Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 190700Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 182130Z NOV 25 – 190700Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. Core analysis of the synchronized conventional and hybrid threat on the Pokrovsk axis remains valid and critical. New information reinforces RF internal cohesion efforts.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Pokrovsk Axis (FEBA): Remains the main effort for RF. The concentration of the 40th Separate Marine Brigade (OMBR) and 155th OMBR signals an imminent high-intensity assault phase (MLCOA).
• Logistics Choke Point (Kostiantynivka Corridor): No confirmed kinetic action has occurred in the reporting period, but the threat window for Spetsnaz (SpN) interdiction remains open (0-8 hours from previous report expiring).
• Donetsk People's Republic (DNR) Rear Area: RF-occupied Khartsyzsk is experiencing significant water supply issues, requiring volunteer aid distribution (Narodnaya Druzhina). This suggests ongoing infrastructure strain or successful deep UAF strikes impacting utilities in RF-controlled areas.
• Forward Defensive Lines (General): UAF units (e.g., Predator/Patrol Police Brigade) continue localized counter-reconnaissance and kinetic engagement against dug-in RF positions, demonstrating effective low-tech logistics (pushcarts) and integrated thermal ISR/strike capabilities.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Night conditions were favorable for RF SpN infiltration/action, aligning with the MLCOA window. No new, significant weather events reported.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Forces (Ground): Unit biographical propaganda (e.g., 'Surok,' 'Provodnik,' 'Zas,' 'Karl') continues to emerge, confirming wide-scale utilization of mobilized personnel (from 2022) across different fronts (Zaporizhzhia, airborne VDB, general assault companies). RF units are adapting tactics, including the use of dirt bikes/motocross for rapid movement in rough terrain.
• UAF Forces: Active deep reconnaissance and tactical precision strikes are ongoing (90 OAeMB 'ONIX,' Patrol Police Brigade 'Predator'). UAF is demonstrating low-level logistical ingenuity to counter resource constraints.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Specialized Tactical Mobility: RF units are deploying non-standard, low-profile tactical vehicles (motocross/dirt bikes) for ISR, rapid deployment of riflemen, and potential SpN infiltration in complex terrain. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
2. Integrated ISR-Strike Cycle: Confirmed RF capability to rapidly link drone reconnaissance (Operator 'Provodnik') with FPV drone strike execution against high-value targets (UAF 'Bogdana' SAU claim).
3. Infrastructure Targeting: DNR declaring a State of Emergency due to attacks on Thermal Power Plant (TPP) energy generation suggests RF perceives UAF capacity to degrade strategic utility infrastructure, forcing RF administrative response.

Intentions:

1. Sustain Operational Tempo: RF continues intense combined arms pressure across major axes, aiming to exhaust UAF manpower and resources ahead of the Pokrovsk breakthrough.
2. Exploit Logistical Weakness: Sever the Kostiantynivka road (MLCOA) while simultaneously forcing UAF to dedicate resources to counter infrastructure threats in RF-controlled areas (Khartsyzsk water issues/DNR TPP emergency).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• RF Tactical Mobility: Use of off-road motorcycles/dirt bikes is a confirmed tactical adaptation, likely to bypass heavily mined or choked main roads, or to quickly deploy reconnaissance elements.
• RF IO Humanization: A sustained campaign (Messages: 'Surok,' 'Karl,' 'Provodnik,' 'Zas') focuses on individual soldiers, promoting unit cohesion, family values, and swift response to mobilization, aiming to counteract domestic fatigue and recruitment issues.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF Logistics: Propaganda emphasizes logistical resilience and individual unit support. However, civilian humanitarian crises in occupied cities (Khartsyzsk water) and the need for a DNR State of Emergency (energy) suggest underlying infrastructure vulnerabilities or successful UAF targeting deep in the RF operational rear.
• UAF Logistics: Remains CRITICAL. The time elapsed since the previous report (08 hours) without confirmed road closure is a temporary reprieve, not a reduction in threat.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 demonstrates doctrinal coherence, utilizing specialized units (VDB, SpN) and mechanized forces (40th/155th OMBR) to achieve synchronized effects. The IO campaign is clearly centrally coordinated to support the kinetic effort. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Posture: UAF units are maintaining active, localized defensive counter-fire and deep strike capabilities, evidenced by the 90th OAeMB (Air Assault Brigade) and Patrol Police Brigade actions. The use of low-tech/high-ingenuity logistics (wheeled carts) shows adaptation to severe resupply constraints.
• Readiness: Overall combat readiness is high, but the logistical vulnerability constitutes an unacceptable operational risk that must be addressed immediately.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes: Confirmed UAF counter-UAS operations (implied by RF MoD showcasing Pantsir-S systems in previous report). Continuous suppression of RF armor and artillery by deep strike units (90th OAeMB, Shadow Unit - previous report) maintains morale and degrades RF breakthrough capacity.
• Setbacks: None confirmed in the kinetic domain during the reporting period, but the psychological effects of the RF information campaign targeting domestic instability and corruption remain a significant internal constraint.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate security surge for the Kostiantynivka GLOC, as the MLCOA remains the most probable threat, despite the expiration of the 8-hour window without confirmed incident.
• CONSTRAINT: The continued ambiguity regarding the Kamyan’ske Rail BDA/ETR hinders the planning of alternative logistical arteries.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO (Humanization/Cohesion): RF actively promotes narratives of military heroism, family dedication, and unit camaraderie (Messages: 'Surok,' 'Karl,' 'Provodnik,' 'Zas'). This targets domestic recruitment and counters potential desertion or morale issues arising from heavy losses.
• RF IO (Dehumanization/Atrocities): The message chain includes subtle pro-atrocity messaging (e.g., soldier 'Surok' stating "even if it's the enemy" when discussing evacuating a wounded captive, suggesting this is an exception to a harsher norm).
• RF IO (Internal RF Stability): Heavy, formulaic messaging praising Chechen leadership and regional development (Messages: 'Rayana,' 'Baudin,' etc.) suggests an internal focus on reinforcing loyalty among specific ethnic/regional forces to prevent fragmentation or resource diversion.
• RF IO (Economic/Governance Critique): Scattered domestic messages questioning petrol/gasoline supply ("А давайте про БЕНЗИН") and general dissatisfaction point to potential internal pressure points RF may need to manage.
• RF IO (Debt Narrative): A recurring narrative posits Ukraine is "long in debt to the West" and the conflict serves Western interests (Message: Yelizaveta Vysokaya). This aims to undermine international support.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• RF frontline morale, as presented in propaganda, focuses on duty and dedication.
• UAF morale remains focused on competence and localized success (Predator/ONIX videos), but rear-area stability is being continuously tested by RF IO efforts.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• The information environment continues to suggest RF is using sabotage claims (in Poland, reported previously) to create strategic friction. The focus on air base activity (Monchegorsk/Pskov) remains the most critical strategic indicator.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

The MLCOA has been delayed but is not cancelled. It is now due to execute during the next period of low visibility (tonight, 192000Z NOV 25 – 200400Z NOV 25).

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Confirmation Window 192000Z NOV 25 - 200400Z NOV 25)

1. GLOC Interdiction Re-Tasking: RF SpN, having possibly aborted the initial attempt due to perceived UAF readiness, will execute the planned kinetic strike on the Kostiantynivka road corridor during the next low-visibility window.
2. Conventional Assault: The 40th/155th OMBR will initiate a coordinated, high-firepower conventional assault on the Pokrovsk axis immediately upon confirmation of GLOC disruption.
3. Tactical ISR Focus: RF will prioritize fixed-wing and FPV drone strikes against UAF artillery positions and known C2 nodes to suppress counter-fire and disorient UAF defense prior to the main assault.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 48 Hours

(MEDIUM-HIGH CONFIDENCE)

• Air-Ground Synchronization: Successful and sustained closure of the Kostiantynivka GLOC (>12 hours) coupled with the simultaneous use of strategic assets (activity at Monchegorsk/Pskov) to deliver precision strike packages against UAF forward logistics hubs (munitions depots, tactical C2 bunkers) west of the immediate front. This synchronized multi-domain attack creates operational shock and paralyzes the defensive C2/logistics cycle.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (Maneuver) / SOF Command: Execute High-Intensity Hunter-Killer Operations (VIPER HUNT).

   • Action: Immediately transition all designated security and SOF elements along the Kostiantynivka GLOC from passive escort to aggressive, pre-emptive "Hunter-Killer" patrols, utilizing thermal and night vision assets. The objective is to force the SpN element to engage prematurely or withdraw before they can successfully deploy IEDs/ambush.
   • Rationale: The MLCOA is confirmed and imminent. Passive defense failed to deter the threat. Active engagement is required to secure the GLOC.

2. J4 (Logistics): Secure and Verify Emergency Caches.

   • Action: Confirm the physical readiness and security of all 36-hour emergency forward caches (per previous recommendation) by 191200Z NOV 25. Initiate a "Ghost Convoy" operation using non-critical vehicles to test the route security and draw out potential SpN IED triggers before high-value convoys move.
   • Rationale: Provide minimum essential buffer stock for Pokrovsk units during the expected 4-8 hour road closure following the MLCOA.

3. STRATCOM / J2: Public Counter-Narrative on Infrastructure Resilience.

   • Action: Leverage UAF successes (Predator, ONIX) to publicly emphasize the failure of RF deep strikes and infrastructure attacks (e.g., contrasting the success of UAF units with the emergency situation in RF-controlled Khartsyzsk/DNR). Simultaneously, coordinate with the Ministry of Defense to release highly professional footage of combat engineers preparing GLOC defenses/contingency routes.
   • Rationale: Undermine the RF IO narrative of UAF collapse and demonstrate active measures to secure critical logistics, thereby boosting internal public trust.

//END SITREP//