Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 052100Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 052030Z NOV 25 – 052100Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Focus on confirming the start of the predicted mass Shahed attack and UAF long-range strike effectiveness.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• RF Deep Strike Execution (Kyiv/Zaporizhzhia/Kharkiv Axes): FACT: UAF Air Force confirms multiple UAV groups ingress: one group moving north through Zaporizhzhia Oblast toward Kamianske (2056Z), and another group moving from Southern Chernihiv Oblast toward Kyiv Oblast (2040Z). FACT: Reports of explosions in the area of Bohodukhiv, Kharkiv Oblast (2103Z), possibly related to missile/glide bomb strikes or AD activity. JUDGMENT: This confirms the commencement of the predicted, synchronized RF mass Shahed strike phase (MLCOA). The strike is multi-directional, designed to saturate UAF AD across key economic and C2 centers. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF Defensive Posture (Donetsk): FACT: RF military reporters confirm explosions in Donetsk city (2049Z). JUDGMENT: This is likely residual effects or secondary strikes following the significant UAF deep strike on the RF depot reported in the previous SITREP, or continued UAF counter-battery fire, maintaining pressure on the RF operational rear. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• UAF Deep Strike (Russia): FACT: UAF sources confirm drone security alerts across 10 central and southern RF Oblasts (Volgograd, Voronezh, Rostov, etc.) (2046Z). JUDGMENT: This confirms UAF is sustaining a high tempo of deep strikes against RF territory, forcing RF AD diversion and maintaining strategic pressure. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• The predicted deteriorating weather continues to favor the RF mass Shahed strike, potentially degrading UAF ground-based ISR and AD visual/optical detection capabilities, especially in the north (Kyiv axis).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Posture: UAF AD is actively tracking and reporting UAV ingress (2038Z, 2040Z, 2056Z), indicating effective C2 and early warning systems are functioning as designed. UAF deep strike capability is demonstrated and sustained.
• RF Posture: RF is executing the predicted kinetic synchronization attack (mass Shaheds) while simultaneously attempting to mitigate UAF deep strikes against its own territory (TASS reporting 16 UAVs destroyed, 2059Z).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Mass UAV Strike (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF has the demonstrated capability to launch large, synchronized waves of Shaheds across multiple axes (South/East to North/Center), specifically targeting CNI.
2. Psychological Warfare (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF continues to leverage high-profile US political narratives (Trump statement, 2035Z) to support the IO objective of portraying Ukraine as diplomatically isolated and politically weakened.

Intentions:

1. Degrade CNI and C2: The current multi-directional Shahed strike is intended to overwhelm UAF AD, targeting energy infrastructure and C2 hubs in central/northern Ukraine.
2. Fix Operational Reserves: By striking Zaporizhzhia and Dnipro regions simultaneously, RF intends to fix UAF AD and QRF assets in the south/center, preventing their deployment to counter the confirmed SpN threat in Kostiantynivka or reinforcement of the Pokrovsk front.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Immediate Synchronization: RF has executed the Shahed phase immediately following the prior kinetic shaping (strike on UAF UAV system), demonstrating tight synchronization between intelligence, preparation, and execution of the strategic strike package.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• UAF deep strikes (e.g., Tuapse port halt, wide drone security alerts) confirm a sustained effort to degrade RF logistics and economic sustainment, though the immediate tactical impact on ammunition availability on the Donbas front remains to be seen.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 is effectively directing complex multi-domain attacks (mass UAV launches synchronized with political IO). UAF C2 is effective at the AD tracking and warning level. The immediate test for UAF C2 will be the effective coordination of AD resources to counter the new threats approaching Kyiv and Kamianske.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Readiness: High, in anticipation of the imminent strike. UAF AD reporting demonstrates effective early warning.
• Deep Strike Capability: UAF maintains the strategic initiative in the deep battlespace, forcing RF to commit significant AD resources to defend its own territory (16 UAVs destroyed, 2059Z).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Tactical Successes:

1. Continued AD Awareness: Rapid detection and tracking of new UAV waves approaching Kyiv and Kamianske.
2. Successful Mobilization/Support: The reported "Fundraising Closed" message (2037Z) indicates successful grassroots mobilization and sustained popular support for specific military initiatives.

Setbacks:

1. The full extent of the immediate kinetic setback (strike on UAF UAV system in Dnipropetrovsk) will become clear only after the current Shahed wave passes, as it may affect AD sensor coverage.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: AD Munitions: The sustained high tempo of RF strikes (KABs, mass Shaheds) rapidly expends UAF interceptor stocks. Effective prioritization of AD fire control is essential.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO Focus: RF channels (Colonelcassad, 2035Z) continue the narrative that US/Western focus is shifting inward (Trump's comments) and away from Ukraine, aiming to erode confidence in sustained support. They also utilize tactical events (Donetsk explosions) to reinforce the perception of constant threat to RF-held territory.
• UAF IO Focus: Maintaining public engagement and support (successful fundraising closure, 2037Z) and transparent reporting of threats (Air Force alerts, 2038Z, 2040Z).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Morale is supported by domestic fundraising success and successful UAF deep strikes, but the multiple simultaneous air alerts (2045Z) will increase public stress and anxiety across major population centers.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• FACT: Poland is reportedly seeking to increase US LNG imports, partly for Ukraine (2056Z). JUDGMENT: This indicates continued, tangible allied effort to strengthen Ukraine's energy security and resilience, directly countering RF IO narratives of isolation. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4-8 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) The kinetic synchronization attack is in progress:

1. Shahed Attack Peak (0-4H): The multi-directional mass Shahed strike will peak, aiming for maximum CNI disruption in Kyiv, Dnipro, and Central Ukraine. UAF AD is expected to intercept the majority, but critical hits remain probable.
2. Kostiantynivka SpN Execution (2-6H): The confirmed RF infiltration groups in Kostiantynivka will likely execute their planned raids (against C2, ASPs, or GLOCs) under the cover of the nationwide air alert, maximizing psychological and material disruption.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

• Operational Paralysis from Rear Disruption: A highly successful SpN raid in Kostiantynivka (e.g., successful targeting of a Brigade Command Post) combined with simultaneous loss of critical power/C2 functionality due to Shahed strikes results in a temporary, localized C2 blackout in the operational rear of the Pokrovsk salient. This creates a critical window (4-6 hours) for RF frontal forces to launch a decisive armored thrust, exploiting the confusion and lack of fire coordination.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (Air Defense): Re-prioritize SHORAD for Kamianske/Kyiv.

   • Action: Immediately task all mobile SHORAD assets within range to reinforce the protection of critical energy infrastructure serving the Dnipro/Kyiv CNI, specifically focusing on the confirmed UAV trajectories (2040Z, 2056Z). Prioritize protection of primary power relay stations.

2. J2/J3 (Counter-Infiltration): Immediate QRF Deployment (Kostiantynivka).

   • Action: Launch designated Quick Reaction Force (QRF) teams with organic thermal optics and communication security into Kostiantynivka NOW to preempt SpN kinetic action, using the ongoing air alert as operational cover for QRF movement. Secure the main Pokrovsk-Kostiantynivka GLOC and local C2 nodes.

3. J2/J5 (International Support): Leverage Polish LNG Reporting.

   • Action: Work with diplomatic liaison channels to amplify the positive news regarding Poland's efforts to secure LNG for Ukraine, using this as a direct counter-narrative to RF claims of waning international support.

//END SITREP//