Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 052345Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 052300Z NOV 25 – 052345Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Confirmation of UAF deep strike execution against critical RF economic targets, reinforcing the multi-domain operational tempo.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• RF Deep Rear (Volgograd): FACT: UAF sources, supported by Russian media reports, confirm a successful long-range UAV strike targeting the Lukoil-Volgogradneftepererabotka refinery complex (2239Z, 2246Z). JUDGMENT: This confirms UAF’s ability to sustain deep kinetic pressure on RF economic/logistical infrastructure, directly following the previous strike on Tuapse. This action is a strategic counter-escalation to the RF saturation strikes on Ukrainian CNI. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Kamianske/Dnipro Axis (Central Front): FACT: UAF sources report "over 20 explosions" in Kamianske (2241Z). This reinforces the previous SITREP's assessment of a saturation strike on the Dnipro axis. JUDGMENT: The high number of kinetic events indicates a major multi-platform attack (likely Shahed and potentially cruise missiles) designed to overwhelm local UAF AD. The primary target remains CNI in the industrial corridor. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Kostiantynivka/Pokrovsk Axis: No new tactical reports regarding the RF infiltration groups have been received in this reporting period. JUDGMENT: The lack of new kinetic activity from RF SpN suggests one of two possibilities: 1) The SpN groups are currently in staging/coordination phase prior to a major action; or 2) UAF counter-infiltration operations (as recommended) are having an immediate suppressive effect. The threat remains CRITICAL. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• The nighttime environment combined with previously reported deteriorating weather conditions continues to favor low-level penetration by both RF Shaheds and UAF long-range UAS (Volgograd strike).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Posture: UAF AD remains heavily engaged in the central axis. The confirmed ability to execute the Volgograd strike demonstrates operational resilience and successful launch/C2 of deep strike assets despite RF efforts to degrade UAF ISR (previous Daily Report).
• RF Posture: RF is maintaining the predicted simultaneous pressure: Deep strike (Dnipropetrovsk) and strategic defense failure (Volgograd) against UAF deep strikes.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Sustained Saturation Strike: Confirmed ability to launch complex, high-volume strikes against the central Ukrainian deep rear (Kamianske).
2. Information Aggression: RF maintains a high-tempo IO operation designed to distract and demoralize (e.g., exaggeration of tactical gains, immediate amplification of domestic instability).

Intentions:

1. Inflict Systemic Damage: Maximize the degradation of industrial and energy capacity in the Dnipro River corridor.
2. Test UAF Response: Observe UAF AD resource allocation in response to simultaneous kinetic strikes on the front (Kupyansk) and the deep rear (Kamianske/Kryvyi Rih).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• No significant tactical changes observed in this reporting window beyond the sustained execution of the previously predicted saturation strike plan.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• CRITICAL IMPACT: The confirmed strike on the Volgograd refinery directly impacts RF fuel production and distribution, likely affecting logistics flows to the Southern and Eastern fronts within the next 72-96 hours if repairs are delayed. This strike is a strategic logistics victory for UAF. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 remains robust enough to sustain the deep strike campaign but failed to prevent a highly damaging UAF deep strike on a strategic economic target.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Strategic Offense: UAF deep strike capability is highly effective and responsive to RF escalation.
• AD Strain: UAF AD is under severe strain in the central axis, indicated by the high number of confirmed kinetic events in Kamianske.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Tactical Successes:

1. Confirmed Deep Strike Success: Successful UAV attack on the Volgograd Lukoil refinery, severely impacting RF energy exports and domestic fuel supply.

Setbacks:

1. AD Penetration: Significant kinetic damage and high number of explosions in Kamianske indicate continued AD limitations against saturation strikes.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• The necessity to maintain high tempo for deep strike operations (UAS and targeting intelligence) must be balanced with the critical requirement for AD assets to protect CNI in the Central Axis.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Internal Instability Amplification (TASS): FACT: TASS reported an unconfirmed grenade explosion in a Kyiv shopping center (2244Z). JUDGMENT: This immediate amplification of alleged internal security incidents is a standard RF IO tactic designed to portray Ukraine as unstable and ungovernable, distracting from the successful UAF strike on Volgograd. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF Nuclear De-escalation Narrative (Peskov): FACT: Peskov stated the Kremlin does not believe the world is closer to nuclear war than during the Cuban Missile Crisis, following earlier comments by Trump regarding testing (2246Z). JUDGMENT: This is RF management of the strategic narrative, attempting to appear measured and non-escalatory in the face of U.S. political rhetoric, while simultaneously diverting attention from the escalation of kinetic warfare in Ukraine. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF Political Exploitation (Trump): FACT: RF military channels amplified Trump’s comments on Christian threats in Nigeria (2259Z). JUDGMENT: RF consistently exploits U.S. domestic political rhetoric, especially from figures skeptical of Ukraine aid, to portray the U.S. as distracted and unreliable, weakening the confidence of international partners. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• The successful deep strike on Volgograd is a significant morale boost for the Ukrainian populace, providing a narrative counterpoint to the domestic CNI damage in Kamianske.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• The continued multi-domain conflict (saturation strikes vs. deep strikes) reinforces the narrative of a high-intensity, total war, increasing the urgency for Western military aid, specifically for robust mobile air defense.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4-12 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Continuation of Central Axis Strikes: RF will execute follow-on strikes on the Kryvyi Rih area (as previously tracked) and will prioritize BDA-driven strikes against CNI that survived the first wave in Kamianske/Dnipropetrovsk.
2. Kostiantynivka Raid Execution: The RF SpN elements in Kostiantynivka will execute a synchronized, short-duration raid (targeting C2 or key logistics convoys) before withdrawing, leveraging the confusion caused by the deep strike campaign.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

• Kupyansk Breakthrough and Operational Encirclement: RF commits reserves to Kupyansk to force a rapid UAF retreat to the Oskil left bank, achieving the stated IO goal of "liberation." Simultaneously, RF forces west of Pokrovsk attempt a focused tactical breakthrough supported by heavy fires, coordinated with SpN action in Kostiantynivka, to create a local operational encirclement of forward UAF units in the Donetsk sector.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (Air Defense): Reallocate AD for Follow-on Strikes.

   • Action: Immediately task remaining available SHORAD systems (e.g., MANPADS teams, mobile AA systems) to establish redundant coverage for critical rail nodes and military stockpiles within the Kryvyi Rih area, prioritizing mobility over fixed defense.

2. J3 (Ground/SOF): Proactive Security in Kostiantynivka.

   • Action: Implement immediate, unpredictable, and highly visible movement restrictions and security checks on all major routes into/out of Kostiantynivka. Utilize ground radar/thermal surveillance to detect any SpN egress routes or staging points, denying the enemy sanctuary.

3. J5/J2 (IO/Deep Strike Coordination): Exploit Volgograd Success.

   • Action: Prepare and release validated BDA imagery of the Volgograd refinery strike to international partners and domestic audiences within the next 4 hours. Use this to reinforce the narrative of UAF strategic capability and resilience against RF aggression.

//END SITREP//