiction) long enough to achieve a decisive, strategically marketable breakthrough toward the operational goal (Kostiantynivka/Pokrovsk).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• IO Amplification of Political Crisis: RF sources are actively amplifying internal UAF political instability (Vice-Prime Minister Kachka calling for resignations in NCRECP) to reinforce the collapse narrative, linking kinetic success to administrative failure.
• Propaganda Focus Shift (Northern Front): The sudden, highly dramatic claim of entry into Seversk (Alex Parker) is a likely diversionary IO effort intended to draw UAF attention away from the real decisive effort near Pokrovsk. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - JUDGMENT)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF Sustainment: No new data contradicts the previous assessment of RF readiness to sustain high-intensity conflict (confirmed financial commitments). RF IO is actively promoting its ability to export high-tech military hardware (Geran UAVs to Algeria), signaling confidence in its production base. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - FACT/JUDGMENT)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 remains highly effective in synchronizing multi-domain operations (Deep Strike, IO, Ground Assault preparation). The release of the UAF POW testimony (MoD Russia) immediately preceding the expected Pokrovsk attack highlights sophisticated timing designed to maximize demoralization at the line of contact. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Strategic Response: UAF/Kyiv response to the Ternopil attack has been to raise the incident at the UN Security Council (RBC-Ukraine), demonstrating reliance on international diplomatic pressure to counter RF terror tactics.
• Frontline Resilience: UAF units are executing successful local strikes (Shadow Unit previously confirmed) and engaging RF positions (Kupiansk axis reported by Butusov Plus), demonstrating tactical initiative despite the strategic IO environment.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Deep Interdiction): Reports of missile strikes in Crimea suggest UAF is maintaining its deep strike capability and operational tempo against RF rear logistics/C2 nodes.
• Setback (Information Overload): The cumulative weight of the Ternopil strike, the peace deal rumors, and the internal political turmoil severely taxes UAF ability to maintain centralized, clear C2 in the decisive Pokrovsk sector.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: C2 and Trust: The simultaneous political resignations, corruption investigations, and false peace narratives create the optimal environment for RF's MDCOA (Operational Paralysis). Trust in command integrity and strategic clarity must be immediately restored.
• Requirement: Urgent reinforcement of counter-battery fire systems and mobile air defense along the Kostiantynivka GLOC to protect convoy movement against expected SpN/UAV interdiction efforts.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• Peace Narrative (CRITICAL AMPLIFICATION): The report that US/RF peace terms will be announced to Zelensky tomorrow (Operatsiya Z, Reuters) is the core element of the current IO campaign, designed to enforce the "fait accompli" narrative.
• Corruption/Weakness Theme: RF outlets (TASS) highlight US sanctions on RF individuals and RF internal corruption raids, while simultaneously pushing the narrative of UAF government corruption (Kachka/NCRECP resignations). This serves to undermine the legitimacy of both sides in the eyes of the international community, furthering the "Kyiv must be excluded" narrative.
• Global Diversions: RF sources attempt to link the US/RF peace plan to unrelated geopolitical events (e.g., Venezuela's opposition leader Maria Machado), attempting to create the illusion of a grand, negotiated global settlement managed entirely by Moscow and Washington.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Sentiment in Western Ukraine (Ternopil) is likely characterized by outrage and fear following the confirmed Kh-101/Geran strikes on residential areas.
• Morale among soldiers near Pokrovsk is the immediate target of the IO campaign (MoD Russia POW testimony claiming encirclement, logistics failure). This must be countered immediately.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• Ukraine utilizing the Ternopil strike at the UNSC is a necessary diplomatic counter-move, but it cannot substitute for decisive battlefield action.
• RF propaganda highlighting potential internal conflicts within NATO/EU (Polish President allegedly preparing for EU exit - TASS) is a long-term effort to degrade cohesion and belief in sustained Western support.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

The synchronized kinetic and cognitive attack is already underway. The expected timeline for the GLOC interdiction and the main ground assault remains critical (0-8 hours).

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4 Hours (212300Z NOV 25 - 220300Z NOV 25)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Synchronized Attack Execution)

1. GLOC Interdiction Execution: RF Spetsnaz or high-mobility sabotage/reconnaissance groups (DRG) will initiate the complex ambush on the Kostiantynivka GLOC, possibly using high-volume FPV drone swarm attacks or command-detonated IEDs, aiming for sustained closure (>6 hours).
2. Psychological Warfare Peak: A high-impact IO event (e.g., alleged, fabricated internal UAF directive announcing a strategic retreat or confirming the peace terms) will be released to target operational C2 during the critical GLOC closure period.
3. Forward Assault Prep: Intense preparatory fires targeting UAF command posts, artillery positions, and known strongpoints immediately north of Pokrovsk (Volodymyrivka–Sofiivka axis) will be executed to suppress resistance before the 40th/155th OMBR main effort.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Operational Penetration)

• The MLCOA is executed. UAF C2 failure (due to IO confusion/political distraction) results in a disorganized defense and logistical collapse at the forward line of contact (FLOT). The 40th OMBR exploits this logistical failure to achieve a rapid penetration of the main defensive line near Volodymyrivka. The RF forces utilize maneuver elements (T-90M/BMP-3) to bypass immediate tactical resistance and achieve a depth of 7-10 km, threatening to cut off secondary defense lines and forcing a general, costly UAF withdrawal in the Pokrovsk sector.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. CINC/STRATCOM: Immediate All-Hands Counter-IO Directive (0-1 Hour).

   • Action: The highest level of UAF command (CINC or President) must issue an immediate, public, and internal address directly refuting the "US/RF Peace Deal" narrative, condemning the Ternopil strike as a terror attack, and reaffirming the single priority: Defense of Pokrovsk.
   • Rationale: This is the only way to neutralize the cognitive domain attack and ensure tactical commanders trust the validity of their current operational orders.

2. J3 (Operations) / JFSOC: Priority Fire and Counter-Interdiction on Kostiantynivka (IMMEDIATE).

   • Action: Allocate 70% of available indirect fire assets (Artillery/MLRS) in the Pokrovsk sector to pre-planned, timed fires along the Kostiantynivka GLOC and suspected SpN avenues of approach. Deploy specialized security forces with FPV counter-UAV capabilities to defend known choke points.
   • Rationale: The GLOC must remain open. Pre-emptive suppression of the interdiction force is the priority kinetic action.

3. J4 (Logistics) / J3 (Air Defense): Alternate/Air Resupply Contingency (0-4 Hours).

   • Action: Immediately activate a backup logistics route (even if less efficient) and prepare all available rotary-wing assets for emergency air resupply missions into forward positions, utilizing low-light/NOE flight profiles, to be executed immediately upon confirmed GLOC closure.
   • Rationale: Mitigate the MDCOA of ammunition starvation during a sustained road closure, allowing FLOT units to hold ground.

//END SITREP//