Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 060600Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 060500Z NOV 25 – 060600Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Confirmation of the predicted RF deep strike activity significantly validates the MLCOA.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Focus Area 1 (Operational Depth - Kostiantynivka/Pokrovsk Corridor): RF SpN activity remains the critical threat. The operational rear of the Pokrovsk salient is under direct infiltration pressure.
• Focus Area 2 (Deep Rear - Dnipropetrovsk/Kamyan’ske): NEW KINETIC ACTIVITY. RF has initiated mass UAV strikes against critical infrastructure (CNI) in the Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, specifically targeting Kamyan’ske. This confirms the initiation of the predicted MLCOA.
• Focus Area 3 (Strategic Counter-Strike): UAF deep strikes continue to impact RF CNI, with confirmed damage to the Volgorechensk GRES (Kostroma Oblast), assessed as a significant blow to RF domestic energy generation capability (3rd most powerful thermal plant).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Deteriorating weather (low visibility/cloud cover) is confirmed to be present and currently favors RF offensive deep strike operations, likely aiding the penetration of the mass UAV attack on Dnipropetrovsk Oblast.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Deep Air Defense: UAF AD units are actively engaged in repelling the mass UAV attack targeting Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. Damage reports (Kamyan’ske) confirm successful penetrations.
• UAF Defensive (Pokrovsk): UAF forces continue to hold the line while simultaneously committing resources to counter-infiltration operations in the Kostiantynivka rear.
• RF Deep Strike: Confirmed commitment of mass UAV assets (likely Shahed-136/131) against CNI targets in the operational rear.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Synchronized Deep Strike (Confirmed): RF demonstrates the capability to launch large-scale, mass UAV attacks targeting CNI in the operational rear (Dnipropetrovsk region), synchronized with tactical ground pressure and SpN activity. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
2. Information Operations (IW): Continued use of strategic IO narratives (WarGonzo, Russian MoD) to shape the perception of tactical gains across multiple fronts (Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk) and amplify political division (Trump claims).

Intentions:

1. Operational Paralysis (Immediate): RF's primary intention is to cause systemic failure of power, rail, and C2 infrastructure in the critical Dnipro corridor (Kamyan’ske being a key target) to impede UAF reinforcement and logistical sustainment of the Pokrovsk front.
2. Force Dispersion: The combined pressure of SpN in Kostiantynivka and mass UAV strikes forces UAF command to commit reserves to rear security and AD, thinning the immediate defensive lines near Pokrovsk.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Shift to Deep Operational Level: The initiation of the mass UAV strike on Dnipropetrovsk Oblast confirms the shift from localized attrition to a high-risk, high-reward deep operational disruption phase, precisely as predicted.
• RF Counter-UAS Claims: RF MoD claim of downing 75 Ukrainian UAVs overnight suggests ongoing, high-volume UAF cross-border strike activity (like the successful strike on Volgorechensk GRES), forcing RF to commit significant AD assets domestically.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• UAF Critical Vulnerability: UAF logistics are now actively threatened by kinetic action (UAV strikes on rail/energy) in the immediate operational rear (Dnipropetrovsk).
• RF CNI Vulnerability: Confirmed UAF strike on Volgorechensk GRES (Kostroma) demonstrates UAF's continued capability to inflict strategic economic damage deep within RF territory, demanding RF AD resources be diverted from the front.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 is highly effective, successfully executing the predicted complex, multi-domain attack sequence (SpN infiltration + Mass UAV strike).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Posture: UAF is currently engaged in the defensive phase against the mass UAV strike (Kamyan’ske). The focus remains dual: Deep AD engagement and priority counter-infiltration operations in Kostiantynivka.
• Strategic Initiative: UAF maintains the strategic deep-strike initiative, confirmed by the successful strike on the Volgorechensk GRES.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes: Confirmed successful UAF strike on Volgorechensk GRES, significantly impacting RF strategic energy generation capability.
• Setbacks: Confirmed damage and casualties (5 wounded in Zaporizhzhia area, damage in Kamyan’ske) resulting from renewed RF mass strike activity, confirming successful penetration of UAF AD in some sectors.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL SHORTFALL: Immediate need for increased SHORAD/Mobile AD assets, particularly those optimized for low-altitude drone engagement in adverse weather, to protect critical rail/power infrastructure in the Dnipro/Kamyan’ske corridor.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Narrative Amplification: Russian milbloggers (WarGonzo, Rybar) are providing operational updates focused on RF tactical gains across multiple fronts (Kharkiv, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia) to maintain the narrative of persistent offensive success.
• Political Interference: RF narratives leverage US political figures (Trump claims of peace-making efforts) to promote the idea that the conflict is near an end under favorable terms for Russia, targeting Western resolve.
• Domestic Focus (RF): RF narratives (TASS, MoD) emphasize successful defense against UAF UAVs (75 downed) and the necessity of patriotism (Putin quote) to bolster domestic support and deflect from internal vulnerabilities.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• UAF civilian morale is tested by the renewed mass strikes on population centers and CNI (Kamyan’ske, Zaporizhzhia). UAF military morale remains dependent on successful mitigation of the rear-area SpN and UAV threats.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• The increased RF strategic escalation (mass CNI strikes) provides UAF with renewed leverage for demanding advanced AD systems and counter-battery fire capability from international partners.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

The simultaneous execution of the mass UAV strike and confirmed SpN presence validates the current threat model. The critical phase of the RF operational plan is currently underway.

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4-8 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - In Progress)

1. SpN Kinetic Initiation (Imminent): RF infiltration groups in Kostiantynivka will initiate coordinated kinetic actions (IEDs, targeted ambushes, C2/Comms attacks), likely timed with the peak chaos caused by the ongoing UAV strikes in the rear.
2. Frontal Escalation (Pokrovsk): Utilizing the tactical reserve distraction caused by the deep strike/SpN activity, RF ground forces will launch high-intensity probing attacks or localized mechanized assaults on the Pokrovsk salient to test for exploitable breaches.
3. IO Amplification: RF will heavily disseminate damage assessments from the Kamyan’ske strike, linking them with the supposed UAF surrender narratives in Pokrovsk to maximize psychological effect.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Unchanged, heightened probability)

• Systemic Rear Disruption and Frontal Exploitation: Successful RF SpN operations sever a primary GLOC near Kostiantynivka. Concurrently, the UAV strike causes catastrophic power/C2 failure across the Dnipro rail corridor. This paralyzes UAF reinforcement, enabling a decisive RF mechanized breakthrough on the Pokrovsk salient and forcing a costly, disorganized withdrawal.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J2 (Counter-Infiltration): Kostiantynivka Clearance Operation (IMMEDIATE EXECUTION).

   • Action: Immediately task dedicated SSO/SOF teams, leveraging available thermal and night vision assets, to conduct aggressive sweeps of Kostiantynivka, prioritizing C2 and GLOC security. The SpN threat must be neutralized before frontal action escalates.
   • Rationale: The simultaneous rear-area strikes (UAV) and infiltration (SpN) are designed to achieve operational paralysis. Eliminating the SpN threat removes the primary component of localized chaos.

2. J4/J6 (Logistics/Comms): Emergency CNI Bypass Activation.

   • Action: Immediately transition critical rail and power services in the Dnipropetrovsk region (especially the Kamyan’ske corridor) to backup generators and redundant communication systems. Prioritize the movement of ammunition and fuel convoys to the Pokrovsk salient immediately before daylight hours.
   • Rationale: Minimizing the kinetic impact of the UAV strike is essential for maintaining the defense of the Pokrovsk salient.

3. J3 (Air Defense): Re-task Mobile SHORAD.

   • Action: Given the confirmed strikes in Kamyan’ske, immediately deploy or re-task available mobile Short-Range Air Defense (SHORAD) assets to provide point defense for the most vulnerable rail transfer points and power substations still operating in the Dnipro operational area.
   • Rationale: Focus limited AD resources on securing the critical GLOC for the Pokrovsk defense.

//END SITREP//