Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 040339Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 040100Z NOV 25 – 040339Z NOV 25 (Immediate Update) ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Increased clarity on strike focus and successful UAF counter-action in the south; new threat confirmation in the northeast.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry is defined by the RF strategy of simultaneous deep strike saturation to distract and disaggregate UAF Air Defense (AD) assets, while maintaining intense ground pressure on the Pokrovsk Axis.

Updated Active Threats (Immediate):

• Sumy Oblast (Northeast Axis): CRITICAL NEW THREAT CONFIRMATION. The previously reported KAB launches are now confirmed to be supplemented by S-300/Ballistic Missile strikes targeting the border area (specifically Yunakivka/Khotin vicinity). This represents a rapid and dangerous escalation of strike capability against the northeastern border.
• Donetsk Oblast: Confirmed repeated KAB launches continue to support the main RF ground effort in the Pokrovsk sector.
• Odesa Oblast (Izmail/Maritime): CONFIRMED INTERDICTION. Reports suggest UAF has achieved confirmed success ("minus") against the high-volume Shahed group targeting the Izmail/Danube port cluster. This temporarily mitigates the maritime logistics threat.
• Kharkiv/Zaporizhzhia Oblasts: Ongoing low-to-medium volume UAV activity (Shahed/Lancet types) targeting Kharkiv (from the NE) and Zaporizhzhia (from the East).

Internal RF Area Attacks (Non-UAF Confirmed): Reports of a significant incident in Kstovo (Nizhny Novgorod Oblast, RF), with visual evidence of a large fire/explosion. Kstovo hosts a major ROSNEFT oil refinery (NORSI). This is likely an unconfirmed UAF or Russian Volunteer Corps (RVC) deep strike, aiming for strategic RF economic targets.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Night conditions continue to enable RF deep strike and UAV operations. The employment of ballistic/S-300 missiles against Sumy is unaffected by weather but capitalizes on darkness to reduce visual tracking and response time.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Strike Posture: RF has rapidly escalated the northeastern strike package from KABs (air-launched) to S-300/ballistic (ground-launched), demonstrating the use of diversified and layered deep strike capabilities near the border.
• UAF Control Measures: Successful rapid engagement of the Izmail UAV group demonstrates effective UAF AD deployment in the Southern Sector. The new threat in Sumy necessitates immediate, high-priority reallocation of mobile AD assets to the northeastern border sector.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Multi-Domain Strike Synchronization: RF demonstrates the capability to launch KABs, Shaheds, and S-300/ballistic missiles simultaneously across geographically disparate operational zones (Donetsk, Odesa, Sumy).
• Integrated Ballistic/Area Denial: The use of S-300 (likely in Surface-to-Surface mode) against the Sumy border regions is intended to saturate localized UAF forward positions or destroy static infrastructure (e.g., C2, temporary depots) in the border zone.

Intentions (Immediate):

1. Force AD Redeployment (Primary Intent): The synchronized strikes (UAVs in the South/Central, Ballistic/KABs in the North/East) are intended to fix or destroy UAF AD assets, specifically preventing their concentration to protect the Pokrovsk main effort logistics (Pavlohrad) or the main combat area (Donetsk). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
2. Degrade Northeastern Border Capacity: The S-300 strikes on Sumy/Yunakivka aim to destabilize the border region, potentially targeting forward assembly areas, reconnaissance elements, or local C2, thus fixing UAF reserves in the north. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
3. Sustain Pokrovsk Pressure: Continued KAB use on Donetsk aims to prepare the battlefield for RF ground assaults, degrading UAF fixed defenses and morale, supporting the RF penetration of southern Pokrovsk (as detailed in the previous daily report). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The Confirmed Ballistic Missile/S-300 employment on Sumy Oblast is the most critical tactical adaptation. This moves the threat level in the northeast from harassing fires to high-speed kinetic strikes with minimal warning time, requiring immediate UAF counter-action and warning protocols.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF sustainment remains capable of supporting high-tempo, multi-axis deep strike operations. The alleged strike on the Kstovo refinery (RF territory) would, if confirmed, negatively impact RF POL supply chain continuity in the medium term, but has no immediate tactical effect.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is demonstrating high synchronization, successfully managing the complex, diversified strike package across four major operational sectors (Donetsk, Kharkiv, Sumy, Odesa).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness is high, demonstrated by the quick and successful reported interdiction of the high-volume UAV group near Izmail. The posture is now extremely strained due to the mandatory requirement to manage three simultaneous, diverse deep strike threats: UAVs (low-speed, saturation), KABs (high-precision, air-launched), and S-300/Ballistic (high-speed, minimal warning).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Success: Confirmed early interdiction of the Izmail UAV threat. (Source: Vanek, HIGH CONFIDENCE). Setback: The introduction of ballistic/S-300 strikes to the Sumy border region significantly complicates AD planning and increases risk to rear area assets.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate requirement is for Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) capability to be made available to the northeastern sector (Sumy border), a resource that is extremely constrained and typically prioritized for Kyiv or critical logistics hubs.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO channels (TASS reporting on the blogger) are focused on demonstrating internal security control and legal enforcement, maintaining the narrative of a stable, secure rear while UAF is under deep strike pressure. UAF (РБК-Україна) highlights the US political support (Congress plan), bolstering the narrative of sustained Western commitment amidst operational pressure.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The simultaneous air raid alerts across vast areas, including Kyiv (1:20:40Z), and the confirmation of ballistic attacks in Sumy, will generate widespread fear and public anxiety. The success of the Izmail interdiction must be rapidly confirmed by official UAF sources to counter the psychological effects of the widespread alert.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4-6 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to sustain the layered strike campaign:

1. Northeast Escalation: RF will continue to utilize S-300/Ballistic strikes against the Sumy border area for area denial and to provoke UAF AD response and resource movement.
2. KAB Sustainment: KAB strikes will continue on Donetsk Oblast targets, focusing on eliminating fixed UAF positions and interdicting immediate tactical resupply to the Pokrovsk defense.
3. Counter-Attack in Pokrovsk: RF ground forces will attempt to exploit the psychological effect of the deep strikes to solidify their penetration into southern Pokrovsk and push toward key urban infrastructure.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 6-12 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

1. BMD Overload/Decapitation Strike: RF launches a synchronized strike involving high-speed cruise missiles (e.g., Kh-101) and ballistic missiles targeting a high-value UAF C2 node or critical AD hub in Central Ukraine (e.g., near Poltava/Dnipro), immediately preceding a decisive, overwhelming push on the Pokrovsk defensive perimeter. The intent is to achieve temporary C2 paralysis during the critical ground maneuver.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/AD Command (Northeast Sector): DEPLOY MOBILE BMD. Immediately task mobile, high-value Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM) systems (e.g., NASAMS, Patriot, or Hawk equivalents) to establish a protective umbrella over key military facilities and logistics nodes within 50-70km of the Sumy border to counter the confirmed S-300/ballistic threat. (CRITICAL PRIORITY - IMMEDIATE)
2. J3/Fires Coordination (Donetsk Sector): COUNTER-MOBILITY IN POKROVSK. Dedicate all available long-range artillery and precision guided munitions to interdict RF reinforcement and resupply lines leading into southern Pokrovsk, ensuring the penetrated forces cannot establish secure logistics. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)
3. J2/GUR (IO/Public Affairs): CONFIRM AD SUCCESS. Issue official, immediate confirmation of the successful neutralization of the Izmail UAV threat to stabilize public confidence and counter the broad psychological impact of the synchronized air raid alerts. (HIGH PRIORITY)

//END SITREP//