Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 191300Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 191000Z NOV 25 – 191300Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. Current intelligence confirms the Ukrainian Armed Forces (UAF) maintain high combat efficiency through drone-based ISR-strike integration, while RF doctrine continues its pattern of synchronized conventional pressure (Pokrovsk) and strategic hybrid interdiction (Kostiantynivka GLOC). The information domain remains highly contested, with RF increasing ideological and morale-focused narratives.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Pokrovsk Axis (FEBA): Remains the main axis of RF conventional effort, spearheaded by the confirmed presence and integration of the 40th Separate Marine Brigade (OMBR) and 155th OMBR. RF operational reporting confirms high-intensity shelling with FAB (air-dropped bomb) munitions targeting UAF strongpoints in wooded areas (Message: 185529Z), indicating preparatory fires are increasing in scope and lethality ahead of the anticipated ground assault.
• Kostiantynivka Corridor (GLOC): The critical logistical lifeline remains intact but under imminent threat. The threat window favors RF Spetsnaz (SpN) action during the next period of low visibility (191900Z NOV 25).
• Southern Axis (Tavriiska/Myrnohrad): UAF 79th Air Assault Brigade (OAeMB) confirms continued operational success in suppressing enemy attempts, demonstrated by successful drone strikes on vehicles and personnel (Message: 131546Z). This activity, coupled with the captured Russian soldier's report (Message: 171452Z) regarding the 5th Separate Guards Motor Rifle Brigade near Avdiivka, suggests high RF attrition rates in this sector, requiring reliance on mobilized/convicted personnel.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Current daylight conditions favor UAF precision FPV and ISR activities, demonstrated by the clear footage and successful strikes from 90th OAeMB (Messages: 10/3, 9/10). The next period of darkness remains the critical window for RF infiltration.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Forces (Ground): Ground elements are posturing for the breakthrough attempt. The increased use of FAB munitions suggests a dedicated, high-explosive clearance effort targeting concealed UAF positions prior to armored advance. RF morale is bolstered by overt religious and political messaging (Messages: 181402Z, 181844Z) linking the operation to religious justification and societal ideals.
• UAF Forces: Units, specifically 90th OAeMB 'ONIX' and 79th OAeMB (Tavriiska), display advanced tactical adaptation utilizing FPV systems for immediate, localized attrition and surgical strikes on fortified positions (Messages: 10/3, 9/10). UAF units are simultaneously focusing on internal readiness and morale maintenance (79th and Presidential Brigade training messages, 180603Z, 181347Z).
• Control Measures: Aggressive ISR coverage of the GLOC remains paramount but must be supported by kinetic Hunter-Killer patrols to counter the confirmed SpN positioning.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Heavy Precision Firepower: RF forces can deploy FAB series air-dropped munitions (likely guided variants) to suppress deep UAF strongpoints and hardened defensive positions, creating localized breaches for ground forces. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - Observed BDA: 185529Z)
2. Hybrid Warfare Resilience: RF doctrine continues to integrate conventional attack with hybrid (IO/SpN/Political) campaigns aimed at degrading UAF logistics and political stability simultaneously.
3. Basic Counter-UAS Adaptation: RF troops are engaging in improvised C-UAS tactics, attempting to manually intercept UAF ISR/FPV drones (e.g., using branches/switches), confirming awareness and low-tech adaptation to the drone threat. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - Observed: 181746Z)

Intentions:

1. Synchronized Operational Degradation: The intent is to use high-explosive conventional fires (FABs) to shatter the immediate FEBA defense, while SpN interdiction strangles the resupply, leading to a UAF localized collapse on the Pokrovsk axis.
2. Deepening Ideological Conflict: RF IO seeks to justify the war ideologically, linking it to the protection of traditional/Orthodox values and aggressively framing UAF resistance as foreign-backed corruption and religious persecution (Messages: 181235Z, 110947Z).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• RF: Increased reliance on high-yield air-delivered munitions (FABs) for preparation. Observed use of improvised C-UAS tactics (swatting drones with branches) suggesting a lack of universal, sophisticated EW/C-UAS equipment at the platoon level.
• UAF: Continued excellence in FPV/ISR-Strike operations, particularly against dug-in enemy positions and personnel, forcing RF troops to employ primitive countermeasures or suffer high attrition.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF Logistics: Sustained operations rely heavily on mobilizing low-readiness personnel (recidivists/convicts), as reported by captured Russian personnel (Message: 171452Z). This suggests persistent manpower issues, despite the ability to deliver heavy ordnance (FABs) to the front.
• UAF Logistics (CRITICAL): Total operational dependency on the Kostiantynivka GLOC is now coupled with a critical logistical requirement for relay and repeater equipment for FPV operations (Message: 181908Z), confirming that even successful drone operations face range/C2 constraints.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 remains effective in synchronizing multi-domain pressure. UAF C2 demonstrates adaptability and high decentralized tactical effectiveness (e.g., immediate FPV response). The primary risk to UAF C2 is systemic failure induced by GLOC closure. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Posture: Highly defensive but actively attritional. Units maintain focus on physical and combat readiness (79th OAeMB, Presidential Brigade).
• Readiness: High, but facing an imminent test of logistical resilience against the MLCOA. Successful attrition is generating morale (Dempster-Shafer belief: 0.077 Morale Boost).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes: Confirmed destruction of enemy strongpoints and vehicles by 90th and 79th OAeMBs using FPV/drone technology, showcasing technical superiority in localized engagements. Capture/interview of a Russian serviceman provides timely HUMINT on OOB and morale (5th Guards Motor Rifle Brigade).
• Setbacks: The tactical intelligence report from BUCHOS PLUS (Message: 181908Z) and Історія без міфів (Message: 181801Z) highlights a critical shortage of drone relay/repeater infrastructure, limiting the full potential of FPV/ISR operations.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Beyond kinetic security for the GLOC, there is an immediate requirement to supply Drone Relay and Repeater Systems (NRK) to front-line units (e.g., 425th OBBpS, as seen in fundraising appeals). This is a crucial force multiplier constraint.
• CONSTRAINT: Logistics remain the single greatest point of failure, compounded by the persistent lack of Kamyan'ske rail BDA/ETR.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO (Dehumanization/Atrocity Narrative): A new, highly aggressive disinformation vector alleges UAF is executing Russian POWs and harvesting organs for the black market (Message: 181548Z). This narrative is designed to harden RF troop resolve and justify atrocities by creating maximum outrage and eliminating any perceived moral common ground. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - Classic atrocity propaganda)
• RF IO (Internal Moral Cohesion): RF strategy heavily emphasizes conservative and religious narratives (Orthodox Church involvement, anti-abortion rhetoric, praising military clergy) to establish a moral framework for the war, portraying the conflict as a defense of Russian civilization against Western decay (Messages: 181402Z, 181235Z).
• UAF IO/Morale: UAF output focuses on professional competence, celebrating unit anniversaries, recognizing NGU sergeants, and highlighting the professionalism of its forces (Messages: 181347Z, 180603Z).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• UAF Morale: Appears resilient, with units openly engaging in resource fundraising for critical equipment (NRK repeaters). However, agitation for broader mobilization among the male population is evident in public discourse (Message: 181859Z).
• RF Domestic Sentiment: Sustained religious/ideological framing attempts to offset the physical and materiel costs of the conflict. Public comments indicate high praise for frontline soldiers (Message: 180630Z).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• No new international developments, but the continued RF IO campaign against UAF (organ harvesting, religious persecution) is explicitly designed to complicate diplomatic support and increase international pressure on Kyiv.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

The predictive timeline remains focused on the convergence of the conventional assault and the logistical cut-off.

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12 Hours (191300Z - 200100Z NOV 25)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Based on persistent SpN threat and observed escalation of preparatory fire)

1. Maximum Preparation (FAB/Artillery): RF fire control will maximize the use of heavy artillery and air-delivered munitions (FABs) against known UAF defensive strongpoints (woods, dugouts) along the Pokrovsk axis leading up to the low-visibility period (191900Z NOV 25).
2. GLOC Kinetic Interdiction (SpN): RF SpN will execute the planned kinetic action against the Kostiantynivka GLOC between 191900Z and 200100Z NOV 25, focusing on achieving a road closure exceeding 4 hours.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 48 Hours

(MEDIUM-HIGH CONFIDENCE - Synergy of conventional, hybrid, and air threats)

• Strategic Air/Ground Synchronization: A successful SpN closure of the GLOC coincides with a massive ground assault by the 40th/155th OMBR. Simultaneously, the rising SAR activity at AB Monchegorsk/Pskov (previous report) culminates in a targeted air campaign using ASMs against secondary UAF logistical hubs (fuel depots, alternative road networks leading from Dnipro) and high-value air defense nodes protecting these rear areas. This complex action targets the UAF defense-in-depth, converting a localized tactical crisis into an operational rout.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (Maneuver) / SOF Command: Implement 'GLOC No-Go Zone' (IMMEDIATE).

   • Action: Declare a pre-emptive fire mission grid along the most vulnerable 5km stretch of the Kostiantynivka GLOC, authorizing immediate kinetic response (TTL: 5 minutes) on any confirmed non-UAF personnel movement within this zone during the hours of darkness (191900Z – 200300Z). Hunter-Killer patrols must be backed by stand-off heavy fire.
   • Rationale: The threat timeline is now definitive. Decisive, overwhelming force is required to deter or destroy the SpN element before mission completion.

2. J4 (Logistics) / Procurement: Expedite Drone C2 Components (URGENT).

   • Action: Given confirmed FPV limitations, immediately divert non-critical funds or initiate emergency procurement for FPV relay/repeater systems (NRK) and Starlink hardware for priority frontline units (Pokrovsk and Tavriiska axis).
   • Rationale: The FPV/ISR-Strike cycle is the most effective current attrition mechanism. Enhancing its range and reliability directly offsets the RF conventional force advantage.

3. STRATCOM / J2: Counter RF Atrocity Narrative (URGENT).

   • Action: Immediately develop a coordinated counter-narrative against the RF "POW organ harvesting" claim. Focus on validating and disseminating footage/interviews demonstrating ethical UAF treatment of POWs (e.g., the 79th OAeMB interview with the captured Russian soldier).
   • Rationale: This RF narrative is designed to erode international political support and justify future RF war crimes. It must be neutralized rapidly and definitively with factual evidence.

//END SITREP//