Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 060000Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 052345Z NOV 25 – 060000Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM (New kinetic activity confirmed; however, the status of the critical RF infiltration groups in Kostiantynivka remains unknown.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Kyiv Oblast (Deep Rear): FACT: UAF Air Force reports (2319Z) a UAV detected southwest of Kyiv, moving towards Bila Tserkva. JUDGMENT: This confirms the RF saturation strike, predicted in the previous reports, is now underway and encompassing targets beyond the initial central axis (Kamianske/Dnipropetrovsk). Bila Tserkva is a critical logistics and training hub. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF Deep Rear (Lipetsk Oblast): FACT: Russian officials declared a "Red Level - UAV Attack Threat" alert for Lipetsk City, Lipetsk MO, and surrounding districts (2325Z). JUDGMENT: This declaration, issued shortly after the Volgograd strike, indicates heightened RF domestic paranoia and confirms UAF deep strike assets are actively operating in the RF operational depth, forcing RF to divert AD assets from the front. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Kostiantynivka/Pokrovsk Axis: No new tactical reports regarding the RF infiltration groups have been received. JUDGMENT: The lack of reports, coupled with the ongoing deep strike campaign (both sides), suggests the SpN groups may be leveraging the widespread confusion and AD engagement as cover for their final staging or initial movement. The threat remains CRITICAL. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Nighttime conditions continue to facilitate low-level UAV ingress on both sides (Kyiv and Lipetsk). Deteriorating weather previously reported will likely compound the difficulty for UAF AD sensors tracking the multiple inbound threats.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Posture: UAF AD is fully engaged across the operational rear (Kyiv, Central Axis). UAF deep strike capability remains demonstrably active (Lipetsk alert). Control measures focus on managing the ongoing multi-vector saturation attack.
• RF Posture: RF is executing the predicted two-pronged assault: multi-vector deep kinetic strikes on UAF CNI (Kyiv/Central) and mandatory AD activation in the RF rear (Lipetsk).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Multi-Vector Strike: Confirmed ability to launch complex strikes targeting the entire UAF operational depth simultaneously (Central, Kyiv).
2. Rapid Warning Systems: RF internal AD and civil defense systems are capable of rapidly issuing alerts, though not consistently successful in interception (Volgograd strike).

Intentions:

1. Overwhelm UAF AD: Force UAF to scatter high-value AD assets across multiple oblasts, reducing the effectiveness of point defense in the critical industrial corridor (Dnipro).
2. Impose Cost on Deep Rear: Utilize the threat to Kyiv Oblast/Bila Tserkva to disrupt logistics and training flows critical to the operational stability of the Donetsk front.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Expansion of Strike Geography: The inclusion of Bila Tserkva/Kyiv Oblast in the current saturation strike confirms RF is using its full inventory capacity to maximize the operational scope of this attack wave.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• UAF Constraint: The ongoing saturation strikes will force increased expenditure of UAF AD munitions, straining existing stockpiles.
• RF Constraint: The successful UAF strike on Volgograd and the threat to Lipetsk will increase the operational tempo and vulnerability of RF logistics and energy distribution systems.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 remains effective in coordinating the multi-vector strike. UAF C2 is demonstrating resilience by issuing rapid AD warnings and maintaining deep strike operations.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• UAF AD units are responding effectively to the new vectors in Kyiv Oblast. Readiness remains high, but reserves of AD munitions are the primary constraint under this sustained pressure.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Tactical Successes:

1. Sustained Deep Pressure: The confirmed "Red Level" alert in Lipetsk validates the effectiveness and reach of UAF deep strike capabilities, forcing RF operational resources to defend the homeland.

Setbacks:

1. Geographical AD Stretch: The necessity to defend the Kyiv axis, in addition to the Central axis, stretches UAF AD resources critically thin.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• The immediate constraint is the allocation and consumption rate of mobile SHORAD systems and AD interceptors against the ongoing saturation strike. Prioritization must remain fixed on the Pokrovsk-supporting GLOCs and CNI.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Domestic Distraction (TASS): FACT: TASS reports focused heavily on domestic policy discussions (maternity capital increase) immediately prior to the Lipetsk alert. JUDGMENT: This reflects a consistent RF strategy of dominating the domestic information space with positive social narratives to distract the populace from the military costs and failures (e.g., successful UAF deep strikes). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF Internal Morale: The Lipetsk alert, following Volgograd, will increase public anxiety in the Russian interior, counteracting the positive domestic narratives from TASS.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Ukrainian domestic morale will be strained by the widespread AD alerts, but the confirmed effectiveness of counter-strikes (Lipetsk/Volgograd) provides a necessary counter-narrative of symmetrical capability.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• The expansion of the RF strike geography to include Kyiv/Bila Tserkva reinforces the urgent need for Western partners to deliver long-range, mobile AD systems capable of protecting the deep rear.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4-8 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Strike Culmination and BDA Phase: The RF saturation strike will culminate, with remaining UAVs targeting the primary nodes in the Central Axis and Kyiv/Bila Tserkva area. RF intelligence will prioritize BDA collection to inform the next strike wave.
2. Kostiantynivka Activation: RF SpN elements will initiate their localized, time-sensitive raids (ambushes or C2 node attacks) within the Kostiantynivka area, leveraging the confusion and media distraction caused by the widespread deep strike activity.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

• Coordinated Frontal Assault (Pokrovsk): RF forces, exploiting the paralysis and resource drain from the deep strikes and SpN activities in the rear, launch a major mechanized assault against the Pokrovsk salient, forcing UAF to divert operational reserves already stretched thin by rear-area security threats.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (Air Defense): Dynamic Priority Shift.

   • Action: Immediately shift all available mobile SHORAD (e.g., Gepard, Avenger, short-range AD crews) to establish a dynamic defense corridor along the primary logistics and rail lines feeding the Pokrovsk salient, acknowledging the immediate threat to the Kyiv/Bila Tserkva axis, but prioritizing the main front GLOCs.

2. J3 (Ground/SOF): Kostiantynivka Trigger Readiness.

   • Action: Place Quick Reaction Forces (QRFs) in Kostiantynivka on IMMEDIATE STANDBY (Alert 1) to respond to the anticipated SpN raids. Pre-brief QRFs on likely SpN targets (communications relays, command posts, primary bridges/rail lines) to ensure rapid response within 15 minutes of first contact.

3. J2 (Intelligence): Rapid BDA for Strategic Targeting.

   • Action: Prioritize the use of strategic ISR assets (if available) to immediately confirm the extent of damage to the Volgograd refinery and the operational impact of the Lipetsk AD alert. Use this information to inform the next cycle of UAF deep strike target selection.

//END SITREP//