Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 031730Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 031700Z NOV 25 – 031730Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The situation on the Pokrovsk Axis remains critical. RF forces are committed to urban entrenchment.

• Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmiiskoye) Axis: New RF milblogger maps (Z комитет) confirm RF control over the eastern and southern approaches to Dymytrov (Myrnohrad direction), reinforcing the tactical goal of cutting off the Pokrovsk salient from the South/Southwest. This map data aligns with the previous report's judgment of an attempted encirclement maneuver. (FACT - RF Map Analysis / HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Deep Strike Confirmation (Pavlohrad): RF sources (Colonelcassad, НгП раZVедка) are actively claiming a successful strike using an OTRK "Iskander" missile on a concentration of UAF personnel (a "postroyeniye" or formation/ceremony) in Pavlohrad (Dnipropetrovsk Oblast). Subsequent UAF confirmation (Оперативний ЗСУ, ДБР) of casualties and an investigation into the incident validates the kinetic effect of the deep strike campaign targeting logistics and C2 in Central Ukraine. (FACT - Corroborated Strike Event / HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Northern ISR/Strike Threat: UAF Air Force confirms continued UAV activity near Shostka (Sumy Oblast) and Novhorod-Siverskyi (Chernihiv Oblast) following the earlier deep ballistic strikes. This indicates persistent RF intent to fix UAF AD and reconnaissance assets in the North. (FACT - UAF AF Alerts / HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• UAF Counter-Offensive Confirmation (Donetsk): UAF Commander-in-Chief Syrsky reports successful advances by UAF assault units in the Dobropillya salient area, resulting in 188 km² liberated and 248.7 km² cleared of RF reconnaissance/sabotage groups (DRGs). This suggests a local counter-effort to relieve pressure on the main Pokrovsk defensive line. (FACT - UAF Official Report / MEDIUM CONFIDENCE on exact metrics, HIGH on trend)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No new weather or environmental factors reported. Conditions remain conducive for both ground maneuver and UAS/deep strike operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Deployment (Deep Strike): RF is prioritizing the use of high-value ballistic missiles (Iskander) against critical rear-area targets (Pavlohrad/logistics/personnel concentrations). This indicates a shift in targeting priority from static infrastructure to time-sensitive, high-payoff personnel gatherings.
• UAF Response: UAF AD alerts for ballistic threats have terminated across major cities (Kyiv, Zaporizhzhia), but the threat remains demonstrated. The investigation by the State Bureau of Investigation (DBR) into the Pavlohrad incident suggests that the formation of personnel may have violated force protection measures.
• UAF Morale Reinforcement: UAF IO continues leveraging the memory of national heroes (Marine Skakun, Engineer Corps Day) to bolster morale and emphasize tactical ingenuity in the face of current setbacks.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Precision Ballistic Strikes: RF demonstrates effective intelligence and precision targeting capability to hit vulnerable UAF personnel concentrations (e.g., formations, ceremonies, staging areas) deep in the rear.
• Multi-Vector Assault (IO/Kinetic): RF is successfully synchronizing ground pressure (Pokrovsk) with strategic deep strikes and immediate Information Operations (IO) to amplify success and demoralize UAF.

Intentions:

1. Maximize Attrition of Reserves: The immediate intention of the Pavlohrad strike was to inflict heavy casualties on UAF personnel (specifically targeting drone pilots and infantry, per RF claims), directly undermining UAF readiness and the ability to feed fresh units into the Pokrovsk fight.
2. Propaganda Amplification: Immediately leverage confirmed deep strike success (Pavlohrad) and tactical ground gains (Pokrovsk) to reinforce the narrative of overwhelming RF superiority and UAF collapse.
3. Sustain Logistics Interdiction: Continued probing with UAVs (Sumy/Chernihiv) suggests the intent to divert UAF AD while preparing follow-on strikes against Northern and Central logistics routes.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The most critical tactical adaptation is the confirmation of RF intelligence targeting UAF ceremonies/formations for high-value ballistic strikes. This indicates excellent RF HUMINT/SIGINT/IMINT on UAF force movement and assembly patterns, posing an extremely high threat to Force Protection.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF forces operating under the "Vostok" Group of Forces (37th Guards Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade) are demonstrably reliant on civilian/milblogger supply chains (U/AZ "Bukhanka" vehicle procurement), suggesting organic logistics for certain ground support elements remain strained despite UAF deep strikes. This vulnerability should be continuously exploited.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in coordinating complex, time-sensitive strikes (Iskander launches). However, the RF MoD claim of liberating "Novoaleksandrovka in Dnepropetrovsk region" (a deep rear area) is geographically illogical, suggesting either significant confusion in reporting or deliberate IO distortion. This specific claim should be dismissed as tactical misinformation, but the overall C2 for kinetic strikes is robust.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness is stable but compromised by the successful deep strike in Pavlohrad. The incident highlights critical failures in Force Protection (FP) and Operations Security (OPSEC), particularly concerning the massing of personnel in known or easily surveilled rear areas. The success of the local counter-advance near Dobropillya indicates high motivation and effective C2 execution in certain sectors.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• Confirmed advance in the Dobropillya Salient (relieving flank pressure on Pokrovsk).
• Continued domestic effort to modernize and scale FPV drone technology (Operatyvny ZSU video), addressing a critical tactical need.

Setbacks:

• Confirmed fatal/injury casualties in Pavlohrad due to ballistic missile strike on a personnel formation, indicating a significant breach of FP/OPSEC.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate and comprehensive review and enforcement of OPSEC and Force Protection measures across all rear-area C2 nodes, logistics hubs, and personnel staging areas. Large-scale formations must be immediately ceased. CONSTRAINT: The continuous requirement to fight the attritional battle on the Pokrovsk front while simultaneously defending strategic depth from precision ballistic strikes forces a sustained, high-risk operational tempo and dispersal of AD assets.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Narrative Escalation: RF sources (Colonelcassad, Военкор Котенок) are intensely focusing on the Pavlohrad strike, amplifying claims of high-value casualties ("best UAV pilots," "infantrymen") to maximize psychological impact and internal division.
• Western Instability: UAF and RF media are covering the ongoing US government shutdown threat, which RF IO will attempt to leverage to signal declining Western commitment and aid instability to the UAF audience.
• Internal RF Messaging: Kadyrov's focus on non-military civic projects (sports cluster in Grozny) is standard practice aimed at projecting normalcy and stability back home, counterbalancing the high attrition rates acknowledged by the continued reliance on volunteer fundraising for basic military vehicles (U/AZ).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public morale is likely to be negatively affected by the news of the Pavlohrad strike, particularly if high-profile casualties are confirmed. The UAF response (DBR investigation, Syrsky's counter-attack report) is essential to manage this morale shock and project accountability and continued military effectiveness.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The immediate threat of a prolonged US government shutdown (RBC-Ukraine reporting) is a critical geopolitical concern, potentially affecting the consistent flow of military and financial aid packages. UAF must prepare for the possibility of a temporary delay in materiel deliveries.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to double down on deep targeting and sustained ground pressure.

1. Exploitation of OPSEC Failure: RF intelligence units will immediately task ISR and SIGINT assets to search for more opportunities to strike massed UAF personnel, particularly near logistics hubs (Dnipro, Pavlohrad, Poltava) or known command post areas.
2. Reinforcement of Pokrovsk Bridgehead: RF will prioritize securing and fortifying the current penetration in southern Pokrovsk and expanding control toward Dymytrov/Myrnohrad, leveraging heavy indirect fires to suppress UAF counter-attacks.
3. Diversionary Strikes (North): Follow-on low-level attacks (UAVs, light artillery) will occur across the Sumy/Kharkiv border to ensure UAF AD remains dispersed and fixed.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 72 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Strategic C2 Decapitation Strike: RF dedicates a saturation strike (multiple Iskander/S-400 missiles) against a high-level UAF C2 node (e.g., General Staff or a key operational command) in Kyiv or Dnipro, aiming to temporarily blind UAF leadership during a critical phase of the Pokrovsk defense.
2. Pokrovsk Operational Envelopment: RF executes the MDCOA defined in the previous report: a rapid, mechanized maneuver around the Western flank of Pokrovsk, forcing a general, chaotic UAF withdrawal from the Donetsk defensive line under intense long-range fire.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/SBU (Force Protection): ISSUE IMMEDIATE OPSEC STAND DOWN. All personnel formations and ceremonies (including awards, rotations, training) larger than platoon size in rear areas (West of the O-0407/T-0404 line) are forbidden until further notice. Implement random, rapid relocation of all identified high-value targets (C2, drone teams, special forces). (CRITICAL PRIORITY)
2. J3/J2 (Donetsk Axis): EXPLOIT RF VULNERABILITY. Utilize confirmed SSO strike capabilities (Storm Shadow) against RF logistics nodes supporting the 37th Guards MRB ("Vostok") as highlighted by their reliance on public fundraising for basic transport, aiming to exacerbate their sustainment difficulties on the Pokrovsk Axis. (HIGH PRIORITY)
3. J3/AD Command (Central AO): TASK AD TO MOBILE LOGISTICS. Given the confirmed Pavlohrad strike, permanently assign all remaining mobile Short-Range Air Defense (SHORAD) assets to defend high-traffic rail yards, POL depots, and documented troop transit points near Dnipro and Pavlohrad, moving them dynamically based on strike warnings. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)

//END SITREP//