Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 051200Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 051130Z NOV 25 – 051200Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH (Confidence remains high on the imminence of the strategic strike and the continued RF objective of isolating Pokrovsk GLOCs, reinforced by new intelligence confirming UAF deep strike efficacy and continued RF internal security focus.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Donetsk Axis (Pokrovsk/Krasnoarmiysk): RF sources (Colonelcassad) released a video of a captured UAF serviceman near Krasnoarmiysk (1147Z), confirming continued close-quarters combat and successful RF penetration/capture operations near the city. FACT: The prisoner confirms capture after an assault by the 79th Air Assault Brigade (a key UAF unit), suggesting intense, persistent pressure on UAF defensive lines.
• Chasiv Yar Axis: UAF General Staff released images showing high-quality, reinforced infantry positions and tunnel systems (1145Z). JUDGMENT: This confirms UAF commitment to a robust, deep defense posture in Chasiv Yar, likely aimed at absorbing the continuing RF offensive pressure.
• RF Deep Rear: UAF deep strikes continue to impact RF critical infrastructure. FACT: Russian port Tuapse stopped fuel exports after drone strikes (1141Z). JUDGMENT: This confirms UAF capability to impose economic and logistical costs deep inside RF territory, directly impacting RF operational freedom of maneuver.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Drone Activity (South/Strategic): UAF Air Force reports UAVs over the Black Sea and Southern Mykolaiv Oblast, tracking toward Ochakiv and Kobleve (1150Z). FACT: This confirms the preliminary phase of the predicted saturation strike (MLCOA) is currently in execution, likely positioning reconnaissance or first-wave platforms.
• UAF Hardening: The confirmed start of construction for underground hospitals (1159Z) indicates UAF is actively hardening medical infrastructure against the anticipated large-scale air strikes.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Tactical Resilience: UAF units are utilizing FPV drones effectively to neutralize RF elements in the field (SBU FPV strike video, 1144Z), indicating high tactical proficiency in contested areas.
• UAF Strategic Resilience: Ukraine has joined the Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) (1203Z). JUDGMENT: This is a key political/military signal demonstrating continued commitment to integrating with Western defense structures, bolstering deterrence, and securing future resource channels.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Prisoner Exploitation (IW): RF channels are immediately weaponizing captured UAF personnel (Pokrovsk prisoner video) to degrade UAF morale and amplify the narrative of successful RF advances and UAF surrender/collapse. CONFIDENCE: HIGH.
2. Long-Range Interdiction: RF operational reach (via KAB/Artillery/Infiltration) maintains a critical threat to the Pokrovsk-Huliaipole GLOC, aiming to turn the UAF reinforcement corridor into a sustained supply chokepoint.

Intentions (Tactical/Operational):

1. Execute Strategic Saturation Strike (IMMINENT): The persistent Shahed activity over Mykolaiv and the Black Sea, coupled with previous intelligence on inventory increases, makes the launch of the main strategic strike the highest priority threat in the next 0-6 hours.
2. Normalize Occupation/Hybrid Governance: The highly publicized, security-heavy wedding of high-profile Russian figures (Shaman and Mizulina) in occupied Donetsk (1147Z, 1154Z) signals RF intent to legitimize and project permanence regarding its control over occupied territories.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• RF Counter-Narrative Focus: RF Ministry of Defense (via "Diary of a Paratrooper") is directly refuting UAF claims (e.g., Zelensky's statements on Kupiansk, 1142Z). This suggests RF is actively tracking and attempting to neutralize specific UAF narrative victories, moving beyond generic propaganda.
• Personnel Attrition (RF): Independent reporting (BUTUSOV PLUS) highlights the case of a tank commander claiming to be the sole survivor of his unit (1148Z). JUDGMENT: If representative, this confirms continued high attrition rates within specialized RF units, which places long-term strain on RF combat effectiveness and replacement training. CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM (Requires multi-source confirmation).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF Logistics Disruption: The confirmed suspension of fuel export at Tuapse (1141Z) validates the strategic impact of UAF deep strikes, forcing RF to divert resources and likely causing localized fuel/POL shortages for civilian and potentially military use in the Southern Military District.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF utilizes a centralized C2 structure for propaganda (TASS, Mash na Donbasse) to amplify high-value information operations (e.g., Donetsk wedding, captured UAF soldier).
• UAF C2 is proactively responding to the deep strike threat by hardening key facilities (underground hospitals) and securing political support (JEF accession).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• ISR/Targeting Readiness: UAF tactical units demonstrate effective FPV strike capability against ground targets (1144Z).
• Personnel Management: The Rada approved changes to the procedure for dismissing intelligence officers from military service (1136Z). JUDGMENT: This indicates UAF is actively refining personnel policies, especially for specialized elements, crucial for maintaining long-term force quality and retention.
• Defensive Posture: UAF positions in Chasiv Yar show strong engineering and depth, suggesting a prepared defense to absorb the sustained assault (1145Z).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Tactical Successes:

1. Strategic Fuel Interdiction: The confirmed disruption of Tuapse fuel exports is an operational success with strategic economic implications for RF.
2. Counter-IW Resilience: UAF General Staff and operational channels continue to focus on tangible combat actions (Chasiv Yar positions, FPV strikes) rather than engaging directly in RF's fabricated "kettle" narrative.

Setbacks:

1. Personnel Loss/Capture: The capture of a UAF serviceman near Pokrovsk (1147Z) confirms the difficulty and danger of the close-quarters fighting, providing RF with immediate propaganda material.
2. Logistical Impact (Friendly): Ukrainian railways reportedly lost 49% of cargo transportation (1157Z). JUDGMENT: While the cause is not specified, this highlights the vulnerability of national logistics systems, which will be exacerbated by the predicted RF strategic strike.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (Hybrid Operations)

• RF Objectives: RF propaganda focuses on: 1) Tactical victories (Pokrovsk capture/surrender claims); 2) Normalization of occupied life (Donetsk wedding); and 3) Diverting attention (TASS reporting non-war news like German health crisis, Hakassia cinema incident).
• UAF Objectives: UAF Information Operations focus on: 1) International legitimacy and support (Japan meeting, JEF accession); 2) Internal resilience and security (SBU FPV strike, Rada legislation); and 3) Highlighting RF vulnerabilities (Tuapse strike).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• UAF public support is bolstered by high-level diplomatic visibility (Zelenskyy meeting with Japan PM, 1140Z).
• RF internal repression continues (St. Petersburg resident sentenced for "fakes," 1135Z), indicating the requirement for constant domestic security efforts to maintain the war narrative.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) The synchronization of the deep strike and Pokrovsk isolation will intensify:

1. Strategic Strike Main Wave Launch (IMMEDIATE): The main wave of Shahed UAVs (estimated 50-80+) will launch within the next 2-4 hours, targeting major logistics nodes (rail yards, POL depots) and primary energy transmission infrastructure in Central and Eastern Oblasts (Dnipro, Poltava, possibly Kyiv region).
2. Pokrovsk Corridor Attrition: RF will use heavy KAB/Artillery fire and increased просачивание infiltration to maximize attrition against UAF elements defending the corridor west of Pokrovsk, aiming to disrupt supply flow and force a tactical decision by the UAF command.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

• Combined-Arms Breakthrough at Pokrovsk: RF forces, having sufficiently attrited the UAF western GLOC defenses, launch a synchronized combined-arms armored assault along the highway axis into Pokrovsk. This attack, timed to coincide with severe C2 and power disruption from the strategic Shahed strike, forces a premature and potentially costly UAF withdrawal from the entire Pokrovsk salient, opening a major avenue of advance toward Krasnoarmiysk.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (AD) / J4 (Logistics): EXECUTE IMMEDIATE, MAXIMUM FORCE PROTECTION MEASURES AGAINST STRATEGIC STRIKE (CRITICAL PRIORITY).

   • Activate the maximum alert level for AD forces across Central and Eastern Ukraine.
   • Prioritize AD coverage for key railway junctions (P’yatykhatky, Lozova, Synelnykove) that are essential for the Pokrovsk logistics flow.
   • Initiate emergency fuel and ammunition dispersal/burial protocols at all major forward supply depots (FAS).

2. J3 (Maneuver) / J7 (Doctrine): IMPLEMENT ANTI-INFILTRATION QUICK REACTION FORCE (CRITICAL PRIORITY).

   • Establish dedicated, highly mobile quick reaction forces (QRFs), comprised of mechanized infantry and FPV drone teams, assigned exclusively to patrol and rapidly neutralize RF просачивание groups attempting to breach the Pokrovsk GLOC.

3. J2 (Intelligence): INCREASE COUNTER-PROPAGANDA EFFORTS REGARDING POW/ATTRITION (HIGH PRIORITY).

   • Task the counter-intelligence and IO cells to analyze and fact-check the captured UAF serviceman video and the RF attrition claims. Prepare verified counter-narratives emphasizing UAF resilience, professional care for military families (Rada legislation), and the extreme losses incurred by RF forces.

//END SITREP//