Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 051235Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 051200Z NOV 25 – 051235Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Confidence is supported by corroborated UAF General Staff and regional administration updates, directly addressing the key tactical threats of Pokrovsk isolation and impending strategic strike.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Pokrovsk-Myrnohrad Agglomeration (Donetsk Axis): FACT: UAF General Staff (Genshtab) explicitly confirmed that there is NO encirclement of UAF units within the Pokrovsk-Myrnohrad agglomeration (12:08Z, 12:11Z, 12:12Z). JUDGMENT: This highly public statement counters persistent RF information operations (IO) claiming encirclement (the MDCOA from the previous report). It confirms UAF control over the reinforcement corridor established by GUR (as noted in the daily report).
• Volchansk (Kharkiv Axis): FACT: RF sources claim the raising of the Russian flag in the southern part of Volchansk (12:23Z). JUDGMENT: While the flag claim is an IO objective, the location suggests continued, localized RF pressure in the Volchansk urban area. This does not indicate a large-scale breakthrough but confirms ongoing attritional street fighting.
• Sumy Oblast: FACT: UAF Air Force reports KAB (Guided Aerial Bomb) strikes against Sumy Oblast (12:13Z). JUDGMENT: This confirms RF air superiority and continued use of KABs to interdict UAF positions and potentially rear-area infrastructure in the North, maintaining pressure outside the main Donbas axis.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• No specific changes to weather are reported; however, the ongoing focus on C2 resilience (Dnipropetrovsk meeting, 12:08Z) indicates preparations for operational disruption caused by infrastructure strikes, suggesting a high probability of poor visibility and power outages affecting C2 and ISR.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF C2 Resilience (Dnipropetrovsk): FACT: Dnipropetrovsk OVA held a high-level meeting with mobile operators, police, and emergency services (DSNS) to ensure stable mobile communication during power outages (12:08Z). JUDGMENT: This directly operationalizes the legislative measures previously identified, showing UAF is actively hardening C2 and telecommunications ahead of the MLCOA strategic strike. Dnipropetrovsk is a critical logistics hub, making its C2 resilience paramount.
• UAF Counter-Intelligence: FACT: SBU detained an FSB agent in Kramatorsk accused of adjusting strike coordinates, described as being drug-dependent (12:29Z). JUDGMENT: This confirms active RF HUMINT/subversive efforts in critical rear areas near the main front and highlights the continued success of SBU counter-intelligence operations.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Strategic IO/PSYOP: RF maintains a high capability to flood the information space with strategic deterrence narratives (e.g., mention of the 9M730 Burevestnik nuclear cruise missile, 12:04Z) and diplomatic distraction (joint exercises with Sri Lanka, 12:05Z).
2. KAB Dominance: RF Air Force continues to use KABs effectively in both the primary axis (Pokrovsk) and secondary axes (Sumy), indicating sustained precision strike capacity.
3. Hybrid Warfare/HUMINT: The use of drug-dependent individuals for targeting/coordination (Kramatorsk arrest) confirms RF willingness to use compromised assets for high-risk espionage.

Intentions (Tactical/Operational):

1. Maintain Pressure on Pokrovsk GLOC: RF will intensify efforts to neutralize the confirmed UAF reinforcement corridor by targeting logistics points with KABs and using infiltration groups, despite the Genshtab's denial of encirclement.
2. Amplify Deterrence Narratives: RF IO efforts seek to portray overwhelming long-term military power (Burevestnik) and expanded geopolitical reach (Sri Lanka exercise) to influence Western decision-makers.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Shift in Deep Strike Target Selection: While the strategic strike (MLCOA) on energy remains imminent, the KAB strikes reported in Sumy (12:13Z) indicate RF is diversifying its high-value kinetic strike focus to include northern regions, potentially trying to draw UAF Air Defense assets away from Central Ukraine.
• Continued Reliance on Proxy Forces (DPRK): RF channels continue to amplify reports (citing South Korean intelligence, 12:04Z; WarGonzo, 12:11Z) regarding the deployment of DPRK military personnel near the Ukrainian borders. JUDGMENT: This remains an unsupported IO narrative aimed at intimidation and confirming a "coalition" against Ukraine. While collection remains critical (Gap P4), no new facts regarding direct combat deployment have emerged.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF External Operations: The confirmed loss of a Russian-crewed IL-76 in Sudan (12:06Z, 12:15Z, attributed to a Chinese FK-2000 MANPADS) confirms the continued operational activity (likely logistics or PMC support) of Russian assets in third-party conflicts. This incident does not directly impact the UAF theater but highlights attrition risks for RF long-haul airlift capability.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF utilizes synchronized state media (TASS) and military bloggers (Colonelcassad, WarGonzo) to rapidly deploy strategic IO (Burevestnik, DPRK, celebrity endorsements).
• UAF C2 demonstrates timely response capability (Genshtab denying encirclement) and proactive operational readiness (Dnipropetrovsk C2 meeting).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Information Posture: UAF General Staff is actively managing the information space to prevent demoralization and maintain international confidence by directly refuting encirclement claims (12:12Z).
• Civil-Military Coordination: The meeting in Dnipropetrovsk (OVA, mobile operators, DSNS) confirms a high level of interagency coordination focused on maintaining the civilian and military command link integrity during anticipated power outages.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Tactical Successes:

1. Pokrovsk Corridor Confirmation: UAF successfully maintained the integrity of the Pokrovsk-Myrnohrad defense, confirmed by Genshtab's denial of encirclement.
2. Counter-Intelligence Win: SBU's successful arrest of an FSB agent in Kramatorsk degrades RF's tactical reconnaissance and targeting capability in a vital eastern hub.

Setbacks:

1. Continued KAB Threat: The confirmation of KAB strikes on Sumy Oblast (12:13Z) demonstrates UAF's continued vulnerability to stand-off precision strikes, particularly in northern sectors.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (Hybrid Operations)

• RF Strategic Deterrence: RF is employing a "weapons of the future" narrative (Burevestnik, 12:04Z) and leveraging celebrity/public figure endorsements (Errol Musk, 12:06Z) to project strength and international relevance, distracting from operational struggles.
• RF Tactical Denial: RF continues to push the narrative of UAF collapse (Volchansk flag raising, Pokrovsk encirclement attempts) while simultaneously attempting to legitimize control over occupied territories (Donetsk wedding report, 12:25Z).
• UAF Domestic Focus: UAF IO emphasizes internal security (SBU arrests, border land recovery, 12:08Z, 12:29Z) and operational control (Genshtab denials) to build trust and resilience.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• RF domestic security issues persist, highlighted by reports of a runaway military serviceman/criminal detained in Belgorod (12:16Z, 12:21Z). This ongoing issue of internal breakdown among RF personnel near the border likely degrades local morale and security.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) The synchronization of the deep strike and Pokrovsk pressure remains the primary threat.

1. Strategic Strike Launch (IMMINENT): The main wave of Shahed UAVs (estimated 50-80+) will launch within the next 2-6 hours, directly challenging the resilience efforts seen in Dnipropetrovsk. Targeting will focus on energy grid control nodes and railway hubs in Central/Eastern Ukraine.
2. Intense KAB/Infiltration Targeting on Pokrovsk GLOC: Despite Genshtab's denial of encirclement, RF will view the established corridor as a high-value target and will use KAB saturation and infiltration tactics to interdict it, aiming to isolate the city logistically.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - UNCHANGED)

• C2 Degradation and Tactical Collapse: The strategic Shahed strike successfully causes systemic, localized power and C2 failure in a key logistics hub (e.g., Dnipro/Poltava). Simultaneously, RF infiltration forces successfully sever the Pokrovsk GLOC through a high-profile interdiction (e.g., bridge demolition). The resulting logistical and command paralysis forces an uncoordinated UAF withdrawal from the Pokrovsk salient under heavy fire.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (AD) / J7 (Doctrine): EXECUTE AIR DEFENSE PRIORITIZATION FOR C2 AND LOGISTICS HUBS (CRITICAL PRIORITY).

   • Re-prioritize AD assets (especially MRAD/SHORAD) to defend the C2 nodes and energy infrastructure within the Dnipropetrovsk-Poltava-Kryvyi Rih triangle, based on the high probability of the MLCOA strike.
   • Integrate real-time reporting from the Dnipropetrovsk OVA C2 resilience group directly into J3 situational awareness.

2. J3 (Maneuver) / J2 (Intelligence): SUSTAIN CORRIDOR SECURITY AND COUNTER-INFILTRATION (CRITICAL PRIORITY).

   • Maintain the current high-tempo ISR coverage and QRF deployment to protect the Pokrovsk GLOC.
   • Issue immediate guidance to forward units to treat all contact west of Pokrovsk as potential просачивание elements capable of Time-Sensitive Targeting (TST), utilizing FPV drones as primary response weapons.

3. J2 (Counter-Intelligence): AUGMENT HUMAN INTELLIGENCE VETTING (HIGH PRIORITY).

   • Based on the Kramatorsk arrest, issue an immediate directive to SBU and military counter-intelligence units to increase vetting and surveillance of individuals with known vulnerabilities (e.g., substance dependency, debt) operating near critical infrastructure or in proximity to sensitive military information in Eastern and Central Ukraine.

//END SITREP//