Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 052000Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 051900Z NOV 25 – 052000Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Confirmation of sustained deep strikes and the expansion of the RF UAV threat demonstrates the execution of the anticipated MLCOA.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Donetsk Axis (UAF Deep Strike): FACT: Multiple reports (1932Z, 1933Z, 1945Z, 1955Z, 1957Z) confirm massive explosions and resulting fires in Russian-occupied Donetsk. Imagery shows a large plume of smoke and intense illumination characteristic of a secondary explosion, strongly indicating a successful strike on a large RF facility. JUDGMENT: This is assessed with HIGH CONFIDENCE as a highly successful UAF deep kinetic strike, likely targeting a major RF ammunition or fuel depot (ASP/POL). This reduces immediate RF logistics capacity near the front lines.
• Eastern Ukraine Rear Areas (RF Strike Preparation/Execution): FACT: An air raid alert was issued for Lipetsk Oblast, RF (1933Z), indicating continued UAF deep strike capability targeting RF territory. FACT: UAF Air Force reports an RF ISR UAV near Odesa coast (1943Z), assessed as a spotter/target designator preceding further kinetic activity. FACT: Kyiv power outage schedules released for 6 NOV (1937Z). JUDGMENT: RF is continuing synchronized pre-strike shaping operations across multiple axes, focusing on degrading UAF AD/ISR and psychologically preparing the Ukrainian population for CNI disruption.
• Kharkiv Axis: FACT: Casualties in Bogodukhiv, Kharkiv Oblast, have risen to five following a prior RF UAV attack (1935Z, 1939Z). JUDGMENT: This confirms RF targeting of population centers near the border to impose psychological pressure and distract UAF defensive efforts from the critical Donbas axis.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Night conditions continue to prevail, favoring deep strikes (UAF on Donetsk) and the ongoing/imminent large-scale RF Shahed wave. The low cloud cover (indicated by illuminated plumes) slightly degrades the precision of UAF AD sensors but enhances the concealment of RF SpN activity in the Kostiantynivka area.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Posture: UAF deep strike capability remains demonstrably effective against high-value fixed targets (Donetsk). UAF AD is anticipating the RF mass strike, implementing proactive power outage schedules (Kyiv) to manage grid stability. UAF units are conducting internal morale operations (Zelenskyy address, 2000Z).
• RF Posture: RF is leveraging its IO apparatus to claim widespread success across multiple axes ("West" Grouping video, 2003Z) while continuing kinetic strikes across the depth of the UAF operational area. RF IO also attempts to capitalize on UAF prisoner propaganda (1947Z).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Deep Strike Precision (HIGH CONFIDENCE): UAF deep strikes against Russian logistics continue to demonstrate effective targeting and weapon delivery against fixed HVT in occupied territory (Donetsk depot).
2. Psychological Warfare (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF maintains a robust IO capability, rapidly disseminating propaganda videos (e.g., POW interviews, 1947Z) to degrade UAF morale and encourage surrender.
3. ISR/Targeting in the Black Sea (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): The deployment of an RF ISR UAV near Odesa coast (1943Z) confirms active targeting cycles against critical maritime logistics and CNI in the southern sector.

Intentions:

1. Logistical Attrition (UAF INTENT): UAF intends to maintain high-tempo deep strikes to directly reduce RF ability to sustain offensive operations near Pokrovsk.
2. C2 Disruption (RF INTENT): RF's synchronized attack (SpN in Kostiantynivka, mass Shahed strike) intends to overwhelm UAF C2 and AD simultaneously, creating exploitable windows for local tactical breakthroughs.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• UAF Counter-Logistics Escalation: The scale of the Donetsk explosion suggests the use of high-yield munitions or targeting of a particularly dense storage area, indicating continuous improvement in UAF deep strike asset allocation.
• RF Information Operations: Immediate release of POW videos (1947Z) demonstrates RF operational synchronization between battlefield action (captures) and information exploitation.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF Constraint: The confirmed major explosion in Donetsk severely impacts RF ammunition and fuel throughput in the critical Donbas sector. This will require RF logistics planners to immediately shift reliance to more distant depots, increasing GLOC vulnerability to further UAF interdiction.
• UAF Constraint: The continued need to allocate AD assets to protect against strategic CNI strikes (Kyiv power schedules, Odesa ISR threat) draws resources away from protecting forward logistics against confirmed SpN infiltration in the Kostiantynivka area.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• UAF C2 remains proactive in managing the anticipated RF strike wave (power schedule issuance, public addresses). The immediate priority for UAF C2 is resolving the Kostiantynivka SpN threat, which directly targets C2 and logistics nodes, thus testing the system's ability to fight simultaneously in the kinetic and counter-infiltration domains.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Readiness: High. UAF is executing effective deep strikes against RF HVTs. UAF political leadership is directly engaging with forces (Zelenskyy mention of Pokrovsk, 2000Z) to sustain morale and focus.
• Vulnerability: UAF forces remain vulnerable to the confirmed SpN threat in the rear and the systemic shock of the imminent mass Shahed strike. The rise in civilian casualties in Bogodukhiv highlights the persistent difficulty in protecting border communities from RF UAS attacks.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Tactical Successes:

1. CRITICAL Deep Strike: The strike on the Donetsk depot (1932Z-1957Z) is a significant operational success, directly degrading RF combat sustainment capacity in the Donbas.
2. AD Innovation (Previous Report): Continued reporting on drone-on-drone interception (1937Z) showcases UAF's dynamic adaptation to the Shahed threat.

Setbacks:

1. Civilian Casualties: Confirmed increase in civilian casualties from UAV attacks in Bogodukhiv (1935Z).
2. RF IO Exploitation: Successful RF capture of UAF personnel (23rd Brigade, 1947Z) and rapid exploitation via propaganda videos.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Targeted ISR for SpN: Immediate requirement for high-endurance, thermal-capable ISR assets to support QRF hunting the confirmed RF infiltration groups in the Kostiantynivka area.
• AD Requirement: Dynamic, non-committal AD assets (mobile SHORAD/ManPADS) must be prioritized for the defense of the Pokrovsk-Kostiantynivka GLOCs and C2 nodes during the anticipated Shahed saturation phase.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO Focus: RF channels (Colonelcassad, 1935Z, 1947Z) are aggressively promoting claims of mass UAF losses across all sectors and immediately exploiting POW narratives to encourage desertion/surrender.
• UAF IO Focus: UAF leadership is focused on maintaining public and military focus on resilience, AD effectiveness, and the importance of international support (Zelenskyy, 2000Z), while also highlighting historical/cultural context (Chasiv Yar mention, 1952Z) to reinforce national identity.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Public morale is constantly tested by the strategic strike campaign (Kyiv power schedules, Bogodukhiv casualties). The significant success of the Donetsk deep strike provides a crucial morale boost, demonstrating UAF capacity to strike back effectively.
• The reported grenade explosion in a Kyiv shopping center (2001Z), if confirmed as non-accidental, poses a localized internal security/SpN-related threat that could significantly impact civilian confidence in rear area security.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• The UAF President's focus on securing AD and energy sector support from partners (2000Z) highlights the critical reliance on international military aid during the current synchronized attack phase.
• RF channels continue to report on US domestic political distractions (Trump G20 comment, 1955Z), seeking to portray waning international focus on Ukraine.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4-8 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) The synchronization attack enters its peak kinetic phase:

1. Shahed Saturation (0-4H): The main wave of RF Shahed drones will impact target areas (Dnipropetrovsk, Poltava, possibly Kyiv/Odesa). RF will prioritize coordinated strikes on substations and regional C2 hubs to maximize systemic failure, exploiting the distraction caused by the SpN threat.
2. Kostiantynivka SpN Raid (2-6H): RF infiltration groups will attempt a high-profile kinetic action (IED detonation, standoff fire, or direct assault) against a high-value C2 node or a critical intersection/bridge supporting the Pokrovsk GLOC, timed to coincide with peak AD distraction.
3. IO Amplification: RF will utilize the kinetic activity to flood the information space with claims of strategic victory, targeting Ukrainian and international audiences.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

• CNI Grid Collapse & Rear Area Severance: The Shahed strike achieves high penetration (e.g., >40% of targets hit), causing systemic failure of regional CNI. Concurrently, the Kostiantynivka SpN groups successfully sever the primary logistics route into Pokrovsk via destruction of a key bridge or repeated successful ambushes. This combination threatens the operational viability of UAF forces in the Pokrovsk salient.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J2/J3 (Counter-Infiltration): Secure the Kostiantynivka Rear.

   • Action: Immediately dedicate maximum available thermal/low-light ISR to support specialized counter-SpN units in Kostiantynivka. Secure all major GLOC intersections and bridges on the Barvinkove-Pokrovsk axis with reinforced QRF elements, prioritizing defense against IED/ambush threats.

2. J4 (Logistics): Exploit RF Logistical Degradation.

   • Action: Based on the assumed success of the Donetsk strike, immediately accelerate resupply operations through the operational rear, capitalizing on the expected, temporary reduction in RF artillery/MLRS fire volume over the next 48-72 hours.

3. J1/J2 (Information Operations/Morale): Counter RF Propaganda.

   • Action: Immediately issue public statements and internal messages leveraging the success of the Donetsk HVT strike to counter RF IO claims of victory and the POW propaganda videos. Emphasize UAF capability to strike the enemy deep.

//END SITREP//