Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 040030Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 040000Z NOV 25 – 040035Z NOV 25 (Immediate Update) ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM (Focus on immediate UAV threat tracking and strike confirmation)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The critical axis remains Pokrovsk (Donetsk Oblast), where RF forces are consolidating their penetration in the southern quarters. The immediate threat, however, lies in the Central Logistics Corridor (Dnipropetrovsk Oblast).

New Active Threats (Immediate):

• Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Pavlohrad Axis): UAF Air Force confirms a UAV group is currently tracked approaching/passing Pavlohrad from the north. Pavlohrad is a critical rail and road junction supporting UAF reserves moving toward Pokrovsk.
• Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovsk): Confirmed launch of Guided Aerial Bombs (KAB) targeting the Donetsk sector, indicating persistent RF tactical aviation support for the ground forces engaged in the Pokrovsk urban fight.
• Odesa Oblast (Black Sea): Active UAV track in the Black Sea heading south toward Southern Odesa Oblast. Likely targeting energy or port infrastructure.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Night conditions persist, favoring RF deep strike operations. The ongoing KAB use in Donetsk confirms RF reliance on high-altitude/standoff glide bombs, which are less susceptible to current weather patterns, to suppress UAF defenders in Pokrovsk.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF UAV Vectors (Active Threat):
  1. Pavlohrad Group (CRITICAL): Moving south, posing an immediate threat to the logistical axis.
  2. Odesa Group (HIGH): Moving toward southern port infrastructure.
• RF Tactical Aviation: Active employment of KABs over Donetsk.
• Control Measures: UAF Air Force resources are currently split between interdicting the critical Pavlohrad group and monitoring the Odesa threat.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Synchronized Multi-Domain Attack: RF is demonstrating synchronization between ground maneuver (Pokrovsk consolidation), kinetic deep strikes (Dnipropetrovsk confirmed fire), and persistent tactical air support (KAB launches).
• Adaptive Strike Profiles: RF continues to adjust UAV routes (Pavlohrad axis confirmed) to exploit gaps or saturated AD zones.

Intentions (Immediate):

1. Interdict Reserves: The primary intention of the current UAV movement toward Pavlohrad is to disrupt the flow of UAF reserves and supplies to the Pokrovsk salient, directly supporting the MDCOA defined in the previous report.
2. Pressure Pokrovsk Defenders: The immediate use of KABs is intended to degrade UAF defensive positions and break the will of defenders (e.g., 68th Jaeger Brigade) holding the line against the RF urban penetration.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The identification of a specific UAV vector approaching/passing Pavlohrad confirms RF prioritizing the rail and road network feeding the Pokrovsk fight. This is an immediate adaptation following the successful strike confirmed in Synelnykove Raion (reported previously).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF sustainment remains critical to the Pokrovsk push. While UAF deep strikes against Luhansk depots were successful, the immediate RF priority is to degrade UAF logistics before those effects manifest.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust, coordinating simultaneous, multi-domain operations across several critical fronts (Pokrovsk, Central Ukraine deep strike).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces in Pokrovsk are under intense pressure, now exacerbated by the confirmed KAB launches. AD assets are tasked with defending two concurrent critical axes (Pavlohrad and Odesa).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

The successful identification and tracking of the new UAV vector (Pavlohrad) is a minor success, providing a window for interception. The immediate tactical setback is the confirmed use of KABs, which pose a significant threat to fixed positions and urban defenses.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate constraint is the allocation of interceptors and EW assets between the critical Pavlohrad logistics defense and the high-value Odesa port defense. Priority must be given to the main effort defense.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

TASS reporting on the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD) warning against fraud/scams, while seemingly domestic, reinforces the RF state narrative of maintaining public order and safety, projecting stability in contrast to the high-stakes battlefield developments.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Media focus on international support (e.g., Reuters report on new EU requirements) aims to maintain public confidence in Ukraine's long-term trajectory, counteracting the immediate anxieties caused by deep strikes (Dnipropetrovsk) and the Pokrovsk crisis.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to achieve a kinetic strike on a high-value target along the Pavlohrad-Dnipro logistics axis within the next two hours, maximizing the effect of the multi-axis UAV saturation attack.

1. Strike Execution: The UAV group currently tracked near Pavlohrad will attempt to strike a key rail junction, transshipment depot, or fuel storage facility supporting the Pokrovsk front.
2. KAB Escalation: RF tactical aviation will increase the tempo of KAB launches over Pokrovsk to enable RF ground forces to expand their southern foothold before UAF reserves can be fully committed.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 6 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

1. Simultaneous Strike on Logistics and C2: RF launches a combined, multi-weapon strike (e.g., high-speed cruise missile or ballistic missile) on a key UAF operational C2 node in the Poltava/Dnipro region, synchronized with the UAV strike against the Pavlohrad logistics hub. This simultaneous attack aims to decapitate regional command while paralyzing sustainment to the main effort.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/AD Command (Central Sector): INTERDICT PAVLOHRAD AXIS. Immediately prioritize and re-task mobile AD assets (e.g., Gepard, Avenger, or available long-range systems) to establish a hardened interception zone around Pavlohrad's critical infrastructure. (CRITICAL PRIORITY - IMMEDIATE)
2. J3/Fires Coordination (Donetsk Sector): COUNTER-AIR-INTERDICTION. Utilize the new Storm Shadow capability (per previous recommendation) or long-range artillery against confirmed or suspected RF tactical airbases (e.g., Morozovsk, if in range) to reduce the operational tempo of KAB launches against Pokrovsk. (HIGH PRIORITY)
3. GUR/SBU (Internal Security): FORCE PROTECTION ALERT. Immediately raise force protection levels and implement increased counter-sabotage surveillance around rail and road infrastructure supplying the Pokrovsk salient (including the Pavlohrad area), anticipating that deep kinetic strikes may be coordinated with internal sabotage efforts. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)

//END SITREP//