Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 041000Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 040900Z NOV 25 – 041000Z NOV 25 (Immediate Update) ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH (High confidence in RF strategic/tactical intent; Medium confidence in RF force generation/replacements effectiveness.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The core operational focus remains the Pokrovsk Defensive Sector (Donetsk Oblast). RF ground forces are confirmed to have penetrated and entrenched in the southern city quarters. The principal RF effort is now synchronizing urban maneuver with tactical air support (KAB) and strategic deep strikes.

• Donetsk Axis (Pokrovsk): The situation remains critical. RF continues KAB saturation strikes to suppress UAF defense, supporting the established infiltration groups.
• Deep Rear Targets (RF): UAF deep strike operations remain effective, confirmed by the impact on the Sterlitamak petrochemical plant (Bashkiria). This demonstrates a sustained capability to interdict RF strategic refining capacity far from the front. (FACT - V/C Kotenok)
• Central/Southern Ukraine Infrastructure: RF is maintaining pressure on UAF strategic logistics and energy. NEW strikes have targeted a DTEK energy facility in Odesa Oblast and civilian infrastructure in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, confirming the continuation of the RF interdiction campaign against UAF rear areas. (FACT - Operatyvny ZSU/RBC-Ukraine)
• Air Activity (Kharkiv/Sumy): RF is utilizing KABs against Kharkiv and Sumy Oblasts, suggesting an ongoing effort to fix UAF air defense assets and degrade defense infrastructure in the north-east, potentially drawing AD resources away from the critical Pokrovsk or Central Ukraine axes. (FACT - PS ZSU)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant weather factors are reported. Clear conditions support the continued high-volume usage of RF KABs and UAS operations across the contact line and into UAF depth.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF: RF forces are being reinforced strategically with new materiel (e.g., confirmed transfer of new Su-35S fighters to the VKS). Tactically, there is confirmed use of poorly motivated/trained foreign national and convict forces (Tajik migrant testimony), suggesting reliance on lower-quality but expendable manpower to sustain attrition rates. (FACT - Basurin, Butusov Plus)
• UAF: UAF maintains effective deep strike and counter-C2 capability (confirmed destruction of RF communications equipment by DSHV). The focus is on holding the urban line in Pokrovsk while sustaining strategic pressure on RF logistics. (FACT - DSHV ZSU)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Sustained Deep Strike (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF retains the capacity to launch missile/UAV strikes targeting UAF energy infrastructure (Odesa, Dnipropetrovsk) and strategic logistics hubs (Poltava/Kharkiv), demonstrating capability to prosecute multi-domain operations.
2. Air Superiority/KAB Dominance (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF VKS continues to deliver significant numbers of KAB strikes (Kharkiv, Sumy, Donetsk), supported by new fighter deliveries (Su-35S), enabling effective air-ground synchronization.
3. Human Wave Replacements (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): RF compensates for losses by utilizing foreign national/convict contingents, which increases volume of fire/attrition capacity but lowers overall tactical quality and raises internal morale issues (surrender intent noted).

Intentions (Immediate - 0-24 hours):

1. Consolidate Pokrovsk Gains: RF will prioritize securing and expanding the initial penetration in southern Pokrovsk, supported by KABs, to prevent a UAF counter-envelopment.
2. Disrupt UAF Energy/Logistics: RF will continue deep strikes on UAF energy (Odesa/Dnipropetrovsk) to degrade UAF war-fighting capacity in the deep rear, aligning with the MDCOA defined in the previous report.
3. Propaganda Amplification: RF IO will heavily promote the tactical penetration into Pokrovsk ("reminds of Sudzha retreat") and continue synchronized "National Unity Day" messaging to bolster domestic morale. (FACT - Operatsiya Z, TASS)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Integrated Strike Campaign: RF is clearly linking deep strikes (Odesa energy) with tactical ground operations (Pokrovsk), aiming to deny power and logistics to the reinforcing UAF units.
• Force Generation Reliance: Confirmed reliance on low-quality manpower (migrants/convicts) to fill high-attrition roles, indicating strain on professional contract soldier recruitment.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

UAF deep strikes on refining capacity (Bashkiria) are having a strategic impact on RF POL. However, RF ground force sustainment in the immediate combat zone (Pokrovsk) appears sufficient for current operational tempo. The increase in RF UAV activity in Zaporizhzhia suggests a proactive effort to secure logistics routes or increase ISR for ground operations in the South. (FACT - Arkhangel Spetsnaza)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in synchronizing multi-domain strikes (Deep Rear, KABs, Ground Assault). UAF countermeasures against RF communications nodes are confirmed (DSHV strike), indicating UAF is actively targeting RF C2 redundancy.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness is focused on anti-infiltration and urban defense in Pokrovsk. The successful destruction of RF communication nodes demonstrates effective tactical ISR and precision strike capability (FPV/artillery). Air defense posture is under pressure due to simultaneous RF KAB strikes in Kharkiv/Sumy and deep strikes in Odesa/Dnipropetrovsk.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

1. Strategic Denial: Confirmed damage to the Sterlitamak petrochemical plant continues the trend of successful UAF strategic denial operations against RF refining capacity.
2. Tactical C2 Interdiction: Confirmed destruction of RF communications gear by DSHV, degrading RF command and control in that sector.

Setbacks:

1. Energy Infrastructure Damage: Confirmed strikes on DTEK facilities in Odesa Oblast.
2. Civilian Infrastructure Damage: Confirmed strikes on civilian targets in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The primary constraint is AD allocation: how to distribute AD assets effectively to counter RF KAB saturation (Donetsk/Kharkiv) while simultaneously defending critical energy and logistics infrastructure in the deep rear (Odesa/Dnipropetrovsk).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO Focus (High Priority): RF media is intensely focused on "National Unity Day" to reinforce domestic cohesion and legitimize the war. Tactically, they are amplifying claims of UAF retreat from Pokrovsk, comparing it to Sudzha, a clear attempt to demoralize UAF defenders and the public. (FACT - TASS, Operatsiya Z)
• UAF IO Focus: UAF reporting is focused on operational successes (deep strikes, C2 destruction) and maintaining national cohesion through official daily remembrance (Minute of Silence messaging).
• Narrative Conflict: RF is actively promoting narratives of UAF war crimes (Kursk testimony) to justify its actions, while UAF highlights RF reliance on convicts/migrants, undermining the perceived quality of the RF army.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale remains generally resilient, supported by tangible strategic successes and national unity messaging. RF domestic sentiment is heavily influenced by state propaganda tied to national holidays, masking underlying issues related to forced recruitment and high casualties among low-quality units.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to translate its confirmed penetration into Pokrovsk into operational victory while simultaneously degrading UAF strategic capacity.

1. Pokrovsk Envelopment Attempt: RF armored reserves will attempt to exploit the established foothold in southern Pokrovsk, focusing efforts on flanking maneuvers or deep internal pushes to split UAF defenses.
2. Targeted Infrastructure Strike Wave: Following the Odesa energy strike, RF deep strike assets (missiles/UAVs) will prioritize logistics and energy hubs vital for supporting the Pokrovsk front (e.g., rail lines connecting Central Ukraine to Donetsk Oblast).
3. Pressure on Kharkiv/Sumy: Continued high-volume KAB strikes on Kharkiv and Sumy to tie down UAF AD resources and degrade operational capacity in the North-East.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 48-72 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF achieves a strategic kinetic advantage.

• AD Overload & Deep Logistical Cut: RF coordinates a maximum-effort, multi-axis air assault (massed UAVs and missiles) targeting the Poltava/Kremenchuk logistics corridor and key AD positions in Central/Eastern Ukraine. Success would isolate the Donetsk front from major repair, fuel, and heavy materiel resupply, significantly accelerating the potential collapse of the Pokrovsk defense.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/JFSCC (Air Defense/Fires): DYNAMIC AD REALLOCATION. Given the confirmed RF multi-axis strike strategy (KABs/Deep Strikes), implement dynamic allocation of mobile SHORAD assets. Prioritize defense of the Pokrovsk reinforcement corridor and critical energy nodes supporting the Donetsk effort (e.g., Dnipropetrovsk distribution points) over static population centers in the North-East. (CRITICAL PRIORITY - FORCE PROTECTION)
2. J3/Special Operations Forces (SSO/DSHV): EXPLOIT C2 DEGRADATION. Capitalize on the confirmed successful strike against RF communications. Immediately task follow-on FPV/loitering munition waves to the sector of the previous strike to hit RF C2 repair teams or redundant communications infrastructure before RF can re-establish robust command links. (HIGH PRIORITY - KINETIC ACTION)
3. J7/Information Warfare Command: COUNTER RF MORALE OPERATIONS. Directly counter the RF "Sudzha/Pokrovsk retreat" narrative by rapidly distributing confirmed combat footage and testimony demonstrating UAF resilience in the city. Simultaneously, utilize the testimony of captured RF foreign fighters (migrant/convict) to undermine the legitimacy and motivation of the RF fighting force. (HIGH PRIORITY - COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

//END SITREP//