Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 182130Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 182100Z NOV 25 – 182130Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. Intelligence confirms the synchronization of critical kinetic threats (GLOC interdiction) with a major conventional RF buildup on the Pokrovsk axis.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Pokrovsk Axis (FEBA): The area remains the primary center of gravity. RF continues high-intensity combat operations utilizing integrated artillery support (confirmed by MoD videos featuring 2S19 Msta-S footage). The commitment of the 40th Separate Marine Brigade (OMBR) alongside the 155th OMBR (confirmed in previous reports) indicates RF aims for deep penetration.
• Logistics Choke Point (Kostiantynivka Corridor): The road remains operationally open but is under imminent threat of Spetsnaz (SpN) interdiction. This road is the sole high-capacity supply route for the entire Donbas front.
• Zaporizhzhia Direction: Defensive consolidation efforts are visible. Ukrainian forces (🇺🇦 Zaporizhzhia Regional Military Administration) are visibly supporting frontline units with equipment (drones, generators) while simultaneously preparing deep rear-area resilience infrastructure ("Points of Invincibility" - PUNs) for the coming winter.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• No significant change from the previous report. Night conditions remain favorable for RF SpN kinetic action (MLCOA) and UAV operations. Winter preparation (PUNs) in the rear areas indicates planning for prolonged operations under severe weather constraints.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Forces (Ground): RF MoD propaganda confirms active employment of various Groupings of Forces (Sever, West, Center, South, Dnipro), suggesting high operational tempo across multiple axes, likely to fix Ukrainian reserves. The use of the 'Zemledelie' remote mine-laying system is confirmed in propaganda, highlighting RF intent to create persistent barriers, particularly near key breakthroughs (e.g., Avdiivka area/Krasnoarmeysk direction).
• UAF Forces: Units such as the 47th Separate Mechanized Brigade (47 OMBr 'Magura') demonstrate ongoing deep ISR capability via newly supplied fixed-wing UAVs (Nation Code 47 funding). This suggests UAF is maintaining critical tactical awareness despite RF air defense efforts (Pantsir-S, ZU-23-2 crews).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Integrated Conventional Strike: Confirmed capability to synchronize large mechanized (40th/155th OMBR) assaults with highly effective artillery support (2S19 Msta-S, BM-30 Smerch) and sophisticated mine-laying systems ('Zemledelie'). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
2. Air Defense/Counter-UAV: RF Air Defense remains prioritized for high-value targets. Testimonials confirm active engagement by Pantsir-S systems against UAF UAVs, highlighting the continued threat to UAF air superiority.
3. High-Intensity Information Warfare (IW): RF channels are exploiting and amplifying any perceived instability or loss of morale, particularly focusing on the TCC (Territorial Centre of Conscription) mobilization process and alleged Ukrainian internal corruption (Hypothesis: $0.139$ IW: Social Media Campaign).

Intentions:

1. Achieve Operational Decoupling: Sever the Kostiantynivka GLOC to create a logistical crisis, enabling the 40th/155th OMBR to execute a decisive tactical breakthrough on the Pokrovsk axis.
2. Fix UAF Reserves: Maintain offensive pressure on secondary axes (Lyman, Kupyansk, Zaporizhzhia) to prevent the redeployment of UAF mechanized reserves to the primary threat area.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• RF Doctrine Focus: Propaganda emphasizes the combined arms approach, featuring specific unit types (Artillery, Airborne, Engineers with 'Zemledelie'), suggesting a doctrinal focus on engineering-supported, high-firepower assaults to overcome static UAF defenses.
• UAF Deep Reconnaissance Countermeasure: The explicit public acknowledgment and deployment of new fixed-wing ISR drones by UAF (47 OMBr) indicates a continued adaptation to maintain deep situational awareness against concentrated RF formations.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF Logistics: RF continues to showcase logistical achievements and individual unit support (e.g., 'Heroes of Z' features), aiming to reassure rear-area personnel and support recruitment. RF ground forces appear adequately supplied for the planned breakthrough operation.
• UAF Logistics: CRITICAL. Total dependence on the vulnerable road network remains the single most critical operational constraint.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 is demonstrating high synchronization capability, coordinating the multi-axis conventional pressure (fixing attacks) with the highly specialized SpN interdiction threat on the Pokrovsk GLOC.
• UAF C2 requires immediate decisive action to secure the GLOC and implement logistics contingency plans.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Posture: UAF units, including the 47th OMBr, are actively engaged in localized counter-reconnaissance and defensive operations. There is a strong emphasis on maintaining civilian resilience (PUNs in Zaporizhzhia), reflecting deep operational planning for prolonged conflict under adverse conditions.
• Readiness: High combat readiness is assumed, but sustainability is directly correlated to the next 8-12 hours of GLOC operational status.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes: Demonstrated continuous acquisition and deployment of high-value ISR assets (47 OMBr drones), allowing for continued operational transparency over the RF advance. Leadership visibility (Zelenskyy visiting troops) reinforces frontline morale.
• Setbacks: The commitment of the second major RF unit (40th OMBR) dramatically increases the kinetic pressure at the most vulnerable point, compounding the effects of the existing logistics crisis.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate allocation of combat engineers and specialized EOD teams to the Kostiantynivka road corridor to rapidly clear any SpN-laid IEDs, mines, or obstacles from the MLCOA.
• Constraint: Continued internal security and corruption issues (Mindich/NABU, TCC scrutiny) divert high-level attention and STRATCOM resources needed for the kinetic threat response.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO (Dehumanization/Atrocities): RF continues to push heavy combat footage (MoD compilation) and highly nationalistic, aggressive rhetoric ("Не должно быть никаких украин на нашей земле!"), aiming to mobilize extreme domestic support and dehumanize UAF.
• RF IO (Internal Critique Amplification): RF channels (e.g., "Два майора") are directly linking domestic issues (Mindich/NABU, TCC abuses) to military failures and mandatory conscription, reinforcing the narrative of corrupt and incompetent Kyiv leadership. This is a clear hybrid operation to erode public trust in the face of the impending conventional assault. (Hypothesis: $0.139$ IW: Social Media Campaign by RF).
• UAF IO: UAF forces (e.g., 47 OMBr, Zaporizhzhia Admin) are focusing on themes of resilience, competence, and gratitude for civilian support, directly contrasting the RF narrative of collapse.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• RF domestic propaganda targets internal division (e.g., Chechen-focused messaging promoting loyalty and achievement), suggesting a continued need to solidify cohesion within RF forces.
• UAF morale remains high on the frontline (evident in unit videos) but is highly vulnerable to the success of the RF IW campaign leveraging domestic corruption and the TCC issue.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• The information environment remains dominated by internal RF and UAF narratives. No new critical international diplomatic developments were observed in this period. The focus remains on strategic delays (RF sabotage claims in Poland) and maintaining non-Western partnerships (SCO/Lavrov).

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

The intelligence picture confirms the imminence of the MLCOA. The window for pre-emptive action is closing.

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 8 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Confirmation Window 2130Z NOV 25 - 0530Z NOV 26)

1. GLOC Interdiction Execution: RF SpN will initiate the planned kinetic strike on the Kostiantynivka road corridor, likely involving IEDs, EFPs, and direct-fire ambush against a high-value logistics convoy.
2. Opening Assault: Within 2 hours of GLOC confirmation, the synchronized 40th/155th OMBR formation will begin a high-firepower, coordinated ground assault aimed at exploiting the expected supply bottleneck on the Pokrovsk axis.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 48 Hours

(MEDIUM-HIGH CONFIDENCE)

• Operational Collapse and Strategic Decapitation Strike: RF SpN achieves sustained closure of the Kostiantynivka GLOC (>12 hours). Strategic assets (Monchegorsk/Pskov activity monitored) launch a targeted strike against UAF operational C2 nodes or known high-value logistics hubs (e.g., major railheads west of Kostiantynivka, if ETR confirmed long). This combination achieves operational and command paralysis, leading to a major, irreversible withdrawal.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (Maneuver) / Engineer Command: Pre-position Breach and Clearance Assets.

   • Action: Immediately forward deploy two (2) heavy EOD/Engineer clearance teams (with heavy equipment capable of removing armor/wreckage) to pre-determined, hardened staging points (e.g., secure road-side bunkers) within 10 km of the highest-risk section of the Kostiantynivka road. Teams must have 5-minute readiness to deploy.
   • Rationale: Reduce the time needed to restore the GLOC to operational status from the inevitable SpN kinetic strike (MLCOA), mitigating the resulting ammunition dip at the front.

2. J2 / J5 (Plans): Establish Trigger for Air Strike Response.

   • Action: Define a specific, measurable threshold (e.g., SAR score >20 or confirmation of specific aircraft type/ordnance loading) at Monchegorsk/Pskov that triggers immediate activation of the highest alert status for all air defense systems in the rear operational area (Dnipro, Kramatorsk).
   • Rationale: Convert persistent strategic threat indicators (SAR scores) into concrete tactical decision points, reducing reaction time if the MDCOA is executed.

3. STRATCOM / J2: Tactical IO Support for Logistical Security.

   • Action: Utilize STRATCOM assets to disseminate deliberately misleading and conflicting information about convoy routes and movement times using monitored RF propaganda channels as a vehicle (i.e., plant false intelligence data). Simultaneously, launch a localized counter-propaganda effort in the rear area emphasizing the successful execution of the TCC process and the integrity of logistics support.
   • Rationale: Create confusion for RF SpN C2 regarding immediate convoy targeting and reinforce domestic trust in the security of the supply line.

//END SITREP//