Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 031700Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 031600Z NOV 25 – 031700Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The Pokrovsk Axis (Referred to as Krasnoarmiiske by RF sources) remains the critical point of friction.

• Urban Entrenchment Confirmed: RF milblogger maps (Z комитет, Дневник Десантника) confirm the established RF presence inside the southern quarters of Pokrovsk. RF sources are utilizing the term "сжимать кольцо окружения" (tightening the ring of encirclement) near Dymytrov, reinforcing the objective to isolate and collapse the UAF defense lines East of Pokrovsk. (ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT based on RF Propaganda/Map Analysis / HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Deep Strike Domain (Vulnerability): A new wave of RF ballistic missile threats was initiated from the North-East (likely Voronezh region) and South, targeting Central Ukraine, specifically Kyiv, Dnipro, Pavlohrad, and Pervomaisk. This ongoing kinetic campaign targets strategic depth, likely aiming for logistics, C2, and energy infrastructure. (FACT - UAF AF Alerts, Local Administration / HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Operational ISR Shifts: RF reconnaissance UAVs (likely Orlan/Supercam) were detected over Shostka (Sumy Oblast) and Northern Kharkiv Oblast, while another group was detected over the Black Sea/Odesa littoral. This indicates a multi-domain ISR push targeting both the Northern Axis and the recently degraded A2/AD area near Odesa. (FACT - UAF AF Alerts / HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant weather factors reported to materially impede ground operations. Low-level helicopter flight observed (RF milblogger footage, Krasnoarmiiske direction) suggests reasonable visibility and stable air conditions for tactical air assets. (ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT / MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Deployment (Donetsk): High concentration of RF VDV (Airborne Forces, per one milblogger source) and specialized assault infantry continues the urban fight in Pokrovsk. The low-level helicopter activity observed near the front suggests active use of rotary-wing assets for MEDEVAC/CASEVAC or rapid insertion/extraction, indicating high-tempo operations and corresponding attrition.
• UAF Air Defense Posture: UAF AD is engaged across multiple axes due to the ballistic and UAV threats targeting Kyiv, Dnipro, and Kharkiv. This forced dispersal of AD assets reduces the concentration available for local defense over the Pokrovsk Axis.
• UAF C2 & Morale Reinforcement: UAF leadership continues internal morale campaigns, exemplified by the rewarding of the 138th Territorial Defense Battalion personnel (165 days of continuous defense), intended to stabilize morale despite the intense pressure on the Eastern Front. (FACT - Operatyvny ZSU / HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Ballistic Strike Capability: RF retains the capability to launch simultaneous, multi-vector ballistic missile strikes (likely Iskander/S-400 converted missiles) targeting deep UAF strategic centers (Kyiv, Dnipro).
• Persistent ISR/Strike Link: Demonstrated ability to sustain deep reconnaissance flights (Sumy, Kharkiv, Odesa) concurrently with ground operations, ensuring continuous targeting data.
• Propaganda Utilization: RF state media (TASS) effectively utilizes drone footage of destroyed areas (e.g., Dymytrov) to reinforce the narrative of successful encirclement and UAF defeat.

Intentions:

1. Exploit Pokrovsk Breakthrough: RF's immediate intention is to leverage the current penetration, forcing UAF to commit reserves into a costly urban attritional fight, facilitating a larger operational maneuver (encirclement).
2. Disrupt Central Logistics: The primary goal of the multi-vector ballistic strike is to disrupt the flow of military aid (MTS, POL) and reserves from Central Ukraine (Dnipro/Pavlohrad) toward the Donetsk axis.
3. Test Northern Defenses: UAV reconnaissance missions near Sumy and Kharkiv are intended to identify vulnerabilities in Northern UAF defenses, either for future diversionary strikes or to fix UAF AD assets away from the main effort.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The synchronization of a major urban ground assault (Pokrovsk) with a maximum-effort, multi-domain deep strike campaign (Ballistics on Kyiv/Dnipro, ISR on Sumy/Odesa) is the most significant tactical adaptation. This is a multi-domain approach designed to paralyze UAF decision-making and resource allocation.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

Despite confirmed UAF deep strikes on POL/MTS depots (previous report), RF has demonstrated the ability to rapidly initiate strategic kinetic strikes, indicating missile and launch platform availability remains sufficient for high-volume attacks. The confirmed new aid package from Italy and Storm Shadow delivery from the UK directly challenges RF efforts to interdict Western materiel flow.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust, coordinating simultaneous, complex operations across geographically separated axes (Donetsk ground, Central ballistic strikes, Northern/Southern ISR). UAF alerts regarding rapid "speed targets" (ballistics) indicate minimal warning time, suggesting effective operational security from RF launch units.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness remains high, but under extreme stress across multiple sectors simultaneously. The success of UAF personnel in prolonged defense (138th TrO Bn) highlights exceptional resilience, but strategic reserves are stretched thin by the need to counter both the urban breakthrough (Pokrovsk) and the renewed ballistic threat to the capital and logistics hubs.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• Confirmed continued international military support (Italy 12th package, UK Storm Shadow).
• Ongoing successful morale operations by UAF leadership.

Setbacks:

• Confirmed penetration and entrenchment of RF forces within Pokrovsk urban quarters.
• Multiple simultaneous ballistic missile threats across Central Ukraine, forcing significant dispersal of UAF AD resources.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate allocation of mobile air defense units (e.g., Gepard, Avenger, or similar short-range systems) to reinforce critical logistics nodes near Pavlohrad and Dnipro, which are currently under confirmed ballistic threat. CONSTRAINT: UAF faces a zero-sum choice between concentrating AD assets over Kyiv (political/strategic center) or defending industrial/logistical hubs (Dnipro/Pavlohrad). The simultaneous threats force suboptimal dispersal.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Escalation of Victory Narrative: RF sources are actively amplifying the Pokrovsk penetration, using terms like "encirclement" (Dymytrov) and "Krasnoarmiisk" (Pokrovsk) to instill a sense of inevitable UAF operational collapse in Donetsk.
• Deep Strike Justification: RF milbloggers are confirming strikes on Zaporizhzhia and Nikolaev energy systems, justifying the kinetic campaign as targeting military infrastructure.
• Anti-Western Messaging: RF sources are amplifying anti-Ukrainian political shifts (Czechia) and attempting to tie US political maneuvering (Trump/Mexico) to global instability, aiming to distract from the domestic costs of the conflict.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public concern regarding the security of major cities (Kyiv, Dnipro) is heightened by the ballistic missile threat. UAF leadership's recognition of frontline heroism (138th Bn awards) is crucial for maintaining morale and validating the costly defense effort.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

Positive: Italy is preparing its 12th aid package, indicating sustained European political will. Negative: RF sources are highlighting shifts in Czech internal politics as anti-Ukrainian, suggesting a potential diplomatic setback or reduction in support from that nation, which requires monitoring. Economic Pressure: Reports of Chinese refineries reducing Russian oil purchases due to sanctions suggest continued, effective economic pressure on the RF.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to consolidate and expand their Pokrovsk urban bridgehead while simultaneously disrupting UAF logistics.

1. Urban Attrition: RF will commit non-mechanized assault groups (SF, VDV) to clear the first line of Pokrovsk's southern quarters, leveraging heavy indirect fire and loitering munitions, aiming to fix UAF 68th Jaeger Brigade in place.
2. Logistics Interdiction: RF will launch follow-on strikes, likely using Shahed-type UAVs, targeting energy infrastructure or documented logistics hubs in Dnipro/Pavlohrad regions, leveraging the suppression and diversion caused by the earlier ballistic strikes.
3. Northern Probing: RF ISR assets will likely be followed by limited artillery or mortar fire across the border near Sumy/Kharkiv to force UAF deployment confirmation and test reaction times.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 72 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Breakout and Envelopment: RF utilizes mobile armored assets (held in reserve near Pokrovsk) to exploit the UAF's commitment to the urban fight, executing a rapid, mechanized maneuver around the Western flank of Pokrovsk to threaten the logistics artery to Myrnohrad, forcing a wide and chaotic UAF withdrawal.
2. Targeted C2 Strike: RF launches multiple, coordinated ballistic missiles against the known or suspected location of a high-value UAF operational C2 node (e.g., Joint Forces HQ or an operational command center) in Central Ukraine, potentially leveraging the recent multi-vector strike pattern to saturate AD.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J2 (Deep Strike Counter-Strategy): DEPLOY MOBILE AD TO LOGISTICS HUBS. Immediately task mobile, short-range AD assets (e.g., MANPADS teams, mobile SAMs) to reinforce critical rail and road logistics nodes outside Dnipro and Pavlohrad, as these are confirmed high-value targets for current RF ballistic operations. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)
2. J3/Donetsk Command (Pokrovsk): COUNTER-ATTACK WESTERN FLANK. Given the confirmed urban penetration, allocate reserves and indirect fire assets to aggressively secure and defend the Western approaches to Pokrovsk (towards Myrnohrad), mitigating the MDCOA of envelopment. Focus on destroying RF armored vehicles trying to transition from urban support to open maneuver. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)
3. J2/GUR (IO Counter): AMPLIFY UKRAINIAN RESILIENCE. Counter the escalating RF "encirclement" narrative by immediately distributing positive media (e.g., awards for the 138th TrO) and confirmed RF logistics losses (e.g., previous SSO strikes) to frontline units and the domestic audience to maintain cognitive resilience. (HIGH PRIORITY)

//END SITREP//