Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 181900Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 171900Z NOV 25 – 181900Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (The operational threat remains the synchronized RF exploitation of confirmed rail GLOC severance via SpN action; the core MLCOA is now highly probable within the next 8 hours.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Focus Area 1 (Logistics Interdiction): The operational rear area, specifically the road networks connecting Kostiantynivka and Myrnohrad to the Pokrovsk axis, remains the critical vulnerability. These bypass routes are the sole high-volume supply lines and are subject to immediate RF SpN kinetic attack.
• Focus Area 2 (Kinetic Fixation): The Pokrovsk front continues to experience high-intensity, localized RF assaults, assessed as an effort to fix Ukrainian defenses and prevent the relocation of reserves to the rear-area security role.
• Focus Area 3 (Strategic Rear): The Polish logistics corridor remains politically and operationally contested following the RF-amplified hybrid sabotage claims.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• No operationally significant weather changes in the past 24 hours. The ground remains traversable, favoring RF mechanized movement and SpN maneuver on and off-road, particularly under conditions of poor visibility (night/dawn).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Forces (Ground): Continued deployment of high-tempo assault elements on the Pokrovsk axis. RF appears to have committed units from the 40th Separate Marine Brigade (OMBR), supplementing the 155th OMBR, near the Volodymyrivka – Sofiivka / Rusin Yar – Novopavlivka sectors (Confirmed by Zvиздец Мангусту source, MEDIUM CONFIDENCE). This indicates a sustained, multi-brigade effort to achieve a breakthrough.
• UAF Forces (Security): UAF security posture in the Kostiantynivka operational rear remains insufficient to fully mitigate the widespread SpN threat, despite enhanced convoy escort protocols (Operation IRON CLAW initiated).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Sustained Ground Assault (Donbas): RF has the capability to commit additional high-value maneuver units (40th OMBR confirmed) to key penetration axes, sustaining high casualty rates to achieve fixation and exploit logistics gaps. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
2. SpN/Hybrid Interdiction: RF SpN elements are assessed to be in position, possessing the capability to execute complex ambushes (IEDs, FPVs, direct action) against high-value logistics nodes or C2 assets.
3. IO Warfare: RF continues to seamlessly integrate kinetic action with strategic information warfare, leveraging internal vulnerabilities (like the Poland incident) to erode international support and complicate logistical security. (Dempster Shafer belief strongly supports Propaganda/Disinformation efforts, HIGH CONFIDENCE)

Intentions:

1. Kinetic Interdiction: Execute the MLCOA: a kinetic attack on the Kostiantynivka road corridor within the next 8-12 hours to completely halt critical road traffic.
2. Operational Fixation: Prevent UAF commanders from releasing reserves to counter the rear-area threat by maintaining high-tempo assaults at Pokrovsk, potentially using the newly committed 40th OMBR to pressure weak points.
3. Strategic Delay: Use the resulting logistics crisis and the amplified Polish incident to force NATO partners to increase screening and security on GLOCs, intentionally slowing the flow of military material into Ukraine.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• RF Maneuver Commitment: The reported commitment of the 40th OMBR to the Volodymyrivka/Novopavlivka sectors demonstrates the RF's willingness to expend high-value naval infantry units to achieve a breakthrough on the Pokrovsk axis while logistics stress is maximized. This unit is likely intended to sustain momentum that the 155th OMBR may have lost. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• Persistent Ground Pressure: Ukrainian forces reported repelling 7 RF assaults in the Kursk and North Slobozhansky (Sumy) directions, confirming RF intent to maintain pressure across multiple axes, fixing UAF reserves away from the Donbas crisis area. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF Logistics (Strike): No change. RF remains in a 24-72 hour reconstitution phase following the mass UAV expenditure. The immediate threat is kinetic ground/SpN, not air strike.
• UAF Logistics: CRITICAL. Full dependency on high-risk road convoys. Lack of BDA/ETR for the Kamyan’ske rail line severely hinders long-term contingency planning.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 is effectively maintaining synchronization between the ground, SpN, and IO domains. The rapid deployment of the 40th OMBR (if confirmed) suggests effective tactical C2 responsiveness to exploit perceived UAF logistics weaknesses.
• UAF C2 is actively managing the crisis but is operating under severe stress due to the lack of logistics intelligence (Kamyan’ske ETR) and the widespread nature of the SpN threat.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Posture: Active defense on the Pokrovsk axis; high-alert/internal security posture in the Kostiantynivka rear.
• Readiness: Combat units are ready. Logistics and rear-area security readiness is low due to insufficient dedicated assets. Morale appears sustained by confirmed deep strike successes (Підрозділ Shadow videos, etc.) but remains vulnerable to logistics failure.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes: Confirmed successful UAF AD response to the mass strike. UAF deep strikes continue to erode RF assets (Shadow Unit reports confirmed destruction of tank and artillery pieces, MEDIUM CONFIDENCE). UAF units successfully repelled 7 assaults in the northern sector.
• Setbacks: The rail GLOC remains severed, and the diplomatic risk posed by the hybrid sabotage claims is a new, ongoing strategic setback.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL Requirement: Dedicated armored and SOF assets for immediate and sustained counter-SpN operations along the Kostiantynivka road corridor.
• CRITICAL Requirement: Definitive technical BDA on the Kamyan’ske rail line to inform J4 operational planning beyond the immediate 48-hour crisis window.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF messaging continues to amplify the Poland sabotage claims. The primary analytical judgment is that this is a synchronized effort to create friction in the NATO GLOC, which is supported by the Dempster-Shafer hypothesis prioritizing "Military Action: Propaganda Effort" and "Military Action: Disinformation Campaign." (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF Internal Messaging: Pro-Russian military bloggers (e.g., General SVR) continue to release routine, high-volume commentary, but content analysis does not indicate any immediate shift in strategic narrative beyond maintaining general anti-Western/pro-war sentiment.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Ukrainian domestic morale is currently supported by visible tactical successes (AD victories, confirmed RF equipment losses by Shadow Unit).
• Risk: The ongoing, high-profile crowdfunding efforts (Zvиздец Мангусту channel) demonstrate public engagement and resilience but also highlight the severe equipment and logistics shortfalls UAF faces, which could negatively impact long-term public confidence if the logistics crisis is not solved.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• The immediate risk remains the Polish response to the alleged RF hybrid attack using Ukrainian citizens as proxies. J2 assessment holds: Monitor for any formalized increase in border screening or documentation requirements that would increase GLOC throughput time.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

The core MLCOA remains the SpN kinetic interdiction. The new RF commitment of the 40th OMBR increases the probability of ground success if the MLCOA logistics interdiction is successful.

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 8 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. SpN Kinetic Execution (Road GLOC): RF SpN elements will initiate a high-value kinetic attack (ambush, IED/EFPs) on a UAF logistics convoy or a forward transloading point along the Kostiantynivka–Pokrovsk road corridor. This action will be synchronized with opportunistic fire missions (artillery/mortars) to suppress UAF security forces responding to the ambush.
2. Increased Pokrovsk Fixation: The newly committed 40th OMBR, likely alongside the 155th OMBR, will launch a coordinated, high-intensity assault on a secondary defensive line (e.g., Rusin Yar/Novopavlivka) to maximize pressure and prevent UAF C2 from stabilizing the logistics situation.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - MDCOA Probability Increased due to RF Maneuver Unit Commitment)

• Operational Rear Collapse/MDCOA: A successful SpN kinetic attack results in the sustained, non-recoverable closure of the primary road GLOC (>18 hours). This logistics failure, combined with the successful fixation of UAF reserves by the 40th/155th OMBR at Pokrovsk, forces the disorderly retreat of forward UAF units due to lack of ammunition and fuel, creating an operational penetration point (>5km) that RF ground forces immediately exploit.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J4 (Logistics Security): Immediate Active Interdiction (Operation VIPER HUNT Escalation).

   • Action: Transition all available UAF SOF and SIGINT reconnaissance elements in the Kostiantynivka sector from static patrol to Active Hunter-Killer operations. Utilize thermal and EO persistent ISR (UAS) to immediately prosecute any identified RF SpN signature (thermal blooms, unusual vehicle movement, comms bursts) with extreme prejudice before the MLCOA can be executed.
   • Rationale: The SpN threat is kinetic and imminent (0-8 hours). Passive defense will fail. Direct, preemptive engagement is required to preserve the GLOC.

2. J3 (Maneuver): Contingency Logistics and Defensive Depth.

   • Action: Immediately establish and stock pre-positioned logistics caches for essential fuel and high-rate ammunition (152mm/155mm) in hardened, alternative locations near the Pokrovsk front, sufficient to sustain units for 36 hours without resupply. Simultaneously, fully resource and expedite engineering work on alternative defensive line preparation (Line 2).
   • Rationale: Hedge against the MDCOA. If the road fails, the caches prevent immediate force collapse. Prepared defensive lines ensure a controlled, tactical withdrawal is possible, preventing operational collapse.

3. J2 (Intelligence/Liaison): Technical BDA Priority Tasking.

   • Action: J2 must task liaison channels with UZ (Ukrainian Railways) and engineering corps to immediately fuse all available IMINT and engineering reports to provide a preliminary ETR (even if broad: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months).
   • Rationale: Long-term strategic logistics planning is impossible without this data. J4 needs to know whether rail capacity will return in weeks (temporary constraint) or months (permanent shift to road/air).

//END SITREP//