Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 041300Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 041000Z NOV 25 – 041300Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Focus on Pokrovsk combat confirms previous assessment; AD effectiveness quantified.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The Pokrovsk Defensive Sector remains the critical operational focus. NEW verified footage (UAF GUR, Butusov Plus) confirms UAF special operations forces (GUR MO Timur Special Unit) are engaged in extremely close-quarters combat and clearance operations inside the city, utilizing unconventional means (e.g., TM-62 mines to destroy occupied buildings). This corroborates the previous report's assessment of RF penetration and the immediate shift to urban warfare.

• Pokrovsk Axis (Donetsk Oblast): Fighting is confirmed to be house-to-house. UAF counter-action is focused on denying RF consolidation of the initial breach.
• Southern Axis (Zaporizhzhia): RF ISR activity has INCREASED. Pro-RF channels confirm additional UAV crews have been deployed to the Zaporizhzhia Oblast, indicating preparation for enhanced reconnaissance or kinetic operations. (FACT - Arkhangel Spetsnaza)
• Deep Strike Targets (UAF): OSINT analysis confirmed that the recent deep strike in Kstovo hit not only the Nizhny Novgorod Refinery (NPS) but also the adjacent SIBUR-KSTovo petrochemical plant. This expands the strategic impact of UAF denial operations against RF refining and chemical production capacity. (FACT - Operatyvny ZSU)
• Rear Area (Nikopol/Dnipropetrovsk): RF forces shelled Nikopol, confirmed by damage to a civilian ambulance (RBC-Ukraine, Silly Oborony Pivdnya). This aligns with the previous assessment of continued RF fires targeting civilian and critical infrastructure near the contact line.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No change. Clear conditions continue to favor RF high-volume UAS and KAB operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF: RF forces continue deep reconnaissance and limited combined arms training in the rear (T-72B3M training confirmed by MoD Russia), suggesting ongoing force generation and rotation planning. Frontline disposition is centered on securing urban footholds in Pokrovsk.
• UAF: UAF has committed specialized forces (GUR MO Timur unit) to counter-infiltration/urban clearance, indicating the high priority assigned to stabilizing the Pokrovsk line. UAF forces maintained a very high rate of UAS interception overnight.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Massed UAS Strike (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF demonstrated the capability to launch a massed strike of 130 UAVs overnight, coupled with 1 Iskander-M and 6 S-300 missiles. This confirms RF intent and capacity to overwhelm UAF AD through sheer volume. (FACT - PS ZSU)
2. Urban Entrenchment (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF is successfully utilizing infantry elements to occupy urban structures in Pokrovsk, requiring costly close-quarters combat (CQC) by UAF forces to dislodge them.
3. ISR Surge (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): Increased deployment of RF UAV crews in Zaporizhzhia suggests a near-term intent to execute reconnaissance and strike operations along that axis, possibly anticipating a UAF counter-concentration in Pokrovsk.

Intentions (Immediate - 0-12 hours):

1. Containment and Exploitation (Pokrovsk): RF will maintain the pressure in Pokrovsk, relying on established infantry positions to hold ground and draw UAF reserves into CQC engagements, enabling continued aerial saturation.
2. Sustained Kinetic Pressure: RF will continue to utilize a mix of kinetic strikes (S-300/UAVs) against civilian and military logistics near the frontline (Nikopol, Dnipropetrovsk) to distract UAF resources.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• UAS Mass Saturation: The strike package of 130 UAVs confirms RF strategy to deplete UAF AD stocks and exploit gaps for missile strikes.
• CQC Resistance: RF doctrine in urban environments appears to prioritize rapid entrenchment of light infantry (often low-quality/expendable personnel) to secure immediate gains, delaying UAF counter-attacks.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The confirmed successful targeting of the SIBUR-Kstovo petrochemical plant alongside the NPS represents a systemic strategic blow to RF petroleum and associated chemical production. While this will not affect immediate frontline fuel supplies, it exacerbates long-term POL shortages and complicates RF industrial sustainment.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in coordinating the multi-domain mass strike overnight. However, UAF forces are successfully targeting individual C2 nodes (as noted in the previous report).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness is high, demonstrated by the confirmed neutralization of 92 out of 137 incoming hostile air targets (92/130 UAVs, 0/1 Iskander, 0/6 S-300). While this is a high success rate against UAVs (70.8%), the failure to intercept the ballistic targets (Iskander, S-300) confirms critical gaps in layered AD coverage, particularly against fast/high-altitude threats. The commitment of GUR special forces to Pokrovsk confirms UAF prioritization of securing the city.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

1. Air Defense Volume Success: Neutralization of 92 UAVs prevents widespread damage and demonstrates resilience against massed strikes.
2. Strategic Industrial Denial: Confirmed damage to the SIBUR-Kstovo plant severely hampers RF strategic capacity.
3. Pokrovsk Counter-Action: Confirmed GUR MO special forces are active in the city, executing close-quarters clearance and denying RF easy consolidation.

Setbacks:

1. Ballistic/SAM Penetration: The failure to intercept 7 critical missile targets (Iskander-M, S-300) indicates these targets successfully reached their intended deep-rear targets, likely resulting in damage to energy or logistics facilities.
2. Civilian Damage: Confirmed strike on a civilian ambulance in Nikopol (Dnipropetrovsk region).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The critical constraint remains the shortage of kinetic AD solutions against ballistic and high-speed cruise missiles (Iskander, S-300 variants). The current focus must be on maximizing AD performance against the overwhelming volume of UAVs while minimizing exposure of key strategic assets to missile penetration.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO Focus (National Unity Day): RF channels (WarGonzo, Arkhangel Spetsnaza, TASS) are heavily promoting narratives tied to "National Unity Day," featuring patriotic music videos and cultural/historical themes to unify the domestic audience. Simultaneously, they are attempting to amplify tactical gains in Pokrovsk.
• RF Hybrid IO: RF is leveraging Iranian media (via "Dva Mayora") to portray President Zelenskyy alongside deceased US adversaries (Saddam, Gaddafi) on propaganda posters in Tehran, clearly aiming to undermine UAF international standing and portray him as a victim of US policy.
• UAF IO Focus (Resilience): UAF messaging (President Zelenskyy, Regional Administrations) emphasizes the resilience of critical infrastructure (Ukrzaliznytsia Railway Workers Day) and the effectiveness of tactical forces (GUR MO Pokrovsk footage) to maintain high public morale despite heavy strikes.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale is sustained by the highly visible, successful deep strike campaign and the commitment of elite forces to the Pokrovsk urban defense. RF morale is bolstered by state holiday propaganda but faces internal ethnic friction, evidenced by RF nationalist commentary (Alex Parker Returns) criticizing the MoD for prioritizing non-Slavic iconography in unity messaging.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to capitalize on current operational advantages (urban foothold, massed UAV capability).

1. Continuation of Urban Attrition in Pokrovsk: RF will rotate fresh, likely low-quality infantry (conscript/migrant) into Pokrovsk to absorb UAF CQC attrition while preparing slightly higher-quality tactical reserves for subsequent exploitation.
2. Increased UAS/ISR on Southern Flank: RF will leverage the newly deployed UAV crews in Zaporizhzhia to increase ISR and precision FPV/loitering munition strikes against UAF forward logistics and C2 in the Orekhiv/Robotyno sectors, aiming to fix UAF attention away from Pokrovsk.
3. Targeted Ballistic Strikes: RF will execute another small, high-value missile strike (Iskander/S-300) targeting a major non-redundant logistics hub or AD radar system in Central/Eastern Ukraine, utilizing intelligence gained from the previous massed UAV strike.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 48-72 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Increased Risk) RF achieves operational breakthrough in Pokrovsk leading to a major regional retreat.

• Pokrovsk Collapse and Deep Penetration: RF commits multiple armored Battalion Tactical Groups (BTGs) to breach the stabilized urban front line after UAF AD resources are exhausted/relocated by a major RF deep strike wave. RF success in this penetration leads to the functional encirclement or operational bypass of UAF units defending Myrnohrad, forcing a rapid, disorganized retreat from the entire western Donetsk arc.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/JFSCC (Ground Operations): MAXIMIZE URBAN EXPLOSIVE COUNTER-ACTION. Authorize UAF ground elements in Pokrovsk (GUR, 68th) to continue utilizing heavy demolition methods (e.g., TM-62) against RF-occupied structures to deny consolidation and minimize UAF CQC casualties. Provide immediate resupply of appropriate explosive materiel to the frontline. (CRITICAL PRIORITY - KINETIC ACTION)
2. J2/J3 (Air Defense/Fires): IMMEDIATE SHORAD RELOCATION. Given the confirmed missile penetration, immediately relocate mobile SHORAD assets (Gepard, Avenger, etc.) to defend known or suspected AD radar/control sites that facilitate mid-to-long range AD (NASAMS, Patriot) to protect the ability to counter future Iskander/S-300 strikes. (HIGH PRIORITY - FORCE PROTECTION)
3. J7/Information Warfare Command: AMPLIFY UAF CQC SUCCESS. Immediately push verified GUR MO (Timur Unit) footage and messaging regarding successful urban clearance in Pokrovsk. This directly counters RF "urban victory" propaganda and maintains both international confidence and domestic morale. (HIGH PRIORITY - COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

//END SITREP//