Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 201200Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 200600Z NOV 25 – 201200Z NOV 25 (Day Cycle Update) ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH. The operational picture is characterized by continued RF ground and IO pressure, countered by effective UAF deep strike attrition and sustained defense/training. The criticality of the Kostiantynivka GLOC remains the decisive operational factor.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Pokrovsk Axis / Kostiantynivka Corridor (GLOC): Remains the operational center of gravity. No confirmed SpN interdiction action has been reported, confirming the success of UAF counter-measures during the peak overnight threat window (Previous SITREP). However, the threat remains active and is expected to shift to the next low-visibility period (see Section 5).
• Gulyaypole Salient (Zaporizhzhia Axis): RF sources claim success by the Vostok group, alleging breaches along the Yanchur River and capture of Sladkoye and Novouspenovskoye, placing UAF positions under pressure towards Pokrovskoye and Ropnopolye. This claim is UNCONFIRMED by Blue Force tracking but confirms RF operational focus on pressuring the flanks of the Gulyaypole garrison. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - Based on source intent)
• Operational Rear Area: Confirmed continued RF use of FPV/loitering munitions against Ukrainian military transport (trucks/vans), suggesting persistent RF tactical ISR and strike capability targeting logistical and troop movement across the immediate rear. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - Message: 181728Z)
• Southern/Southeastern Air Activity: Ukrainian Air Force reports renewed tactical aviation activity in the southeastern direction, indicating RF maintaining air pressure (ISR/CAS readiness) to support ground operations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - Message: 181932Z)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Daylight hours reduce the effectiveness of SpN infiltration but increase the risk of RF fixed-wing or tactical drone CAS/ISR.
• The effects of the TPP strikes (500k power outage) continue to affect RF infrastructure and logistics in occupied DPR.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Forces (Ground): The pressure exerted by the newly committed 40th OMBR (Pokrovsk axis) is synchronized with the alleged offensive efforts by the Vostok Group (Gulyaypole axis). RF utilizes modified UAZ vehicles (Bukhanka vans) with 'Mangal' (cage) armor, suggesting adaptations to counter UAF FPV strikes, particularly for medical and logistics roles. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - Message: 061300Z)
• UAF Forces: Maintaining active defense. Azov Brigade footage confirms high-readiness training (CQB, water survival, marksmanship) and effective use of advanced counter-battery radar (K12 system), demonstrating capability to degrade RF fire support. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - Messages: 180707Z, 171457Z, 151620Z)
• Control Measures: Focus remains on deep defense, aggressive C-UAS/C-SpN measures on the GLOC, and maintaining high-quality specialized unit training.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Hybrid Logistics Resilience: RF continues to demonstrate a massive, institutionalized mobilization of civilian/NGO support ("Narodny Front," "Zdorovoe Otechestvo") providing critical military equipment (motorcycles, ATVs, FPV/Sokol drones, body armor, and even specialized vehicle modifications like the UAZ Mangal) totaling millions of rubles in value. This capacity significantly buffers conventional military logistical shortfalls, particularly in niche equipment. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - Messages: 100700Z, 070700Z, 061300Z)
2. Adaptive C-IED/C-UAS: RF sappers are utilizing small, commercial-derived UAVs for remote demolition/demining operations in areas like Orekhovo, indicating adaptive force protection and obstacle clearing tactics. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - Message: 181806Z)
3. IO Escalation (Strategic): RF messaging is now linking UAF long-range strikes (e.g., ATACMS on Voronezh) directly to US permission, intending to trigger escalation rhetoric between the US and Russia and potentially pressure US policy regarding strike targets within Russia proper. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - Message: 181931Z)

Intentions:

1. Sustained Ground Pressure (Pokrovsk/Gulyaypole): RF intends to maintain simultaneous pressure on key UAF defensive salients, particularly in Zaporizhzhia (Gulyaypole) and Donbas (Pokrovsk), aiming to force UAF resource dilution.
2. Protect Vulnerable Logistics: The focus on adapting logistics vehicles (UAZ Mangal armor) and using UAVs for sapper work shows intent to protect supply chains and clear routes, confirming that RF perceives UAF FPV/IED actions as effective threats to their sustainment.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• RF: Increased public demonstration of FPV drone use (oOSpN 'Ohotnik' footage) against UAF military transport, likely for morale and recruitment purposes, but also confirming successful localized tactical strikes. Integration of civilian-sourced vehicle armor (Mangal).
• UAF: Continual high-level training and integration of advanced ISR/strike coordination (Counter-Battery Radar/HIMARS correlation).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF Logistics (Hybrid): Functionally robust due to the massive flow of supplemental civilian-sourced military gear, offsetting shortfalls in official procurement or standard logistics processes. However, the requirement for Mangal armor indicates high vulnerability of rear-area transport to UAF attrition.
• UAF Logistics (CRITICAL): The situation is unchanged. Full reliance on the Kostiantynivka GLOC and the persistent, critical lack of a Kamyan’ske rail BDA/ETR make the entire forward operational sustainment fragile.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 demonstrates high effectiveness in integrating operational maneuver (40th/155th OMBR) with strategic IO (escalation messaging regarding ATACMS use) and parallel hybrid logistical/mobilization efforts (Narodny Front), confirming a multi-domain approach to the conflict. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Posture: Active defense and localized counter-attrition. The use of specialized units (Azov) for high-intensity training suggests UAF C2 is prioritizing professionalization and maintaining elite unit readiness for immediate counter-attack or stabilization roles.
• Readiness: High, supported by successful counter-battery efforts (Message: 151620Z) and confirmed capture of enemy personnel (Message: 131225Z). Logistics remains the primary operational risk factor.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes:
  • Sustained defensive operational tempo demonstrated by specialized units in trench warfare and reconnaissance (Azov footage).
  • Confirmed capability to utilize Counter-Battery Radar systems effectively to eliminate RF fire support.
  • No confirmed SpN GLOC closure during the high-threat window.
• Setbacks: RF sources allege tactical advances near Gulyaypole, which, if confirmed, represent a successful localized RF offensive, drawing UAF attention away from Pokrovsk.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: The lack of secure, high-volume logistical redundancy (Kamyan’ske ETR) severely constrains operational flexibility and the ability to maneuver reserves.
• Equipment Requirement: Continued need for advanced ISR platforms (Sokol VTOL equivalent) to counter the demonstrated RF reconnaissance/strike capability.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO (Domestic Mobilization): Continuous stream of content from "Narodny Front" and "Zdorovoe Otechestvo" (Messages: 181607Z, 101300Z, 070700Z). This multi-layered IO campaign focuses on:
  1. Heroism and Sacrifice: Testimonials from soldiers ('Buryat,' 'Buddist') appealing to patriotism and historical grievances.
  2. Civic Duty: Integration of military support with normalized civilian life (e.g., GTO physical readiness events in Stupino).
  3. Transparency of Aid: Explicitly listing equipment delivered (drones, ATVs, generators) to maintain donor confidence and drive further contributions.
• RF IO (Strategic Escalation): The messaging around UAF ATACMS use in Voronezh (Message: 181931Z) aims to manipulate US-Russia relations, creating a geopolitical friction point to benefit RF operations.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• RF Morale: Appears sustained and institutionalized, driven by the highly effective hybrid mobilization apparatus which links combat success directly to civilian participation.
• UAF Morale: Remains high, reinforced by successful kinetic actions (counter-battery, prisoner captures, training readiness) and strong unit-level identity (Azov content).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• The RF IO campaign alleging UAF ATACMS strikes on Russian soil requires immediate diplomatic clarification by Ukraine and its allies to prevent strategic damage to the logistics pipeline, potentially linking back to the previously observed Polish sabotage narrative.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

The failure of the initial SpN interdiction MLCOA during the night cycle (200000Z NOV 25) increases the probability of a higher-risk execution attempt during the next period of reduced visibility. RF ground forces are now fully committed (40th OMBR confirmed).

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours (201800Z NOV 25 - 211200Z NOV 25)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Resynchronization and Execution)

1. Synchronized GLOC Interdiction and Ground Assault: RF SpN will execute the planned interdiction of the Kostiantynivka GLOC under the cover of the next night cycle (after 201800Z NOV 25). This action will be synchronized with a heavy, coordinated preparatory artillery barrage followed by high-intensity maneuver warfare conducted by the 40th and 155th OMBR on the Pokrovsk axis, seeking to exploit the resulting logistical friction.
2. Increased Tactical Air Pressure: RF tactical aviation (reported activity in the southeast) will conduct increased Close Air Support (CAS) sorties or targeted guided munitions strikes against identified UAF command posts and localized reserves in the immediate vicinity of the Pokrovsk or Gulyaypole advances.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Unchanged, but greater probability)

• Logistical Collapse and Deep Penetration: A successful, protracted SpN closure of the Kostiantynivka GLOC (lasting $>12$ hours) coincides with the simultaneous breakthrough of RF mechanized forces (40th/155th OMBR) on the Pokrovsk axis. Simultaneously, the rising SAR activity at AB Monchegorsk/Pskov (CRITICAL GAP) culminates in a targeted air campaign using ASMs against secondary UAF logistical hubs and high-value ADS nodes protecting the rear (e.g., in the Dnipropetrovsk Oblast). This synergistic pressure breaks the immediate resupply corridor and prevents external reinforcement, leading to a forced operational withdrawal on the Pokrovsk axis.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (Maneuver) / J2 (ISR Fusion): GLOC Denial and Counter-Attack Preparation (IMMEDIATE - 201600Z NOV 25).

   • Action: Preempt the MLCOA by executing a pre-planned, high-volume counter-battery strike along the Kostiantynivka-Pokrovsk axis between 201700Z NOV 25 and 201900Z NOV 25 to disrupt RF preparatory fire. Place armored reserves in a 30-minute reaction window to counter the immediate post-interdiction breakthrough attempt.
   • Rationale: Proactive disruption of preparatory fire degrades the effectiveness of the synchronized ground assault, buying time for Hunter-Killer teams to neutralize SpN threats.

2. J4 (Logistics): Critical Stockpile Dispersal (IMMEDIATE).

   • Action: Given the persistent rail BDA gap and the imminent road threat, direct the dispersal of the remaining three days of ammunition/fuel reserves from centralized depots into smaller, hardened, and geographically separated caches forward of the vulnerable GLOC choke points.
   • Rationale: Mitigates the single point of failure (GLOC interdiction) by distributing risk and ensuring forward units have a minimal buffer to sustain the defense during a prolonged closure (>12 hours).

3. STRATCOM / J2: Counter RF Escalation Narrative (URGENT).

   • Action: Immediately task STRATCOM to prepare and release documented counter-narratives and third-party verification to refute RF claims regarding ATACMS use in Voronezh being tied to US targeting policy. Coordinate this release with international partners to stabilize the diplomatic information environment.
   • Rationale: Neutralizing this IO vector is necessary to protect the supply chain from potential international political friction or self-imposed limitations on critical Western military aid.

//END SITREP//