Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 041033Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 041000Z NOV 25 – 041033Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH (The Pokrovsk urban situation is rapidly deteriorating based on RF IO claims, though kinetic confirmation of the scale is pending. UAF deep strike and tactical AD/C-UAS success provides localized tactical counter-balance.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational focus remains split between critical urban defense in Donetsk Oblast and the ongoing counter-hybrid campaign across the Central and Eastern rear.

• Pokrovsk Axis (Donetsk Oblast): CRITICAL URBAN FIGHTING / IO ESCALATION. RF sources (Military Bloggers, citing Bild analyst Julian Röpcke) are amplifying the claim that RF controls 85% of Pokrovsk (ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT - This specific percentage is likely extreme IO hyperbole, but confirms RF intent to seize the city rapidly and suggests substantial territorial control beyond the initial Shcherbakova penetration). HUR/GU intelligence footage (Kotsnews re-post) confirms continued intense close-quarters combat (CQB) within heavily damaged urban structures, consistent with RF having a stabilized foothold.
• Kruhliakivka/Lyman Axis (Kharkiv/Donetsk Border): UAF C-UAS SUCCESS. UAF 7th Separate Air Assault Dnipro Brigade released drone footage confirming the successful targeting and neutralization of two figures (deemed hostile personnel or combatants) near Kruhliakivka (FACT - UAF footage). Furthermore, RF sources confirm a disabled/destroyed military vehicle near Krasny Liman - Masyakovka (FACT - RF footage of burning vehicle). This indicates persistent, successful UAF counter-mobility and reconnaissance/strike operations in this sector.
• Deep Strike/AD Domain (Central Ukraine): PERSISTENT UAV THREAT. UAF Air Force confirms new UAV activity in Eastern Kharkiv Oblast near Savintsi (FACT - UAF Air Force alert). This is a continuation of the multi-pronged deep strike effort previously identified toward Poltava/Kharkiv.
• Zaporizhzhia Axis (Tactical): UAF 46th Separate Airmobile Brigade footage confirms successful drone strikes against RF trenches, personnel, and, notably, the destruction of an enemy Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) (FACT - UAF footage). This confirms the deployment and successful counter-engagement of RF tactical robotic platforms.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• The approaching winter (implied by discussions of "Winter Support" funding) will continue to favor the attacker (RF) capable of massed, protected fires (KABs) and complicate UAF logistical resupply and maneuver, especially in wet/muddy conditions seen in recent frontline footage (Lyman area).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF: RF is concentrating its combat and information efforts on projecting near-total control over Pokrovsk. Dispositions reflect a clear priority on urban assault groups (like the "Sparta" Battalion) and sustained deep strike targeting (UAVs confirmed near Savintsi).
• UAF: UAF forces are executing a complex, multi-domain defense: 1) Intense CQB in Pokrovsk; 2) Active offensive counter-mobility operations on the flanks (Lyman); and 3) Continuous, critical AD/C-UAS operations against deep strike waves. Rear area focus is on securing military-industrial base stability (previous report) and celebrating logistical resilience (railway day messaging).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Urban Exploitation (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF has the demonstrated ability to use urban terrain for cover and exploit initial breaches, attempting to solidify rapid gains (Pokrovsk IO claims).
2. Tactical Robotics (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): The deployment and subsequent loss of an RF UGV (46th Brigade footage) confirms RF is integrating tactical robotic platforms into the combat zone. These are likely employed for resupply, reconnaissance, or fire support in high-risk zones, such as the Pokrovsk breach or Avdiivka-like defensive sectors.
3. IO Warfare (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF is utilizing maximalist claims (85% control) to pre-condition the information space for an imminent victory announcement, potentially masking slower kinetic progress or preparing the public for a strategic objective achievement.

Intentions (Immediate - 0-12 hours):

1. Validate Pokrovsk Seizure: RF intends to quickly capture and secure Pokrovsk city center and key infrastructure to confirm the IO narrative and gain a major strategic objective.
2. Sustain Deep Strike Pressure: RF will continue to utilize UAVs to saturate Central and Eastern Ukrainian rear areas (Poltava/Kharkiv axis) to disrupt UAF logistical flow and national morale.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Increased Use of UGVs: The confirmed destruction of an RF UGV (46th Brigade) suggests an adaptation to use unmanned systems to mitigate high personnel losses in critical areas, particularly against FPV attacks.
• Hybrid IO/Kinetic Synchronization: The immediate mass dissemination of the "85% Pokrovsk control" claim, even if exaggerated, is designed to generate panic and pressure UAF C2 before UAF can stabilize the defensive line.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics are supporting the high-volume use of KABs (previous report) and maintaining supply to urban assault elements. UAF counter-logistics strikes (previous report - Luhansk POL/MTS strikes) are a successful countermeasure, but the overall front remains supplied.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in synchronizing the Pokrovsk assault, deep strike UAV waves, and managing IO outputs, suggesting centralized, responsive command.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are demonstrating high tactical readiness through the successful execution of C-UAS/C-UGV operations (46th Brigade) and effective counter-mobility (7th Brigade near Kruhliakivka). Readiness in Pokrovsk itself is under critical strain due to confirmed urban penetration.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

1. Confirmed UGV Neutralization: Destruction of an enemy UGV (46th Brigade) provides valuable intelligence on RF tactical robotics and limits their ground support capability.
2. Effective Counter-Mobility: Destruction of an RF vehicle and personnel near Lyman/Kruhliakivka confirms UAF retains effective precision strike capability on contested fronts.

Setbacks:

1. Escalating Urban Loss Risk: The high-volume RF IO claim (85% control of Pokrovsk) suggests UAF defensive lines within the city are under severe pressure, representing a potential imminent strategic setback.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The primary constraint remains the AD gap against both high-altitude KAB/fixed-wing threats (requiring long-range systems) and low-altitude, pervasive UAV threats (requiring SHORAD/C-UAS). The high operational tempo demands continuous resupply of FPV drone munitions and precision artillery.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO Focus: RF is aggressively pursuing the Victory/Unity Narrative (Kadyrov, TASS, Russian bloggers celebrating National Unity Day). This narrative links historical Russian conflicts (Poles, Napoleon, Germans) directly to the current conflict ("Ukro-Nazis"), seeking to legitimize the war as an existential defense of Russia. The core tactical lie is the "85% control of Pokrovsk" claim, designed for maximum demoralization.
• UAF IO Focus: UAF is emphasizing Resilience and State Functionality (Kyiv Military Administration, Zaporizhzhia OVA celebrating Railway Day), highlighting the critical role of logistics (Ukrzaliznytsia) as the "nerve of the state." UAF is also emphasizing accountability (arrest of Sviatohirsk Lavra cleric) and transparency (HUR footage release, even if framed as "shameful" by RF sources).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The dual messaging (RF claiming rapid victory in Pokrovsk vs. UAF highlighting institutional resilience) likely results in polarized sentiment. Public morale is supported by confirmed tactical successes (C-UAS/UGV destruction) but heavily strained by the persistent strategic threat to key cities and infrastructure.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to convert the heavy IO claims regarding Pokrovsk into kinetic reality, while maintaining strategic distraction in the rear.

1. Pokrovsk Main Effort Consolidation: RF forces will prioritize clearing and fortifying the central district of Pokrovsk, particularly targeting UAF C2 and communication hubs to cut off remaining defenders. Fire support (KABs/heavy artillery) will be concentrated immediately West of Pokrovsk to prevent rapid UAF reserve deployment.
2. Continued Deep Strike / Diversion: The UAV wave confirmed near Savintsi will attempt to strike high-value energy or logistics targets in Kharkiv Oblast to maintain pressure on the Eastern front logistics, preventing UAF from freely shifting assets to Pokrovsk.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 48-72 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF leverages the perceived operational success in Pokrovsk to execute a rapid flank penetration.

• Breakthrough to Myrnohrad/Selydove: RF initiates a mechanized attack, potentially leveraging newly introduced tactical robotics (UGVs), southwest of Pokrovsk towards Myrnohrad or Selydove. This push, supported by maximum KAB saturation, aims to bypass heavily contested Pokrovsk and directly threaten the next major UAF defensive line, forcing a large-scale, potentially chaotic withdrawal.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/JFSCC (Pokrovsk): COUNTER-URBAN FSK/ATK. Use precision artillery (HIMARS, guided artillery) to systematically destroy RF logistics/assembly points just inside the confirmed penetration perimeter (Shcherbakova) to isolate and attrit the assault elements, while denying fire missions on the city center until precise UAF location is confirmed. (CRITICAL PRIORITY - COMBAT ISOLATION)
2. J3/JFSCC (AD/C-UAS): IMMEDIATE C-UAS DEPLOYMENT. Augment C-UAS and FPV defensive teams in the Lyman/Kruhliakivka sector (7th Brigade AO) to sustain the confirmed successful counter-mobility operation and neutralize any potential RF follow-on ground/drone attack aimed at stabilizing the Kharkiv/Donetsk flank. (HIGH PRIORITY - FORCE PROTECTION/FLANK SECURITY)
3. J2/GUR (TECHINT): PRIORITIZE UGV EXPLOITATION. Task the rapid collection and technical exploitation of the destroyed RF UGV (46th Brigade) to inform immediate counter-UGV tactics, jamming frequencies, and targeting profiles for other known RF robotic assets. (HIGH PRIORITY - TECHNICAL ADVANTAGE)

//END SITREP//