Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 041130Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 041033Z NOV 25 – 041130Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH (High certainty on RF IO escalation regarding Pokrovsk; medium certainty on the scale of kinetic losses on the Lyman axis. Diplomatic support for UAF is stable.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry is defined by the critical urban fight in Pokrovsk and persistent localized counter-mobility operations by UAF on the flanks.

• Pokrovsk Axis (Donetsk Oblast): CRITICAL URBAN FIGHTING / IO ESCALATION. RF state media and prominent military bloggers (Alex Parker Returns, Colonelcassad) are aggressively re-circulating and amplifying the claim of 85% RF control of Pokrovsk (ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT - This maximalist claim remains highly improbable but confirms RF's intention to rapidly achieve and announce full seizure). UAF defense units (e.g., National Guard Omega, "Hostri Kartuzy") are executing sustained FPV drone attacks on RF forces on the immediate approaches to Pokrovsk (FACT - UAF footage), confirming that RF supply and reinforcement lines remain contested outside the city limits. A map, purportedly from a UAF source ('Mouthpiece'), shows operational planning/projection around Pokrovsk dated 03.11.2025, underscoring the high-priority defensive effort.
• Krasny Liman Axis (Lyman): HIGH RF ATTRITION. RF sources (Dva Mayora) released thermal imagery footage confirming a successful kinetic strike (likely UAV or precision artillery) against a Ukrainian military vehicle (likely a supply truck or light armored vehicle) traveling on the Krasny Liman direction. This strike confirms UAF movement in the sector is still vulnerable but also highlights the continuing UAF presence and activity.
• Kherson/Kakhovka Axis: LIMITED GUR ADVANCE. UAF GUR special operations forces (SSO) have executed a successful raid, raising the Ukrainian flag over an outpost on islands within the exposed bed of the Kakhovka Reservoir (FACT - GUR/RBC-Ukraine footage). This confirms UAF maintains the initiative in small-unit operations across the Dnipro river line and seeks to consolidate control over key topographical features in the affected area.
• Herson City/Sloviansk: RF sources report drone strikes against a UAF point of deployment (POD) in Sloviansk using "Geran-2" (Shahed-type) UAVs (FACT - RF claims; kinetic verification pending). This confirms RF's continued deep strike capability utilizing loitering munitions against tactical targets near the front line. RF sources also claim strikes on Kherson City, coinciding with the "Day of National Unity."

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant changes. The general trend towards colder, potentially muddier conditions in late autumn favors RF reliance on heavy fire support (KABs/artillery) over maneuver, placing the burden of counter-mobility on UAF FPV/C-UAS teams.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF: Forces remain heavily committed to the Pokrovsk main effort, prioritizing urban assault units and the corresponding IO synchronization. Tactical assets (UAVs, heavy artillery) are deployed to interdict UAF counter-attacks near Pokrovsk and conduct deep strikes further north (Sloviansk).
• UAF: UAF is executing a multi-layered defense: (1) Active FPV defense on Pokrovsk approaches (Omega/Hostri Kartuzy); (2) Sustained mobility and counter-mobility operations on the Lyman/Krasny Liman axis, despite losses; (3) Small-scale, high-impact raids (GUR Kakhovka islands). Rear areas are focused on AD and securing essential services (Kharkiv Railway Day messaging).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Urban Momentum (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF has established momentum within Pokrovsk, driven by aggressive IO amplification designed to mask friction and demoralize UAF defenders.
2. Long-Range Kinetic Threat (HIGH CONFIDENCE): Confirmed use of Geran-2 in Sloviansk demonstrates RF’s ability to employ loitering munitions against tactical targets well behind the immediate front line.
3. Diplomatic Weaponization (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): RF political figures are escalating the rhetoric of arms exports (Oreshnik missiles to Venezuela), attempting to create a geopolitical distraction and pressure Western allies supporting Ukraine.

Intentions (Immediate - 0-12 hours):

1. Validate Pokrovsk Seizure (Primary): RF intends to fully seize and secure Pokrovsk, using maximalist IO messaging to cement the strategic victory before UAF counter-attacks can stabilize the situation.
2. Disrupt Flank Logistics: RF will attempt to intensify strikes (Geran-2/artillery) along the Sloviansk/Kramatorsk corridor to disrupt the staging and deployment of UAF reserves directed towards Pokrovsk.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Aggressive IO Overload: The continuous repetition of the "85% control" figure is a clear adaptation to maximize psychological impact, suggesting RF is prioritizing the cognitive domain over strict adherence to kinetic reality in this phase of the operation.
• Synchronization of Deep Strike with Ground Push: The reported Geran strike on Sloviansk correlates temporally with the intense pressure on Pokrovsk, suggesting an intent to disrupt tactical reserves and logistics flowing from the deeper rear.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

UAF deep strikes on Luhansk (previous report) likely continue to impact RF sustainment, but the flow of materiel to the Pokrovsk assault elements remains sufficient to sustain the current operational tempo. The reported use of tactical UAVs/precision fires on the Lyman axis (RF-claimed strike on UAF vehicle) indicates continued RF ISR/strike dominance in key contested sectors.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is demonstrating high effectiveness in synchronizing kinetic attacks (Sloviansk, Pokrovsk) with a unified, high-volume information campaign (Pokrovsk IO), indicating clear operational objectives and centralized messaging control.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture is defensive in depth but remains operationally agile. Readiness is high in specialized units (GUR SSO, National Guard FPV teams), which are executing successful, high-impact missions to counter RF momentum. The operational readiness of the main defense elements in Pokrovsk is under severe stress but remains engaged in active defense.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

1. Pokrovsk FPV Attrition: National Guard FPV teams are successfully engaging RF forces on the approaches to Pokrovsk, slowing reinforcement and supply (FACT - UAF footage).
2. GUR Kakhovka Consolidation: The flag-raising operation on Kakhovka reservoir islands confirms successful small-unit penetration and consolidation of control over key terrain features.

Setbacks:

1. Lyman Axis Vehicle Loss: The confirmed destruction of a UAF vehicle on the Krasny Liman axis (RF-released footage) indicates vulnerability to RF precision strike/UAV interdiction in a critical supply sector.
2. Sloviansk Strike: The reported Geran-2 strike on Sloviansk suggests RF can successfully target UAF tactical rear areas supporting the Donetsk front.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate requirement is Urban Combat Materiel (anti-armor systems, FPV drones, and immediate resupply of front-line units within Pokrovsk). Strategically, the need for long-range AD systems to mitigate the threat of KABs and deep-striking Geran UAVs (Sloviansk) remains the primary constraint.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO Focus: The central theme is "Imminent Victory in Pokrovsk" (85% claims) synchronized with the domestic "Day of National Unity" celebrations (TASS/WarGonzo imagery). This linkage seeks to frame the Pokrovsk capture as a historical necessity and a symbol of Russian national resurgence, boosting domestic morale and attempting to break UAF psychological resistance. RF is also using high-level political rhetoric to create geopolitical noise (Oreshnik missiles to Venezuela).
• UAF IO Focus: UAF is counter-messaging with themes of Institutional Resilience, Logistics, and Small-Unit Valor. Highlighting Railway Day (Kharkiv Governor) reassures the public of state functionality under fire. The GUR Kakhovka flag-raising emphasizes continued offensive spirit and control over the strategic southern flank.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

International sentiment is favorable (EU macro-financial aid of €1.8B confirmed by TASS), bolstering confidence in long-term support. Domestic UAF morale is likely heavily polarized: high stress regarding the Pokrovsk penetration, counterbalanced by visible tactical successes and assurances of continuous international financial backing.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to capitalize on perceived tactical success and IO momentum to consolidate control over Pokrovsk and isolate the remaining UAF defenders.

1. Pokrovsk Encirclement/Clearing: RF assault elements will push North and West within Pokrovsk, prioritizing the seizure of key municipal buildings and utility infrastructure. Fire support will maintain maximum pressure on UAF exit routes/LSRs (Logistical Supply Routes) west of the city.
2. Increased Flank Surveillance/Interdiction: RF will utilize ISR and strike assets (UAVs/Geran-2) to proactively interdict UAF movement and resupply in the Kramatorsk-Sloviansk-Lyman triangle, anticipating UAF reserve movement toward Pokrovsk.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 48-72 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF achieves full control of Pokrovsk and immediately exploits the gap created in the main defensive line.

• Rapid Mechanized Thrust toward Selydove/Myrnohrad: Following the declaration of Pokrovsk's seizure, RF immediately launches heavily supported mechanized formations (armored units previously held in reserve) westward, targeting Selydove to establish a bridgehead across the next major UAF defensive line. This aims to deny UAF the time to establish a stable fall-back position and could lead to the tactical overextension of UAF reserves.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/JFSCC (Pokrovsk): DELAY AND ATTRIT REINFORCEMENTS. Implement a high-volume interdiction fire mission utilizing MRLS and precision artillery on all confirmed RF vehicular movement (per the Lyman Axis observation) and assembly areas on the immediate eastern and southern approaches to Pokrovsk. Focus fire on isolating the penetrated assault elements inside the city. (CRITICAL PRIORITY - COMBAT ISOLATION)
2. J3/JFSCC (AD/C-UAS): AD ALERT LEVEL RED. Immediately elevate AD readiness and saturation of C-UAS/EW assets in the Sloviansk-Kramatorsk corridor following the reported Geran strike. Prioritize protection of logistics/railhead nodes critical for resupply to the Pokrovsk front. (HIGH PRIORITY - LOGISTICS PROTECTION)
3. J2/GUR (IO Counter): PROACTIVE COUNTER-IO. Immediately disseminate verifiable UAF tactical success (e.g., GUR Kakhovka raid, FPV attrition rates near Pokrovsk) through all channels to directly counter the maximalist 85% Pokrovsk control narrative being pushed by RF sources. (HIGH PRIORITY - COGNITIVE STABILITY)

//END SITREP//