Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 040400Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 040339Z NOV 25 – 040400Z NOV 25 (Immediate Update) ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Confirmation of widespread air defense success; continued focus on Pokrovsk and RF logistics degradation.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The immediate operational geometry is defined by the cessation of the coordinated RF deep strike wave and the stabilization of the air domain in central and southern Ukraine. The focal point of tactical concern remains the Pokrovsk Axis (Donetsk Oblast) and the vulnerability of the Northeastern Border (Sumy Oblast) to further S-300/Ballistic strikes.

Updated Strike Status (Immediate):

• Kyiv/Central: BALLISTIC THREAT CLEARED. Air raid alerts for ballistic threats in Kyiv and Central Oblasts (including Zaporizhzhia) have been cancelled (01:38Z – 01:52Z). This confirms that UAF Air Defense (AD) successfully neutralized the high-speed threats or that the incoming projectiles were targeted away from critical infrastructure. (FACT)
• Kharkiv/Odesa: Confirmed reports of explosions in both Kharkiv and Odesa Oblasts (01:53Z), indicating that RF utilized localized strike assets (likely Shaheds or S-300/MLRS) despite the broader cancellation of the deep ballistic threat. (FACT)
• RF Rear Area (Kstovo, Nizhny Novgorod): Imagery confirms a large fire and intense illumination at the location of the ROSNEFT NORSI refinery. This follows a suspected deep strike, representing a successful UAF/RVC effort to degrade RF strategic POL capacity. (ANALYTICAL JUDGEMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Night conditions persist. Cloud cover (not explicitly reported but inferred from historical patterns) may have aided the earlier RF deep strike attempt, but darkness did not prevent UAF AD from achieving successful threat mitigation.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Strike Posture: RF has temporarily ceased the synchronized multi-domain strike package, likely to reassess UAF AD response effectiveness and prepare for the next wave. Assets remain deployed (S-300 in the Sumy border region, tactical aircraft for KABs in Donetsk).
• UAF Control Measures: UAF successfully managed the widespread ballistic threat, demonstrating effective C2 and AD asset distribution. The immediate focus must now shift back to ground defense in Pokrovsk and establishing counter-battery fire/SEAD against the new S-300 threat in Sumy.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities: RF maintains the capability to launch diversified deep strikes simultaneously across multiple axes. The confirmed employment of S-300 in a Surface-to-Surface role near the Sumy border provides RF with short-notice, high-kinetic strike capability against UAF rear areas in the northeast, potentially without the need for high-risk aircraft deployment.

Intentions (Immediate):

1. Regroup and Re-Strike: RF's immediate intent is to analyze the effectiveness of the initial layered strike and prepare a follow-on strike package, focusing on targets that were identified as weaknesses in the UAF AD response. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
2. Maintain Pressure on Pokrovsk: The ground assault in Pokrovsk is the main effort. Air/artillery support (KABs, MLRS) will continue to suppress UAF counter-attacks, preparing for RF reinforcement into the southern city quarters. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
3. IO Amplification: RF IO channels will likely continue to amplify strategic narratives (e.g., "Day of National Unity," 01:34Z) to distract from UAF deep strike successes (Kstovo) and maintain domestic morale.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The successful neutralization of the broad ballistic threat confirms that the RF adaptation of synchronized strikes (detailed in the previous SITREP) did not achieve its desired effect of overwhelming UAF AD saturation. However, the confirmed local explosions in Kharkiv and Odesa (01:53Z) suggest RF is maximizing the use of localized tactical fires (MLRS, short-range UAVs) to exploit the moment of high alert.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The potential successful strike on the Kstovo refinery (NORSI) is a significant development. While not an immediate tactical effect, this location is a major source of fuel for RF forces. The strike, if confirmed severe, will increase RF reliance on rail transport from more distant facilities and complicate the POL supply chain for the central axes (Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia). (ANALYTICAL JUDGEMENT - MEDIUM TERM IMPACT)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains synchronized but rigid. The widespread failure of the high-speed strike package to achieve critical kinetic effects suggests that UAF AD C2 remains resilient and responsive.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture is high, having successfully navigated the immediate deep strike crisis. Readiness remains high in the AD domain, but the high operational tempo required for ballistic defense strains maintenance and crew rotation schedules. The ground defense in Pokrovsk remains the priority operational concern.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Success: Confirmed mitigation of the widespread ballistic threat in Kyiv/Central Oblasts. Confirmed deep strike success against the Kstovo refinery (pending formal UAF confirmation). Setback: Localized explosions reported in Kharkiv and Odesa (01:53Z) confirm localized tactical hits, requiring immediate damage assessment.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The constraint on Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) assets, highlighted previously, is momentarily relieved by the "all-clear" status, but the threat remains. Resources must now be rapidly repositioned to address the Sumy S-300 launch area and the high-density artillery use in Pokrovsk.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO channels are focusing on internal Russian holidays (Day of National Unity, 01:34Z) and promoting strategic distractions (North Korea missile launches, 01:49Z) to minimize attention on the Kstovo fire and the failure of the mass missile strikes.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The cancellation of the widespread ballistic threat will temporarily stabilize public morale. However, the confirmed explosions in Kharkiv and Odesa will maintain a sense of unease. Official confirmation of the successful AD interdiction and the Kstovo strike (if confirmed UAF-related) is critical for morale.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The TASS report on North Korea's missile launch during the US Defense Secretary's visit (01:49Z) is irrelevant to immediate UAF operations but serves RF interests by emphasizing global geopolitical tensions and distracting Western focus.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4-12 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will prioritize consolidating tactical gains in Pokrovsk:

1. Pokrovsk Reinforcement: RF forces will attempt to push immediate reserves (likely motorized infantry and light armor) into the southern Pokrovsk penetration point to secure a defensive perimeter within the city limits.
2. S-300 Fire Missions: RF will execute follow-on S-300/Ballistic strikes on identified UAF C2 or logistics sites in the Sumy border region, testing UAF AD reaction time in the northeast.
3. Low-Intensity Strikes: Continuation of low-volume Shahed and Lancet attacks on secondary logistical/industrial targets in Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF leverages temporary UAF AD asset reallocation (due to the Sumy threat) to execute a short-notice, massed, high-precision air strike (KABs and Cruise Missiles) targeting the primary UAF operational logistics hub near Pavlohrad/Dnipro, preceding a synchronized counter-attack by RF reserves designed to break the Pokrovsk defense.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/Fires Coordination (Donetsk Sector): INITIATE COUNTER-ATTACK (Pokrovsk). Utilize UAF 68th Jaeger Brigade (supported by tactical reserves) to launch a synchronized counter-attack before 040800Z NOV 25 to dislodge RF forces from their established positions in southern Pokrovsk. Fires priority must immediately shift to targeting RF reinforcement columns approaching the city. (CRITICAL PRIORITY - IMMEDIATE)
2. J3/AD Command (Northeast Sector): EXECUTE S-300 HUNTER-KILLER PROTOCOL. Task all available ELINT/SIGINT assets to focus exclusively on the Sumy border region for S-300 launch signature triangulation. Prepare pre-planned targets and load high-precision long-range munitions (e.g., HIMARS/Storm Shadow) for immediate Counter-Battery Fire/SEAD execution upon target confirmation. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)
3. J2/GUR (Information Warfare): AMPLIFY KSTOVO STRIKE. If UAF confirmation of the Kstovo refinery strike is secured, immediately release controlled information highlighting the strategic economic impact to degrade RF domestic morale and reassure Ukrainian public opinion regarding UAF deep strike capabilities. (HIGH PRIORITY)

//END SITREP//