Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 040339Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 040035Z NOV 25 – 040339Z NOV 25 (Immediate Update) ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM (Increased clarity on strike focus; high uncertainty regarding KAB intent and scope)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry continues to emphasize the Pokrovsk Axis (Donetsk Oblast) as the main ground effort, supported by deep strikes targeting logistics (Central Ukraine) and maritime/port infrastructure (Southern Ukraine).

Updated Active Threats (Immediate):

• Odesa Oblast (Izmail/Maritime): Confirmed high-volume UAV threat (approx. 12 Shahed-type UAVs) approaching the Izmail port cluster from the Black Sea/Northeast. Izmail is critical for grain export and Danube River logistics. This replaces the previous generalized Odesa threat.
• Sumy Oblast (Northeast Axis): NEW CRITICAL THREAT. Confirmed launch of Guided Aerial Bombs (KAB) targeting Sumy Oblast. This represents a significant, previously unconfirmed expansion of RF tactical aviation activity beyond the established Donetsk/Kharkiv front lines.
• Dnipro/Pavlohrad Axis: No further updates on the previously reported critical UAV group approaching Pavlohrad. Assume the threat remains active until confirmed interdiction or impact.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Night conditions favor RF deep strike operations, particularly the high-volume UAV attack on Izmail. The shift in KAB deployment to Sumy Oblast suggests RF is exploiting favorable launch conditions or perceived gaps in UAF long-range air defense coverage on the northern front.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF UAV Vectors (Active Threat): Highly concentrated group moving toward Izmail, confirming RF intent to degrade critical economic infrastructure.
• RF Tactical Aviation: Active employment of KABs across two highly separated operational zones: Donetsk (main effort support) and Sumy (new strike focus).
• Control Measures: UAF Air Force resources must now be split across three high-priority sectors: Pokrovsk logistics defense (Pavlohrad), Southern maritime logistics defense (Izmail), and the defense of the Sumy region from new KAB strikes.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Extended KAB Range Exploitation: RF demonstrates the capability to employ KABs across vastly separated fronts (Donetsk and Sumy), potentially utilizing long-range fighter-bomber assets (Su-34/Su-35) or closer forward operating airfields.
• High-Volume Maritime Saturation: The confirmed 12+ UAV deployment toward Izmail indicates sustained capability for high-volume, multi-vector saturation strikes on high-value economic targets.

Intentions (Immediate):

1. Isolate North-Eastern Front: (NEW INTENTION) The KAB launches on Sumy are likely intended to destroy static UAF infrastructure, pressure logistics nodes, or degrade C2 facilities near the border, potentially preparing the ground for future spoiling attacks or fixing UAF reserves away from Pokrovsk. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
2. Degrade Export Capacity: The high-volume strike on Izmail aims to disrupt port operations and damage or destroy Danube River transshipment infrastructure, targeting Ukraine's critical grain export capacity and international economic lifeline. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
3. Sustain Pokrovsk Pressure: Continued pressure on logistics (Pavlohrad) and immediate defenses (Donetsk KABs) remains the primary intention supporting the main effort (Pokrovsk urban assault).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The KAB strikes on Sumy Oblast are the most significant tactical change. This forces UAF to commit AD and response assets to a previously stable deep rear area, significantly stretching UAF SHORAD and air defense coverage across the entire eastern half of the country.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF tactical aviation sustainment remains robust enough to support simultaneous KAB operations on widely separated fronts (Sumy and Donetsk). UAF strikes on Luhansk depots, while effective, have not yet curtailed RF ability to conduct strategic air operations.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective, demonstrating complex synchronization of ground maneuver (Pokrovsk), high-volume UAV strikes (Izmail), and multi-front tactical aviation deployment (Sumy/Donetsk).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture is now severely tested by the multi-domain, multi-axis attack. Readiness levels must be elevated across all three critical sectors (Donetsk/Central Logistics, Sumy, Odesa).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Setback: The expansion of the KAB threat to Sumy Oblast is a significant operational setback, demanding immediate resource reallocation. Success: Tracking and confirmation of the high-volume Izmail UAV threat provides a narrow window for interception efforts.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

UAF AD assets are critically constrained. The necessity to defend Pavlohrad logistics, Izmail port, and the newly threatened Sumy infrastructure requires difficult triage and prioritization decisions, potentially exposing lower-priority assets to unacceptable risk.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO channels (e.g., Colonelcassad, with the "Horror of Estonia" photo/video) continue to push narrative content designed for Western consumption, attempting to frame the conflict as part of a wider threat to NATO. The grainy video of a motorboat is likely an attempt to project Russian military reach or suggest covert operations, though the military utility is zero. (LOW CONFIDENCE in immediate tactical impact of the boat video).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The simultaneous deep strike campaigns (Sumy, Izmail, Pavlohrad) will increase public anxiety across multiple oblasts, compounding the stress from the critical situation in Pokrovsk. UAF must rapidly confirm successful AD interdiction to maintain public confidence.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to maximize the disruptive effect of the synchronized strikes:

1. Izmail Strike: The 12+ UAV group will attempt to penetrate AD and strike the Izmail port cluster, targeting oil storage, transshipment equipment, or power infrastructure by 040500Z NOV 25.
2. Sumy KAB Follow-up: RF tactical aviation will conduct additional KAB sorties against Sumy Oblast infrastructure within the next 4 hours to assess UAF AD response and exploit weaknesses. The targets are likely static military facilities or industrial zones.
3. Pokrovsk Consolidation: Ground forces in Pokrovsk will utilize the widespread deep strikes as a diversion and morale-breaker while attempting to consolidate and expand their southern urban foothold.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 6 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

1. Airborne Synchronization: RF launches a synchronized long-range missile strike (e.g., Kalibr or Kh-101/555) targeting major UAF AD sites in Central Ukraine (e.g., near Poltava or Dnipro), immediately followed by the UAV strike on Pavlohrad. This aims to paralyze UAF air defense C2 and open the logistics corridor for significant damage, directly feeding the MDCOA for Pokrovsk (as defined in the previous report).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/AD Command (Southern & Central Sector): AD TRIAGE AND REALLOCATION. Immediately commit the maximum feasible AD resources to the Izmail axis to counter the high-volume threat (12+ UAVs), protecting the critical port infrastructure. Simultaneously, maintain heightened readiness and mobile patrol along the Pavlohrad logistics corridor. (CRITICAL PRIORITY - IMMEDIATE)
2. J3/Fires Coordination (Northeast Sector): KAB COUNTER-SUPPRESSION. Utilize available medium-range surface-to-air missile systems (if within range) or rapidly deploy mobile SHORAD assets to the Sumy region. Prioritize targeting of RF tactical aviation launch platforms operating near the border to deter sustained KAB use. (HIGH PRIORITY)
3. J2/GUR (Information Operations): COUNTER-NARRATIVE. Immediately prepare and disseminate public messaging confirming successful AD interdictions (if achieved) over Izmail and Pavlohrad, and rapidly downplay the operational impact of the new KAB threat in Sumy to prevent localized panic and maintain public morale. (HIGH PRIORITY)

//END SITREP//