Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 040600Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 040300Z NOV 25 – 040600Z NOV 25 (Immediate Update) ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM (High confidence in RF intent and strike location, medium confidence in tactical outcome due to limited UAF damage assessment.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry is defined by the high-intensity defensive battle for Pokrovsk and the extended, synchronized RF retaliatory strike campaign targeting UAF rear area logistics and critical infrastructure in Central and Eastern Oblasts.

• Donetsk Axis (Pokrovsk): The critical ground battle continues with RF forces confirmed to be entrenching in the southern quarters of the city (Previous Reports). OSINT sources (RusVesna) are actively publishing maps and propaganda claiming control around Pokrovsk, reinforcing the enemy's narrative of tactical success. (FACT - OSINT Mapping/Propaganda)
• Deep Strike/Retaliation Axis (Dnipropetrovsk, Poltava, Kharkiv, Sumy, Odesa): RF executed a predicted, multi-oblast missile and UAV strike campaign overnight/pre-dawn.
  • Dnipropetrovsk: Confirmed high-impact strikes on Mykolaiv Hromada (Synelnykove Raion) causing civilian casualties (1 deceased, 11 wounded, including children). This confirms the focus on area targets and the high risk to civilian infrastructure. (FACT - RBK-UA/ASTRA/UAF OBA)
  • Poltava/Kharkiv: UAF Air Force (PS ZSU) confirms active UAV groups operating over Poltava (Opushnia) and a new group moving southwest over northeast Kharkiv Oblast, confirming MLCOA Step 2 (Sustained Retaliatory Strikes) is ongoing. (FACT - PS ZSU)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Night/pre-dawn darkness provided optimal cover for RF combined missile/UAV strike execution across multiple axes (Odesa to Kharkiv). Current weather conditions do not impede ongoing operations or UAF AD response.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF: RF forces are posturing to exploit gains in Pokrovsk while sustaining the deep strike campaign. The constant stream of RF propaganda videos (Naval Infantry, 40th Bde) confirms a continued emphasis on high-morale, assault-oriented units (Marine Infantry) which are likely allocated to the Donetsk axis reinforcement.
• UAF: UAF AD is engaged in active defense in Central and Eastern Oblasts against continuous UAV/missile waves. Ground forces maintain active defense lines in Pokrovsk, focusing on counter-entrenchment fires (Previous Recommendations).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Sustained Deep Strike (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF retains the capability to execute multi-wave, multi-domain strikes (missile, UAV) across significant depth, demonstrated by simultaneous strikes in Odesa, Kharkiv, Sumy, and Dnipropetrovsk.
2. Information Synchronization: RF is effectively utilizing the domestic "Day of National Unity" holiday (Nov 4th) to flood the information space with high-production military propaganda (Naval Infantry Brigades 155th, 336th, 40th) to counter UAF deep strike successes (Kstovo) and boost domestic morale. (FACT - Two Majors, TASS, Colonelcassad)
3. Counter-Battery Effectiveness (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): RF claims of successfully targeting and destroying a French CAESAR SPG via Msta-S counter-battery fire (90th Guards Tank Division) suggest sustained high-priority intelligence on UAF Western artillery assets. (FACT - Colonelcassad claim)

Intentions (Immediate - 0-12 hours):

1. Air Saturation: Continue UAV and missile activity throughout the morning/day in Poltava and Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts to find and fix UAF AD and logistics nodes.
2. Propaganda Dominance: Maintain a high volume of morale-boosting propaganda and IO focused on "unity" and "victory" to drown out reports of RF strategic losses (POL/Kstovo) and to legitimize tactical gains (Pokrovsk).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Geographic Expansion of Strikes: The confirmed strike operations covering Odesa, Kharkiv, Sumy, and Dnipropetrovsk demonstrate a broad, punitive scope beyond just the Pokrovsk logistical pipeline, intended to strain UAF AD resources widely.
• Artillery Targeting Priority: RF publicizing the successful targeting of a high-value Western asset (CAESAR) via counter-battery fire indicates a directed effort to prioritize the destruction of NATO-supplied artillery, likely based on improved ISR or signals intelligence.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The logistics situation remains constrained for the RF due to successful UAF deep strikes (Kstovo, Dovzhansk POL). However, the RF ability to execute complex, multi-axis deep strikes confirms that critical missile/UAV stocks are currently sufficient for sustained punitive operations.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is highly effective in executing synchronized multi-domain operations, linking deep strike retaliation with ongoing ground offensive requirements in Donetsk. The unified IO effort surrounding the National Unity Day further demonstrates synchronized command messaging.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF Air Force (PS ZSU) is actively tracking and reporting continuous UAV threats, indicating high readiness of AD assets, particularly in the central and eastern regions. UAF ground forces must maintain maximum vigilance against an anticipated reinforcement and expansion of the Pokrovsk penetration.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

1. Deep Strike Initiative: UAF maintains the ability to execute strategic strikes (Previous Reports) forcing RF into a reactive posture focused on IO and punitive strikes rather than purely offensive action.

Setbacks:

1. Confirmed Civilian Impact: The strike on Dnipropetrovsk resulting in casualties, including children, confirms the failure to neutralize all elements of the RF strike package.
2. Artillery Loss Confirmation (RF Claim): While unconfirmed by UAF sources, the public RF claim of destroying a CAESAR SPG is a credible indicator of successful RF counter-battery intelligence.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate constraint is the limited depth and mobility of high-value AD systems required to cover the newly threatened areas (Poltava, Kharkiv NE) against incoming UAV swarms that precede or accompany missile strikes.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Dominant Narrative (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The environment is saturated with RF state and military-blogger content linking military service, tactical advances (Pokrovsk flag planting), and military history (Naval Infantry) to the "Day of National Unity." This is a classic IO strategy to integrate the conflict into the national identity, justifying high casualties and strategic losses.
• Focus on Civilian Targeting: RF state media (TASS) is concurrently running soft-propaganda (bakers sending pies to the front) to create a veneer of normalcy and care, directly contrasting with the UAF reporting on civilian casualties in Dnipropetrovsk, which highlights RF war crimes intent.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF public sentiment is likely driven by fear and resilience following the confirmed strikes on civilian areas. RF troop morale is being aggressively maintained through synchronized holiday greetings and flag-planting imagery (Воин DV, Two Majors).

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will continue to leverage the information environment while applying pressure on the front and in the deep rear.

1. Pokrovsk Reinforcement and Expansion: RF will commit specific Naval Infantry formations (155th/40th/336th Bdes or elements thereof, based on IO exposure) to reinforce the penetration in Pokrovsk, seeking to push beyond the initial lodgment and widen the breach.
2. Targeted Infrastructure Strike: RF will shift punitive strikes toward high-value electrical substations or key railway nodes in Dnipropetrovsk/Poltava, following the current UAV trajectory from Kharkiv, aiming to delay UAF reserve deployment to the Donetsk axis.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF achieves localized breakthroughs via massed fires and airborne coordination.

• Tactical Air Superiority and Reserve Interdiction: RF utilizes massed tactical aviation and glide bombs (FABs) against UAF reserves preparing west of Pokrovsk, while simultaneously deploying Iranian-supplied suicide drones (Shahed) to saturate UAF AD coverage protecting critical rail hubs (e.g., in Dnipro), preventing timely counter-attack reinforcement.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/Air Defense Command (Central/Eastern Oblast): IMMEDIATE AD REPOSITIONING. Immediately redeploy high-mobility, short-range AD assets (e.g., MANPADS, mobile AD gun systems) to the identified UAV approach corridors in Poltava and northeast Kharkiv Oblasts to engage confirmed incoming threats and protect critical railway infrastructure. (CRITICAL PRIORITY - IMMEDIATE ACTION)
2. J3/Fires Command (Pokrovsk Axis): HIGH-VALUE COUNTER-BATTERY MISSION. Prioritize the suppression and destruction of all identified and suspected RF counter-battery positions (especially Msta-S units) using dedicated Western precision munitions (e.g., Excalibur, HIMARS). Implement strict OPSEC and EMCON protocols for all NATO-supplied SPGs to mitigate the identified RF ISR advantage. (CRITICAL PRIORITY - KINETIC INTERDICTION/OPSEC)
3. J7/Information Warfare Command: COUNTER-PROPAGANDA EXECUTION. Launch a synchronized IO campaign immediately, featuring confirmed imagery and casualty reports from the Dnipropetrovsk strike (especially concerning children) to directly contrast and neutralize the RF "National Unity" narrative. Focus on international and domestic audiences to undermine RF legitimacy. (HIGH PRIORITY - COGNITIVE DEFENSE)

//END SITREP//