Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 060400Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 060000Z NOV 25 – 060400Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Kinetic activity confirms synchronization of RF deep strike with infiltration threat. Ballistic threat is the critical new factor.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Kyiv/Central Axis (CRITICAL): FACT: Air Raid sirens sounded in Kyiv (2342Z) and an alert issued for the threat of ballistic missile use (2343Z) from the northeast. Multiple rapid, high-speed targets confirmed en route to Sumy (2347Z - 0000Z). JUDGMENT: RF is escalating the kinetic phase of the saturation strike from UAVs to high-speed ballistic threats (likely Iskander or S-300 converted to ground attack) targeting the national capital and key northeastern logistics hubs (Sumy). This attempts to overwhelm AD systems already engaged with UAVs. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Northern Axis (Chernihiv): FACT: UAV activity confirmed in northern Chernihiv Oblast, moving toward Chernihiv City (2351Z). JUDGMENT: This confirms RF is leveraging the entire northern border area for multi-axis UAV infiltration, further distributing UAF AD assets away from the critical Donbas axis. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Dnipropetrovsk Axis (Pavlohrad Corridor): FACT: UAV detected southeast of Dnipropetrovsk, inbound for Pavlohrad (2336Z). JUDGMENT: Pavlohrad remains a high-priority target due to its critical railway junction and industrial capacity, confirming the sustained pressure on the Central Axis logistics backbone. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Night conditions continue to provide concealment for all inbound threats (UAV and Ballistic). The previously reported deteriorating weather will significantly aid the evasion of low-flying UAVs and potentially compound the difficulty of early detection for ballistic trajectories.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Posture: UAF AD is fully stressed, responding to confirmed UAV threats in Chernihiv and Dnipropetrovsk, while simultaneously dealing with the high-priority, time-sensitive ballistic threat to Kyiv and Sumy. Control measures focus on rapid threat identification and dynamic target prioritization.
• RF Posture: RF is executing a successful multi-domain strike synchronization: UAV saturation (low-speed, low-cost) combined with Ballistic/High-Speed weapons (high-speed, high-damage potential) to maximize the probability of penetration.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Synchronized Multi-Vector Strike: Confirmed ability to combine low-altitude, low-speed UAVs with high-speed ballistic/quasi-ballistic missiles in a coordinated strike package designed to saturate UAF AD. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
2. Information Warfare (IO): RF maintains active information campaigns regarding internal UAF organizational changes and alleged UAF atrocities in border regions.

Intentions:

1. Achieve Kinetic Breakthrough: RF seeks to maximize the chance of striking high-value CNI/C2 targets in Kyiv and the northern axis (Sumy/Chernihiv) by forcing UAF AD systems to commit to multiple threat types simultaneously.
2. Disrupt Operational Depth: The strikes are designed to maximize rear-area chaos, facilitating the kinetic action of SpN infiltration groups confirmed in Kostiantynivka (previous report).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Introduction of Ballistic Threat to Kyiv/Sumy: The shift from primarily UAV saturation (previous SITREP) to an integrated strike package including ballistic missiles represents a significant escalation in RF risk and resource commitment. This indicates a very high-priority target set in the capital region. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF Ballistic Inventory: The expenditure of multiple high-speed ballistic systems (multiple targets on Sumy) confirms RF is willing to expend its higher-end strike inventory to achieve strategic effects. This must be monitored closely for sustained attack capability.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 remains highly effective, demonstrating complex coordination across multiple launch platforms (UAV, Ballistic) and multiple strike axes (Dnipropetrovsk, Kyiv, Chernihiv, Sumy).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• UAF AD crews are currently under extreme pressure. Readiness levels remain high, but the allocation of interceptors against ballistic threats (which require higher-value systems like PATRIOT or SAMP/T) severely strains the inventory compared to SHORAD use against UAVs.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Setbacks:

1. Ballistic Overload: The introduction of ballistic threats stretches the UAF AD high-value asset coverage across the operational depth, creating coverage gaps in other critical areas.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• Immediate Constraint: Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) interceptors (PAC-2/3, Aster-30). Their consumption rate under the current coordinated strike profile is the single most critical resource constraint.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Internal Focus (Colonelcassad/TASS): FACT: Pro-RF channels disseminated IO focusing on alleged UAF organizational changes and a video documenting alleged UAF "crimes" in Kursk Oblast. JUDGMENT: This is standard RF information shaping, attempting to divert domestic attention from UAF deep strikes (Lipetsk/Tuapse) and reduce morale by highlighting alleged instability within UAF. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Targeting International Support (TASS/Angelina Jolie): FACT: TASS claimed that Angelina Jolie's team contacted the Zelensky office regarding a driver's release. JUDGMENT: This attempt seeks to inject confusion and create a narrative of informal or clandestine political influence over UAF operations. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• The introduction of the ballistic threat to Kyiv (KMWVA alert) will inevitably increase public anxiety compared to standard UAV alerts. The perception of vulnerability in the capital must be managed via transparent reporting of successful AD engagements.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• EU Visa Restrictions (RBC-Ukraine): FACT: EU is planning to complicate visa rules for Russians. JUDGMENT: This reinforces the ongoing international political pressure on the RF regime, a beneficial development in the multi-domain conflict.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4-8 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Sustained Integrated Strike: RF will sustain the combined UAV/Ballistic strike pattern until achieving BDA on primary HVTs (C2, energy transmission, rail hubs) in the Kyiv/Sumy/Dnipropetrovsk regions.
2. Kostiantynivka Activation: The RF SpN groups in Kostiantynivka will likely activate their planned kinetic action (ambushes, IEDs, direct raids on C2) within the next 2-4 hours, utilizing the high-alert status in the deep rear as cover.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Increased from Medium)

• Systemic Disruption and Frontal Exploitation: Successful RF ballistic strikes compromise a key national C2 node or critical energy transmission line in the Kyiv or Central region. Concurrently, successful SpN actions in Kostiantynivka sever the main logistics arteries supporting Pokrovsk. This combination forces UAF operational reserves to be split between rear-area security and front-line defense, enabling a successful RF breakthrough on the Pokrovsk salient.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (Air Defense): Ballistic Threat Prioritization.

   • Action: Immediately allocate BMD assets (PATRIOT/SAMP/T) to cover the highest-priority C2/CNI nodes in Kyiv and the primary logistics flow corridors feeding the Donbas. Accept higher risk for UAV penetration in low-priority rear areas to conserve BMD interceptors for the high-speed threat.

2. J3 (Ground/SOF): Initiate Immediate Counter-Infiltration Operations.

   • Action: EXECUTE the initiation of pre-emptive counter-infiltration sweeps in Kostiantynivka. Do not wait for first contact. Utilize SOF and dedicated QRFs, supported by thermal/UAS ISR, to disrupt the SpN staging areas before they execute their mission, leveraging the distraction of the deep strikes to our advantage in the kinetic phase.

3. J2 (Intelligence): Multi-Domain Threat Fusion.

   • Action: Merge all tactical reporting on ballistic trajectory and SpN activity. Analysts must confirm if the ballistic strikes achieved an effect that directly supports a SpN operational goal (e.g., C2 node destruction allowing SpN to move unmolested). This will inform the next protective posture.

//END SITREP//