Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 211800Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 211200Z NOV 25 – 211800Z NOV 25 (Afternoon Update) ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. All indicators point to the immediate initiation of the Pokrovsk ground assault, capitalizing on the successful strategic shaping operation (energy strikes). Diplomatic activity provides critical windows for high-level support.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Deep Rear (Western/Northern Ukraine): Confirmed follow-on damage reports from the mass strike wave.
  • Chernihiv Oblast: Confirmed hit by enemy UAV on an energy facility during the morning. (Source: OMA)
  • Ternopil: Renewed imagery confirms the destruction of a multi-story residential building and confirmed fatalities, validating the pattern of maximizing civilian harm. (Source: Ukrainian channels/Zelenskyy)
  • National Grid: Repair crews are engaged; however, the impact remains severe, constraining both industrial and logistical consumption.
• FLOT - Pokrovsk Axis: No confirmed mechanized breakthrough has been initiated yet, maintaining the immediate pre-assault window. Heavy Russian artillery fire is expected to escalate significantly within the next 4-8 hours.
• FLOT - Zaporizhzhia Axis: Confirmed FPV drone activity against UAF positions, reflecting ongoing high-tempo tactical engagement to fix forces and utilize the hybrid warfare asymmetry. (Source: Russian channels, WarGonzo).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Recent Russian military media shows heavy mud impacting wheeled/tracked vehicle mobility, specifically featuring a 2S35 Koalitsiya-SV operating in severely degraded terrain. This favors dismounted operations, prepared defensive positions, and potentially limits the speed of any RF mechanized breakthrough attempt in the Donbas if similar conditions exist.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Forces: Artillery units (e.g., 37th Separate Motor Rifle Brigade elements) are celebrating the "Day of Missile Forces and Artillery" (19 November) with aggressive operational tempo, suggesting high morale and continued availability of ordnance. The use of advanced systems (2S35 Koalitsiya-SV) is confirmed.
• UAF Forces (AD/Logistics): UAF President Zelenskyy confirmed the scale of the saturation attack, citing over 470 strike UAVs and 48 missiles of various types utilized in the recent strike wave. This large number underscores the saturation strategy and the immense strain on UAF Air Defense reserves.
• Deep Rear Activity (NEW): High-level US Department of Defense officials (Minister of the Army Dan Driskill and Chief of Staff General Randy George) arrived in Kyiv for an unannounced visit, suggesting immediate high-level coordination and potential rapid logistical adjustments.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Strategic Strike Depth: Demonstrated capability to launch a complex saturation strike (470+ UAVs, 48 missiles) across the entire depth of the operational space, simultaneously targeting energy infrastructure and civilian morale centers. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
2. Hybrid Logistics: Continued reliance on military-civilian hybrid logistics support (via "Dva Mayora" fundraising for the 106th Division, 119th Artillery Regiment for vehicles/jammers) to sustain forward units, particularly in the Sumy direction, compensating for institutional weaknesses.

Intentions:

1. Exploitation: RF intent remains the immediate kinetic exploitation of the nationwide power outages to pressure the Pokrovsk axis. The failure of the mechanized assault to launch within the last 6 hours may indicate internal friction (logistics/terrain issues) or a decision to wait for the logistical crisis to worsen.
2. Information Warfare: Aggressively utilizing the deep strike success (Ternopil imagery) and amplifying diplomatic narratives (AXIOS peace plan) to erode Ukrainian internal confidence and international support cohesion.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Targeting Priority Confirmation: Continued targeting of energy facilities (Chernihiv) confirms the strategic focus is on resource and logistical strangulation.
• Denial of Atrocities: Russian military channels are actively posting counter-narratives claiming all hits are "military," which is immediately contradicted by the confirmed residential building strikes. This dual narrative maintains domestic Russian support while attempting to sow confusion internationally.
• Focus on UAV/Counter-UAS: Direct appeals from RF units for RF receivers/jammers underscore the continued importance of the counter-UAS fight, especially on the periphery (Sumy direction).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF Logistics: Sustained by continuous materiel donations for front-line units. Artillery/Missile Day celebrations signal high confidence in ordnance supply for the immediate term.
• UAF Logistics: STATUS REMAINS CRITICAL. The successful deep strike severely limits rail resupply, forcing maximum dependence on the vulnerable Kostiantynivka road corridor for the Pokrovsk sector.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2: Exhibited effective strategic synchronization of the strike wave. Tactical C2 for the ground assault is currently unclear, as the anticipated 40th/155th OMBR launch window appears to have stalled (T-0 delay).
• UAF C2: Strategic C2 is focused on crisis management and securing international support (Zelenskyy's communication, US DoD visit). Tactical C2 is stressed by the immediate need for resource reallocation (AD/repair crews) to the rear while holding the line at the FLOT.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Posture: Maintaining defensive cohesion, despite logistical fragility.
• Readiness: Forward units (Pokrovsk) are at maximum alert. Logistical support is at HIGH RISK due to road dependence. The presence of US DOD leaders suggests a rapid assessment and acceleration of required military aid, potentially bypassing bureaucratic delays.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes: Active counter-IO against Russian atrocity denial (Ternopil). Successful engagement of RF personnel via precision UAV strikes on the FLOT. (Source: Butusov Plus).
• Setbacks (CRITICAL):
  • Confirmed UAV hit on an energy facility in Chernihiv.
  • Confirmation of the large volume of inbound ordnance (470+ UAVs, 48 missiles) confirms the strategic failure to adequately defend critical infrastructure.
  • Unconfirmed but disturbing reports of the execution of UAF prisoners of war (Mirnohrad), confirming RF disregard for international law.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL SHORTFALL: Mobile, short-range AD/C-UAS for immediate deployment along the Kostiantynivka road to counter the imminent SpN/drone ambush threat.
• Logistical Priority: Immediate technical assessment of the Kamyan’ske rail hub is required to enable long-term logistical recovery planning. This remains an unacceptable intelligence gap (Priority 2, daily report).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO - Strategic Disruption (NEW): RF channels (ASTRA, Operation Z) are heavily amplifying the AXIOS report regarding secret US-Russia peace talks and claiming a pro-Russian plan is being developed by "Witkoff." This narrative is highly corrosive, designed to undermine Ukrainian sovereignty and generate domestic distrust in US/NATO commitment, perfectly coinciding with the tactical crisis. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF IO - Atrocity Denial: Continued denial of civilian targeting, promoting the narrative that the deep strikes were necessary "denazification" measures.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Sentiment is strained by the energy crisis and the graphic confirmation of civilian casualties in Western Ukraine.
• The unannounced arrival of high-level US military leadership in Kyiv offers a crucial counter-narrative, signaling sustained military commitment despite the AXIOS rumors.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• Positive Development: Unannounced visit by US Army leadership. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Negative Development: Amplification of the alleged secret US-Russia peace plan (AXIOS report), which requires immediate, high-level diplomatic counter-messaging to maintain international coalition cohesion.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

The current phase is the Immediate Pre-Assault Window (T-0 Imminent). The delay in the ground assault (4-8 hours beyond previous estimate) is likely due to either terrain constraints (mud) or final logistical/fire preparation.

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4-12 Hours (211800Z NOV 25 - 220600Z NOV 25)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Synchronized Attack Initiation)

1. Pokrovsk Mechanized Assault (Delayed Launch): The 40th and 155th OMBRs initiate the concentrated mechanized assault in the Volodymyrivka–Sofiivka sector under heavy protective artillery fire (including 2S35/Malka systems) to achieve rapid tactical penetration.
2. GLOC Interdiction (SpN Execution): RF SpN executes the complex ambush operation targeting the Kostiantynivka road corridor, likely targeting a critical resupply convoy simultaneously with the ground assault launch to maximize confusion and ammunition starvation.
3. Fixed Wing/KAB Resumption: After the initial post-strike BDA pause, RF Tactical Aviation resumes mass KAB deployment on fixing axes (Kharkiv/Sumy) to prevent UAF reserve movement.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Tactical Exploitation)

• RF forces (40th/155th OMBRs) achieve rapid operational penetration (>8km) at Pokrovsk, compromising a key UAF defense node (e.g., Ocheretyne, or nearby sector). Crucially, this is compounded by the successful interdiction and temporary closure of the Kostiantynivka GLOC, preventing UAF reserve commitment (e.g., 47th Mech BDE/92nd Mech BDE) for 24+ hours.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (Operations) / J2 (Intelligence): Execute Hunter-Killer Operations (IMMEDIATE - POKROVSK REAR).

   • Action: Immediately transition the rear area security forces (Operation VIPER HUNT) from defensive escort to aggressive "Hunter-Killer" patrols in the 30km radius west of Kostiantynivka. All detected FPV/SpN signatures must be targeted and destroyed preemptively to ensure the Kostiantynivka GLOC remains open during the ground assault.
   • Rationale: Preventing road closure is now the single most critical factor in holding the line at Pokrovsk.

2. J2 (Intelligence) / J4 (Logistics): Force Closure on Kamyan’ske BDA (URGENT).

   • Action: Leverage the high-level US DoD visit to facilitate the rapid deployment of a specialized engineering assessment team (either UAF or NATO-vetted) to conduct a full technical BDA of the Kamyan’ske rail hub.
   • Rationale: The prolonged inability to assess this strategic asset is causing operational negligence in long-term resupply planning.

3. STRATCOM / MFA: Counter AXIOS Peace Plan Narrative (CRITICAL).

   • Action: The President's Office, in conjunction with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) and the US DoD delegation, must issue a unified, unambiguous denial of any secret pro-Russian peace plan. Emphasize that the only viable plan is one based on full territorial integrity and withdrawal, linking Russia's current strategic strikes directly to its unwillingness to negotiate in good faith.
   • Rationale: Neutralize the information warfare attack designed to fracture the Western coalition at a critical tactical moment.

//END SITREP//